eagleye13 Loc: Fl

I have a couple questions for you, sUp;
do you still hold allegiance to the queen?
Have you become a US citizen?

straightUp Loc: California

How would a 5th grade drop out like you know anything about high school? BTW, it's "wasted" not "waisted", it's "too much" not "to much" and you capitalize proper nouns.


There's more than six people on this site dumb-ass.


wishful dreams of impotent retards.


Sounds good to me.


Fuck you, I go where ever I want.


'got that... 'you want me to help you with yours? ...'cause you seem to have problems with social awareness.


Don't worry, I don't have any "dessases"


Yeah... I bet you hear that a lot. I almost feel bad for you. Is that why you sign on as missinglink? Is that what people call you? Do you even know what that means? It's a reference to an less evolved version of man. So, I guess it's fitting, but just so you know, if that's what people are calling you, they're not being nice.


LOL... for like, a second or two I was going to try and make and effort to understand what you're even saying... Then I lost interest.

My response to you is the same as it is for dickahic. Neither of you morons have provided an argument... All you got is insults because your both idiots.

Maybe read Loki's responses... at least he makes the effort to come up with a counter punch.

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

Oh boy another Grammar / Spelling NAZI . Perfect . Fits .
I did not read your entire post .
Did you deny being a by product of incest ?

Glad I was able to yank a knot in your pantie's .

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Knot.... Not not..

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

Why I thank ya . Straightdown thanks ya .

straightUp Loc: California

Still? Did you not get the part where I said I was 2 years old when I got here? 'You really think 2 year old babies hold allegiances to monarchs?


Yes, as soon as I turned 18, which is as soon as I was allowed. (After two years of paying taxes without representation). I also had to pass a test, take an oath and pay several hundred dollars, did you? Or were you just lucky to be born here?

And what's your point anyway?

straightUp Loc: California

When you start insulting a person's intelligence with a rush of grammatical errors, you're pretty much setting yourself up.


Not surprised... It was probably more than 30 words. I'm sure that's a challenge for you. Oh, did I loose you already? LOL


hmm... OK, time to talk to some adults now... Bye bye.

straightUp Loc: California

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

But when discussing CO2 allegations and alternative energy, solar is propped up as the answer to clean our air...

Yet here you suggest it's too expensive to invest in???
Not practical, and imply Trump can't get the money to build the wall. I suspect you're going to see differently relatively soon...

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Actually I don't think you know much at all. You.parrot what you are fed. As far as your posts, when you.learn to be objective, people may discuss matters with you, but until you drop the attitude you'll reap what you sew.

Now, the thread is about why people support Trump.

The answer is that you, in your infinite wisdom speaking for all liberals, gave us no choice.

Again, you reap what you sew.

When you resort to filthy language, you admit defeat. You give up quite easily. You say you became a citizen ASAP so you must like it here. You don't act like it.

As far as whom I speak for and how it works:

We had a meeting. You weren't invited.

straightUp Loc: California

such as?


Well, it's faster than typing out all the colors... black, brown, yellow, red... so yeah.. "non-whites". And, I tell ya what... Show me one example of a violent crime committed by non-whites that are state-sponsored or legally excused and ask me what I think.

If you just think I'm being one-sided, have another look at this...
So... about this Antifa group...

I started this topic specifically to denounce the violent actions of Antifa. Here's an excerpt from my post...

In contrast, Antifa is totally counterproductive. I *do* understand the frustration young Americans are feeling toward Trump and the white nationalists and the attraction of confronting them. I understand the feeling that you just want to beat the living shit out them. But this is the sentiment we hear being expressed by right-wing extremists about liberals, Jews, blacks and... well anyone who isn't a white nationalist. Do we really want to stoop to the same level? ...it's not a winning strategy.


First of all, I said "banning Muslims"... I did NOT say "banning ALL Muslims". Secondly, it doesn't matter to filth like Trump if some other non-Muslims get caught in the ban because they happen to come from the same country. Have you never heard of collateral damage? The point (and I've said this before) is symbolic. There is no functional advantage to this travel ban, the advantage is symbolic. It's a move designed to win the black hearts of his putrid base and I'm going to say it worked.


I said... "But you don't really know that. You're just speculating just like with your feeble attempt to make a right-wing terrorist a victim." Is that any clearer?


Ugh... Just because you make a huge deal over every typo I make, doesn't mean I do the same to you. I pretty much ignore 90% of your grammatical errors. Look, YOU were the one who started this grammar Nazi thing. I was just responding to you attacking my grammar with a grammatically incorrect sentence. I mean seriously, how could I ignore that set up? And just for the record, I don't think you're grammatically challenged. I can tell the difference between rushed grammar, which should be expected to some degree on a site like this and a near-complete lack of grammatical capacity, like some others here.


I schooled you. I remember being surprised that you knew as much as you did but you fell short on the argument because I knew more.


Not when it comes to life and death. You make this much more complicated than it really is. I know you do this to obscure your own bigotry but when people are facing horrific conditions, you either help them or you don't. It's that simple. Fuck your idiot nationalism bullshit.


How do you know?
You don't.
So, why even say stupid things like that?


What's that even mean? Are you going to tell me your a judge now, delivering legal opinions? Or are you just saying that your personal opinion is based on legal opinions, just like everyone else?


Is that a run-on sentence? I'm only saying because it's hard to know what you're actually saying or asking here. Maybe I can break it down...

Am I so set in left-wing situational ethics that I cannot accept that laws can be challenged? No. Did you not understand where I said "as an American I feel a duty to challenge the laws that I feel are unjust?" Was that just too hard for you to comprehend?

You also said (in the same sentence) But until they are challenged successfully, they are still the laws. Well, no fucking shit Mr. Genius. I said challenge the law, not break the law.

So, let me ask you something... are you practicing the art of intentional misunderstanding? I can't actually tell if you're being divisive or if you really do have a reading comprehension problem, but I know it's either one or the other.


LOL... you TOTALLY are... It's not just you... Being submissive is a huge part of conservative culture. Next to the North Koreans, I would say American Conservatives are the most submissive sheep in the world and it's funny as hell because it's the last thing they want to hear.


I don't think so.


Yeah, see? He didn't actually say it was illegal.

Here's what you said... "OBAMA said his amnesty was illegal, more than 20 times in public. Right up until the time he declared it." And now you're saying that he didn't actually say it was illegal but there isn't much doubt that's what he meant. Uh-huh. Well, actually it's pretty clear what he is saying... the same thing I already told you, that Obama was trying to explain that laws come from Congress, not executive orders. He was also explaining that he can't use executive orders to override the law. That's basically all he said within the confines of passage you decided to quote. He was explaining the rules, he didn't say anything about his policy on amnesty. As it turns out, the way DACA was written, it is NOT in violation of ANY laws passed by Congress.

If you were to send a link to your source so I could read your cherry-picked passage in it's original context, I bet I would see a situation where Obama was answering a challenge from an antagonist suggesting that he thinks he can just make up the rules (that was a constant challenge from the right throughout Obama's presidency) It would make sense then for Obama to explain that he actually can't do that, even if he wanted to.


That's pretty much what I just explained to you, but using Trump's travel ban as an example.


LOL... If every problem is a leaky faucet, hockey teams would have to stop game play before they can fix defensive problems. Obviously, some things CAN be fixed on the fly. I load hotfixes at work all the time, which means we fix things without taking systems down. Also, a leaky faucet is a physical matter, immigration is a matter of policy, which is logical not physical.

So... give me an example of an immigration problem that can't be resolved without shutting off the visitors from these specific countries for 90 days. Please explain why the same problem couldn't have been solved in the 90 days following the court decision.


That's you're response? LOL According to my logic, Trump succeeded; according to yours, he failed. The only reason why you don't like my logic is because it shows us how absurd your political positions are.


You're an idiot. How old were you when you realized Santa Clause isn't real? 23?

LOL

So, SHOW me where it says citizens have a right to live here that permanent resident aliens don't have.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Just a couple quick comments.

1. The countries on Trump's travel ban are the countries on Obama's list of terrorist harbouring countries.

2. If EO cannot over ride law, how did Obama later the ACA repeatedly through EO?

straightUp Loc: California

We all have opinions. So... what's this got to do with the topic, anyway?


We all do, dumb-ass. If you mean to say, I don't produce my own thoughts, well I guess you missed about 90% of my posts.


The problem you are having is that the many civil discussions that I do actually have with sensible people on all sides tend to be long, so you probably don't read them. I'm pretty sure you tune in when exchanges are shorter, with less complicated words, because it's during those exchanges that I so often see you chiming in. As far as the attitude goes, I do it all. I do the civil intelligence discussions with civil intelligent people and I also fling poo with the poo flingers.


First of all, I don't speak for all liberals, OK? Got that?
Secondly, *I* am not the one who gave you no choice.
Thirdly, the Democrats aren't the ones who gave you no choice either... There were 16 frickin' Republicans running for president in 2016... You're going to blame you lack of choice on the Democrats?


Actually, you're right. I get pretty much exactly what I intend to get. I know what kind of conversations I want with certain people, I know the buttons to push, the points to make and you're right, I am hardly ever disappointed.


That's your rule, not mine. I don't resort to filthy language. People resort to something when they have no other recourse, like when they resort to insults when they don't have a counter argument. I don't usually have that problem. I *leverage* filthy language because it's expressive.

'Little bit out of the box there for ya?

To be honest, it floors me how some of the people here can make excuses for physical violence but can't tolerate specific arrangements of letters.


I was 18. I didn't KNOW anywhere else.


You don't either.


zzzz

straightUp Loc: California

So?


How did he "later" the ACA..? That doesn't make any sense, so I'm not really sure what you're asking but in case you're confused, the ACA was legislated through Congress. I know right wing media tries to lie about that. Oh, and speaking of fake news, I know it's also been said that the ACA was passed without giving Republicans a chance to review it... That's basically a lie too; the legislation of the the ACA involved a very long process where both parties were involved in reading, understanding, disputing, editing and voting. I remember tracking it... The Kaiser Foundation used to publish a report on the updates and what they would mean for American patients if passed.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

The way you like to classify people is amusing and it shows how full of yourself you are. You say when people sling, you do also. Well, that makes you a liar because I never swear and yet look at what you say to me. Since you reveal yourself as a liar, nothing of what you say can carry any credibility because liars lie. Fool me.once, shame on you. You don't get a second opportunity.

And I do read your posts, at least I have been but find little worthy of response. I doubt that I'll waste much more time reading yours as we have pleny of foul mouthed liberals here and your collective vocabulary is boring.

Please continue to thrash about in your self absorbed glory. How's that working out for you? .