Blade_Runner wrote:
Oh, you poor baby, so thin skinned you can't take what you constantly dish out. Everything you post and every stupid question you ask is an insult to human intelligence. Your knowledge of WW2 history is just as vacuous as your knowledge of Islam. You have no clue regarding the reality of any of this.
I have spent most of my life studying history, much of it on the Second World War. I cannot count the number of works I have read on the subject, many I've read two or more times. I've read the works of national leaders, politicians, statesmen and soldiers on all sides of the conflict, from the journals and memoirs of the soldiers in the fight to the men who led them to the generals and the presidents, prime ministers, kings and dictators. And, I have covered both theaters.
I have no idea why you would even ask why Hirohito was allowed to remain as emperor of Japan. Given the the death and devastation the nation suffered because of their imperialistic folly and the healing processes a defeated people must endure and the rebuilding of whole cities and infrastructure, and most importantly, the divine status of the emperor in the eyes of the Japanese people, it is no mystery why MacArthur allowed Hirohito to remain. He felt that retaining the emperor, the Japanese would be much less resistant to the occupation and reconstruction of Japan. However there were conditions:
Japan surrendered unconditionally. The allies gave no guarantee that Hirohito would stay in power. Here is what they agreed to when they signed the declaration:
The authority of the Emperor and the Japanese Government to rule the state shall be subject to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers who will take such steps as he deems proper to effectuate these terms of surrender.
Signed at TOKYO BAY, JAPAN at 0904 on the SECOND day of SEPTEMBER 1945. (Read: Instrument of Surrender)
Hirohito was actually convinced he would be deposed and when he first met Douglas MacArthur he supposedly offered to step down from the throne and take the blame for starting the war.
Although only MacArthur, Hirohito and Hirohito's translator were present during this historic meeting in the book Embracing Defeat Dower spells out that Hirohito offered to fall on his sword but that MacArthur encouraged him to stay on as Emperor.
As Robert J. Kolker said in another answer the move to keep the Emperor on the throne was political. MacArthur and his occupation authorities, known in Japan as General Headquarters (GHQ), thought Japan would be easier to govern thus requiring less men to be stationed in Japan.
Even though evidence shows that Hirohito took part in the decision making process leading up to World War II the Americans and the Japanese collaborated together to put all the blame on Japanese government officials like Prime Minister Tojo and General Matsui. They willingly took the blame in order to save their Emperor, essentially killing themselves for Hirohito.
Hirohito didn't have the same position as before the war. In the famous January 1, 1946 Humanity Declaration he told the Japanese people that he wasn't a god and relinquished his authority over Japan becoming a powerless figurehead of the state.
Oh, you poor baby, so thin skinned you can't take ... (
show quote)
You don't seem to understand my question.
Why does that not surprise me.
Would Hitler be allowed to remain as Chancellor of Germany if he decided not to kill himself?
Saddam Hussein was hanged. Gaddafi was murdered by U.S. mercenaries.
If Hirohito did actually encourage the Japanese people to take up the strategy of Ketsugo against Americans as you said in your post on page 2,
why wouldn't he do it again? Maybe. . . just maybe . . . your information is all wrong . . . as usual.