North Korea launches at Guam, what would you do? (Page 8): In other words you can't answer my questions. You CC's are such phony pieces of shit. You no more trust that god of yours...

PeterS

Gener wrote:

Peter, you are not even in touch with reality. So there is no point in arguing with you or carrying on a conversation.

In other words you can't answer my questions. You CC's are such phony pieces of shit. You no more trust that god of yours than you do us liberals who have no belief in your illusionary god. You're the one who brought up "turn the other cheek" so did Christ only expect you to follow this tenet when the going was easy or did he expect you to follow it when the going was difficult too? Do you not think that you are under Christs protection if you follow his commands? What's your problem G, why do you followers of Christ have such trouble following the commands that he gives?

If you are as enlightened as you claim to be I wouldn't think you would have a difficult time answering any of my questions. If you are just a phony POS, as I suspect you are, then just deflect as you usually do and move on to something else...

PeterS

Gener wrote:

Well, I relented and tried to be nice and answer him. But whether it was me or all of us that got on his case, he seems to have disappeared.

I disappeared? Sorry G, the wife and I had lunch with my son and daughter in law and then went to a peach farm and pick up what will be the last of this years peaches. It was a lovely day spent with the people that I most admire and love and pigging out on Mexican food and peaches--not as bad a combination as you might believe.

As for yourself, you really aren't as important as you think you are. If you want to have a on going conversation with me your best chance is late at night. I have neuropathy in my feet and it's worse at night so I spend my most my time at the computer were doing so keeps my mind off the pain in my feet.

And I'm sorry, but how is answering me relenting and being nice?

PeterS

Docadhoc wrote:

Go hide in the closet with TD. What part of you have no clue as to the topic scenario don't you get? Stick to the.topic or take a hike coward.

And what part of the topic haven't I stuck to? Simply because you lack the patience to read my posts doesn't mean I haven't responded.

PeterS

Gatsby wrote:

North Korea's ballistic missile program has be BANNED by the U.N. on numerous occasions.
North Korea's nuclear arms programs has been BANNED by the U.N. on numerous occasions.
Yet North Korea now has both nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles capabale of delivering them.
But not to worry, the use of nuclear weapons would be the act of a madman.
Kim Jong Un is only a homocidal maniac, not a real madman.

So because they were banned by the UN then we have a right to act using maximum force against them? Didn't we act as the UN police force when forcing Saddam out? How did that work out for us?

Maintaining the Status Quo doesn't mean never learning. Those who never learn from history are condemned to repeat it...or some such anyway...

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Gener wrote:

Well, I relented and tried to be nice and answer him. But whether it was me or all of us that got on his case, he seems to have disappeared.

He'll be back. He's like herpes. All he does is try to make.America out to be a terrible place. He tries to justify Obama's fundamental transformation efforts. He's never wrong and when he's backed into a corner he starts swearing. He's another coward who hides behind the ignore tab.

TD, DJ, and Pete's are cut from the same cloth.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

PeterS wrote:

You didn't answer my question. If you shoot first China will come to NK rescue and that will most likely involve their use of nukes on us. So by trying to prevent NK from nuking us, China does the favor for them--much more efficiently I might add. So who gained what by your action?

Only a madman invites full out nuclear war. So are you a madman or are you sane. That's the only question you need to answer...

Last time dumb ass. The thread is about NK launching first. Stop playing. You want to talk about us launching first, start your own thread about it.

Here, either stick with the scenario or leave. Stop trying to change it to fit your agenda.

PeterS

Docadhoc wrote:

Last time dumb ass. The thread is about NK launching first. Stop playing. You want to talk about us launching first, start your own thread about it.

Here, either stick with the scenario or leave. Stop trying to change it to fit your agenda.

They've been launching first numb-nuts. If you want to start WWIII then strike first. What part of that are you unable to understand?

PeterS

Docadhoc wrote:

He'll be back. He's like herpes. All he does is try to make.America out to be a terrible place. He tries to justify Obama's fundamental transformation efforts. He's never wrong and when he's backed into a corner he starts swearing. He's another coward who hides behind the ignore tab.

TD, DJ, and Pete's are cut from the same cloth.

G gets upset because I don't keep his hours and just who have I put on ignore? Last I checked there was but one and he wasn't you. And you have to understand--it's hard to be wrong when discourse is with the likes of you. Didn't we learn anything when Bush blundered into his war with Saddam? Now you want the same folly only with nuclear weapons? You people are the herpes on America's ass. You go from one war to the next never learning from your mistakes...

Gatsby

Launching any ballistic missiles at Guam is an act of WAR.

The moment any such missile leaves North Korean airspace it should be destroyed!

China can go suck an egg, if they launch, China will be a nuclear wasteland before the first one can get here, and they know it!

PeterS wrote:

Either that or have China launch their armed missi... (show quote)

RETW Loc: Washington

PeterS wrote:

Either that or have China launch their armed missi... (show quote)

You are actually postulating that China should launch their armed missiles at us. Better to lose a few 100 thousand than 10 million. ( Yup, your insane. )

You really need to shut up and leave. You no Absolut zero about this subject.

So lets see now. You want China, to attack a country that is paying there country, 167 % of the Monies they take in, that goes to pay fore the reduction of there debt of 300 % over there GDP. ??????????

RETW

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

PeterS wrote:

G gets upset because I don't keep his hours and just who have I put on ignore? Last I checked there was but one and he wasn't you. And you have to understand--it's hard to be wrong when discourse is with the likes of you. Didn't we learn anything when Bush blundered into his war with Saddam? Now you want the same folly only with nuclear weapons? You people are the herpes on America's ass. You go from one war to the next never learning from your mistakes...

Stop getting off topic. This thread presumes NK launched first. You are not addressing that. You are trying to change the direction of the thread.

If you feel you need to bash America go start your own thread and see if people are interested in your opinion. Stop trying to change the direction of this thread to suit your America bashing agenda.

We are addressing NK attacking, and if they are stupid enough they can pay the price. You don't like it? Send Too Fat a note to not slap the gorilla. You sound like a child pansy who would give away l.your lunch money if a bully threatened you.

Knock off this garbage. None of your idiot comments apply here.

okie don

PeterS needs to relocate to:
red china,
north Korea or
Venezuela where the ' commies' are...(:

pickmeup Loc: Mid Michigan

why do you ask about "gays" I don't see any reference to them?

200MPHTape wrote:

1: How did the US become the bully when tu fat is the one threating, or are you offended by Trumps Ill just kick your ass?
2: What the hell do gays have to do with NK?

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

PeterS wrote:

And what part of the topic haven't I stuck to? Simply because you lack the patience to read my posts doesn't mean I haven't responded.

I read them and they are ridiculous and not following topic.

Let me ask you a simple question:

If someone with the ability to kill you and your family and friends, threatens to do so, is your answer to wait to see if he tries? And if he does try, do you wait to see if your are all dead before you decide what to do?

okie don

'Logic and Reason' is way beyond Libtards grasp...