Rancher's Trial in Las Vegas (Page 3): "The Democrat lead Congress, Senate Majority leader Harry Reid, was selling our nation out to foreign communist robber barons. How did you skip...

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

CounterRevolutionary wrote:

Eagleye, you write: "This is an investigation... (show quote)

"The Democrat lead Congress, Senate Majority leader Harry Reid, was selling our nation out to foreign communist robber barons. How did you skip that part of the story?" - CounterRevolutionary

A reasonable question, CR. SOOOO much to cover on this episode. You have mentioned a very big point here.
I just want more people to quit ignoring all the facts, and to realize what is at stake for America's future as a free Republic.

Like I keep saying;
PASS THIS ON TO ALL CONTACTS. THIS TRIAL IS BEING BLACKED OUT.

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

eagleye13 wrote:

"The Democrat lead Congress, Senate Majority leader Harry Reid, was selling our nation out to foreign communist robber barons.

Just like Hillary was doing America was up and has been up forsale by the demo's !

CowboyMilt

4430 wrote:

Yes to LaVoy ponied up with his life just like our founding fathers did and faced the evil of tyranny !

This has opened a "sore" in my brain & I am going to say a few more things. LaVoy didn't deserve to be shot down like a dog, period! He was shot several times & as far as I could see he didn't really try to shoot at anyone. I'm not even sure he had a gun on his person. "They" (the feds) all claimed he was armed & was going for it...but in my viewing the helicopter films, I couldn't really tell one way or the other for sure...I personally think his arm action was reflex from being shot several times while he stood with his arms "up"! I'm just glad I'm not any of the ones who fired at him as they are dealing with something they probably would rather not deal with & they are probably doing a lot of "human" rationalization...they know what happened & they have to live with it. I truly think the "feds" really wanted to shoot everyone in Finicum's truck in that snow bank when they originally stopped...by the time they got to the final "roundup" the adrenalin was so high that it was out of control...and then it was over & LaVoy lay dead with several bullets in his body...he was no longer a "danger"...was he??? Then began the scurrying in the minds...

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

4430 wrote:

Another one that thinks we must obey the fed government at all cost makes no difference if it's committing a wrong and illegal act we must all obey

..so you disagree?

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

CowboyMilt wrote:

This has opened a "sore" in my brain &am... (show quote)

The survivers have been held in jail without bail for 22 months, "because they were dangerous".
The jury is finding out differently.
The government is looking real bad, hence the black out.

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

Dummy Boy wrote:

..so you disagree?

Kinda looks that way doesn't it .

If the government is wrong we the people have a responsibility to hold them accountable !

I should have said that differently as we some of the people have a responsibility to hold them accountable there will always be a certain amount of folks that will chose to be in lock step with those promoting tyranny !

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

4430 wrote:

Kinda looks that way doesn't it .

If the government is wrong we the people have a responsibility to hold them accountable !

I should have said that differently as we some of the people have a responsibility to hold them accountable there will always be a certain amount of folks that will chose to be in lock step with those promoting tyranny !

It is past time for more Americans to wake up, and step up to fighting for what is right.
If they don't, we all will have a bleaker future; except the PTB, sitting in DC and in their ivory towers.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

4430 wrote:

Kinda looks that way doesn't it .

If the government is wrong we the people have a responsibility to hold them accountable !

I should have said that differently as we some of the people have a responsibility to hold them accountable there will always be a certain amount of folks that will chose to be in lock step with those promoting tyranny !

That's okay. Doesn't bother me one way or the other.

I read about a study done in Africa that showed that a lack of open grazing is actually causing problems with the habitats become less resilient.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Dummy Boy wrote:

That's okay. Doesn't bother me one way or the other.

I read about a study done in Africa that showed that a lack of open grazing is actually causing problems with the habitats become less resilient.

Dummy Boy; as almost always, you have not watched the Lavoy video.
He explains how the BLM was preventing him to make good and proper use of the land when it was available.
Here try again:
Listen to LaVoy Finicum Speak. (Before he was Murdered by Our Government) A GREAT AMERICAN RANCHER
https://youtu.be/7gXRZQOIogs

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

eagleye13 wrote:

Dummy Boy; as almost always, you have not watched the Lavoy video.
He explains how the BLM was preventing him to make good and proper use of the land when it was available.
Here try again:
Listen to LaVoy Finicum Speak. (Before he was Murdered by Our Government) A GREAT AMERICAN RANCHER
https://youtu.be/7gXRZQOIogs

I don't disagree-I support grazing...did I spell that right....doesn't look right.

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

Dummy Boy wrote:

I don't disagree-I support grazing...did I spell that right....doesn't look right.

I'm glad to hear that DB.

It's a proven fact controlled grazing << and not government controlled helps make the eco system work as it should .

Many of the wild fires are caused by the eco nuts not wanting any grazing at all .

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

4430 wrote:

I'm glad to hear that DB.

It's a proven fact controlled grazing << and not government controlled helps make the eco system work as it should .

Many of the wild fires are caused by the eco nuts not wanting any grazing at all .

"That's okay. Doesn't bother me one way or the other.

I read about a study done in Africa that showed that a lack of open grazing is actually causing problems with the habitats become less resilient"
- Dummy Boy
I failed to understand your point, Dummy Boy.
What was it?
Do you back the ranchers?

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

eagleye13 wrote:

"That's okay. Doesn't bother me one way or the other.

I read about a study done in Africa that showed that a lack of open grazing is actually causing problems with the habitats become less resilient"
- Dummy Boy
I failed to understand your point, Dummy Boy.
What was it?
Do you back the ranchers?

There's a big difference in controlled and open grazing it's a proven fact and controlled grazing promotes better habitats and wildlife .

Yes I do back ranchers the folks on the ground know more about the eco system than bureaucrats

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

4430 wrote:

There's a big difference in controlled and open grazing it's a proven fact and controlled grazing promotes better habitats and wildlife .

Yes I do back ranchers the folks on the ground know more about the eco system than bureaucrats

I know we agree 4430.
The question was directed at dummy Boy.
Dummy Boy wrote:
I don't disagree-I support grazing...did I spell that right....doesn't look right.

CowboyMilt

eagleye13 wrote:

The survivers have been held in jail without bail for 22 months, "because they were dangerous".
The jury is finding out differently.
The government is looking real bad, hence the black out.

THIS HAS BEEN ABOUT 2 FULL YEARS OF FARCE BROUGHT ON BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION...FOR WHAT? LAND? GOD'S LAND?