How come Liberals are reluctant-- (Page 2): Ya, she should be held accountable by being put in front of a firing squad. Of Marine's and Navy Seals..

trucksterbud

PaulPisces wrote:

We all know she used a private e-mail server that she should not have - that is not news and I don't care.

I don't know if the Wikileaks information is true or not, so I'm withholding judgement on that.

If we find that Clinton did indeed mishandle classified information she should be held accountable.

Ya, she should be held accountable by being put in front of a firing squad. Of Marine's and Navy Seals..

working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina

bilordinary wrote:

Why is it that liberals are reluctant to talk about
the recent discoveries made by Wikileaks?
Is there no defense so they don't want to talk about it?
Do they regard it as unimportant?
Be nice to hear from them on it.

Could be the same reasons that conservatives overlook Mr. Trumps flaws. Bottom line, at this point, is that no one is going to change their minds about who to vote for.
Clinton is unacceptable to conservatives.
Trump is unacceptable to liberals.

We're each going to jump to those items that help us or hurt the other, and ignore what helps the other or hurts us.

Who said these candidates would not be able to unify the country?

JimMe

PaulPisces wrote:

We all know she used a private e-mail server that she should not have - that is not news and I don't care.

I don't know if the Wikileaks information is true or not, so I'm withholding judgement on that.

If we find that Clinton did indeed mishandle classified information she should be held accountable.

So I take it you're not Voting this year as a Major Candidate's viability to be President is uncertain...
The funny thing is, what you say is true, but I'm Voting for Donald Trump because I believe he's the better of the choices... I never needed emails, Wikileaks, or arrests to decide... Their stance on the issues was enough...

Trump in 2016!!!

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

bilordinary wrote:

Why is it that liberals are reluctant to talk about
the recent discoveries made by Wikileaks?
Is there no defense so they don't want to talk about it?
Do they regard it as unimportant?
Be nice to hear from them on it.

Maybe the results are to hard to defend.

Detroit in RUINS! (Crowder goes Ghetto)
https://youtu.be/1hhJ_49leBw
So who wants more of this?

maureenthannon

The recent leaks show that Hillary isn't the only one who lied. Obama had said that he first found out about Hillary's illegally using personal e-mails from news reporting on it. The e-mails show that he knewabout it before. A politician lying? Whp'd think that could happen?

peter11937 Loc: NYS

ssgtgood wrote:

Are you kidding me?! Do you know anything about security clearances? She put classified material out where anyone could get to it, thats a crime pure and simple. There are 4 different classifications of security clearances, CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, TOP SECRET, and TOP SECRET CRYPTO. You need to do some serious studying before you open you mouth and show everyone how stupid you are. Hillary Clinton is a criminal, end of story.
Semper Fi

I had top secret clearance in the Army and did NOT have access to Crypto. Had I put even simple classified info on the air without protection , and the Army discovered it, I'd have been in the barb wire hotel so fast it would have left my had spinning. Hillary caught with top secret on an open source, her e-mail on her home brew server, and she gets no punishment? Above the law does not get to be president.

moldyoldy

peter11937 wrote:

I had top secret clearance in the Army and did NOT have access to Crypto. Had I put even simple classified info on the air without protection , and the Army discovered it, I'd have been in the barb wire hotel so fast it would have left my had spinning. Hillary caught with top secret on an open source, her e-mail on her home brew server, and she gets no punishment? Above the law does not get to be president.

Watching fox faux news, you would think that all her e mails were secret. Actually the hundreds claimed by fox are more like 4 or 5, not including ones that were later classified. The C marking was not uniformly applied. The state dept. e mail server was hacked, while the Clinton server was not.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

moldyoldy wrote:

Watching fox faux news, you would think that all her e mails were secret. Actually the hundreds claimed by fox are more like 4 or 5, not including ones that were later classified. The C marking was not uniformly applied. The state dept. e mail server was hacked, while the Clinton server was not.

Markings are irrelevant, a Sec. of State has been educated on how to recognize classified material, how to handle classified material and HAS THE AUTHORITY to classify material as well. Hillary has NO EXCUSE for what happened, and I guarantee you that if it were you or I who had used a private server and mishandled even ONE piece of classified material and it were discovered , we'd have been arrested and charged. Because it is a crime.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

peter11937 wrote:

Markings are irrelevant, a Sec. of State has been educated on how to recognize classified material, how to handle classified material and HAS THE AUTHORITY to classify material as well. Hillary has NO EXCUSE for what happened, and I guarantee you that if it were you or I who had used a private server and mishandled even ONE piece of classified material and it were discovered , we'd have been arrested and charged. Because it is a crime.

Liberals will support this; but they can't defend it.

Hillary Clinton Cringe Compilation
https://youtu.be/njczesGlXaQ

Hillary Clinton's Most Idiotic Moments
https://youtu.be/_RsI9Ol-W04

moldyoldy

peter11937 wrote:

Markings are irrelevant, a Sec. of State has been educated on how to recognize classified material, how to handle classified material and HAS THE AUTHORITY to classify material as well. Hillary has NO EXCUSE for what happened, and I guarantee you that if it were you or I who had used a private server and mishandled even ONE piece of classified material and it were discovered , we'd have been arrested and charged. Because it is a crime.

Is that what you say about Colin Powell doing the same thing? bush deleting millions of e mails. His cabinet using RNC servers.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

eagleye13 wrote:

Liberal will support this; but they can't defend it.

Hillary Clinton Cringe Compilation
https://youtu.be/njczesGlXaQ

Hillary Clinton's Most Idiotic Moments
https://youtu.be/_RsI9Ol-W04

Compulsive liar, isn't she? i cannot help but wonder why she needs to indulge it this lying, talk about not being fit for the Presidency!

peter11937 Loc: NYS

moldyoldy wrote:

Is that what you say about Colin Powell doing the same thing? bush deleting millions of e mails. His cabinet using RNC servers.

Powell did no such thing, he had no server. Having a private email account is OK. The president may declassify anything that the president chooses, as was done by Carter, and others who loosed info on stealth bomber and fighter, how we learned to cut silent submarine propellers. While this is irritating to me personally, it was not illegal. EVERYTHING Hillary did was illegal and designed to either defeat FOIA or the 1997 Records keeping law and subsequent updates.

kenjay Loc: Arkansas

moldyoldy wrote:

Is that what you say about Colin Powell doing the same thing? bush deleting millions of e mails. His cabinet using RNC servers.

Typical liberal bullshit when they can't refute the facts they deflect and lie. Moldy your source for Colin Powell having a private server in his house. And Clinton the pig deleted e mails after being subpoenaed big difference.

moldyoldy

peter11937 wrote:

Powell did no such thing, he had no server. Having a private email account is OK. The president may declassify anything that the president chooses, as was done by Carter, and others who loosed info on stealth bomber and fighter, how we learned to cut silent submarine propellers. While this is irritating to me personally, it was not illegal. EVERYTHING Hillary did was illegal and designed to either defeat FOIA or the 1997 Records keeping law and subsequent updates.

White House officials were using nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications."[11

The "gwb43.com"[9] domain name was publicized by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who sent a letter to Oversight and Government Reform Committee committee chairman Henry A. Waxman requesting an investigation.[10] Waxman sent a formal warning to the RNC, advising them to retain copies of all emails sent by White House employees. According to Waxman, "in some instances, White House officials were using nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications."[11] The Republican National Committee claims to have erased the emails, supposedly making them unavailable for Congressional investigators.[12]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy

Chanita

I love that they scream " but Russia hacked the emails!!!" Which kind of makes the point about the unsecured server, doesn't it? If they hacked this how do we know they didn't hack top secret stuff?