The reality of Armed Conflict (Page 5): Hey everyone I think most here on OPP knows what WELCOME HOME means when refering to Vitenam Veterans Right? I just repeonded to Super Dave here...

2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland

Hey everyone I think most here on OPP knows what WELCOME HOME means when refering to Vitenam Veterans Right? I just repeonded to Super Dave here just a few moments ago on this thread anad this is what I said. Hey Super Dave. I responded to one of good ole Andys comments wherin he stated that he had been in NAM at least for a short while and he just now or recently commented to me that he didnt understand what I meant when I said to him WELCOME HOME! WTF OVER!!!!! Me thinks we have a serious POS here. Am I the one thats missing something here?
Semper Fi

Super Dave wrote:

I was hiding lighting a haters absurdity by being absurd.

Andy Lynch

2bltap wrote:

Hey everyone I think most here on OPP knows what ... (show quote)

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

2bltap wrote:

Hey Super Dave. I responded to one of good ole An... (show quote)

Hate runs deep with the hard core leftists.

That expression was still in use when I served USAF post Viet Nam.

Nothing is beyond them.

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

peter11937 wrote:

Let's agree to disagree, BTW, you were drafted after I was yet have a lower US number.....

Women were not drafted! Apparently this person posting as Ellen is actually Andy and is actually Rumitoid! He must have been drinking that night. He has a tendency to forget who he is and what story has already been used with another one of his 'identities'!

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

Andy Lynch wrote:

Thank you. As you are tracking so well, as in earlier and very similar posts, perhaps you would be so kind as to post all these similarities you found, or claimed to find. It would be edifying. The discrediting machine here at OPP seems to work overtime at undermining any voice that does not perfectly fit its parameters. Always a great conspiracy!

Have no fear!!!! I will continue to track you and reveal your 'fake identities' every single time!!!! You are obsessed with being relevant. You have to continually invent these different characters in order to have these members to constantly pay attention to you. It's apparent when you are drinking because you make stupid mistakes like telling the same stories over and over, and making dumb statements like " I am a combat vet.. drafted in NY in 66 " while posting as a woman by the name of ELLEN Longo, answering for Andy!!! Women were not drafted! Anyone can go to the User List and pull up my name and find the many times and proof of your psychotic behavior. Later, Rumi 😘

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

2bltap wrote:

Hey everyone I think most here on OPP knows what ... (show quote)

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

2bltap wrote:

Hey everyone I think most here on OPP knows what ... (show quote)

Andy Lynch

TexaCan wrote:

Women were not drafted! Apparently this person posting as Ellen is actually Andy and is actually Rumitoid! He must have been drinking that night. He has a tendency to forget who he is and what story has already been used with another one of his 'identities'!

Texacan, you are probably Ellen. Dirty Tricks like in the Nixon era. You do not like my views and seek to undermine me. This does not change the value of what I say.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

TexaCan wrote:

Women were not drafted! Apparently this person posting as Ellen is Andy and is actually Rumitoid! He must have been drinking that night. He has a tendency to forget who he is and what story has already been used with another one of his 'identities'!

Maybe that was his/her father's US number and he/she just got the dates a little wrong,. I wonder if he.she knows where the pre induction physical was given in them thar' days? Hint, the name starts with a W , second word starts with a S... The walls were covered with blood near chest high, Wonder if he/she knows why that was so?

acknowledgeurma

America Only wrote:

You statement is senseless...but then it appears you would like to deflect the responsibility that the LEFT is accountable for with their hiring from Craigslist and paying from the origination source of Hillary Clinton's new "org" in which she announced she had funds for any GROUPS that want to protest and create mayhem in public to protest Trump. You can slide all that "juice" all over and try your best to put some spin on it...but you're already busted.

I don't know, but it seems to make sense to me, and I'm not any deep thinker.

But it doesn't seem to require much deep thinking to see, that if one understands what a certain group finds reprehensible then one might seek to convince that group that one's enemies will and do commit those reprehensible acts. Isn't that the whole point of propaganda? If one's enemy doesn't in fact commit those reprehensible acts, then one might be tempted to pose as one's enemy and be seen committing the reprehensible acts. For example, I've heard that Hitler had some German soldiers dress up as Polish soldiers and attack German posts, then Hitler used that attack as justification for invading Poland.

Ricktloml wrote, "Most likely those on the left are so used to accusing others of what they are actually doing, and having the propaganda wing of the Democrat Party, (laughably called the main street media) cover for, defend, excuse and outright lie for them, they think this deflection will automatically be accepted. What is scary is there is a formula the left uses to advance it's horrible agenda. First propaganda and indoctrination, that's been going on for decades, then coercion, a hard or even cursory look at our politicians can tell you that has been going on for decades as well, and finally violence, gee guess where we are right now, then it's sedition and treason"

I agree that people who willingly commit reprehensible acts, will believe their enemies are equally willing to commit reprehensible acts and will accuse their enemies of reprehensible acts. However, that does not mean that someone who accuses someone else of something reprehensible, will therefore be willing to commit that reprehensible thing.

I think honesty is usually the best policy. Deceit requires too good of a memory (unless one is trying to deceive those with an even poorer memory). But I did learn some of the ways of deceit at my Daddy's knee. My Daddy was a very deceitful man. How he got that way, I don't know, maybe he learned at his Pop's knee. An example: I thought I was half Native American until I was sixteen, because Daddy told me many times, "I'm [Daddy] full blooded Indian. I was born on a horse blanket, under a chestnut tree."

So you can see, I might have some understanding of deceit and might have learned to be a suspicious person. Given that and my belief that most Americans (most people) find violence reprehensible (despite the popularity of football), I might be predisposed to think that an enemy of America might pretend to be an American patriot and then advocate violence. Thereby leading people to believe that Americans are a violent unreasonable people.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

acknowledgeurma wrote:

I don't know, but it seems to make sense to me, and I'm not any deep thinker.

But it doesn't seem to require much deep thinking to see, that if one understands what a certain group finds reprehensible then one might seek to convince that group that one's enemies will and do commit those reprehensible acts. Isn't that the whole point of propaganda? If one's enemy doesn't in fact commit those reprehensible acts, then one might be tempted to pose as one's enemy and be seen committing the reprehensible acts. For example, I've heard that Hitler had some German soldiers dress up as Polish soldiers and attack German posts, then Hitler used that attack as justification for invading Poland.

Ricktloml wrote, "Most likely those on the left are so used to accusing others of what they are actually doing, and having the propaganda wing of the Democrat Party, (laughably called the main street media) cover for, defend, excuse and outright lie for them, they think this deflection will automatically be accepted. What is scary is there is a formula the left uses to advance it's horrible agenda. First propaganda and indoctrination, that's been going on for decades, then coercion, a hard or even cursory look at our politicians can tell you that has been going on for decades as well, and finally violence, gee guess where we are right now, then it's sedition and treason"

I agree that people who willingly commit reprehensible acts, will believe their enemies are equally willing to commit reprehensible acts and will accuse their enemies of reprehensible acts. However, that does not mean that someone who accuses someone else of something reprehensible, will therefore be willing to commit that reprehensible thing.

I think honesty is usually the best policy. Deceit requires too good of a memory (unless one is trying to deceive those with an even poorer memory). But I did learn some of the ways of deceit at my Daddy's knee. My Daddy was a very deceitful man. How he got that way, I don't know, maybe he learned at his Pop's knee. An example: I thought I was half Native American until I was sixteen, because Daddy told me many times, "I'm [Daddy] full blooded Indian. I was born on a horse blanket, under a chestnut tree."

So you can see, I might have some understanding of deceit and might have learned to be a suspicious person. Given that and my belief that most Americans (most people) find violence reprehensible (despite the popularity of football), I might be predisposed to think that an enemy of America might pretend to be an American patriot and then advocate violence. Thereby leading people to believe that Americans are a violent unreasonable people.

I don't know, but it seems to make sense to me, an... (show quote)

Perhaps you might want to explore this site... www.thereligionofpeace.com

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

2bltap wrote:

Thats pure bullshit Andy. Not one of us United St... (show quote)

Wooooooowwwwwww!!!!!!! Now that's what I'm talken about!!! Hot dang excellent words and I know you mean everything said here!!!

Right there with you too!!!!

2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland

Thank you Ms. Linda. Your right I meant every damn thing I said. You know. IT IS WHAT IT IS. Stay sweet please.
Semper Fi

lindajoy wrote:

Wooooooowwwwwww!!!!!!! Now that's what I'm talken ... (show quote)

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

Andy Lynch wrote:

Texacan, you are probably Ellen. Dirty Tricks like in the Nixon era. You do not like my views and seek to undermine me. This does not change the value of what I say.

That's the best you got?? It's tough to get caught 'being stupid' for a man of your intelligence and education from a woman of average intelligence and only a high school education, huh Rumi?

Andy Lynch

TexaCan wrote:

That's the best you got?? It's tough to get caught 'being stupid' for a man of your intelligence and education from a woman of average intelligence and only a high school education, huh Rumi?

My apologies. I had no proof to accuse you Texacan of sabotaging my thread. Yet it seemed simply logical to conclude you were the culprit. The set-up was egregiously obvious: no sane American, no matter how drunk, could possibly post that women were drafted. You admitted to your obsession in tracking Rumitoid. You knew his history. You made it seem plain your purpose here was exposing this guy. But a reasonable conclusion is not evidence. It seems more confirmation bias than vicious intent. Maybe.

What we have here with Ellen Longo could be a young person, a crazy person, or a mean one. I have seen a lot of extremely nasty stuff on this site towards the opposition of whatever party. Nothing surprises me. Yet your posts, Texacan, seem to be a purposeful deflection from the topic: "This guy is making sense, let's derail him."

I listen to everyone, even from the mouths of babes and racists. If they make sense, have a noteworthy insight, they have my ear, like them or not.