In 1958, at the beginning of the campaign to increase agriculture in the People's Republic of China, which was called "a great leap forward", it came to Mao Tse-Tung’s mind that sparrows ate too much grain. "They are enemies of the revolution," roared Mao, and he commanded to eliminate the sparrows, as if they were political enemies, with great conviction and tenacity. ---------------------- Immediately, the flunkey bureaucrats as good sycophants, to justify the order of the Great Helmsman and give it a character of scientific certainty, calculated how much grain eats each sparrow in a year and concluded with accuracy , that for every million sparrows killed, sixty thousand persons could be fed. -------- The National Academy of Sciences of the United States, contradicting the "wisdom" of the Great Helmsman, warned that sparrows preferred to eat more insects than grains and that agriculture would become vulnerable to attack by insects, because they would not have natural predators to contain them; but as a good Marxist, Mao did not accept the capitalist councils and redoubled his efforts .-------------It was then the locusts that revealed the "mistake" of the Red Emperor. And in less than three years, without sparrows to eliminate them, they gobbled up whatever farmland they found in their path. The result: a famine, which killed tens of millions of human beings in China. ------------- Finally, Mao revoked his campaign. "Forget them," he said about sparrows, and he also intended that the tens of millions of people who had starved to death because of his "mistake" were forgotten. He was defeated and received a great lesson from Nature that mocked the aphorism he had imposed: "Man must defeat nature". It was undoubtedly a genocide, attributable to the Great Helmsman, who had been opportunely warned of the mistake he was making with his "brilliant idea". -------The elimination of sparrows, because they ate much grain, can be equated with the campaign developed by those who intend to eliminate the consumption of fossil fuels, because they produce CO2 emissions; that according to an unproven theory, is a GREENHOUSE GAS, responsible for global warming, which is endangering the existence of life on the planet. --------------- On the other hand, a large amount of scientists agree with former Greenpeace president, Patrick Moore, doctor in ecology, when he says: “… carbon dioxide (CO2) is food for life, not pollution”, claiming that the use of fossil fuels actually saved life from an early disappearance, because CO2 was decreasing since the last ice age; and later he added: "... climate change is a complete hoax and a scam driven by corrupt scientists who are hooked on public subsidies that benefit them." ---------Other Scientists say that what is coming in the future is a new ice age, not a global warming; and that "anthropogenic warming" is not a commonly accepted scientific theory; although it is supported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), that is presented in the media as the overwhelming authority of an imposing international organization, which like any UN body, is political and its final conclusions are politically motivated, as stated by Professor Philip Stott, Biogeographer of the University of London; and we see how Professor Robert Stavins, who helped draft the UN Climate Report in 2014, revealed to Breitbart News magazine that "politicians demanded to change and edit parts of the report to suit their needs." ----------------The climatologist and researcher John L. Casey, in his book “Winter darkness: How the Sun is the cause of a 30-year cold wave”, published in 2014, assures that climate change is a fraud scheme of great proportions to enrich groups in collusion of politicians, scientists, the green industry and the UN. ----Shortly after Casey exposed his truth about "global warming", 1,000 emails and 2,000 documents emerged from top scientists on the subject, pointing out revealing conspiracies, collusions, data manipulation, destruction of information, and even admission of flaws, which were conveniently buried. ---------------In a short statement on May 16, 2014, Barack Hussein Obama stated that: "97% of scientists agree: climate change is real, man-made and dangerous." However, shortly thereafter, The Wall Street Journal responded that such a claim was a fiction; and when a new review was conducted, it was found that only 1% of scientists agreed with Obama's claim.----------- Outraged, 31,487 scientists signed a document stressing that there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, and other gases are causing or could, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic global warming and disruption of the Earth's climate. Even one of the founders of the "anthropogenic global warming" theory, Claude Allegre, resigned his position by admitting that the cause of this climate change is unknown .---------Al Gore, received the Nobel Prize in 2007 for his Global Warming Initiative; and in his speech upon receiving it, he stated: “… the waters of the oceans are warming to unprecedented levels and the polar ice caps will melt in the next seven years”; but 14 years have passed without such a phenomenon having happened .------------------------------- Upon leaving the White House, Mr. Gore's private fortune was $ 2 million. Today, his investments in "green technology" have increased his personal capital by hundreds of millions of dollars, as a result of having invested in a handful of companies, 14 of which received more than $ 2.5 billion in loans, grants, tax breaks and much more from the Obama administration. ------------How much will Mr. Gore receive, for his "green businesses”, of the $ 1.2 trillion now approved for infrastructure by Joe Biden? --------------------The above confirms what Moore and Casey expose in relation to the existing conspiracy to get rich using the fraud scheme of large proportions of climate change, to which politicians, scientists, the green industry and the United Nations lends themselves. --------Also, we see how Mr. Biden (irresponsibly) suspends petroleum and gas drilling in Arctic areas, stops fracking and revokes the permit for the Keystone XL pipeline, reducing US oil production, which was meeting the country's needs, leading it to import this fuel again; since the “green technology” does not cover the need that the oil (stopped producing) was satisfying; measure that does not reduce the consumption of fossil fuels and; therefore, it is not effective to reduce CO2 emissions; but it is detrimental to the economy of the nation and the American people, who are facing the rise in the price of gasoline; as well as all products and services, since everything is related to the price of oil, generating unnecessary inflation. Just to say he is taking action related to climate change. --------------------------On the other hand, the attack against the oil supply source could endanger the stability of the country if there is a 'climate change', not of global warming, but of 'global cooling' that has been predicted by climatologist John L. Casey in the research he has conducted, analyzing the scientific data from the federal government, which has been corroborated by 17 independent and individual organizations. Casey was a White House science advisor, national policy advisor, NASA headquarters consultant, and the engineer who investigated the causes of the space shuttle Challenger disaster on January 28, 1986. In addition, he had access to a number of classified documents. In his book, he argues that climate change has been a puzzling problem for years and warns of ominous changes in Earth's climate and the Sun.---------- Casey's study predicts a growing cataclysm started years ago, in which the planet's atmosphere and oceans are cooling instead of warming, which could unleash a series of natural ecological and geological calamities that would be difficult to deal with. ----------In a technical sense, the researcher attributes climatic changes to the effects of variations or oscillations in the temperature of the solar surface and their influence on the four climatic seasons of the year on Earth. ------------According to the above, the politicians, scientists, the green industry and the UN would be acting the same as Mao, when he ordered the slaughter of the sparrows, who acted out of scientific ignorance; in what currently, some do it out of greed and others (in the case of the Marxists) to gain power; both groups acting equally irresponsibly, since by eliminating fossil fuels, if the temperature of the solar surface decreases, suddenly, the so-called green technology would not work and what could save humanity from glaciation would have been destroyed; what if it happens, those who have caused this situation will suffer the consequences not of their "mistake" but of their "evilness", because if there is a sudden cooling, they will not have the luck of the Great Helmsman, who was not a victim of the genocide that he created , since he did not go hungry.---------- I hope that if a new ice age occurs, those who are promoting the defenselessness of humanity by eliminating fossil fuels, will be trapped by karma and somehow form, be the most affected. ------------ I am for the gradual replacement of fossil fuels, as other sources of energy that are cheaper and better are developed (like the one that Nikola Tesla wanted); never following such a hasty, disastrous and damaging method, as the one used for the withdrawal from Afghanistan, by pure politicking
In 1958, at the beginning of the campaign to incr... (
show quote)