A simple question for the evolutionist: I, being one that believes in god, now considered dumb by the atheist and scientist of our society, i have a simple question for them. How many...

sweetlips

I, being one that believes in god, now considered dumb by the atheist and scientist of our society, i have a simple
question for them.
How many mutations, good or bad, did it take to get from a single cell something to a full blown human being?
This shouldn't be to hard for the enlightened ones.

steve66613

Several less than average to get a liberal?

Little Ball of Hate

steve66613 wrote:

Several less than average to get a liberal?

Let us all fervently hope that liberals are an evolutionary dead end.

Singularity

sweetlips wrote:

I, being one that believes in god, now considered dumb by the atheist and scientist of our society, i have a simple
question for them.
How many mutations, good or bad, did it take to get from a single cell something to a full blown human being?
This shouldn't be to hard for the enlightened ones.

The answer is also in the form of a question.

Have you any human progeny?

The answer would be one less than they.

Your question is in a form designed to spread disinformation and confuse persons not as smart as you are into thinking you really understand evolution and have 'disproved it' when you know you are just bearing false witness!

As an atheist and scientist of this community, I feel the need to explain to those you plan to brag to about a possible lack of refuting posts that I will not contend fairly with you as you have presented a dishonest challenge. You are a traitor to the both Science you vaguely fathom and the commandments of the God you claim to follow. Therefore I cannot believe you desire and honest and forthright discourse.

My choice to jump straight to the insult portion of tonight's entertainment is in the interest of freeing up time.

I wanna watch tv.

sweetlips

i would agree, TV is about your speed
why don't you answer the question, could it be that you can't.

solarkin

sweetlips wrote:

I, being one that believes in god, now considered dumb by the atheist and scientist of our society, i have a simple
question for them.
How many mutations, good or bad, did it take to get from a single cell something to a full blown human being?
This shouldn't be to hard for the enlightened ones.

God is the line between light and dark.
Creation ,vs it's antithesis .
Greek mythology has clues to our beginnings.
History has given us the answers we need.

Singularity

sweetlips wrote:

i would agree, TV is about your speed
why don't you answer the question, could it be that you can't.

It is loaded question of the standard Strawman fallacy type, leading by design to confusion rather than understanding.

And, because you are revealing yourself to be a socially retarded individual who does not seek understanding and an increase in that knowledge, rather you prefer an intemperate exchange of inane to profane insults, I will not indulge that foolishness either.

Singularity

Singularity wrote:

It is loaded question of the standard Strawman fallacy type, leading by design to confusion rather than understanding.

And, because you are revealing yourself to be a socially retarded individual who does not seek understanding and an increase in that knowledge, rather you prefer an intemperate exchange of inane to profane insults, I will not indulge that foolishness either.

Kazudy

Sweetips, it took exactly 3'874,194,627,998,217 mutations from the one cell goowie stuff to turn into a human. I know
it was a rhetorical question. God made man in His image,male and female.

Carol Kelly

Little Ball of Hate wrote:

Let us all fervently hope that liberals are an evolutionary dead end.

Oliver Loc: Dayton, OH

sweetlips wrote:

I, being one that believes in god, now considered dumb by the atheist and scientist of our society, i have a simple
question for them.
How many mutations, good or bad, did it take to get from a single cell something to a full blown human being?
This shouldn't be to hard for the enlightened ones.

Even better would be the question: How many mutations (or attempts) did it take for the elements to form just one so-called "simple" cell?...knowing that if any one cell PART or just one incomplete cell FUNCTION occurred, it would render the whole process null and void and would have to start over again with absolutely no "memory" of where it went wrong in the first place. According to evolutionists own theory of "survival of the fittest" anything "unfit" is done away with. Such is the case of every cell that is either incomplete in part or function...it is rendered obsolete! So until the scientists can determine (which scientifically it is impossible for them to do do) how many mutations it took to get from one cell to a whole body, they first must determine how many tries it must have taken for the elements to form just ONE "simple" cell. Good luck on that one!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Singularity wrote:

The answer is also in the form of a question. br ... (show quote)

Took the words right out of my mouth, but with the gift of gab which I lack.

A reverse question is, why is gawd do preoccupied with penis foreskins? Was Mary still a virgin after gawd knocked her up? When Adam named the animals, what language did he speak?

Stupidity in the realm of Bible knowledge is excusable. It's a book of fairy tales. Stupidity in science is inexcusable.

Little Ball of Hate

nwtk2007 wrote:

Took the words right out of my mouth, but with the gift of gab which I lack.

A reverse question is, why is gawd do preoccupied with penis foreskins? Was Mary still a virgin after gawd knocked her up? When Adam named the animals, what language did he speak?

Stupidity in the realm of Bible knowledge is excusable. It's a book of fairy tales. Stupidity in science is inexcusable.

There is no known process whereby the first cell could have evolved. Scientists "theorize" that RNA might have been involved as the first replicator, but that is simply a guess. Even the odds of a self evolving RNA replicator are close enough to zero that we can safely dismiss it as a possibility. It sure does take a lot of faith to believe that all life is the result of an accident, and that evolution itself is even a believable theory. I'll put my faith in my Creator, and I'll see you all on Judgement Day.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Little Ball of Hate wrote:

There is no known process whereby the first cell c... (show quote)

Thank gawd for those creators who have simply always existed, needing not to explain where they come from, they just simply are, always.

I'll place my faith in good people, good hearted, not so perfect human beings. Like family, friends, etc.

Little Ball of Hate

nwtk2007 wrote:

Thank gawd for those creators who have simply always existed, needing not to explain where they come from, they just simply are, always.

I'll place my faith in good people, good hearted, not so perfect human beings. Like family, friends, etc.

You should realize that God is not a material being. Therefore, the laws of our universe do not apply to Him. He always existed. And don't you atheists believe that energy always existed? It just simply is. No explanation where it came from. LOL! That's just too funny.