One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
North Korea launches at Guam, what would you do?
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
Aug 15, 2017 23:28:54   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
That is the problem, isn't it? Let's see if the China- USA negotiations can put an end to it.

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 01:06:01   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Gener wrote:
While they are more rational, you don't always know what someone else's agenda is. They did say they would get involved if we strike first. My point is they could be fooled into thinking we struck first, and maybe we did. There is always a hidden agenda behind these things that the general public does not know about. There is also a contingency of the international elite that want war and will go out of their way to create it. China may very well have an agenda of their own, and they may very well be pulling strings behind the curtain. The general population will never know. China has been very angry about some of our trade and financial policies. They have hated us for decades, at least the mainland has, especially since we supported the Chinese nationalists, (up to a point at least) during the Mao Tze Tung revolution. (Even though we helped them in WWII.) It is not a safe bet to say the Chinese will do nothing. If they felt they could have a decisive military advantage over us, there would be war. Also China has been very, very belligerent about the Islands they have created in the Pacific ocean away from their shores. They are not TOTALLY rational.

I do, however, agree with you up to a point.
While they are more rational, you don't always kno... (show quote)


I'm a glass half full kinda guy. I believe China, Russia, et al know there is no winner in a nuclear war and would not allow the possibility of a misunderstanding begin one. Nor do I believe China values NK enough to endure a nuclear war. Posture, sure. Launch, no.

The exception would be if the talk of the NWO is true and the goal is to drastically reduce world population. Then if the right people were in the right position in China, maybe...but even if population reduction was the goal, there are ways to achieve that without rendering a large part of the globe uninhabitable. There is little point in aspiring to rule a fraction of what is.

Reply
Aug 16, 2017 01:13:33   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
PeterS wrote:
You would be pressing the button not knowing the outcome. There is nothing sane about that. The assumption is that NK leadership is willing to commit suicide simply over a ploy--or would we commit murder over the same. Either way, nothing is lost by waiting to see what happens until the missiles hit. If they are carrying a warhead we are justified in vaporizing the entire country otherwise it was a cheap trick and nothing to lose sleep about.


My understanding is that Too Fat threatened to launch 4 mid range missiles to land in the sea some 18 to 25 miles from Guam.

If that indeed is the threat, then why are you wasting time with vacuous non sequiturs? Why aren't you asking if a threat to blow up the ocean is sufficient to launch against NK?

Do I have to think for you?

Someone here recently said you aren't very bright. You make it difficult to disregard their comment.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2017 16:55:51   #
200MPHTape
 
pickmeup wrote:
why do you ask about "gays" I don't see any reference to them?

PeterS wrote:
Careful, there are more than a few who think that their god no longer protects us because we granted homosexuals the same rights as other human beings.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.