Let's ban matches (Page 2): It is also easy to prevent forest fires, cut em down!

bilordinary Loc: SW Washington

Little Ball of Hate wrote:

Every arsonist has one thing in common. They used a match, or a lighter to start the fire. If we banned matches and lighters there would be no more arson. If this makes no sense to you, then you understand why banning guns will never protect anyone. If you don't get it, then I have nothing to say to you. You are beyond help. A match is harmless, until someone uses it. Same with a gun. Enough said.

It is also easy to prevent forest fires, cut em down!

Little Ball of Hate

bilordinary wrote:

It is also easy to prevent forest fires, cut em down!

Funny you should mention that. One of the worst fires, in California, was the result of an effort to preserve woodlands. There was a drought. All those trees went up like a bunch of matches.

tom25411 Loc: WV

Cumon folks. What is with all the violence and mayhem? The guy watching his wife and kids getting raped should have simply called 911 and waited for trained professionals to arrive and deal with the poor misguided guy who broke into his home by mistake and found a horny sexy 6 year old coming on to him.

A liberal

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

mongo wrote:

LBoH is not for confiscating firearms. You definitely have him wrong!

SEMPER FI

From the large number of posts by LBoH and Comment, I know that both are primarily on the same side. Hopefully they will both rethink their remarks, and go from there.

maureenthannon

Another problem, the places that have the stricted gun laws also have the highest rates of violent crimes.

Big dog

Little Ball of Hate wrote:

Every arsonist has one thing in common. They used a match, or a lighter to start the fire. If we banned matches and lighters there would be no more arson. If this makes no sense to you, then you understand why banning guns will never protect anyone. If you don't get it, then I have nothing to say to you. You are beyond help. A match is harmless, until someone uses it. Same with a gun. Enough said.

Damn right !

Little Ball of Hate

maureenthannon wrote:

Another problem, the places that have the stricted gun laws also have the highest rates of violent crimes.

Well, that's because people are smuggling guns in into the city. If guns were illegal everywhere, America would be a peaceful paradise. We could all sit around the campfire, holding hands and singing Kumbaya.

Of course, that fails to explain why other cities, with a lot of legal gun owners are not crime ridden hellholes. Liberals are just plain stupid, if you ask me.

Big dog

Little Ball of Hate wrote:

Well, that's because people are smuggling guns in into the city. If guns were illegal everywhere, America would be a peaceful paradise. We could all sit around the campfire, holding hands and singing Kumbaya.

Of course, that fails to explain why other cities, with a lot of legal gun owners are not crime ridden hellholes. Liberals are just plain stupid, if you ask me.

I think it's the drugs they use.

Little Ball of Hate

Big dog wrote:

I think it's the drugs they use.

Every major city has a drug problem. That can't be it, because other cities are not combat zones. It has to be something else...Hmmm. Could it be the large black populations in those cities?

Big dog

Little Ball of Hate wrote:

Every major city has a drug problem. That can't be it, because other cities are not combat zones. It has to be something else...Hmmm. Could it be the large black populations in those cities?

City people don't grow up hunting and fishing, they never learn the proper use of guns or gun safety. All they ever get is what the MSM feed them, which is guns are bad. If you want to be a badass you gotta have a gun, and if you're in a gang you gotta be a badass. It's not just blacks, plenty Hispanic gangs too. I doubt if any city gang member could survive in the woods for long with or without a gun. On the other hand for them survival in the city requires a gun. No man made law will stop these people from killing each other. Let's just keep them in the city. BUILD A WALL !

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Little Ball of Hate wrote:

Many wouldn't. Just as a murderer would use a knife or blunt object, if they didn't have a gun. If you want someone dead, no law will stop you.

Yet people are allowed to own/operate what probably is the most dangerous weapon they will have access to. Their motor vehicle. MVAs take more lives and cause more injuries each year than all firearms. Ban cars not guns.

Little Ball of Hate

Docadhoc wrote:

Yet people are allowed to own/operate what probably is the most dangerous weapon they will have access to. Their motor vehicle. MVAs take more lives and cause more injuries each year than all firearms. Ban cars not guns.

I'll save the libturds the effort of replying to this one.

"But GUNZ are designed to kill...Cars are not." Like that makes any difference.

Big dog

Docadhoc wrote:

Yet people are allowed to own/operate what probably is the most dangerous weapon they will have access to. Their motor vehicle. MVAs take more lives and cause more injuries each year than all firearms. Ban cars not guns.

That's going to happen as soon as all the bugs are worked out of automated automobiles. Just one more freedom"They" will take away from us for" our own good". !!!!!!!!

Little Ball of Hate

Big dog wrote:

That's going to happen as soon as all the bugs are worked out of automated automobiles. Just one more freedom"They" will take away from us for" our own good". !!!!!!!!

Along with a chip that will allow remote operation of said vehicle, no doubt. For our own good, of course.

Big dog

Little Ball of Hate wrote:

Along with a chip that will allow remote operation of said vehicle, no doubt. For our own good, of course.

Of course