One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Are We Living In A 'Matrix'-like Superhologram?"
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Mar 24, 2017 21:41:57   #
Big dog
 
pafret wrote:
This is not a simple task; historically the Catholic Church fell into a position of dominance in 455 AD during the sack of Rome by Genseric the Vandal. Valentinian the Third had just died and was replaced as Caesar by Maximus who was a coward and ran away when Genseric showed up. Pope Leo I negotiated a deal whereby Genseric would not burn down the city and kill everybody in return for three days of looting. Genseric's horde destroyed a lot of city in their attempt to get everything valuable, even going so far as the rip the copper roofs of the temple of Jupiter. Hence the term Vandalize. The Italians outside of Rome’s walls murdered Maximus.

This left a power vacuum that the Pope filled. Stepping forward, a few years, Childeric the Frank united the various tribes in France and Germany and under his son Clovis this became an empire. This established the Merovingian Dynasty (from Childeric's father Merovech), which Lasted from about 457 AD to about 752 AD when the line became moribund with most Merovingian heirs being stupid or insane. The Major Domos for the Merovingian were the line of Pepins. Pope Zachary formally deposed Childeric III, the last Merovingian. Zachary's successor, Pope Stephen II, confirmed and anointed Pepin the Short in 754, beginning the Carolingian monarchy.

This is important because it is the confirmation that the Church had temporal power over Kings and Princes. Pepin the Short received his crown from the Pope in a religious ceremmony. He made him and he could break him. Pepin's father was Charles Martel who was Mayor of The Palace and the de facto ruler, under the last Merovingian, thus establishing the Carolingian (Carolus) Dynasty.

Why did the Pope depose the Merovingians you might ask?

Lets digress and step back in time, over in the Arabian Peninsula a Warlord named Mohammed died in about 632 AD. After a few years of fighting over the succession to his power his followers swarmed out of the Arabian deserts and began a campaign of terror and conquest. Under the Rashidun Caliphate (632–661) and the Umayyad Caliphate (661–750), Islam conquered Persia by destroying the Sassanid Empire. They conquered Syria, Palestine, Armenia, Egypt, and swept across North Africa, up into Spain and finally into France. They were banging on the doors of the Western Roman Empire, which, while not accepting the Pope’s authority, was also Catholic, -- Byzantine Catholic. Constantinople suffered repeated Sieges from the Caliphate

In 732 Charles Martel met the Moslem hordes that were invading France, on their way to Italy, at Tours and Charlie Martel Kicked their butt. With regard for the signal service in stemming conquest by an alien, inferior, heresy posing as a religion Charlies kid, Pepin, got crowned King.

Pepin the Short was followed by Pepin the Stout and Pepin the Bald and Pepin the Fat and culminated in Charlemagne. Charles the Great who specialized in extending the rule of Catholicism, among the Saxons in the East, the Lombards in Italy and he even led excursions into Spain to combat the Moslems who were entrenched there. His efforts in this regard are immortalized in a heroic poem titled Le Chanson Du Roland, the Song of Roland. Roland was one of Charlemagne's Paladins. The story is full of combat against the Moors and Noble Roland’s tragic Death by ambush somewhere in the Pyrenees, in a dense fog as I recall.

Charlemagne became King of Franks, King of Germany and parts of Italy. His proselytizing efforts resembled those of the Moslems, convert or die. In recognition of these efforts, he was crowned Emperor of the Romans (Holy Roman Emperor) by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day at Old St. Peter's Basilica, around 800 AD.

So from times of antiquity the lines of battle had been drawn between two competing religions and these perforce were coupled politically with the ultimate question -- who dominates?

The Byzantine Empire continued suffering setbacks during the rapid expansion of the Arab Empire until they were overthrown. Spain remained a battleground until Ferdinand and Isabella succeeded in uniting Spain and ridding it of Moslems sometime around 1492. This battle had lasted 700 years and as a result all people residing in Spain got the convert, emigrate, or die option. A bunch of wise guys “converted” but secretly kept their old religion. They became toasty munchies under Torquemada.

There is an old jingle about a guy named Columbus sailing around in 1492; he was an exporter of religion as well as Syphilis. Shortly after he showed the way, Hernan Cortez was in Mexico destroying the Aztec civilization and making them the offer they couldn’t refuse. Pizzaro did the same for the Inca of Peru and both men brought a contingent of priests to minister to the newly converted heathens and these priests accompanied the expeditions into the Mainland US. They established the mission chain up the coast of California to convert Los Indios.

Jumping back in time as well as space, the Moslems penetrated Asia on many fronts. They colluded with China and Korea, they invaded the Eastern Steppes and converted the Mongols and ultimately ended up besieging the walled city of Caffa in 1346 AD.

“The memoir of an Italian Gabriele de’ Mussi, contains a narrative with some startling assertions: that the Mongol army hurled plague-infected cadavers into the besieged Crimean city of Caffa, thereby transmitting the disease to the inhabitants; and that fleeing survivors of the siege spread plague from Caffa to the Mediterranean Basin, principally Naples”

The Moslem Mongol Horde knew what they were doing; after throwing the plague-infected corpses over the walls, by catapult, they packed up and left. The ensuing plague epidemic killed more than twenty five percent of Europe’s population. Hard times call for hard measures carried out by harder people.

So why are religion and politics so intertwined and which caused the wars and which was pre-eminent in survival. There is much, much more to this story but this is a small start on why religion always seems to be in the midst of war and politics.

What say you?
This is not a simple task; historically the Cathol... (show quote)


I repeat, to quote Arthur C. Clark...." Religion is a brain disease" !
And though I believe in God, Jesus Christ, and a bunch of other stuff, I Do NOT practice a "religion". Jesus said to trust in Him. I do. But I sure as HELL don't trust ANY church. Not the Vatican, especially ! True religion teaches a way to enlightenment, NOT a political agenda. One on the road to enlightenment needs no religion, just an occasional road sign to to warn of the dangers ahead. That is what our Creator would like to see us accomplish.
Or so I "believe".

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 21:49:25   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
pafret wrote:
This is not a simple task; historically the Catholic Church fell into a position of dominance in 455 AD during the sack of Rome by Genseric the Vandal. Valentinian the Third had just died and was replaced as Caesar by Maximus who was a coward and ran away when Genseric showed up. Pope Leo I negotiated a deal whereby Genseric would not burn down the city and kill everybody in return for three days of looting. Genseric's horde destroyed a lot of city in their attempt to get everything valuable, even going so far as the rip the copper roofs of the temple of Jupiter. Hence the term Vandalize. The Italians outside of Rome’s walls murdered Maximus.

This left a power vacuum that the Pope filled. Stepping forward, a few years, Childeric the Frank united the various tribes in France and Germany and under his son Clovis this became an empire. This established the Merovingian Dynasty (from Childeric's father Merovech), which Lasted from about 457 AD to about 752 AD when the line became moribund with most Merovingian heirs being stupid or insane. The Major Domos for the Merovingian were the line of Pepins. Pope Zachary formally deposed Childeric III, the last Merovingian. Zachary's successor, Pope Stephen II, confirmed and anointed Pepin the Short in 754, beginning the Carolingian monarchy.

This is important because it is the confirmation that the Church had temporal power over Kings and Princes. Pepin the Short received his crown from the Pope in a religious ceremmony. He made him and he could break him. Pepin's father was Charles Martel who was Mayor of The Palace and the de facto ruler, under the last Merovingian, thus establishing the Carolingian (Carolus) Dynasty.

Why did the Pope depose the Merovingians you might ask?

Lets digress and step back in time, over in the Arabian Peninsula a Warlord named Mohammed died in about 632 AD. After a few years of fighting over the succession to his power his followers swarmed out of the Arabian deserts and began a campaign of terror and conquest. Under the Rashidun Caliphate (632–661) and the Umayyad Caliphate (661–750), Islam conquered Persia by destroying the Sassanid Empire. They conquered Syria, Palestine, Armenia, Egypt, and swept across North Africa, up into Spain and finally into France. They were banging on the doors of the Western Roman Empire, which, while not accepting the Pope’s authority, was also Catholic, -- Byzantine Catholic. Constantinople suffered repeated Sieges from the Caliphate

In 732 Charles Martel met the Moslem hordes that were invading France, on their way to Italy, at Tours and Charlie Martel Kicked their butt. With regard for the signal service in stemming conquest by an alien, inferior, heresy posing as a religion Charlies kid, Pepin, got crowned King.

Pepin the Short was followed by Pepin the Stout and Pepin the Bald and Pepin the Fat and culminated in Charlemagne. Charles the Great who specialized in extending the rule of Catholicism, among the Saxons in the East, the Lombards in Italy and he even led excursions into Spain to combat the Moslems who were entrenched there. His efforts in this regard are immortalized in a heroic poem titled Le Chanson Du Roland, the Song of Roland. Roland was one of Charlemagne's Paladins. The story is full of combat against the Moors and Noble Roland’s tragic Death by ambush somewhere in the Pyrenees, in a dense fog as I recall.

Charlemagne became King of Franks, King of Germany and parts of Italy. His proselytizing efforts resembled those of the Moslems, convert or die. In recognition of these efforts, he was crowned Emperor of the Romans (Holy Roman Emperor) by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day at Old St. Peter's Basilica, around 800 AD.

So from times of antiquity the lines of battle had been drawn between two competing religions and these perforce were coupled politically with the ultimate question -- who dominates?

The Byzantine Empire continued suffering setbacks during the rapid expansion of the Arab Empire until they were overthrown. Spain remained a battleground until Ferdinand and Isabella succeeded in uniting Spain and ridding it of Moslems sometime around 1492. This battle had lasted 700 years and as a result all people residing in Spain got the convert, emigrate, or die option. A bunch of wise guys “converted” but secretly kept their old religion. They became toasty munchies under Torquemada.

There is an old jingle about a guy named Columbus sailing around in 1492; he was an exporter of religion as well as Syphilis. Shortly after he showed the way, Hernan Cortez was in Mexico destroying the Aztec civilization and making them the offer they couldn’t refuse. Pizzaro did the same for the Inca of Peru and both men brought a contingent of priests to minister to the newly converted heathens and these priests accompanied the expeditions into the Mainland US. They established the mission chain up the coast of California to convert Los Indios.

Jumping back in time as well as space, the Moslems penetrated Asia on many fronts. They colluded with China and Korea, they invaded the Eastern Steppes and converted the Mongols and ultimately ended up besieging the walled city of Caffa in 1346 AD.

“The memoir of an Italian Gabriele de’ Mussi, contains a narrative with some startling assertions: that the Mongol army hurled plague-infected cadavers into the besieged Crimean city of Caffa, thereby transmitting the disease to the inhabitants; and that fleeing survivors of the siege spread plague from Caffa to the Mediterranean Basin, principally Naples”

The Moslem Mongol Horde knew what they were doing; after throwing the plague-infected corpses over the walls, by catapult, they packed up and left. The ensuing plague epidemic killed more than twenty five percent of Europe’s population. Hard times call for hard measures carried out by harder people.

So why are religion and politics so intertwined and which caused the wars and which was pre-eminent in survival. There is much, much more to this story but this is a small start on why religion always seems to be in the midst of war and politics.

What say you?
This is not a simple task; historically the Cathol... (show quote)


Too much for comment. I'm a slow reader, not that smart.

I have heard Christ had a son with Mary Magdalene; that they were smuggled away to to the west where they and their family became one of the Merovingian kings.

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 21:52:28   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Big dog wrote:
I repeat, to quote Arthur C. Clark...." Religion is a brain disease" !
And though I believe in God, Jesus Christ, and a bunch of other stuff, I Do NOT practice a "religion". Jesus said to trust in Him. I do. But I sure as HELL don't trust ANY church. Not the Vatican, especially ! True religion teaches a way to enlightenment, NOT a political agenda. One on the road to enlightenment needs no religion, just an occasional road sign to to warn of the dangers ahead. That is what our Creator would like to see us accomplish.
Or so I "believe".
I repeat, to quote Arthur C. Clark...." Relig... (show quote)


Sikhism.

Reply
 
 
Mar 24, 2017 22:10:50   #
Big dog
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Sikhism.


Yeah, perhaps that's the best way to describe it. Sikhism is what you may call "the youngest religion". Question is....how many have died forcing Sikhism on others ?
But...back to the beginning subject......
If we pointed 3 laser beams at our universe, [ (uni= 1)..(verse= a part)] would we see things as they really are ? Is this universe a simple hologram ?
I'm certain of one thing.......
IT sure AIN'T simple.

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 22:22:27   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
Big dog wrote:
I repeat, to quote Arthur C. Clark...." Religion is a brain disease" !
And though I believe in God, Jesus Christ, and a bunch of other stuff, I Do NOT practice a "religion". Jesus said to trust in Him. I do. But I sure as HELL don't trust ANY church. Not the Vatican, especially ! True religion teaches a way to enlightenment, NOT a political agenda. One on the road to enlightenment needs no religion, just an occasional road sign to to warn of the dangers ahead. That is what our Creator would like to see us accomplish.
Or so I "believe".
I repeat, to quote Arthur C. Clark...." Relig... (show quote)


The question asked was not what constitutes true religion, it was why religion is always involved in turmoil, war and atrocities. Arthur Clarke should have stuck to writing science fiction.

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 22:28:09   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Big dog wrote:
Yeah, perhaps that's the best way to describe it. Sikhism is what you may call "the youngest religion". Question is....how many have died forcing Sikhism on others ?
But...back to the beginning subject......
If we pointed 3 laser beams at our universe, [ (uni= 1)..(verse= a part)] would we see things as they really are ? Is this universe a simple hologram ?
I'm certain of one thing.......
IT sure AIN'T simple.



I imagine our little minds are incapable of seeing or visualizing our universe as it really is.

Sikhism doesn't seem like a religion, more like a belief system. It doesn't seek converts.

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 22:42:26   #
Big dog
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I imagine our little minds are incapable of seeing or visualizing our universe as it really is.

Sikhism doesn't seem like a religion, more like a belief system. It doesn't seek converts.


That's the best part, religions got people killed. Believing is simple and what is asked of us by God.

Reply
 
 
Mar 24, 2017 22:46:04   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Big dog wrote:
That's the best part, religions got people killed. Believing is simple and what is asked of us by God.


Can't argue with that.

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 22:46:32   #
Big dog
 
pafret wrote:
The question asked was not what constitutes true religion, it was why religion is always involved in turmoil, war and atrocities. Arthur Clarke should have stuck to writing science fiction.


First off, that was NOT the question. Secondly: Arthur C. Clark was a man of science. Do your homework before shooting your mouth off. He ranks right up there with Stephen Hawkins.
Ya gotta know science to write sci-fi !

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 22:50:45   #
Big dog
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Can't argue with that.


As Justin Haywood said at the Moody Blues concert I went to 20 or so years ago... " Keep The Faith".

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 22:59:46   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Too much for comment. I'm a slow reader, not that smart.

I have heard Christ had a son with Mary Magdalene; that they were smuggled away to to the west where they and their family became one of the Merovingian kings.


Holy Blood - Holy Grail is as much fiction as the Da Vinci Codes. Plausible constructs based on ephemeral evidence. There were a slew of such books including some involving the Templars about the same speculation.

Reply
 
 
Mar 24, 2017 23:02:59   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
Big dog wrote:
First off, that was NOT the question. Secondly: Arthur C. Clark was a man of science. Do your homework before shooting your mouth off. He ranks right up there with Stephen Hawkins.
Ya gotta know science to write sci-fi !


I am well aware of who Arthur Clark was and Stephen Hawking he was not. If that wasn't the damned question what in hell are you blathering about?
Big dog (a regular here) (online) Joined: Sep 21, 2016 Posts: 1845

pafret wrote:
Well, there is where we are going to have to accept difference of opinions. For me, Christ was a historical reality, the fulfillment of all the prophesies of the coming Messiah and the Redeemer of mankind through his divine nature. To prove this would require an extensive amount of time engaged in apologetics and is not a topic for discussion in this forum.


So what's the difference between politics and religion ?


pafret (a regular here) (online) Joined: Aug 4, 2014 Posts: 2820 Loc: Northeast

Big dog wrote:
So what's the difference between politics and religion ?


Politics is derived from the Greek word Polis meaning city and more directly Politika relating to the governance of the city. It specifically means achieving and exercising positions of governance.

A religion is the belief in and worship of a Supreme Being, especially the Creator of all. The particular system of faith and worship in that Supreme being is the cult of religion.

While some religious leaders are political that is not their primary purpose. That purpose is to guide and assist others, in expressing their faith, and belief in the Diety. This is why I do not believe Islam is a religion because it is a political cult of dominance. Its precepts are antithetical to what can be deduced of the nature of the Supreme Being.


Big dog (a regular here) (online) Joined: Sep 21, 2016 Posts: 1845

nwtk2007 wrote:
There's a difference?


That IS what I'm asking. Religion has shaped politics for the Spanish of humanity. And TOO often, vice versa. So why can't we have that discussion here ?

Big dog (a regular here) (online) Joined: Sep 21, 2016 Posts: 1845

pafret wrote:
Politics is derived from the Greek word Polis mean... (show quote)


Okay that works for Islam, but what about the others ?

Try being a little clearer in your responses so I don't waste my time writing up historical precedents when you only want to stuff an atheist's blather down our throats.

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 23:04:19   #
Big dog
 
pafret wrote:
Holy Blood - Holy Grail is as much fiction as the Da Vinci Codes. Plausible constructs based on ephemeral evidence. There were a slew of such books including some involving the Templars about the same speculation.


And if Jesus did have a son, can you blame him ? He WAS a MAN. For Christ's sake, get real.

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 23:06:59   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
pafret wrote:
Holy Blood - Holy Grail is as much fiction as the Da Vinci Codes. Plausible constructs based on ephemeral evidence. There were a slew of such books including some involving the Templars about the same speculation.


The Da Vinci Code was a fictional story, no doubt, not really based upon HBHG. HBHG was more of a discussion of the inconsistency of historical versions of a very old story. However, it made a few leaps, and asked a few very good questions.

Reply
Mar 24, 2017 23:07:33   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Big dog wrote:
And if Jesus did have a son, can you blame him ? He WAS a MAN. For Christ's sake, get real.


Pun intended??

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.