One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
How come Liberals are reluctant--
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Oct 26, 2016 20:21:45   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
Why is it that liberals are reluctant to talk about
the recent discoveries made by Wikileaks?
Is there no defense so they don't want to talk about it?
Do they regard it as unimportant?
Be nice to hear from them on it.

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 20:24:55   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
bilordinary wrote:
Why is it that liberals are reluctant to talk about
the recent discoveries made by Wikileaks?
Is there no defense so they don't want to talk about it?
Do they regard it as unimportant?
Be nice to hear from them on it.


They are doing the head in the sand trick, you know, we cannot see them if their heads are in the sand.

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 20:48:57   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
bilordinary wrote:
Why is it that liberals are reluctant to talk about
the recent discoveries made by Wikileaks?
Is there no defense so they don't want to talk about it?
Do they regard it as unimportant?
Be nice to hear from them on it.


They are waiting for the official DNC response , then they will all chime in like a chorus all in lockstep . would not be surprised if most here are paid as trolls ..

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2016 20:49:10   #
steve66613
 
peter11937 wrote:
They are doing the head in the sand trick, you know, we cannot see them if their heads are in the sand.


Now I understand! Wondered why they were all ass-faced!

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 20:54:41   #
markinny
 
bilordinary wrote:
Why is it that liberals are reluctant to talk about
the recent discoveries made by Wikileaks?
Is there no defense so they don't want to talk about it?
Do they regard it as unimportant?
Be nice to hear from them on it.


also they will not talk about the UNAFFORDABLE CARE ACT, OBAMA CARE DEATH SPIRAL. ALL WE NEED IS TRUMP IN OFFICE WITH A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS.

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 21:44:40   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
bilordinary wrote:
Why is it that liberals are reluctant to talk about
the recent discoveries made by Wikileaks?
Is there no defense so they don't want to talk about it?
Do they regard it as unimportant?
Be nice to hear from them on it.



We all know she used a private e-mail server that she should not have - that is not news and I don't care.

I don't know if the Wikileaks information is true or not, so I'm withholding judgement on that.

If we find that Clinton did indeed mishandle classified information she should be held accountable.

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 21:51:29   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
PaulPisces wrote:
We all know she used a private e-mail server that she should not have - that is not news and I don't care.

I don't know if the Wikileaks information is true or not, so I'm withholding judgement on that.

If we find that Clinton did indeed mishandle classified information she should be held accountable.


Yeah, and while we're making all these discoveries, make her president.
Absolutely no ground to stand on!

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2016 21:59:38   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
She did, she should, she will not.


PaulPisces wrote:
We all know she used a private e-mail server that she should not have - that is not news and I don't care.

I don't know if the Wikileaks information is true or not, so I'm withholding judgement on that.

If we find that Clinton did indeed mishandle classified information she should be held accountable.

Reply
Oct 26, 2016 22:32:45   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
markinny wrote:
also they will not talk about the UNAFFORDABLE CARE ACT, OBAMA CARE DEATH SPIRAL. ALL WE NEED IS TRUMP IN OFFICE WITH A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS.


Being realistic, his plan is going to make things a little tougher for a while, but will help a lot in the long run.
After all, part of the problems we face are our own fault, we could have supported local business when the mega stores
came in. We knew better, predictions came true. A very strong temptation was presented and we fell for it.
Like Obama said when times are tough we don't need that vacation in Vegas!
Only it will be we don't need that latest gadget from the land of the pale skins!
I can tough it out with the toys I now own! I'm sure most people can also.


Reply
Oct 27, 2016 00:36:15   #
kenjay Loc: Arkansas
 
PaulPisces wrote:
We all know she used a private e-mail server that she should not have - that is not news and I don't care.

I don't know if the Wikileaks information is true or not, so I'm withholding judgement on that.

If we find that Clinton did indeed mishandle classified information she should be held accountable.

Paul the FBI has already said she did. She also lied to congress while under oath. She also destroyed e-mails after being subpoenaed. These facts are clear. You withholding judgment on them also?

Reply
Oct 27, 2016 03:15:48   #
L8erToots
 
bilordinary wrote:
Why is it that liberals are reluctant to talk about
the recent discoveries made by Wikileaks?
Is there no defense so they don't want to talk about it?
Do they regard it as unimportant?
Be nice to hear from them on it.
Too much info to read...if it can't fit in a 4 line meme they just keep scrolling.

Reply
 
 
Oct 27, 2016 06:29:05   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
PaulPisces wrote:
We all know she used a private e-mail server that she should not have - that is not news and I don't care.

I don't know if the Wikileaks information is true or not, so I'm withholding judgement on that.

If we find that Clinton did indeed mishandle classified information she should be held accountable.


Leaked emails between Podesda and Abedin already prove that she should be held accountable for some "irregularities" in the Clinton Foundation and actions while she was Sec of State.

Reply
Oct 27, 2016 08:41:16   #
ssgtgood
 
PaulPisces wrote:
We all know she used a private e-mail server that she should not have - that is not news and I don't care.

I don't know if the Wikileaks information is true or not, so I'm withholding judgement on that.

If we find that Clinton did indeed mishandle classified information she should be held accountable.


Are you kidding me?! Do you know anything about security clearances? She put classified material out where anyone could get to it, thats a crime pure and simple. There are 4 different classifications of security clearances, CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, TOP SECRET, and TOP SECRET CRYPTO. You need to do some serious studying before you open you mouth and show everyone how stupid you are. Hillary Clinton is a criminal, end of story.
Semper Fi

Reply
Oct 27, 2016 10:00:00   #
trucksterbud
 
bilordinary wrote:
Why is it that liberals are reluctant to talk about
the recent discoveries made by Wikileaks?
Is there no defense so they don't want to talk about it?
Do they regard it as unimportant?
Be nice to hear from them on it.


When Libtards ram headfirst into the truth, or anything that resembles the truth, they go into brain freeze. Its a common problem, across the board. Libtards need to be controlled, they need to be pacified, they need to live in a little fantasy bubble where some talking head on a screen somewhere assures them (strokes their fur) that everything will be alright if we get one more corrupt politician in office. If we get one more executive order by the pres. If we get one more agency to rule our lives. If we get one more government sponsored benefit. If we get one more...... (well, you get the picture)


Reply
Oct 27, 2016 10:05:34   #
trucksterbud
 
ssgtgood wrote:
Are you kidding me?! Do you know anything about security clearances? She put classified material out where anyone could get to it, thats a crime pure and simple. There are 4 different classifications of security clearances, CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, TOP SECRET, and TOP SECRET CRYPTO. You need to do some serious studying before you open you mouth and show everyone how stupid you are. Hillary Clinton is a criminal, end of story.
Semper Fi


Ya, and lets not go back and do the body count surrounding the Clinton's, INCLUDING one dead Arkansas State Police officer. (How the hell does ANYBODY get away with that...??)

Ya, and lets not go back and count all the $$$millions$$$ the Clinton Foundation received from international conglomerates wishing to mine / drill in Africa WHILE Hillary (corrupt Hillary) was Secretary of State...

Ya, and lets not count the fact that George Soros publicly and openly admitted - on record also with the DNC and Hillary's campaign finances - to donating over $$24 MILLION $$ to Hillary's campaign... (that should be a red flag right there for anyone with active brain cells..)

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.