Steve700 wrote:
I think you should know that you are making a mistake by putting any trust in anti-right wing statistics put out by the Obama administration.
Somehow it doesn't surprise me that you would make such baseless accusations. I suppose I should just ask you for the truth because you're the only one that really knows, right? LOL
Steve700 wrote:
Also it should be obvious that any foundation calling itself the 'NEW' America is an untrustworthy, heavily and incorrectly & biasedly slanted Marxist organization putting out Disinformation (and you can take that to the bank). You need to come to the side of those who hold Truth, Honesty and Integrity has their prime values.
So I guess that makes right-wing think tanks like the Project for a New American Century Marxists... "obviously"
BTW, the fact that you have no clue which words to capitalize doesn't do much to give me the impression that you have the slightest ability to tell the difference between truth and bullshit.
Steve700 wrote:
What are you talking about trying to shove unproven Baseless Blabber..... Because you can't have no spiritual discernment
"can't have no..."? Oh, sorry when someone talks redneck to me it's kind of distracting. You were saying...
Steve700 wrote:
to see the reality of the truth of what's going on and the evil on your side doesn't mean it's unproven crap.
You don't even know what my side is. Pointing out the fallacies of your arguments doesn't necessarily indicate what "side" I am on.
Steve700 wrote:
Most of what I say are obvious Jews
How exactly does that make any sense?
Steve700 wrote:
Most of what I say are obvious Jews that you can't deny such as the such as my
just... if you proof-read... did you learn that in school at all?
OK... I'll try again...
Steve700 wrote:
Most of what I say are obvious Jews that you can't deny such as the such as my last two articles on the left wanting to destroy America and the Democratic Party being the party of HATE.
I'm sure those "articles" were top notch op-eds filled with revelations, but you see, I have never registered Democrat myself so it's hard to be insulted if that's what you're going for. otherwise I don't know why you have to go through such efforts (you post reams of this stuff) to make people think the Democrats are "the party of hate". Steve, people have been calling the GOP the Party of Hate for a long time. it seems everynow and then some Republican get's all uptight about it and goes nuts trying to convince every one that it's the Democrats who are the haters.
The reason why most Americans tend to see the Republicans as the Party of Hate is because for about the last 50 years or so, it's been the Republicans that have demanded unequal treatment and offered only distain for the those on the shorter end. For about the same time at least, they have also been the party most supportive and/or forgiving toward known hate groups. So it makes sense.
Your rhetorical list of "examples" is a small stand of trees in a very, very big forest my freind.
Anyway, the Republicans seem to be the ones that want to exclude blacks, immigrants, Muslims and gays and offer them no quarter. I don't really see that in progressive politics. tion. I think this is all pretty obvious to everyone that doesn't have his head firmly planted in his asses. As for people like you... I've seen your posts seething with hatred. You hate Muslims with a passion, I don't know if you think you're hiding it, but just to let you know... you're really not.
So, it's hard to take your accusation seriously. Your throwing rocks in a glass house.
Steve700 wrote:
You can deny nothing of what is and those articles and here is some more obvious truth that demonstrates the left is evil that you can't deny:
When have you ever seen a mob of Conservatives riot, loot, destroy cars and windows and burn?
Look, this might be over your head but there is a conflict between economic classes that has very little to do with politics or ideology. The 1% are squeezing the 99% and as this happens the poorest of the people get pushed out and their civilized options for recourse are typically shut down. These are human beings, doing what human beings do when they are victimized by unfair systems and fighting to survive. They riot and loot. Most of them don't vote or even care about politics or ideology. So, they're not conservatives or liberals, they're poor disadvantaged humans.
But between the two political sides, it's almost always the left that extends them an open hand while on the right the preference is to kick them while they are down. So you're doing the same thing I caught you doing earlier when suggesting that Muslims are leftists. You are transferring the political identity of the left to any other group the left shows any sympathy for. That's like calling a cancer patient a doctor because a doctor is trying to help him. Pretty stupid right?
Steve700 wrote:
When have you ever seen a mob of Conservative youth on a college campus become so violent that a liberal speaker had to be shut down?
No, but I have never seen a mob of liberal youth doing that either. But I have seen the stunts pulled by the likes of Ann Coulter who says she wanted to speak at Berkeley and refused to schedule for a time when Berkeley said they can provide the appropriate security; instead making a big deal out of how Berkeley "refused" to let her speak. She's smart enough to know what's she's doing. She never even wanted to speak, she just wanted to play that game and agitate the conservatives. I'm sure it worked on you.
Steve700 wrote:
When have you ever heard of a Conservative comedian simulate the beheading of a Democrat President?
Conservatives don't have comedians. Probably because they're too uptight to laugh at anything.
Steve700 wrote:
When have you ever heard of Conservative musicians call for the assassination of a sitting Democrat President?
Ted Nuggent (if you can actually call him a musician... I mean he's always sucked)
Steve700 wrote:
When did Conservatives ever put on a play in a NYC park depicting the assassination of a sitting President?
When did liberals every produce a block buster movie depicting the assasination of a sitting president? (Kingsmen: The Secret Service - 2014)
Oh and the play wasn't about Trump, just so you know... it was a play written hundreds of years ago by a guy named Shakespeare. It's just the part of Caesar
Steve700 wrote:
When has a Conservative ever taken a shot at a Democrat President? All assassinations and attempted assassinations were committed by Democrats against Republican Presidents except for Kennedy. That was a Deep State murder to get to LBJa war monger.
If you're going to consider the entire history of the U.S. presidency then the whole "Democrat" thing looses all relevance. Since you're asking if I've seen or heard of "conservatives" that have done any of these things, I'll assume you are talking about a deeper culture, rather than a political party, the later being far more transient. That being said... Lincoln, a liberal by 19th century standards was shot by a conservative.
Steve700 wrote:
When have Conservatives ever disputed the results of a Presidential election?
When have the Democrats ever given the people reason to dispute the results?
Steve700 wrote:
Sore loser Democrats disputed the last two Republican winsin 2000 when Gore tried to steal the election
Gore won the popular vote without question... point being simple... Most Americans wanted Gore. But of course the president isn't elected by popular vote but by the electoral vote which was so close in 2000 that a mandatory recount was triggered in Florida and the Florida Supreme Court ordered a number of counties to to be recounted. The Democrats wanted this recount to be sure all votes were in fact counted. The Republicans were afraid that counting all the votes would give Gore the lead and appealed to the Supreme Court which decided 5-4 in favor the Republicans and the count was stopped. ...and you think Gore stole the election? Yeah, right. LOL
Steve700 wrote:
and in 2016 when Democrats came up with at least a dozen excuses for Hillary's loss except the real reason that she was the worst candidate in memory.
I really don't see the Democrats coming up with any excuses at all. Most of them have accepted the results and are moving on. Some of them, like myself, have expressed an opposition to the Electoral College, because it really is bullshit. But at the same time we acknowledge that it *IS* indeed the rules and Trump did indeed win according to those rules. That doesn't mean we can't suggest removing it for future elections.
As for Hilary, she actually did win the popular vote and no it's not because of illegal immigrants, it's because like with Gore, most Americans preferred Hilary. But when you have to win the electoral vote you have to play a slightly different game and Trump was better at that game.
Steve700 wrote:
To say the jihadist are on the right is an absurdity. That's like saying Satanism is on the right. How come the right doesn't defend and partner up with them, but the left does because they have so much in common like a tendency towards violence and hatred of Christians and Western civilization.
LOL... your are one confused bitterbean.
"Left" and "Right" are relative Steve. Have you ever stood opposite someone and referred to "HIS right" which would be your left? It's the same thing when applied to politics and culture. It's possible for left and right to appear to be on the same side, given a perspective. On a basic, universal level there is only one distinguishing factor that divides the left and the right... the acceptance of "others". The left is inclusive, open to all. The right is exclusive, preferring to but up barriers to keep the "others" out.
So, it's the very nature of the left is to partner up with anyone. So before we get into endless drivel about how horrible it is to partner with Muslims let me make something very clear. I don't see the problem with it. As far as I am concerned they are humans. Some of them might have ill-intentions just like some Christian do, but I prefer to wait until they prove it. That my friend is called the courage to live in a free society. If you're so scared of Muslims before they even do anything then you don't belong in a free society, it's as simple as that.
As for hating Christians, let me first state that many on the left ARE Christians (as if you haven't been told a million times). Secondly, the left is THE side that champions freedom of religion, which means anyone can practice any religion they want. People like you are hell-bent on taking that freedom away and pushing YOUR religion on everyone and it's that kind of "Christians Only" bullshit that makes *some* people hate Christianity.
Oh, and the left is an inherrent part of Western Civilization too you brainless twit. The terrorist that speak out against Western Civilization are actually religious conservatives that have serious issues with the liberal order that U.S. foreign policy has been pushing on them. They have the same complaints as you do. All this freedom for gays and secularists to go around promoting loose ideas that clearly violate the rules of their uptight religions.
So, yes... the Islamic militants that oppose Western Civilization (which they see as liberal) are on the absolutely on the right.
Steve700 wrote:
And you talk about hatred coming from the right which is total BS because you, like all liberals want to call our principles prejudices.
No, not all of them... but some of them are. If you're going to be prejudiced enough to persecute an entire religion, people are going to notice. They will point out the truth and because you don't like people pointing out the truth about your prejudice, you lash out by calling THEM the haters. LOL...
Steve700 wrote:
It is the liberals that are obsessed with race and color. We could care less, it is decency and ideology we care about. We have nothing against black people. However we don't like angry hateful malcontent criminally minded racist Niggers ----- and I'm sure you don't like them either if you have a brain in your head. Look at the picture on the bottom that tells you where the hate exists.
It's not that liberals are obsessed with race and color, it's that liberals are the ones constantly defending people of different colors against the racism on the right, so yeah... they bring it up... I guess you see that as an obsession. You say you don't have anything against black people... what a fucking liar you are. You think I've never had a conversation with you before? This is how your dumbass shit works... You SAY you only have a problem with criminally minded, racist "niggers". But then you make the automatic assumption that if someone is black he *IS* criminally minded. That alleviates the guilt of your racism by blaming the victims of your racism on their own character which you have already prejudged.
Steve700 wrote:
You are really sick to be speaking of defense for Black Lives Matter. That is an anti-police Hate group standing up for niggers that hate the police and get themselves killed because they become combative with the police who are doing their duty in dealing with them. Even the police who are put on trial are always found by the jury to be innocent.
All the more reason for BLM to make fair-minded people aware of the fact that some cops are racist assholes. Yes, I'm a very proud supporter of BLM. They are not anti-police, they are anti-bad-police. The reason why so many cops are found innocent by jury is that in many jurisdictions, cops get special legal protections, for instance a review board, that a normal citizen wouldn't get. In some states police officers are shielded from criminal prosecution in deadly force cases unless it can be shown they acted with malice and a lack of good faith.
Even with a dash cam, it's not always easy to tell if the officer had a choice or not. But I just watched the dashcam coverage of the Castile incident. And you can't see the victim because he was inside the car. But I also saw the cop fire off about 5 rounds at point-blank range. That is a clear sign the cop lost control of his fear and yet it's not possible to prove he acted in malice. BLM puts a lot of emphasis on working with law enforcement to suggest better training.