One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria? #3
This topic is locked to prevent further replies.
This discussion was started in a previous topic. You can find it here.
This discussion is continued in a new topic. You can find it here.
Page 1 of 99 next> last>>
 
This topic was split up because it has reached high page count.
You can find the follow-up topic here.
 
Jun 11, 2017 18:03:16   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
About the same time you finally realize you're a idiot...


Real idiots such as yourself think floor slabs can collapse on each other at great speed when those floors actually have walls between them.
Real idiots hide behind cowardly anonymity because they don't want the idiotic lies they post to be connected to who they are in real life.

.

walls made of flimsy cardboard.
walls made of flimsy cardboard....

75 lb. block of concrete dropped from a foot above the flimsy walls.
75 lb. block of concrete dropped from a foot above...

Flimsy cardboard walls stop falling mass weighing hundreds of times more than the cardboard.
Flimsy cardboard walls stop falling mass weighing ...

Who's the real idiot, emarine?
Who's the real idiot, emarine?...

Reply
Jun 11, 2017 18:05:58   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
You will never realize how infantile this meme is. It is your way of avoiding the truth.


The truth never comes from those who hide behind anonymity.
If you told the truth you wouldn't have to be in hiding.
You can't even give a valid reason why you won't reveal your identity.

Reply
Jun 11, 2017 22:22:46   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
I will cut BladeRunner some slack. He and his bros, are of limited intellect.
They are still locked onto this scenario:
Everything all Americans should know about 911 in under 5 minutes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=A_IZaUuK_d0

Then they have no option, but to ignore the topic of this thread; 'Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria?
They have to ignore MOTIVES.
The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkamZg68jpk

The road to WWIII by StormClowdsGathering.com
What's really going on in Syria? Let's look at the evidence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP7L8bw5QF4



[quote=Steve700]Just putting that most obvious good proof out there --- Proof that you go into automatic denial on, when that alone should cause a reasonable person to change his mind or at least reevaluate his oppinion. I put it out there in the hopes that you might reevaluate the thinking that leads you to such asinine conclusions, -- in hopes that you might wake up. But I see it failed, [b] because you ARE Truly Nuts[/b[. How do you delude yourself into maintaining such a simpleminded beliefs. There is better cause to believe Santa Claus exists. What the hell are you thinking - That two airliners and everything in them disintegrated into a vaper upon impact ??????????????????????????????? You are Fricking nuts buddy.

And that is just a very small (really tiny) part of the evidence that says that the government has been feeding as a line of BS. Calling me a pony when you're the one who refuses to look at evidence and then gives simplistic rebuttals when you bother to give rebuttals that are actually focused on points made, I've demonstrated again and again that your thoughts can easily be dismantled and proven as false --- But I'm the phony ??????????? There really [u]is[/u] something very wrong with you!

Larry Silverstein made that statement incriminating himself and Bush made two statements incriminating himself and God even let us know that was an inside job from the words the kids said in that classroom and yet you believe the government story in spite of the fact that our government needed and and an excuse to start making war on Middle Eastern Muslim countries which has been proven by the excuse to invade Iraq found out and proven to be a fraud. You are like the naïve child and should know better especially after the last eight years of experience with the Democrats running the government. How does anyone trust them after the gun running to the Mexican drug cartels, the IRS scandal, Ben Ghazi, Sgt Bergdahl', funding and supporting terrorists and delierately destabilizing countries and creating all the chaos in the Middle East -- but you believe they are noble and would only do good.



Blade_Runner wrote:
Civil & Structural Engineers on WTC Collapse

I guess a lot of you have heard about the website ae911truth where a group of individuals claim that what happened to WTC 1, 2 and 7 could not have happened. This is just a claim, because they have nothing to show for their allegation that it could not have happened the way it did. You won't find any calculations that show how the NIST Report is wrong. On this site, you will find many structural engineers - those who actually know what they are talking about - explaining why the towers collapsed the way they did. So feel free to look at all the information I have gathered about the research done on the collapse on the towers. The research has been published in numerous engineering magazines and all over the internet on engineering sites (See the links on the right side of this site).

Only a handful of architects and engineers question the NIST Report, but they have never come up with an alternative. Although at first blush it may seem impressive that these people don't believe the NIST Report, remember that there are 123,000 members of ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) who do not question the NIST Report. There are 80,000 members of AIA (American Institute of Architects) who do not question the NIST Report.

Although their field of expertise is not related to the construction of buildings - they don't seem to have a problem with that over at AE911truth - there are 120,000 members of ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are 370,000 members of IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are 40,000 members of AIChE (American Institute of Chemical Engineers) who do not question the NIST Report. There are 35,000 members of AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) who do not question the NIST report. So who would you rather believe?
url=http://911-engineers.blogspot.com/ Civil &... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jun 11, 2017 23:09:42   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
Real idiots such as yourself think floor slabs can collapse on each other at great speed when those floors actually have walls between them.
Real idiots hide behind cowardly anonymity because they don't want the idiotic lies they post to be connected to who they are in real life.

.
Are you really going to run that block and box bullshit by us again? Good grief, man, you just can't help exploiting your stupidity, can you?

Reply
Jun 11, 2017 23:13:05   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
The truth never comes from those who hide behind anonymity.
If you told the truth you wouldn't have to be in hiding.
You can't even give a valid reason why you won't reveal your identity.
I don't need a valid reason to withhold my identity from the likes of you.

Reply
Jun 11, 2017 23:20:35   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
eagle13 wrote:
I will cut BladeRunner some slack. He and his bros, are of limited intellect.
They are still locked onto this scenario:
Everything all Americans should know about 911 in under 5 minutes
WTF do you mean we're "locked onto" that 5 minute line of horseshit. I've seen that cartoon. If it wasn't so damned idiotic, it would be hilarious. I will admit that the first time I watched I laughed, but the 2nd time I had to exit after 30 seconds. You guys should seek employment doing graphics for SciFi comic books.

Reply
Jun 12, 2017 08:04:52   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Are you really going to run that block and box bullshit by us again? Good grief, man, you just can't help exploiting your stupidity, can you?


You can't refute what the test proves so ridicule is your only option.
You offer unsourced ridicule at that.
Anyone who refuses to identify themselves is an unnamed source.
Unnamed sources have no credibility.

Reply
 
 
Jun 12, 2017 08:07:24   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
I don't need a valid reason to withhold my identity from the likes of you.


You're withholding your identity from every reader on this forum while expecting readers
to believe the repeated lies of one who insults others while hiding behind cowardly anonymity.

Reply
Jun 12, 2017 09:08:13   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
Real idiots such as yourself think floor slabs can collapse on each other at great speed when those floors actually have walls between them.
Real idiots hide behind cowardly anonymity because they don't want the idiotic lies they post to be connected to who they are in real life.

.



The real sign of an idiot is repetitious stupidity... the walls slowed the collapse putz ... the non structural interior walls ... thanks putz... you make this easy... you had time enough to figure out the basic law's of motion putz...

Reply
Jun 12, 2017 09:44:15   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
The real sign of an idiot is repetitious stupidity... the walls slowed the collapse putz ... the non structural interior walls ... thanks putz... you make this easy... you had time enough to figure out the basic law's of motion putz...


My cardboard wall and concrete block experiment shows that the interior walls would have stopped the floor slabs from collapsing on one another.
Newton's third law states that For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object.

In the action of the collapsing towers, the equal and opposite reaction was missing from the fall of all three towers. All the resistance which made up the equal and opposite reaction from the undamaged lower floors was removed by explosives. The towers fell at the speed the explosives were sequenced traveling down the towers.

Reply
Jun 12, 2017 09:52:25   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
I will continue to cut BladeRunner and his bros some slack, as they seem to have some sort of a guilt complex.
They have this need to cover for the perps.
They are still locked onto this scenario:
Everything all Americans should know about 911 in under 5 minutes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=A_IZaUuK_d0

Then they have no option, but to ignore the topic of this thread; 'Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria?
They have to ignore MOTIVES.
The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkamZg68jpk

The road to WWIII by StormClowdsGathering.com
What's really going on in Syria? Let's look at the evidence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP7L8bw5QF4

Reply
 
 
Jun 12, 2017 12:18:44   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
My cardboard wall and concrete block experiment shows that the interior walls would have stopped the floor slabs from collapsing on one another.
Newton's third law states that For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object.

In the action of the collapsing towers, the equal and opposite reaction was missing from the fall of all three towers. All the resistance which made up the equal and opposite reaction from the undamaged lower floors was removed by explosives. The towers fell at the speed the explosives were sequenced traveling down the towers.
My cardboard wall and concrete block experiment sh... (show quote)



An engineered cardboard box can withstand 200/250psi of crush pressure... that's why its a box... non structural sheetrock interior walls who knows?... their not designed to support any weight... except in troofer land where they could slow the massive collapse of a skyscraper ... Try Newton's second law first... you might figure out that the force does increase with speed after all...putz

Reply
Jun 12, 2017 13:23:51   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
An engineered cardboard box can withstand 200/250psi of crush pressure... that's why its a box... non structural sheetrock interior walls who knows?... their not designed to support any weight... except in troofer land where they could slow the massive collapse of a skyscraper ... Try Newton's second law first... you might figure out that the force does increase with speed after all...putz


Non-structural sheetrock? Why don't you see if you can determine how much weight a steel-studded 5/8th inch sheetrock wall can support? It would certainly support a 4" floor slab which attempted to fall past it.



Reply
Jun 12, 2017 15:21:19   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
An engineered cardboard box can withstand 200/250psi of crush pressure... that's why its a box... non structural sheetrock interior walls who knows?... their not designed to support any weight... except in troofer land where they could slow the massive collapse of a skyscraper ... Try Newton's second law first... you might figure out that the force does increase with speed after all...putz


Steel sheetrock studs will support the entire roof structure of this home.
Not load bearing you say?
You've been caught lying again.
Lying is easy when you hide behind cowardly anonymity.



Reply
Jun 12, 2017 16:11:53   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
Non-structural sheetrock? Why don't you see if you can determine how much weight a steel-studded 5/8th inch sheetrock wall can support? It would certainly support a 4" floor slab which attempted to fall past it.




Are you retarded?... there is a non structural interior steel stud platform for sheetrock & a structural platform for structures like a house... the non bearing interior walls or partition walls in a office building don't carry any weight & are not supportive except for sheetrock, pictures & paint... they only go the drop ceiling... its all for aesthetic value, fire proofing & sound control... a steel studded 5/8 sheetrock wall will not slow down 20 acres of 4" concrete & steel for a millisecond ... we know the floor system was overloaded & failed @ 1300tons live load... so your flimsy thin hollow steel studs & sheetrock & brittle little sheetrock screws doesn't even equate in a collapse... time to get real putz...

Reply
Page 1 of 99 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.