WTF Is Wrong With Americans?
Apr 3, 2017 10:36:35 #
Roger71 wrote:
What does this have to do with the errors you posted? I suspect you are deflecting the subject matter.
I'm attempting to help you understand why you are so misinformed.
Apr 3, 2017 15:28:16 #
payne1000 wrote:
I'm attempting to help you understand why you are so misinformed.
I'm misinformed? You are posting things that are not true and that is helping me understand that I am misinformed?
Apr 3, 2017 15:44:22 #
Roger71 wrote:
I'm misinformed? You are posting things that are not true and that is helping me understand that I am misinformed?
Your only argument is based on events which may or may not have happened 1400 years ago.
You have not shown valid evidence to back up anything you've posted.
I have shown valid evidence that Zionists control our media as they predicted they would in the Protocols.
Apr 3, 2017 16:07:02 #
payne1000 wrote:
Your only argument is based on events which may or may not have happened 1400 years ago.
You have not shown valid evidence to back up anything you've posted.
I have shown valid evidence that Zionists control our media as they predicted they would in the Protocols.
You have not shown valid evidence to back up anything you've posted.
I have shown valid evidence that Zionists control our media as they predicted they would in the Protocols.
Are you saying that anything that occurred before the printing press really didn't happen? Do you realize how crazy that sounds?
Apr 3, 2017 16:57:49 #
Roger71 wrote:
Are you saying that anything that occurred before the printing press really didn't happen? Do you realize how crazy that sounds?
I'm saying that most of history didn't happen the way we have been told.
Those who control the press control the narrative. Why should they tell us the truth if it profits them to lie?
Apr 3, 2017 19:05:13 #
payne1000 wrote:
I'm saying that most of history didn't happen the way we have been told.
Those who control the press control the narrative. Why should they tell us the truth if it profits them to lie?
Those who control the press control the narrative. Why should they tell us the truth if it profits them to lie?
How would you know how history happened if you have nothing to anchor it on? You have to base your view of history using the best documents available. There are many old documents which verify the Sunni Muslims invaded and conquered North African countries during the Seventh and Eighth centuries. The many documents from the Muslims themselves are boastful on how they were able to conquer the infidels in the name of Allah. This is settled history.
Apr 4, 2017 09:49:11 #
Roger71 wrote:
How would you know how history happened if you have nothing to anchor it on? You have to base your view of history using the best documents available. There are many old documents which verify the Sunni Muslims invaded and conquered North African countries during the Seventh and Eighth centuries. The many documents from the Muslims themselves are boastful on how they were able to conquer the infidels in the name of Allah. This is settled history.
Why is it so important to you to convince readers that the Muslims defeated the Christians 1400 years ago?
What does that have to do with today's world?
Apr 4, 2017 16:10:25 #
payne1000 wrote:
Why is it so important to you to convince readers that the Muslims defeated the Christians 1400 years ago?
What does that have to do with today's world?
What does that have to do with today's world?
It is important to correct your misstatements regarding what actually happened, no matter when it occurred.
Apr 4, 2017 16:31:04 #
Roger71 wrote:
It is important to correct your misstatements regarding what actually happened, no matter when it occurred.
You have no idea what actually happened.
No one knows what actually happened 1400 years ago.
Apr 4, 2017 16:52:40 #
payne1000 wrote:
You have no idea what actually happened.
No one knows what actually happened 1400 years ago.
No one knows what actually happened 1400 years ago.
I have a very good idea what happened 1,400 years ago, based on established history. This is not hard.
Apr 4, 2017 17:20:23 #
Roger71 wrote:
I have a very good idea what happened 1,400 years ago, based on established history. This is not hard.
Do you believe Oswald was the lone assassin of JFK?
Apr 4, 2017 17:22:40 #
payne1000 wrote:
Do you believe Oswald was the lone assassin of JFK?
That has nothing to do with what we were discussing.
Apr 4, 2017 18:56:36 #
Roger71 wrote:
That has nothing to do with what we were discussing.
Sure it does. I'm trying to determine if you believe all history as it is written.
Apr 4, 2017 19:27:39 #
payne1000 wrote:
Sure it does. I'm trying to determine if you believe all history as it is written.
I believe that the majority of historians believe that a single shooter was responsible. I have also read other stories putting forth the multiple shooter theory but they were light in facts and heavy on what ifs. I lean toward the single shooter, but am open minded if other evidence comes out.
Apr 4, 2017 21:36:14 #
Roger71 wrote:
I believe that the majority of historians believe that a single shooter was responsible. I have also read other stories putting forth the multiple shooter theory but they were light in facts and heavy on what ifs. I lean toward the single shooter, but am open minded if other evidence comes out.
you have entered the realm of...light in facts and heavy on what ifs... good luck...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.