Singularity wrote:
Feeling grateful to learn I am such an entertaining pet, (as long as I don't soil the carpet, or bark too loudly, yes!?!)
Yet I do have teeth. And in any serious debate on this forum with one respectful opponent's points or questions at a time, respecting the guidelines of polite discourse, I seem to hear only
*crickets*
at the conclusion of my arguments.
Or conversely, receive the troll brigade's invasion and warnings from what passes for "admin".
As we have discussed before, your intellect is on the high end of the spectrum. that being said, I know that I cannot "beat" you in a debate. Even if my intellect were on your level, would it matter? You have made your own decisions on what to believe about God and the Bible and will look to reinforce your position by seeking information that supports it, just as I will mine. I think the debate, to some extent is interesting, but I feel sometimes that we that believe in God and the Bible get dismissed as ignorant and closed minded. I am not here to cause conflict or get bombarded by insults, which I know you will not but others may. I have said in the past that there are many intelligent and educated people that believe in God. Have you ever listened to John Lennox or William Lane Craig? If not, take a look. If so, you have to admit that both do have arguments that you would have to admit are at least interesting.
Anyway, the question posed in this thread is indeed a loaded question. I don't know what the underlying intent was, but at this point, now we have what may end up becoming an interesting discourse. I hope so anyway.
Bottom line about belief in God or not becomes a personal decision based off of ones own experiences and weighing of the evidence with ones own intelligence. I listened to a debate between Richard Hawkins and John Lennox and Dawkins said this about science(paraphrased): we as scientists don't have everything figured out, but we are working on it. His implication was that there was hope that eventually science would find all the answers and that eventually God would be completely unnessesarily to explain anything and that would prove that he doesn't exist. This, then would prove the non existence of God.
We have to admit that neither side of this argument has all the answers so both have faith in something and cannot explain everything. Atheists seem a lot of times to believe that christians(I know that there are other religious groups to consider, but I am Christian and the argument at this point is between no God or God so which you choose is irrelevant at this point so I will talk from my perspective) don't want to discover what makes the universe work and any time we come up to something we can't explain that we just use the "God" card and don't want to have answers. This is completely false. I see science as we are constantly discovering just how awesome God truly is. He is not the God of the Gaps, He is The God of everything.
I have said it before that faith and science are not at odds with each other; I forget the response exactly that you have to that, but it was a picture I believe that stated basically, when you can't stand alone that you get in bed with the enemy. I don't buy that. Just because I believe in God doesn't mean that I can't see how amazing the universe or possibly "multiverse" is and have a desire to understand it.
I heard another atheist say about science (again paraphrasing) while you artists and philosophers figure out the philosophical parts of life, us scientists will go figure out how the universe works. This thought process seems so anti climactic to me. What do you do if you ever do figure it all out?