One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Assasination of JFK
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
Oct 23, 2017 09:41:58   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
dtucker300 wrote:
The release will be items in the national archives. But what's not in the archives will be the real story. Conspiracy theorists are going to come out from everywhere with all kinds of new BS.


I do believe you are right...

We do have a right to know but what good is it at this point?? We will not ever know who really did it..

Interesting reading though..I hope Trump does open it up as well as unseal the FBI informant that knows ever so much of that sell off crooked Hills deal with Russia over the Uranium deal!! That is of major interest now..

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 11:44:20   #
hejohnson43 Loc: Portal, Ga.
 
You are right, in one of the video's, someone picked up part of a skull with what looked like a 45 cal. bullet stuck in it. I would have to guess it was part of JFK's skull. I have talked to people who saw what I saw, but haven't seen it since. What would it take to cut that part out?

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 14:14:43   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
permafrost wrote:
trump did nothing to further this.. It has been scheduled by law from 1992.

trump could block the release, but release date had nothing to do with him..

Do a quick search if you wish.. near every article will contain this information..


The release of the information being held in secret at the National Archives — including several thousand never-before-seen documents — was mandated to occur by Oct. 26 under a 1992 law that sought to quell conspiracy theories about the assassination.

Mr. Trump has the power to block the release of the documents, and intelligence agencies have pressured him to do so for at least some of them. The agencies are concerned that information contained in some of the documents could damage national security interests.
trump did nothing to further this.. It has been sc... (show quote)


It is an absolute certainty that the only people who don't know what is in those papers are the American citizens. After fifty years what could possibly affect national security? These agencies are concerned with their own security, not ours..

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2017 14:26:21   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
pafret wrote:
It is an absolute certainty that the only people who don't know what is in those papers are the American citizens. After fifty years what could possibly affect national security? These agencies are concerned with their own security, not ours..



Yes to that idea...

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 14:47:28   #
hejohnson43 Loc: Portal, Ga.
 
We might not know who pulled the triggers, but we should be able to figure out who ordered it. My money is on the CIA, who JFK wanted to do away with. Plus there was a lot of Cuban's that were pissed off at him because he pulled the air support that was to cover the invasion of Cuba. Most people don't realize that the CIA put Castro in power in the first place.

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 15:36:06   #
Nickolai
 
iFrank wrote:
I wonder why other POTUS's didn't do this long ago, what were they hiding. Were they compensated for not declassifying the JFK documents. Go Trump, thats the "Ol pepper" leave no stone unturned.






They could not be de classified until the law mandated de classification Trump is simply following the dictates of the law He isn't doing any thing special

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 15:40:11   #
iFrank Loc: San Antonio
 
Nickolai wrote:
They could not be de classified until the law mandated de classification Trump is simply following the dictates of the law He isn't doing any thing special


As I was saying, the other dumb pres. didn't do anything to make it available to the public. They just let the date get postponed, That's all. Is that clear lefty.

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2017 15:54:14   #
Nickolai
 
okie don wrote:
JFK 'Fired' Allen Dulles from CIA, John Foster Dulles' brother. JFK wanted to 'Dis-band' the CIA. ' Poppy 'Bush was in Dallas 11/22/63 yet denied it!
Just a few 'FACTS' to ponder. (:





Richard Nixon was in Dallas that day also. Poppy Bush was still a CIA agent that day in 1963. E Howard Hunt and Poppy Bush were both CIA agents when they helped organize the Bay Of Pigs. E Howard Hunt led the burglars operation into Watergate as ordered by Richard Nixon who was desperate to know what the Democrats had on him that they could use in the up coming election of 1972. I personally think he was paranoid that the Democrats might have information about his involvement in the JFK assassination. Nixon him self was a prote'ge' of Prescot Bush . GW's grampa a politician and wall street executive in the Brown Brothers Harriman bank that sold Nazi bonds up until 1942 when Congress stopped it under the trading with the enemy act and became a Senator from Connecticut in 1951

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 16:21:25   #
Nickolai
 
lindajoy wrote:
I do believe you are right...

We do have a right to know but what good is it at this point?? We will not ever know who really did it..

Interesting reading though..I hope Trump does open it up as well as unseal the FBI informant that knows ever so much of that sell off crooked Hills deal with Russia over the Uranium deal!! That is of major interest now..






In the months leading up to the 2016 United States presidential election, stories abounded about the relationships between the Clinton Foundation and various foreign entities.
May 2015 saw the publication of a book called Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, an exposé of alleged Clinton Foundation corruption written by Peter Schweizer, a former Hoover Institution fellow and editor-at-large at the right-wing media company Breitbart.
A chapter in the book suggests that the Clinton family and Russia each may have benefited from a “pay-for-play” scheme while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, involving the transfer of U.S. uranium reserves to the new Russian owners of an international mining operation in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
The mining company, Uranium One, was originally based in South Africa, but merged in 2007 with Canada-based UrAsia Energy. Shareholders there retained a controlling interest until 2010, when Russia’s nuclear agency, Rosatom, completed purchase of a 51% stake. Hillary Clinton played a part in the transaction because it involved the transfer of ownership of a material deemed important to national security — uranium, amounting to one-fifth of U.S. reserves — thus requiring the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), on which the U.S. Secretary of State sits.
During the same time frame that the acquisition took place, Schweizer claims in Clinton Cash, the Clinton Foundation accepted contributions from nine individuals associated with Uranium One totaling more than $100 million. Among those who followed him in citing the transaction as an example of alleged Clinton corruption was GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump, who said during a June 2016 speech in New York City: (Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20% of America’s uranium holdings to Russia, while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. )

Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself “never intervened” in committee matters. A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:'

Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state. 
Of the remaining individuals connected with Uranium One who donated to the Clinton Foundation, only one was found to have contributed during the same time frame that the deal was taking place, according to The New York Times — Ian Telfer, the company’s chairman:

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 16:56:12   #
hejohnson43 Loc: Portal, Ga.
 
It was said back in the middle 60's that all information would be held a secret for 50 years. It has been over 50 years, 54 years to be exact. I would guess that some of the people who ordered the killing are still alive, or someone who was involved in the killing is still alive. I believe his name is George H.W. Bush.

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 16:59:20   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
hejohnson43 wrote:
It was said back in the middle 60's that all information would be held a secret for 50 years. It has been over 50 years, 54 years to be exact. I would guess that some of the people who ordered the killing are still alive, or someone who was involved in the killing is still alive. I believe his name is George H.W. Bush.


Killing??? Killing of who???

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2017 18:32:20   #
kcstargoat
 
proud republican wrote:
Conspiracy theory junkies this one's for you,,,,Do you want to know who really killed JFK?? You might find out soon enough thanks to President Trump who wants files on his assasination to go public...


Assassination is spelled with four "s'."

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 18:34:10   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
kcstargoat wrote:
Assassination is spelled with four "s'."


Thank you,KC...Is this the only thing you got out of my thread???

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 18:39:12   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
proud republican wrote:
Killing??? Killing of who???


Cock Robin. He was done in by a Sparrow using a bow and arrow.

Reply
Oct 23, 2017 19:00:11   #
hejohnson43 Loc: Portal, Ga.
 
The whole article was about the assassination of J.F.K. I keep forgetting that most of you were not alive when he got killed. I will try to be more informative next time.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.