Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria? #4
This discussion was started in a previous topic. You can find it here.
Aug 8, 2017 19:08:22 #
amadjuster wrote:
That is not what I said. I said the post was stupid.
Emarine said he agreed with me on nuclear weapons.
Since you're saying the post is stupid, you're implying that emarine is stupid for agreeing with me.
Aug 8, 2017 19:21:49 #
payne1000 wrote:
Iran is allowing international nuclear inspections, so how are they on their way to having nukes?
When did Iran threaten to destroy America?
Iran is allowing international nuclear inspections, so how are they on their way to having nukes?
When did Iran threaten to destroy America?
IAEA mission to Iran ends in failure; Iran still defiant
U.N. Inspectors’ Iran Nuclear Mission Fails as Tehran Denies Access to Key Site
Nuclear Inspectors Say Their Mission to Iran Has Failed
Iran, Nukes and the Failure of Skepticism
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran isn’t providing needed access or information
Aug 8, 2017 20:17:48 #
payne1000 wrote:
My argument has always been that sheetrock walls have a lot of strength. Those in the twin towers which had steel studs on 16" centers were much stronger than the sheetrock walls which hold up your ceiling and roof. Those interior walls by themselves would have prevented the floors in the towers from pancaking on the floor below.
Sheetrock by itself can support a lot of weight:
Sheetrock by itself can support a lot of weight:
Those interior walls by themselves would have prevented the floors in the towers from pancaking on the floor below.
Sheetrock by itself can support a lot of weight
The magnitude of ignorance is amazing putz... you are the bug on the windshield...
Aug 8, 2017 20:52:31 #
payne1000 wrote:
Emarine said he agreed with me on nuclear weapons.
Since you're saying the post is stupid, you're implying that emarine is stupid for agreeing with me.
Since you're saying the post is stupid, you're implying that emarine is stupid for agreeing with me.
So I see you're attempting to destroy my credibility...Time to set the record straight... I only agree that nuke warfare is a bad idea for all everywhere... anything past this issue you're a dork...
Aug 8, 2017 21:20:36 #
emarine wrote:
"In a nuclear world, the true enemy is war itself"So I see you're attempting to destroy my credibility...Time to set the record straight... I only agree that nuke warfare is a bad idea for all everywhere... anything past this issue you're a dork...
Aug 8, 2017 21:31:51 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
We should next day air the video to Korea... The little bastard likes Military shit...
Aug 8, 2017 22:05:25 #
emarine wrote:
Those interior walls by themselves would have prevented the floors in the towers from pancaking on the floor below.
Sheetrock by itself can support a lot of weight
The magnitude of ignorance is amazing putz... you are the bug on the windshield...
Sheetrock by itself can support a lot of weight
The magnitude of ignorance is amazing putz... you are the bug on the windshield...
Is that a rebuttal?
All I see are insults.
Insults indicate you have no rebuttal.
Insults also indicate you know you are losing the argument.
Aug 8, 2017 22:10:33 #
emarine wrote:
So I see you're attempting to destroy my credibility...Time to set the record straight... I only agree that nuke warfare is a bad idea for all everywhere... anything past this issue you're a dork...
It's impossible to destroy credibility which doesn't exist.
Reveal your identity if you want credibility.
Unnamed sources have no credibility.
Aug 8, 2017 22:21:50 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Your first four links are 5 to 6 years old. That would make them before the Obama Iran deal.
Your last article is from the Washington Post whose owner has a $600 million contract with the CIA.
If the CIA asked Jeff Bezos to print propaganda against Iran, do you think he would refuse?
Aug 8, 2017 22:27:44 #
Aug 8, 2017 22:39:57 #
payne1000 wrote:
Is that a rebuttal?
All I see are insults.
Insults indicate you have no rebuttal.
Insults also indicate you know you are losing the argument.
All I see are insults.
Insults indicate you have no rebuttal.
Insults also indicate you know you are losing the argument.
This is such a standard post from you, you must have it as a macro. That way you don't have to think.
Aug 8, 2017 22:41:57 #
payne1000 wrote:
You're teaching your grandchildren to be as stupid as yourself.
Look what you taught them:
Look what you taught them:
I'll bet they are all from the Arkansas side of Texarkana. Oh, you are from the Arkansas side of Texarkana. That explains everything.
Aug 9, 2017 08:42:09 #
amadjuster wrote:
This is such a standard post from you, you must have it as a macro. That way you don't have to think.
Attempted character assassination is standard procedure for Zionist shills.
Aug 9, 2017 08:46:56 #
amadjuster wrote:
I'll bet they are all from the Arkansas side of Texarkana. Oh, you are from the Arkansas side of Texarkana. That explains everything.
Does it explain why I drive a Prius, produce my own electricity with solar panels and recycle everything even when it means driving 40 miles to the recycling center.
Does it explain why I vote Green Party?
Aug 9, 2017 09:42:37 #
payne1000 wrote:
Is that a rebuttal?
All I see are insults.
Insults indicate you have no rebuttal.
Insults also indicate you know you are losing the argument.
All I see are insults.
Insults indicate you have no rebuttal.
Insults also indicate you know you are losing the argument.
In reality we don't argue ... the laws of motion are well proven... YouTube is wide open to anything anyone wants to post... same as your BS... So did the bug impacting the cars windshield slow the car putz?... simple question just like sheetrock...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.