One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria? #2
This topic is locked to prevent further replies.
This discussion was started in a previous topic. You can find it here.
This discussion is continued in a new topic. You can find it here.
Page <<first <prev 57 of 99 next> last>>
 
This topic was split up because it has reached high page count.
You can find the follow-up topic here.
 
May 23, 2017 11:26:26   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
payne1000 wrote:
You've always had difficulty attempting to cover up the truth I post as well.
What use would black boxes be to those who flew the drones into the towers?


That is a photo you copied from some other Troofer site. It is hardly proof of anything.

Reply
May 23, 2017 11:26:40   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
The cardboard I used was made entirely of cellulose--basically paper--certainly no steel inside. Considering scale, the cardboard walls were about twice the height of those in the twin towers.
The flimsy cardboard boxes you see in warehouses weighing 100 lbs have additional stiffening materials inside. The cardboard I used can be torn by hand. How much styrofoam have all of us had to dispose of from boxes we open? My experiment proves the interior floors would prevent rapid floor collapse in the towers. You can attempt to obfuscate all you want but the experiment proves you are lying again.

The image below shows the tower wall heights in scale. The cardboard walls in my experiment were at least twice the height of the tower walls when scale is taken into account.
The weight of the tower floor slabs in scale would not even approach the weight of the 75 pound concrete blocks.
The cardboard I used was made entirely of cellulos... (show quote)




Why must you prove your ignorance...to scale your box experiment proves engineered boxes are stronger than the WTC towers pound for pound... you still don't comprehend live load vs mass in motion and nonstructural interior wall are nonstructural... Why not try dropping your 75lb concrete paver on the corner of your box & observe the result... the WTC towers did not pancake straight down like you just tried to prove with your box... you can either learn the basic laws of motion or keep on experimenting until you finally learn what's up... you must not have taken 8th grade physics in school... turn your paver on edge & drop it on the corner of the box... watch your toes putz...

Reply
May 23, 2017 11:38:55   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
You've always had difficulty attempting to cover up the truth I post as well.
What use would black boxes be to those who flew the drones into the towers?



Flight data recorders or "black boxes" are installed in all commercial aircraft even drones...

Reply
 
 
May 23, 2017 11:44:06   #
payne1000
 
amadjuster wrote:
That is a photo you copied from some other Troofer site. It is hardly proof of anything.


When I assembled this scene from various photos, I did so to show a simulation of how the drones were flown.
It was never meant to be a real photo of the perpetrators in action.
Even idiots know the perpetrators would not take photos which could incriminate them as mass murderers.

Reply
May 23, 2017 11:57:44   #
payne1000
 
[quote=emarine]Why must you prove your ignorance...to scale your box experiment proves engineered boxes are stronger than the WTC towers pound for pound... Common cardboard is not stronger than thick sheetrock walls with steel studs on 16" centers.you still don't comprehend live load vs mass in motion and nonstructural interior wall are nonstructural...My experiment proves the interior walls are extremely structural. You have not provided any valid explanation of how the alleged mass in motion became in motion. Why not try dropping your 75lb concrete paver on the corner of your box & observe the result...How would dropping it on the corner related to the fall of the towers? The floors of the towers did not suddenly become vertical, did they? the WTC towers did not pancake straight down like you just tried to prove with your box... you can either learn the basic laws of motion or keep on experimenting until you finally learn what's up... you must not have taken 8th grade physics in school... turn your paver on edge & drop it on the corner of the box...A better experiment would be to place some dynamite inside the box and see if the cardboard can survive explosives. Do you think it could? watch your toes putz...



Reply
May 23, 2017 11:59:47   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
Flight data recorders or "black boxes" are installed in all commercial aircraft even drones...


You failed to answer my question.
What value would black boxes provide if installed on the drones flown into the towers?

Reply
May 23, 2017 12:12:24   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
This is a public service announcement:
Made necessary by The blade, A Mad jester, and Ema.
Other than the 911 cover up;
Why do liberals cover for and side with a Billionaire elitist like George "Giorgi" Soros?

“This system to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.” - Insider, Professor Carroll Quigley – ‘Tragedy and Hope’,( p. 324)
(Bilderberger Group)
George Soros: Evil Puppet Master Exposed
https://youtu.be/1eRFTHD2CTg
10 Things You Didn't Know About "Giorgi" George Soros
https://youtu.be/tfBHYxEojZk

SOROS ROTHSCHILD RACE WAR PROPAGANDA EXPOSED
https://youtu.be/lhqqz3QFQKE

Reply
 
 
May 23, 2017 12:35:41   #
emarine
 
[quote=payne1000]
emarine wrote:
Why must you prove your ignorance...to scale your box experiment proves engineered boxes are stronger than the WTC towers pound for pound... Common cardboard is not stronger than thick sheetrock walls with steel studs on 16" centers.you still don't comprehend live load vs mass in motion and nonstructural interior wall are nonstructural...My experiment proves the interior walls are extremely structural. You have not provided any valid explanation of how the alleged mass in motion became in motion. Why not try dropping your 75lb concrete paver on the corner of your box & observe the result...How would dropping it on the corner related to the fall of the towers? The floors of the towers did not suddenly become vertical, did they? the WTC towers did not pancake straight down like you just tried to prove with your box... you can either learn the basic laws of motion or keep on experimenting until you finally learn what's up... you must not have taken 8th grade physics in school... turn your paver on edge & drop it on the corner of the box...A better experiment would be to place some dynamite inside the box and see if the cardboard can survive explosives. Do you think it could? watch your toes putz...
Why must you prove your ignorance...to scale your ... (show quote)




Hey... is there anyone else on this planet dumb enough to be pushing the structural strength of nonstructural sheetrock interior walls in skyscrapers?... I think you have finally earned your true calling...putz...

Reply
May 23, 2017 12:37:33   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
You failed to answer my question.
What value would black boxes provide if installed on the drones flown into the towers?




So now you want real answers to delusional questions putz?...

Reply
May 23, 2017 12:40:02   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
Hey... is there anyone else on this planet dumb enough to be pushing the structural strength of nonstructural sheetrock interior walls in skyscrapers?... I think you have finally earned your true calling...putz...


You can't deny what my experiment shows so you resort to your usual insults. I am forced to respond in kind . . .



Reply
May 23, 2017 12:41:35   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
So now you want real answers to delusional questions putz?...


I don't expect answers from those who cannot see . . .



Reply
 
 
May 23, 2017 12:49:47   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
You can't deny what my experiment shows so you resort to your usual insults. I am forced to respond in kind . . .



Bottom line putz... f=m*a or Ka boom if you're an idiot...

Reply
May 23, 2017 13:30:18   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
Bottom line putz... f=m*a or Ka boom if you're an idiot...



Reply
May 23, 2017 13:53:40   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
You can't deny what my experiment shows so you resort to your usual insults. I am forced to respond in kind . . .




Sure I can... but you still won't fess up to anything real... just like you refused to hit your sheetrock bullshit with a sledge hammer to better show what a 10lb hammer will do in motion compared to 160lbs static weight... you tried to fudge it dropping your 75lb block square on to of your box which did crush it some but that still doesn't cut it putz... the WTC towers fell off angle not square... drop your 75lb block off angle on the box & prove my point... or continue to deceive & be a fag... putz...

Reply
May 23, 2017 14:09:03   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
The cardboard I used was made entirely of cellulose--basically paper--certainly no steel inside. Considering scale, the cardboard walls were about twice the height of those in the twin towers.
The flimsy cardboard boxes you see in warehouses weighing 100 lbs have additional stiffening materials inside. The cardboard I used can be torn by hand. How much styrofoam have all of us had to dispose of from boxes we open? My experiment proves the interior floors would prevent rapid floor collapse in the towers. You can attempt to obfuscate all you want but the experiment proves you are lying again.

The image below shows the tower wall heights in scale. The cardboard walls in my experiment were at least twice the height of the tower walls when scale is taken into account.
The weight of the tower floor slabs in scale would not even approach the weight of the 75 pound concrete blocks.
The cardboard I used was made entirely of cellulos... (show quote)
The weight of the concrete on one office area floor was 434 tons. The weight of concrete in one core area floor was 193 tons. The total weight of concrete on one tower floor was 627 tons. This is just the concrete, it does not include the weight of steel in the floors or that of the office contents. The average weight of one tower floor (everything) was 4500 tons.

To what purpose is your experiment with drywall sheets, duct tape and bags of cement? To what purpose is your experiment with a cardboard box and cement blocks? These experiments and your arguments to support them make no sense at all. None of these have any relationship to the design and construction of the twin towers. And, they are effectively defeating your original claim that the "super strong" structural steel was invincible.

If the steel structure was capable of supporting 2000% of the tower's static weight, what prompted you to argue for an additional element of structural strength that, in reality, did not exist?

In the photo here, you have added what appears to be an integrated wall system throughout the office areas, complete with doors and such. Such a thing did not exist in the twin towers. The primary selling point of the twin towers was maximum rental space. Such an enclosed office system would defeat that purpose and was not necessary. Only in rare instances did more than one tenant occupy a single floor. In most cases a single tenant occupied multiple floors--Morgan Stanley, for instance, occupied 21 floors in the South Tower.

Building enclosed offices would add additional weight to each floor, they would reduce available space and curtail the efficiency of every day business communications and transactions, they would slow down considerably employee interactions, they would prevent direct contact between individual departments in the company. After all, it was the World Trade Center, the premier center of world finance. The highest percentage of tenants were engaged in the fast paced world of finance--bankers, investors, venture capitalists, traders, speculators, etc. The people involved in this certainly did not need or want to knock on office doors--"Got a minute?"

Which leads to the question of why truthers are accusing those in the world of high finance--the bankers, investors, venture capitalists, traders, and government insiders--for plotting and killing the very hand that feeds them? Why would those with huge investments of time, energy and money in their dynamic businesses destroy the most advanced and efficient center of world finance in existence at the time?
.

What's wrong with this picture?
What's wrong with this picture?...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 57 of 99 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.