Steve700

Listen you stupid ass insane mother Fokker, produce the pictures and prove your case and stop with the bull shit insults.
No, there wasn't. Where did you get that idea. Because they photographed a number of different items all of which could have been put in the back of one American pickup truck at each location????? That convinces you??? I gave you aerial helicopter video footage that you probably didn't even look at from within a half hour after whatever happened happened. (While things were still smoking with a little fire too) If there was more than one pickup truck worth of parts, surely pictures exist and are available to you of all the wreckage strewn all over . You are Fricking Nuts. Hundreds of seats and all they show is one square foot of fabric from one seat with the American Airlines label on it LOL. There is something wrong with you. In another instance they show one's broken off wheel without the rim even being bent. Where is the rest of the wheels that plane had at least 8 wheels under the wings and probably 16+ the back wheels. Let's see you produce some pictures where you can see the wreckage strewn all over, you nut case. And don't tell me that all vaporized. Those planes can even go 500 miles an hour in thick ground-level air. That's why they go 30,000 feet so they can approach the speed of sound. Let's see the pictures, Dumbo, not just a few pictures of isolated items, which is all the government ever showed because it was nothing else other than what they delivered to take pictures of, like that hole in the field with half a truck load of partially melted scrap metal dumped into it. They cordoned off the areas real quick so people couldn't see, but that couldn't stop the helicopters. Let's See you produce pictures of the wreckage to prove your case and that you are rational and not insane.

And if you can't do it, it is not only proves that you are a willfully blind self-deluded nutcase but a liar as well. ('cuz surely there are pictures if there was wreckage)

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

How many times are you going to repeat this shit, bucko? Stick with your coloring books, just make sure you color within the lines or you might run head on into reality.

The Flight Data Recorder aboard American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757-200, was recovered from the wreckage in the Pentagon. The data recorded on that FDR is definitive proof that the jet hit the building.

payne1000

The photo you posted shows the remains of WTC7 on the left. What propelled North Tower debris over 300 ft in order to allegedly cause WTC7 to fall as you and BR claim?
Why didn't WTC7 fall asymmetrically since the alleged damage was to one side? Why is the section of outside wall section of the North tower still standing when the massive center core has been completely destroyed?

Where are the 110 floor slabs and floor trusses in this photo?

emarine

So you choose repetitive stupidity putz...

payne1000

You choose to repeat the image which proves the North tower did not fall from force of gravity alone.
The image shows that the majority of the debris from the North Tower was ejected outward away from the footprint of the tower.
The image also proves the center core did not fall last because it shows sections of the outer wall structure still standing while the center core is a mass of rubble.

emarine

The only reason it's still standing is because it had nowhere to fall being the ground floors... it's leaning on WTC6 & that's not what I call still standing... you argue stupidity... it fell over on WTC 6... you want to go around again for the third time putz?...

payne1000

Again you fail to explain how the weaker outer wall structure can remain standing while the much stronger center core is reduced to a pile of rubble.
You can't explain it because the only forces which would accomplish that result are the use of cutting charges, nano-thermite and high explosives.

.

Which is stronger, the center core or the outer wall structure?

emarine

Now you can explain why the outer framing is weaker than the inner... the outer frame had to handle two loads... half the gravity load plus wind where the inner was just half the gravity load... do your best now in detail...putz

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

The failure here is in your ability to understand anything that doesn't agree with your idiotic theories. Your obsession with an impossibility is pathological.

Steve700

Oh I'm just getting started. It will go on and on and on and on and on and on until you address what I have written and stop with your bull shit insults, mock, and slander. You need to grow up and stop being a childish punk who think you can casually and automatically dismiss something of great importance and have it all the suddenly not exist. Your playing the fool , and an asinine idiot, big time. My repeating of this is not going to stop, so long as I can find your post and you don't man up and give a serious response to my truth denier dismantling assertions. Show me the pictures of the airliner wreckage strewn all over like it is in every other airliner crash (other than all the 9/11 ones). Certainly, if you are correct, such pictures and video exists. Even you can't deny that and I've already shown you video right after the incidents and there is no airliner wreckage either at the Pentagon or in that field.

Because the government's proven liars tell you something, Doesn't mean it's real, especially in the 911 incidents. Flight recorder found but no airline wreckage to be found LOL. That's a good one. HA HA Ha Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Just how stupid and naïve are you anyway? Just where did you get that information that they were found? From the government's official 9/11 commission report??? And then it turns out that they were too heavily damaged to get any information from right? And then the FBI had them, or it, and then it or them disappeared. Right??? I know all about it, and you're a big naïve dummy with no integrity or common sense. Because they tell you a flight recorder was found doesn't mean it was. And that still would explain the other ones NOT being found. Obviously, that makes no sense. '

Time to start looking at yourself and making corrections to make yourself worthy of respect. I will be waiting for the pictures of the wreckage of those airliners or an honest admission from you.

payne1000

Insults and denial without rebuttal is an admission you have no rebuttal.

payne1000

Are you now claiming the outer wall structure was stronger than the center core?
Your entire theory, which you copied from agents of the perpetrators, depends on the outer wall structure being so weak that floors collapsing straight down would tear it to shreds.
Was it weak or was it strong? Make up your mind.

emarine

I stated fact... the outer framework was designed to provide two functions... the entire horizontal load & half the vertical load where the inner core just provided half the vertical load... it is you that is ass backward as usual putz... you are clueless in structure design & performance...you argue from ignorance not fact or even logic... just because the beams are larger means the structure is stronger?... novice misconception putz... try again...

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

You go right ahead a pound away on that keyboard. 99% of the crap you post isn't worth a plug nickel. It is mostly just psychobabble.

Flight Data Recorder: AA Flight 77

Flight Path Study: AA77 Flight Data Recorder

Flight AA77 on 9/11: New FDR Analysis Supports the Official Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Your failures to understand anything that doesn't agree with your theories the only insult in this entire issue. Your cockamamie theories have been rebutted a thousand times but you are too damned ignorant to see it. You incessantly throw out questions yet reject all answers. Your ignorance of history and scientific principles is astounding, but that is on your shoulders, not anyone else'.