One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Proven Fact! The DNC Servers Were Never Hacked!
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Mar 10, 2019 09:58:32   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there was no “Russian hack.” The DNC servers were not penetrated by the Russian military using a “sophisticated spearphishing attack.”

Oh, NO! The whole 'Russia Collusion Narrative' just got flushed!

https://uspoliticsandnews.com/former-nsa-technical-director-russia-didnt-hack-the-democrats/?inf_contact_key=e7cbc577ecd94131aecbd8a5f6f52a894dfbc39d7283b2cb89d5189540b69330

"The Trump campaign couldn’t have colluded with the Russians to hack the DNC emails. Because the DNC was never hacked."

It means they've been lying through their rotten teeth all along, just like we knew they were!

Now we know the 'real reason' they refused to hand their servers over to the FBI; they would have been 'outed' in seconds.

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 10:05:37   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there was no “Russian hack.” The DNC servers were not penetrated by the Russian military using a “sophisticated spearphishing attack.”

Oh, NO! The whole 'Russia Collusion Narrative' just got flushed!

https://uspoliticsandnews.com/former-nsa-technical-director-russia-didnt-hack-the-democrats/?inf_contact_key=e7cbc577ecd94131aecbd8a5f6f52a894dfbc39d7283b2cb89d5189540b69330

"The Trump campaign couldn’t have colluded with the Russians to hack the DNC emails. Because the DNC was never hacked."

It means they've been lying through their rotten teeth all along, just like we knew they were!

Now we know the 'real reason' they refused to hand their servers over to the FBI; they would have been 'outed' in seconds.
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there ... (show quote)


Excellent post. I have read that information elsewhere but glad to see it on OPP.

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 10:14:08   #
debeda
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there was no “Russian hack.” The DNC servers were not penetrated by the Russian military using a “sophisticated spearphishing attack.”

Oh, NO! The whole 'Russia Collusion Narrative' just got flushed!

https://uspoliticsandnews.com/former-nsa-technical-director-russia-didnt-hack-the-democrats/?inf_contact_key=e7cbc577ecd94131aecbd8a5f6f52a894dfbc39d7283b2cb89d5189540b69330

"The Trump campaign couldn’t have colluded with the Russians to hack the DNC emails. Because the DNC was never hacked."

It means they've been lying through their rotten teeth all along, just like we knew they were!

Now we know the 'real reason' they refused to hand their servers over to the FBI; they would have been 'outed' in seconds.
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there ... (show quote)


I have never seen this before. Does this bring us back around to Seth Rich?

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2019 10:42:34   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
debeda wrote:
I have never seen this before. Does this bring us back around to Seth Rich?

Ha! Probably, but that's beyond knowing for now. Seth Rich was one of the few who was blatantly murdered as a message to anyone else who might think about crossing the Clinton DNC, but don't quote me on that, because there's no 'proof'.

You may, however, use me as an 'anonymous source'.

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 11:07:05   #
debeda
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Ha! Probably, but that's beyond knowing for now. Seth Rich was one of the few who was blatantly murdered as a message to anyone else who might think about crossing the Clinton DNC, but don't quote me on that, because there's no 'proof'.

You may, however, use me as an 'anonymous source'.



Reply
Mar 10, 2019 11:15:25   #
trucksterbud
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there was no “Russian hack.” The DNC servers were not penetrated by the Russian military using a “sophisticated spearphishing attack.”

Oh, NO! The whole 'Russia Collusion Narrative' just got flushed!

https://uspoliticsandnews.com/former-nsa-technical-director-russia-didnt-hack-the-democrats/?inf_contact_key=e7cbc577ecd94131aecbd8a5f6f52a894dfbc39d7283b2cb89d5189540b69330

"The Trump campaign couldn’t have colluded with the Russians to hack the DNC emails. Because the DNC was never hacked."

It means they've been lying through their rotten teeth all along, just like we knew they were!

Now we know the 'real reason' they refused to hand their servers over to the FBI; they would have been 'outed' in seconds.
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there ... (show quote)


Ya, this story has come out several times from several angles.

Do the 'Enlightened One's" ever listen....???

Question: Why, if the Russian's were so suspect of the DNC hack, did it take the DNC crowd over 9 months to turn the servers over to CrowdStrike..?? BTW, the DNC never did let the FBI examine the servers. And by CrowdStrikes own analysis, the download speed was too great to be an online hack. Think 'thumbdrive' and Seth Rich..??

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 11:34:00   #
bahmer
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there was no “Russian hack.” The DNC servers were not penetrated by the Russian military using a “sophisticated spearphishing attack.”

Oh, NO! The whole 'Russia Collusion Narrative' just got flushed!

https://uspoliticsandnews.com/former-nsa-technical-director-russia-didnt-hack-the-democrats/?inf_contact_key=e7cbc577ecd94131aecbd8a5f6f52a894dfbc39d7283b2cb89d5189540b69330

"The Trump campaign couldn’t have colluded with the Russians to hack the DNC emails. Because the DNC was never hacked."

It means they've been lying through their rotten teeth all along, just like we knew they were!

Now we know the 'real reason' they refused to hand their servers over to the FBI; they would have been 'outed' in seconds.
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there ... (show quote)


Thanks for the post we all new it but couldn't prove it.

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2019 12:57:35   #
rumitoid
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there was no “Russian hack.” The DNC servers were not penetrated by the Russian military using a “sophisticated spearphishing attack.”

Oh, NO! The whole 'Russia Collusion Narrative' just got flushed!

https://uspoliticsandnews.com/former-nsa-technical-director-russia-didnt-hack-the-democrats/?inf_contact_key=e7cbc577ecd94131aecbd8a5f6f52a894dfbc39d7283b2cb89d5189540b69330

"The Trump campaign couldn’t have colluded with the Russians to hack the DNC emails. Because the DNC was never hacked."

It means they've been lying through their rotten teeth all along, just like we knew they were!

Now we know the 'real reason' they refused to hand their servers over to the FBI; they would have been 'outed' in seconds.
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there ... (show quote)


September 2015 - The FBI contacts the Democratic National Committee's help desk, cautioning the IT department that at least one computer has been compromised by Russian hackers. A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious.
November 2015 - The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia. DNC management later says that IT technicians failed to pass along the message that the system had been breached.
March 19, 2016 - Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta receives a phishing email masked as an alert from Google that another user had tried to access his account. It contains a link to a page where Podesta can change his password. He shares the email with a staffer from the campaign's help desk. The staffer replies with a typo - instead of typing "This is an illegitimate email," the staffer types "This is a legitimate email." Podesta follows the instructions and types a new password, allowing hackers to access his emails.

June 12, 2016 - During an interview on British television, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says that the website has obtained and will publish a batch of Clinton emails.
June 14, 2016 - The Washington Post reports hackers working for the Russian government accessed the DNC's computer system, stealing oppositional research on Donald Trump and viewing staffers' emails and chat exchanges. The Kremlin, however, denies that the government was linked to the hack, and a US official tells CNN that investigators have not yet concluded that the cyberattack was directed by the Russian government.
June 15, 2016 - A cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC posts a public notice on its website describing an attack on the political committee's computer network by two groups associated with Russian intelligence. According to the post, two Russian-backed groups called "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" tunneled into the committee's computer system. In response, a blogger called Guccifer 2.0 claims that he alone conducted the hack, not the Russians. As proof, he posts internal DNC memos and opposition research on Trump. Furthermore, Guccifer 2.0 claims to have passed along thousands of files to WikiLeaks. Trump offers his own theory on the origins of the attack: suggesting in a statement that the DNC hacked itself to distract from Clinton's email scandal.
July 22, 2016 - Days before the Democratic National Convention, WikiLeaks publishes nearly 20,000 emails hacked from the DNC server. The documents include notes in which DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz insults staffers from the Bernie Sanders campaign and messages that suggest the organization was favoring Clinton rather than remaining neutral. Wasserman Schultz resigns in the aftermath of the leak.
July 25, 2016 - The FBI announces it has launched an investigation into the DNC hack. Although the statement doesn't indicate that the agency has a particular suspect or suspects in mind, US officials tell CNN they think the cyberattack is linked to Russia.
July 27, 2016 - During a press conference, Trump talks about Clinton's use of a private email server while she was secretary of state and calls on hackers to find deleted emails. "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," says Trump. Newt Gingrich, a Trump surrogate, defends Trump in a Tweet, dismissing the comment as a "joke."
August 12, 2016 - Hackers publish cell phone numbers and personal email addresses for Nancy Pelosi and other members of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
September 1, 2016 - During an interview with Bloomberg News, President Vladimir Putin says that he and the Russian government have no ties to the hackers. He says that the identity of the culprit or culprits is not as important as the content of the leaks, and ultimately the hackers revealed important information for voters.
September 22, 2016 - Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Adam Schiff, ranking members of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees, issue a joint statement declaring that based on information they received during congressional briefings, they believe that Russian intelligence agencies are carrying out a plan to interfere with the election. They call on Putin to order a halt to the activities.
September 26, 2016 - During a presidential debate with Clinton, Trump questions whether the DNC cyberattack was carried out by a state-sponsored group or a lone hacker. "It could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds."
October-November 2016 - Over the course of a month, WikiLeaks publishes more than 58,000 messages hacked from the account of John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman.
October 6, 2016 - DCLeaks, a self-described collective of "hacktivists" seeking to expose the influence of special interests on elected officials, publishes a batch of documents stolen from Clinton ally Capricia Marshall. DCLeaks is later identified as a front for Russian military intelligence.
October 7, 2016 - The Department of Homeland Security and the Office of National Intelligence on Election Security issues a statement declaring that the intelligence community is "confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions." According to the statement, document releases on websites WikiLeaks and DCLeaks mirror the methods and motivations of past Russian-directed cyberattacks.
November 29, 2016 - A group of Democratic senators sends a letter to President Barack Obama calling on intelligence agencies to declassify information about "the Russian Government and the US election." Sources later tell CNN that new intelligence has been shared with lawmakers suggesting that Russia's purpose for meddling in the election was to sway voters towards Trump, rather than broadly undermining confidence in the system.
December 9, 2016 - The Washington Post reports the CIA has determined that Russian hacking was conducted to boost Trump and hurt Clinton during the presidential campaign. The Trump transition team dismisses the CIA's findings. President Obama asks intelligence agencies to review the hacking incidents in 2016 and other cyberattacks on political campaigns dating back to 2008. The agencies are asked to deliver their findings before Obama leaves office on January 20. A Russian foreign ministry spokesman expresses skepticism about the review and asks US investigators to share their evidence of government-sponsored cyber espionage. Meanwhile, media critics question the Post's reliance on anonymous sources for the CIA report and advise readers to be wary of claims in the article due to the lack of publicly available evidence to support the spy agency's conclusions.

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 13:20:42   #
Gatsby
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there was no “Russian hack.” The DNC servers were not penetrated by the Russian military using a “sophisticated spearphishing attack.”

Oh, NO! The whole 'Russia Collusion Narrative' just got flushed!

https://uspoliticsandnews.com/former-nsa-technical-director-russia-didnt-hack-the-democrats/?inf_contact_key=e7cbc577ecd94131aecbd8a5f6f52a894dfbc39d7283b2cb89d5189540b69330

"The Trump campaign couldn’t have colluded with the Russians to hack the DNC emails. Because the DNC was never hacked."

It means they've been lying through their rotten teeth all along, just like we knew they were!

Now we know the 'real reason' they refused to hand their servers over to the FBI; they would have been 'outed' in seconds.
So, what does this mean? In all likelihood, there ... (show quote)


The real question is, why didn't the FBI WANT to examine the DNC server?

They had the power to seize it, who prevented that from happening?

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 13:21:39   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
rumitoid wrote:
September 2015 - The FBI contacts the Democratic National Committee's help desk, cautioning the IT department that at least one computer has been compromised by Russian hackers. A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious.
November 2015 - The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia. DNC management later says that IT technicians failed to pass along the message that the system had been breached.
March 19, 2016 - Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta receives a phishing email masked as an alert from Google that another user had tried to access his account. It contains a link to a page where Podesta can change his password. He shares the email with a staffer from the campaign's help desk. The staffer replies with a typo - instead of typing "This is an illegitimate email," the staffer types "This is a legitimate email." Podesta follows the instructions and types a new password, allowing hackers to access his emails.

June 12, 2016 - During an interview on British television, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says that the website has obtained and will publish a batch of Clinton emails.
June 14, 2016 - The Washington Post reports hackers working for the Russian government accessed the DNC's computer system, stealing oppositional research on Donald Trump and viewing staffers' emails and chat exchanges. The Kremlin, however, denies that the government was linked to the hack, and a US official tells CNN that investigators have not yet concluded that the cyberattack was directed by the Russian government.
June 15, 2016 - A cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC posts a public notice on its website describing an attack on the political committee's computer network by two groups associated with Russian intelligence. According to the post, two Russian-backed groups called "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" tunneled into the committee's computer system. In response, a blogger called Guccifer 2.0 claims that he alone conducted the hack, not the Russians. As proof, he posts internal DNC memos and opposition research on Trump. Furthermore, Guccifer 2.0 claims to have passed along thousands of files to WikiLeaks. Trump offers his own theory on the origins of the attack: suggesting in a statement that the DNC hacked itself to distract from Clinton's email scandal.
July 22, 2016 - Days before the Democratic National Convention, WikiLeaks publishes nearly 20,000 emails hacked from the DNC server. The documents include notes in which DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz insults staffers from the Bernie Sanders campaign and messages that suggest the organization was favoring Clinton rather than remaining neutral. Wasserman Schultz resigns in the aftermath of the leak.
July 25, 2016 - The FBI announces it has launched an investigation into the DNC hack. Although the statement doesn't indicate that the agency has a particular suspect or suspects in mind, US officials tell CNN they think the cyberattack is linked to Russia.
July 27, 2016 - During a press conference, Trump talks about Clinton's use of a private email server while she was secretary of state and calls on hackers to find deleted emails. "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," says Trump. Newt Gingrich, a Trump surrogate, defends Trump in a Tweet, dismissing the comment as a "joke."
August 12, 2016 - Hackers publish cell phone numbers and personal email addresses for Nancy Pelosi and other members of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
September 1, 2016 - During an interview with Bloomberg News, President Vladimir Putin says that he and the Russian government have no ties to the hackers. He says that the identity of the culprit or culprits is not as important as the content of the leaks, and ultimately the hackers revealed important information for voters.
September 22, 2016 - Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Adam Schiff, ranking members of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees, issue a joint statement declaring that based on information they received during congressional briefings, they believe that Russian intelligence agencies are carrying out a plan to interfere with the election. They call on Putin to order a halt to the activities.
September 26, 2016 - During a presidential debate with Clinton, Trump questions whether the DNC cyberattack was carried out by a state-sponsored group or a lone hacker. "It could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds."
October-November 2016 - Over the course of a month, WikiLeaks publishes more than 58,000 messages hacked from the account of John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman.
October 6, 2016 - DCLeaks, a self-described collective of "hacktivists" seeking to expose the influence of special interests on elected officials, publishes a batch of documents stolen from Clinton ally Capricia Marshall. DCLeaks is later identified as a front for Russian military intelligence.
October 7, 2016 - The Department of Homeland Security and the Office of National Intelligence on Election Security issues a statement declaring that the intelligence community is "confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions." According to the statement, document releases on websites WikiLeaks and DCLeaks mirror the methods and motivations of past Russian-directed cyberattacks.
November 29, 2016 - A group of Democratic senators sends a letter to President Barack Obama calling on intelligence agencies to declassify information about "the Russian Government and the US election." Sources later tell CNN that new intelligence has been shared with lawmakers suggesting that Russia's purpose for meddling in the election was to sway voters towards Trump, rather than broadly undermining confidence in the system.
December 9, 2016 - The Washington Post reports the CIA has determined that Russian hacking was conducted to boost Trump and hurt Clinton during the presidential campaign. The Trump transition team dismisses the CIA's findings. President Obama asks intelligence agencies to review the hacking incidents in 2016 and other cyberattacks on political campaigns dating back to 2008. The agencies are asked to deliver their findings before Obama leaves office on January 20. A Russian foreign ministry spokesman expresses skepticism about the review and asks US investigators to share their evidence of government-sponsored cyber espionage. Meanwhile, media critics question the Post's reliance on anonymous sources for the CIA report and advise readers to be wary of claims in the article due to the lack of publicly available evidence to support the spy agency's conclusions.
September 2015 - The FBI contacts the Democratic N... (show quote)

And all of that from the FBI without ever once, not even once, being able to gain access to the DNC servers. No wonder the DNC wanted to keep the FBI as far away from their servers as possible. No telling what they might have unearthed!

I smell a rat.

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 13:26:26   #
debeda
 
rumitoid wrote:
September 2015 - The FBI contacts the Democratic National Committee's help desk, cautioning the IT department that at least one computer has been compromised by Russian hackers. A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious.
November 2015 - The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia. DNC management later says that IT technicians failed to pass along the message that the system had been breached.
March 19, 2016 - Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta receives a phishing email masked as an alert from Google that another user had tried to access his account. It contains a link to a page where Podesta can change his password. He shares the email with a staffer from the campaign's help desk. The staffer replies with a typo - instead of typing "This is an illegitimate email," the staffer types "This is a legitimate email." Podesta follows the instructions and types a new password, allowing hackers to access his emails.

June 12, 2016 - During an interview on British television, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says that the website has obtained and will publish a batch of Clinton emails.
June 14, 2016 - The Washington Post reports hackers working for the Russian government accessed the DNC's computer system, stealing oppositional research on Donald Trump and viewing staffers' emails and chat exchanges. The Kremlin, however, denies that the government was linked to the hack, and a US official tells CNN that investigators have not yet concluded that the cyberattack was directed by the Russian government.
June 15, 2016 - A cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC posts a public notice on its website describing an attack on the political committee's computer network by two groups associated with Russian intelligence. According to the post, two Russian-backed groups called "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" tunneled into the committee's computer system. In response, a blogger called Guccifer 2.0 claims that he alone conducted the hack, not the Russians. As proof, he posts internal DNC memos and opposition research on Trump. Furthermore, Guccifer 2.0 claims to have passed along thousands of files to WikiLeaks. Trump offers his own theory on the origins of the attack: suggesting in a statement that the DNC hacked itself to distract from Clinton's email scandal.
July 22, 2016 - Days before the Democratic National Convention, WikiLeaks publishes nearly 20,000 emails hacked from the DNC server. The documents include notes in which DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz insults staffers from the Bernie Sanders campaign and messages that suggest the organization was favoring Clinton rather than remaining neutral. Wasserman Schultz resigns in the aftermath of the leak.
July 25, 2016 - The FBI announces it has launched an investigation into the DNC hack. Although the statement doesn't indicate that the agency has a particular suspect or suspects in mind, US officials tell CNN they think the cyberattack is linked to Russia.
July 27, 2016 - During a press conference, Trump talks about Clinton's use of a private email server while she was secretary of state and calls on hackers to find deleted emails. "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," says Trump. Newt Gingrich, a Trump surrogate, defends Trump in a Tweet, dismissing the comment as a "joke."
August 12, 2016 - Hackers publish cell phone numbers and personal email addresses for Nancy Pelosi and other members of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
September 1, 2016 - During an interview with Bloomberg News, President Vladimir Putin says that he and the Russian government have no ties to the hackers. He says that the identity of the culprit or culprits is not as important as the content of the leaks, and ultimately the hackers revealed important information for voters.
September 22, 2016 - Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Adam Schiff, ranking members of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees, issue a joint statement declaring that based on information they received during congressional briefings, they believe that Russian intelligence agencies are carrying out a plan to interfere with the election. They call on Putin to order a halt to the activities.
September 26, 2016 - During a presidential debate with Clinton, Trump questions whether the DNC cyberattack was carried out by a state-sponsored group or a lone hacker. "It could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds."
October-November 2016 - Over the course of a month, WikiLeaks publishes more than 58,000 messages hacked from the account of John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman.
October 6, 2016 - DCLeaks, a self-described collective of "hacktivists" seeking to expose the influence of special interests on elected officials, publishes a batch of documents stolen from Clinton ally Capricia Marshall. DCLeaks is later identified as a front for Russian military intelligence.
October 7, 2016 - The Department of Homeland Security and the Office of National Intelligence on Election Security issues a statement declaring that the intelligence community is "confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions." According to the statement, document releases on websites WikiLeaks and DCLeaks mirror the methods and motivations of past Russian-directed cyberattacks.
November 29, 2016 - A group of Democratic senators sends a letter to President Barack Obama calling on intelligence agencies to declassify information about "the Russian Government and the US election." Sources later tell CNN that new intelligence has been shared with lawmakers suggesting that Russia's purpose for meddling in the election was to sway voters towards Trump, rather than broadly undermining confidence in the system.
December 9, 2016 - The Washington Post reports the CIA has determined that Russian hacking was conducted to boost Trump and hurt Clinton during the presidential campaign. The Trump transition team dismisses the CIA's findings. President Obama asks intelligence agencies to review the hacking incidents in 2016 and other cyberattacks on political campaigns dating back to 2008. The agencies are asked to deliver their findings before Obama leaves office on January 20. A Russian foreign ministry spokesman expresses skepticism about the review and asks US investigators to share their evidence of government-sponsored cyber espionage. Meanwhile, media critics question the Post's reliance on anonymous sources for the CIA report and advise readers to be wary of claims in the article due to the lack of publicly available evidence to support the spy agency's conclusions.
September 2015 - The FBI contacts the Democratic N... (show quote)


Even if the above is the true sequence of events, why would the FBI not offer assistance in such an extreme case and, if they did, why would the DNC not accept their help. Honestly, the more threads that get pulled on this thing the more tangled it gets

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2019 13:36:22   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
Gatsby wrote:
The real question is, why didn't the FBI WANT to examine the DNC server?

They had the power to seize it, who prevented that from happening?

Constitutional safeguards against unreasonable search and seizure, that's who. No, they did not have the power to seize it. The FBI is constrained by the same Federal laws that restrain other Federal agencies. First they had to show just cause to, and obtain a search warrant from a Federal judge. Then, and only then, could they search the DNC's servers without their permission. Good luck finding a Federal judge who would sign off on that, especially after eight years of Obama terrorizing the entire system with executive order after executive order.

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 13:39:51   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
debeda wrote:
Even if the above is the true sequence of events, why would the FBI not offer assistance in such an extreme case and, if they did, why would the DNC not accept their help. Honestly, the more threads that get pulled on this thing the more tangled it gets

You mean they've wrapped a mystery in an enigma and surrounded it with misdirection and tangential leads? Welcome to the DNC!

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 13:41:41   #
debeda
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
You mean they've wrapped a mystery in an enigma and surrounded it with misdirection and tangential leads? Welcome to the DNC!


Yes. Ugh

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 13:43:03   #
rumitoid
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
And all of that from the FBI without ever once, not even once, being able to gain access to the DNC servers. No wonder the DNC wanted to keep the FBI as far away from their servers as possible. No telling what they might have unearthed!

I smell a rat.


On 6/12, The FBI detected that at least one computer had been compromised by Russian hackers. How did they come to that conclusion is they had not accessed DNC servers?

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.