One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A simple question for the evolutionist
Page <<first <prev 3 of 18 next> last>>
Jul 30, 2016 08:55:31   #
Singularity
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I know, right? This one, like so many, speak science out of their ass, like the guy in the commercial who spoke sports out of his ass; he needed to start listening to ESPN. This one needs a science education.


No. This one is not desiring education or attempting to increase understanding by this post, he is simply soliciting discord.

Proverbs 6:12-19 A naughty person, a wicked man, walketh with a froward mouth. He winketh with his eyes, he speaketh with his feet, he teacheth with his fingers; Frowardness is in his heart, he deviseth mischief continually; he soweth discord. Therefore shall his calamity come suddenly; suddenly shall he be broken without remedy. These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 09:34:12   #
Singularity
 
Singularity wrote:
No. This one is not desiring education or attempting to increase understanding by this post, he is simply soliciting discord.

Proverbs 6:12-19 A naughty person, a wicked man, walketh with a froward mouth. He winketh with his eyes, he speaketh with his feet, he teacheth with his fingers; Frowardness is in his heart, he deviseth mischief continually; he soweth discord. Therefore shall his calamity come suddenly; suddenly shall he be broken without remedy. These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
No. This one is not desiring education or attempti... (show quote)

2 Timothy 2:23 ►

Don't have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels. And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful.

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 09:41:15   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Singularity wrote:
2 Timothy 2:23 ►

Don't have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels. And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful.


Good thing I'm not the Lord's servant!

Reply
 
 
Jul 30, 2016 09:45:12   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
sweetlips wrote:
I, being one that believes in god, now considered dumb by the atheist and scientist of our society, i have a simple
question for them.
How many mutations, good or bad, did it take to get from a single cell something to a full blown human being?
This shouldn't be to hard for the enlightened ones.


Oh boy, hanker down sweetlips, you asked a loaded question here!!

Of course you know any answer given will be based on pure speculation of any scientific data, entered by that human being, right?

You will get some good dialogue on it if Peter and Singularity post...I like reading what they offer up..

Oops, guess I should have all before posting..I see Sing has...

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 09:52:02   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
solarkin wrote:
God is the line between light and dark.
Creation ,vs it's antithesis .
Greek mythology has clues to our beginnings.
History has given us the answers we need.


I like this statement, solarkin, more truth than may be known......

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 09:56:21   #
Singularity
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Good thing I'm not the Lord's servant!


Why would anyone choose such a thing without bribe or coercion?

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 09:56:48   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Oliver wrote:
Even better would be the question: How many mutations (or attempts) did it take for the elements to form just one so-called "simple" cell?...knowing that if any one cell PART or just one incomplete cell FUNCTION occurred, it would render the whole process null and void and would have to start over again with absolutely no "memory" of where it went wrong in the first place. According to evolutionists own theory of "survival of the fittest" anything "unfit" is done away with. Such is the case of every cell that is either incomplete in part or function...it is rendered obsolete! So until the scientists can determine (which scientifically it is impossible for them to do do) how many mutations it took to get from one cell to a whole body, they first must determine how many tries it must have taken for th,e elements to form just ONE "simple" cell. Good luck on that one!
Even better would be the question: How many mutati... (show quote)


In an absolute, then it explains why we are not perfect....

Reply
 
 
Jul 30, 2016 10:05:12   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Much of science I disagree with as well as appreciate...Absolute tho, no..

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 10:11:37   #
Singularity
 
lindajoy wrote:
Oh boy, hanker down sweetlips, you asked a loaded question here!!

Of course you know any answer given will be based on pure speculation of any scientific data, entered by that human being, right?

You will get some good dialogue on it if Peter and Singularity post...I like reading what they offer up..

Oops, guess I should have all before posting..I see Sing has...


Feeling grateful to learn I am such an entertaining pet, (as long as I don't soil the carpet, or bark too loudly, yes!?!)

Yet I do have teeth. And in any serious debate on this forum with one respectful opponent's points or questions at a time, respecting the guidelines of polite discourse, I seem to hear only

*crickets*

at the conclusion of my arguments.

Or conversely, receive the troll brigade's invasion and warnings from what passes for "admin".

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 10:17:16   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Took the words right out of my mouth, but with the gift of gab which I lack.

A reverse question is, why is gawd do preoccupied with penis foreskins? Was Mary still a virgin after gawd knocked her up? When Adam named the animals, what language did he speak?

Stupidity in the realm of Bible knowledge is excusable. It's a book of fairy tales. Stupidity in science is inexcusable.


Why is it excusable or inexcusable when it is all a matter of what we choose to believe??

Imperfection begets perfection over time...We obviously have not attained that level...Maybe when and if we ever do, we will then have achieved utopia????

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 10:24:31   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
PeterS wrote:
Why does it matter how many mutations it would take to get from a single cell to a complex cellular structure such as we are now. Not as long as you would think given that life started about 3.8 billion years ago with at least 4 or 5 near total mass extinctions along the way. Without those mass extinctions complex life most certainly would be here but but probably not us as T-Rex would have found us far too tasty to pass up...


I ask the same question in theory and do so because of the many posts read in here...

Why does it matter??? We are here period and we will leave, eventually, period..

The age old question of creation will never have a sufficient answer all will ever agree with...Thank goodness, least we all become stereotyped placaters of nothingness......

As always, nice to see you, Peter...

Reply
 
 
Jul 30, 2016 10:25:15   #
Singularity
 
lindajoy wrote:
Why is it excusable or inexcusable when it is all a matter of what we choose to believe??

Imperfection begets perfection over time...We obviously have not attained that level...Maybe when and if we ever do, we will then have achieved utopia????


It matters what we choose to believe.

Sciences flies you to the other side of Jupiter and sends photos! And requires one to give up foolish fantasies.

Religion flies you into buildings, and requires one to cut off parts of one's genitals.

Or murder and sacrifice your children as burnt offerings if the deity is out of other holy air fresheners.

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 10:33:10   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Good thing I'm not the Lord's servant!


Ahhh yes, but you are your own servant, which could be far better or far worse...
Your mind, your best friend or worst enemy..

For you, I suspect better, given your grasp of things...
A logical "thinker" you appear to be...

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 10:46:31   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Singularity wrote:
Feeling grateful to learn I am such an entertaining pet, (as long as I don't soil the carpet, or bark too loudly, yes!?!)

Yet I do have teeth. And in any serious debate on this forum with one respectful opponent's points or questions at a time, respecting the guidelines of polite discourse, I seem to hear only

*crickets*

at the conclusion of my arguments.

Or conversely, receive the troll brigade's invasion and warnings from what passes for "admin".


Suspect often enough it is your ability to sufficiently debate the topic backed with what you view supports....

Often enough, for me, when reading you it does not elicit anger but rather makes me think more about what you have said..Even making me ask more of my belief in, yet it stays the course and I appreciate the teaching...
For some, maybe they are uncomfortable with having to admit or at least acknowledge some doubt...????

It's that simple for me..Then again I like learning more on this topic...Thank You for that!

Reply
Jul 30, 2016 10:50:36   #
gaconservative74
 
Singularity wrote:
Feeling grateful to learn I am such an entertaining pet, (as long as I don't soil the carpet, or bark too loudly, yes!?!)

Yet I do have teeth. And in any serious debate on this forum with one respectful opponent's points or questions at a time, respecting the guidelines of polite discourse, I seem to hear only

*crickets*

at the conclusion of my arguments.

Or conversely, receive the troll brigade's invasion and warnings from what passes for "admin".


As we have discussed before, your intellect is on the high end of the spectrum. that being said, I know that I cannot "beat" you in a debate. Even if my intellect were on your level, would it matter? You have made your own decisions on what to believe about God and the Bible and will look to reinforce your position by seeking information that supports it, just as I will mine. I think the debate, to some extent is interesting, but I feel sometimes that we that believe in God and the Bible get dismissed as ignorant and closed minded. I am not here to cause conflict or get bombarded by insults, which I know you will not but others may. I have said in the past that there are many intelligent and educated people that believe in God. Have you ever listened to John Lennox or William Lane Craig? If not, take a look. If so, you have to admit that both do have arguments that you would have to admit are at least interesting.

Anyway, the question posed in this thread is indeed a loaded question. I don't know what the underlying intent was, but at this point, now we have what may end up becoming an interesting discourse. I hope so anyway.

Bottom line about belief in God or not becomes a personal decision based off of ones own experiences and weighing of the evidence with ones own intelligence. I listened to a debate between Richard Hawkins and John Lennox and Dawkins said this about science(paraphrased): we as scientists don't have everything figured out, but we are working on it. His implication was that there was hope that eventually science would find all the answers and that eventually God would be completely unnessesarily to explain anything and that would prove that he doesn't exist. This, then would prove the non existence of God.

We have to admit that neither side of this argument has all the answers so both have faith in something and cannot explain everything. Atheists seem a lot of times to believe that christians(I know that there are other religious groups to consider, but I am Christian and the argument at this point is between no God or God so which you choose is irrelevant at this point so I will talk from my perspective) don't want to discover what makes the universe work and any time we come up to something we can't explain that we just use the "God" card and don't want to have answers. This is completely false. I see science as we are constantly discovering just how awesome God truly is. He is not the God of the Gaps, He is The God of everything.

I have said it before that faith and science are not at odds with each other; I forget the response exactly that you have to that, but it was a picture I believe that stated basically, when you can't stand alone that you get in bed with the enemy. I don't buy that. Just because I believe in God doesn't mean that I can't see how amazing the universe or possibly "multiverse" is and have a desire to understand it.

I heard another atheist say about science (again paraphrasing) while you artists and philosophers figure out the philosophical parts of life, us scientists will go figure out how the universe works. This thought process seems so anti climactic to me. What do you do if you ever do figure it all out?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 18 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.