One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Mayor refuses to cater to muslims
Page <prev 2 of 14 next> last>>
Nov 15, 2014 14:57:29   #
hprinze Loc: Central Florida
 
L8erToots wrote:
It probably won't become a (federal) Constitutional Amendment, but I wonder if individual states could pass it as a law or amend their State Constitution to include it. Here is how Publius Huldah, an expert on the constitution, explains it:

http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/immigration-from-muslim-countries/


=====================================
It would not have to be a constitutional amendment. Cobgress could pass laws defining what a rekigion is.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 15:03:45   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
hprinze wrote:
============================================
That would be good, but muslims should not be admitted to t6he U.S. at all. Even for a visit. Those already here should be treated as described here:

http://pedestrianinfidel.blogspot.com/2007/02/proposed-constitutional-amendment.html


hprinze-meanwhile lets add one a sow and ten piglets in every mosque just to give it class. Good Luck America !!!

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 15:06:23   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
CowboyMilt wrote:
Once we get rid of the Head Muslim Fake president we will probably see it every where in America...


CowboyMilt-I hope you are correct. Also, everything printed by any government should be in English only. Good Luck America !!!~

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2014 15:12:17   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
MajorAhrens wrote:
Now that's how it should be! The people who come to this country want Americans to adapt to their ways of life and customs. They need to remember they came here. That mayor should be applauded for doing what's right. I wish we had some politicians with a spine like the mayor of Quebec. I bet Canadian liberals are blowing a gasket. I love it when pushy immigrants have to abide by the laws instead of letting spineless politicians change them so as "not to offered anyone". Score one for the GOOD GUYS!!!!

:| :thumbup: :thumbup:
Now that's how it should be! The people who come t... (show quote)


Major Ahrens-its actually the mayor of Dorval which is a relatively small town (18K in 2011) within the province of Quebec. Canada needs more mayors liike him and we need at least one with the guts to do likewise., Good Luck America !!!

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 15:18:17   #
MajorAhrens Loc: Myrtle Beach
 
Ricko wrote:
Major Ahrens-its actually the mayor of Dorval which is a relatively small town within the province of Quebec. Canada needs more mayors liike him and we need at least one with the guts to do likewise., Good Luck America !!!

Ricko sir, thanks. I forget who I am sometimes lol. Anyway I like your stance on the issues. And yes we need politicians here in America like that. I'm tired of these touchy feely spineless pukes. Again, thanks and GOD BLESS

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 15:22:35   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
MajorAhrens wrote:
Ricko sir, thanks. I forget who I am sometimes lol. Anyway I like your stance on the issues. And yes we need politicians here in America like that. I'm tired of these touchy feely spineless pukes. Again, thanks and GOD BLESS


MajorAhrens-like yourself, in my younger days, spent 17years in foreign lands and no where did I see any signs or printed matter other than in the language of that country. Also, if you wanted to drive you obtained an International drivers license and learned what the signs meant. We were expected to adapt and they can do likewise., Good Luck America !!!

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 15:32:59   #
MajorAhrens Loc: Myrtle Beach
 
Ricko wrote:
MajorAhrens-like yourself, in my younger days, spent 17years in foreign lands and no where did I see any signs or printed matter other than in the language of that country. Also, if you wanted to drive you obtained an International drivers license and learned what the signs meant. We were expected to adapt and they can do likewise., Good Luck America !!!

YES SIR!!!! They can start doing it the American way or get the %$# out. I've had it with bending over backwards for these leeches.

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2014 16:45:07   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
They should make this a part of every immigration visa issued. And everyone who wishes to immigrate to the U.S. should have to agree to abide by these principles, in writing.


We actually agree on something. I'll be.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 16:48:00   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
hprinze wrote:
=====================================
It would not have to be a constitutional amendment. Cobgress could pass laws defining what a rekigion is.


No they cannot. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 17:00:49   #
MajorAhrens Loc: Myrtle Beach
 
Loki wrote:
No they cannot. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Loki, since when has laws stopped these crooked mother%$#@s. Keep em straight down there.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 17:12:42   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
MajorAhrens wrote:
Loki, since when has laws stopped these crooked mother%$#@s. Keep em straight down there.


Even if it were Constitutional, it would establish a precedent of allowing Congress to decide what is a religion. They might decide that they don't much like Baptists, or Catholics, or Hindus, or whatever next. Do you really trust those clowns that much? There is a reason why the very first Amendment states what it does. People thought I was crazy a few years ago when I was upset about a Government raid on the Church of Scientology. I was not defending a cult. These people enjoy EXACTLY the same legal status as a mainstream religion. If they can get away with it at the Church of Scientology, they have established a legal precedent. Their next target might be the Presbyterians. Folks don't seem to realize that legally, one religion is the same as another.Incidentally, this is why churches are listed as "tax exempt organizations," rather than "churches." Congress cannot decide what is a religion, but a quasi-governmental corporation such as the IRS apparently can.

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2014 18:07:57   #
MajorAhrens Loc: Myrtle Beach
 
Loki wrote:
Even if it were Constitutional, it would establish a precedent of allowing Congress to decide what is a religion. They might decide that they don't much like Baptists, or Catholics, or Hindus, or whatever next. Do you really trust those clowns that much? There is a reason why the very first Amendment states what it does. People thought I was crazy a few years ago when I was upset about a Government raid on the Church of Scientology. I was not defending a cult. These people enjoy EXACTLY the same legal status as a mainstream religion. If they can get away with it at the Church of Scientology, they have established a legal precedent. Their next target might be the Presbyterians. Folks don't seem to realize that legally, one religion is the same as another.Incidentally, this is why churches are listed as "tax exempt organizations," rather than "churches." Congress cannot decide what is a religion, but a quasi-governmental corporation such as the IRS apparently can.
Even if it were Constitutional, it would establish... (show quote)

That is so true. I said the same thing when they went after those kooks at Scientology. But it is listed as a tax exempt entity. And you're right. If they set their sites on one the rest better look out. Keep em straight down there, Loki

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 18:21:42   #
hprinze Loc: Central Florida
 
Loki wrote:
No they cannot. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."


===========================================

For the umpteenth time, Islam is not a religion. It is an evil, murderous, cruel, and dictatorial form of absolute government with total control of people. My suggestion was not that congress could pass laws about a religion, but that it could define religion and rule that Islam is NOT a religion.

Islam is no more a bona fide relugion than voodoo, sacrificing animals, or throwing virgins into volcanos.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 18:49:49   #
hprinze Loc: Central Florida
 
Loki wrote:
Even if it were Constitutional, it would establish a precedent of allowing Congress to decide what is a religion. They might decide that they don't much like Baptists, or Catholics, or Hindus, or whatever next. Do you really trust those clowns that much? There is a reason why the very first Amendment states what it does. People thought I was crazy a few years ago when I was upset about a Government raid on the Church of Scientology. I was not defending a cult. These people enjoy EXACTLY the same legal status as a mainstream religion. If they can get away with it at the Church of Scientology, they have established a legal precedent. Their next target might be the Presbyterians. Folks don't seem to realize that legally, one religion is the same as another.Incidentally, this is why churches are listed as "tax exempt organizations," rather than "churches." Congress cannot decide what is a religion, but a quasi-governmental corporation such as the IRS apparently can.
Even if it were Constitutional, it would establish... (show quote)


===========================================

There really does need to be an official definition of religion.
I don't really trust congress to make that definition but it needs to be made. Otherwise dog fighting and cockfighting groups as well as sex cults, queers, and any other oddball groups can claim to be a religion. There needs to be a way to define bona fide religions.

The first amendment prohibition against laws respecting "the establishment of religion" has been defined, I believe by the supreme court, as a prohibition of tne congress making laws that establish a state religion. Its purpose was to prevent government from establishing an official state religion like the Church of England was.

If the first amendment prihibited laws regarding religion or the free practice of it, there could be no laws against beheading, stoning, marrying babies, abortionist killings, rape or any other lewd or horrible crimes perpetrated in the name of religion.

There DOES need to be an official definition of religion. That definition should not define Islam as a religion.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 19:02:48   #
MajorAhrens Loc: Myrtle Beach
 
hprinze wrote:
===========================================

For the umpteenth time, Islam is not a religion. It is an evil, murderous, cruel, and dictatorial form of absolute government with total control of people. My suggestion was not that congress could pass laws about a religion, but that it could define religion and rule that Islam is NOT a religion.

Islam is no more a bona fide relugion than voodoo, sacrificing animals, or throwing virgins into volcanos.

you are right and wrong. Islam isn't a religion that's true. But the Muslims hide behind it for political reasons. Islam is a way of,(perverted), life. Growing up in the middle east and America has allowed me to see the side of Islam that very few Americans know about. The peace and all that garbage they spout here is totally different in Muslim countries. It's death to America, Israel and any entity that doesn't bow to these low life's. The sad thing is our politicians are selling us out. Democrat and Republican. And for what? So somebody's feelings don't get hurt? Tell that to the families that have had a loved one beheaded by these scumbags.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.