North Korea launches at Guam, what would you do? (Page 7): Maybe North Korea's leader is a reincarnation of Khrushchev. There does seem to be a resemblance, sort of. Khrushchev was a...

Gener

RETW wrote:

Hi ranger. Na, I didn't forget. I just saw no rea... (show quote)

Maybe North Korea's leader is a reincarnation of Khrushchev. There does seem to be a resemblance, sort of. Khrushchev was a little unbalanced too, although not to the same extent. Not nearly. Lets see. Khrushchev was good at throwing shoes. KJU is good at throwing missiles. Hmmm. Well, just speculation.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Gener wrote:

Maybe North Korea's leader is a reincarnation of Khrushchev. There does seem to be a resemblance, sort of. Khrushchev was a little unbalanced too, although not to the same extent. Not nearly. Lets see. Khrushchev was good at throwing shoes. KJU is good at throwing missiles. Hmmm. Well, just speculation.

I have a solution;
Put the UN and its members in the land of Un!!!!
Then it would get serious with potty training that child.

Gatsby

North Korea claims to use GPS targeting systems; whose GPS data are they depending upon?

Could it be possible to feed the guidence systems false positioning data, thus redirecting the missiles to the target of our choice?

eagleye13 wrote:

I have a solution;
Put the UN and its members in the land of Un!!!!
Then it would get serious with potty training that child.

Gener

Gatsby wrote:

North Korea claims to use GPS targeting systems; whose GPS data are they depending upon?

Could it be possible to feed the guidence systems false positioning data, thus redirecting the missiles to the target of our choice?

I would say, yes, it is possible. However, I doubt NK has a highly sophisticated satellite system of their own. (I could certainly be wrong about that.) I would say more likely they are piggy backing off China's satellite system. And for every counter measure there are counter counter measures. There is more to this than meets the eye and the public is being lied to. If they are piggy backing off China's system, what does that tell you about China? Well, enough speculation. Don't be surprised by anything that happens this year and in the next 7.

Gatsby

North Korea has only two satelites, the purpose and capabilities of which are classified, if known.

Destroying them should be a top priority, a reasonable response to their next U.N. prohibited nuclear or missile test.

Could North Korea be using our own GPS system against us?

Gener wrote:

I would say, yes, it is possible. However, I doubt... (show quote)

mongo Loc: TEXAS

RETW wrote:

Do you really live on this planet? ( " if ... (show quote)

Personally, he should take a long nap forever!!!

SEMPER FI

okie don

mongo wrote:

Personally, he should take a long nap forever!!!

SEMPER FI

He can take a deep.breath and hold it for about 20 minutes.

Gener

Gatsby wrote:

North Korea has only two satelites, the purpose and capabilities of which are classified, if known.

Destroying them should be a top priority, a reasonable response to their next U.N. prohibited nuclear or missile test.

Could North Korea be using our own GPS system against us?

I wish I knew. I do understand NK is very good at hacking computer systems.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

PeterS wrote:

What part of "eliminate NKorea as a country" didn't you understand? Doc, it's clear you don't read my posts. So why don't you stop commenting on them and make it easy for everyone else...

Go hide in the closet with TD. What part of you have no clue as to the topic scenario don't you get? Stick to the.topic or take a hike coward.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

PeterS wrote:

If he launches an armed missile than take him out. But if you take him out before he launches a missile you just started WWIII...

Your choice, what will it be...

READ THE HEADER STUPID!

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Gener wrote:

Peter, you are not even in touch with reality. So there is no point in arguing with you or carrying on a conversation.

Pete is trying to do what he usually does. He's trying to change the focus of the scenario so he can try to make America the bad guy. I think he should move to NK so he can hold Too Fat's hand.

Gener

Docadhoc wrote:

Pete is trying to do what he usually does. He's trying to change the focus of the scenario so he can try to make America the bad guy. I think he should move to NK so he can hold Too Fat's hand.

Well, I relented and tried to be nice and answer him. But whether it was me or all of us that got on his case, he seems to have disappeared.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

Gener wrote:

Well, I relented and tried to be nice and answer him. But whether it was me or all of us that got on his case, he seems to have disappeared.

Well, at this point it is the 15th in N. Korea. Looks like the fat crazy kid backed down. Maybe someone in the inner circle group will wack the azzhat soon.

PeterS

Gatsby wrote:

North Korea's ballistic missile program has be BANNED by the U.N. on numerous occasions.
North Korea's nuclear arms programs has been BANNED by the U.N. on numerous occasions.
Yet North Korea now has both nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles capabale of delivering them.
But not to worry, the use of nuclear weapons would be the act of a madman.
Kim Jong Un is only a homocidal maniac, not a real madman.

You didn't answer my question. If you shoot first China will come to NK rescue and that will most likely involve their use of nukes on us. So by trying to prevent NK from nuking us, China does the favor for them--much more efficiently I might add. So who gained what by your action?

Only a madman invites full out nuclear war. So are you a madman or are you sane. That's the only question you need to answer...

PeterS

Gatsby wrote:

So you would trust Kim Jong Un to launch only unarmed missiles at Guam?

Either that or have China launch their armed missiles at us. You haven't been listening to China when they said they will back NK if we strike first. If NK does launch a armed missile at Guam then we lose a few hundred thousand and NK loses tens of millions and we get the regime change we wanted. If we launch first and China backs them up then our loses could be in the tens of millions or higher and there is no guarantee that the status quo changes...

It's a numbers game. Which one are you more comfortable with--a few hundred thousand or tens of millions? Take you pick and leave me alone...