Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

You're wasting your time, E. Even if you cut him loose with thermite charges and detonated a couple tons of explosives under his ass, he'll never come out of that hole he is in.

emarine

the little fella is dedicated to ignorance buddy ... he continually rebuts with irrelevant questions never providing answers to direct questions ... a true master of deception... these tools know nothing but repetitive projection & deflection to perpetuate their argument... pure propagandists with a major neo Nazi Jihadi twist... I believe the Islamic extremists want to eliminate the Jews first then Christians second... these tools have an agenda...

Steve700

You given nothing but 3rd hand hearsay. I have given you know theories, but facts. You're the one who comes up with theories like calculations and supposedly indicate that the building could have come down without explosives. But even if you are right, none of that, says that demolition explosives want used and you can clearly see them going off and quite a few different videos from different angles, showing different faces of the buildings. You given no rebuttals or prove anything. And I've shown you both pictures and video that ARE proof is no plane wreckage at the Pentagon around in that field and that proves the whole thing is a fraud. [u]I've asked you repeatedly to show pictures or video showing plane wreckage at one or both locations and you can't do it because there never was any to take pictures or video of. Surely they would exist if there was wreckage and worst of all you haven't, the integrity to admit you can't find any sex pictures. You just play the part of an irresponsible ass hole who just ignores.

Anybody can say anything and all that shit can be faked and of course they would try to cover all their bases. There is plenty of government affiliated people to support the things you say happened and that people said. In a lesser, not so grandiose plot your evidence might be worth something, but in this case with such an overwhelming mountain of contradictory evidence your evidence is proven unreliable at the very best. I showed you some real proof in both photos and videos that prove it's all a lie and I asked you to show videos and/or pictures to substantiate the existence of wreckage of an airliner there and you haven't and can't do it. You just said that the whole airliner was broken up into pieces no bigger than your hand. Well how come there is one wheel (and only one -- where are the other 15) at the Pentagon with its broken off arm, but not so much as a dent in the rim of it, with the tire looking undamaged and still inflated. (So that completely blows your assertion that everything was broken down into tiny pieces) Why did that not get broken into little pieces??? And where's the engine, because the single part of the engine at the Pentagon didn't even come from that model of aircraft. You've proven nothing except for the sucker you are. And they can say anything about a flight data recorder, but they can't produce it and make the excuse that it's missing. LOL STOPS WITH THE BULL SHIT & SHOW THE PICTURES or AERIAL VIDEO FOOTAGE PROVING YOUR ASSERTIONS or ADMIT YOU JUST DON'T KNOW

payne1000

You finally have stated some fact. The outer wall structures of the towers were designed to support lateral load. Floor slabs falling straight down would not put any lateral load or any vertical load on the outer wall structures. Floor slabs falling straight down would not put any vertical load on the center core either. The only answer to what brought the towers down is controlled demolition. That explains all the explosive debris clouds.

payne1000

payne1000

Insults and denial without rebuttal is an admission you have no rebuttal.

payne1000

Pilots for 9/11 Truth analyze the bogus flight recorder data: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5S9zD3U6Rc

emarine

every video from both towers proved that the entire top sections of structure fell... outer framework floors & core ... The next floor below the impact zone was hit with the entire load In motion... the lower floors failed one @ a time from a gravitational overload , progressive collapse or what ever you want to call it... pancaking is a poor choice, nothing fell squarely in a catastrophic failure collapse... you're still clueless on the magnitude of this event... just like the bug on the windshield putz...

emarine

Neo Nazi rat porn... the proof of ignorance & hatred...

Your mascot larry payne

payne1000

Since no floor on either tower was entirely covered in fire and the fires did not burn long enough to weaken any steel, The upper sections of floors could not have collapsed unless the columns were cut by cutting charges.
"In early 1997, Lawrence Livermore successfully tested a shaped charge that penetrated 3.4 meters of high-strength armor steel. The largest diameter precision shaped charge ever built produced a jet of molybdenum that traveled several meters through the air before making its way through successive blocks of steel. A shaped charge, by design, focuses all of its energy on a single line, making it very accurate and controllable." https://str.llnl.gov/str/Baum.html

Here's how the concrete floor slabs were pulverized in mid air:
"At LLNL, government scientists have learned how to combine the exothermic power of the thermite reaction with organic moieties to produce a thermite reaction that can do pressure/volume work (i.e. turn massive quantities of concrete and other building materials into dust)." https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/wtc-towers/nano-thermite/

payne1000

How come readers know my name but they don't know yours?
Posting lies under your real name would not be good for your real life reputation, would it?

emarine

Why you ask... you're just not very smart putz... I hope it's worth the money to you... I offer my views free of charge... There is only a small percent of radical Muslim Jihad's so far on this planet... you help sell their hatred & lies... a very unjust cause in my opinion putz...

payne1000

You're a Hasbarat, emarine.
Here's how you came to be on the internet:

"If you've come across a hasbarat, on-line or otherwise, you have learned that no amount of reasoned argument or intellectual maturity has any effect. That"s because hasbarats don"t care if they come across as ignorant, obnoxious, nasty or inane. All that matters for them is sabotaging criticism of Israel and support for Muslims. They're like anti-intellectual stink bombs: designed to cause maximum discomfort but have little if any real power.

This deliberate proliferation of on-line hasbarats raises two points. The first concerns why anyone would spend hours a day to prostitute themselves for Israel. Money, of course. Ilan Shturman, deputy director of the Israeli foreign ministry's hasbara department (!), told an Israeli business newspaper in July that US$150,000 had been allocated for the first stage of a campaign to seed the Internet with hasbarats:

"Our people will not say: 'Hello, I am from the hasbara department of the Israeli foreign ministry and I want to tell you the following.' Nor will they necessarily identify themselves as Israelis. They will speak as net-surfers and as citizens, and will write responses that will look personal but will be based on a prepared list of messages that the foreign ministry developed."
http://www.gregfelton.com/media/2009_09_30.htm

whole2th

Probably a sayanim with a business in Florida.

emarine

You require more assistance than payne A-Whole... It's about the hatred neo Nazism & the unjust causes you tools provide...


"unjust" adjective biased, crooked, dishonorable, heinous, immoral, improper, inequitable, influenced, iniquus, iniustus, interested, jaundiced, prejudiced, prepossessed, undeserved, unequal, unfair, unjustifiable, unmerited, unprincipled, unreasonable, venal, warped, wicked, wrong, wrongful