The Death of Democracy (Page 2): When I said "government interferes with evolution", I meant human intellectual, emotional and moral development. Leftist/Liberal/Progressive (the...

Armagh

nwtk2007 wrote:

My view of his meaning is that conservative ideals... (show quote)

When I said "government interferes with evolution", I meant human intellectual, emotional and moral development. Leftist/Liberal/Progressive (the Democrats, in other words) government wants the electorate to remain childlike. The better to oppress you! (Remember Little Red Riding Hood? Another child's fable that impressed me.)

What big teeth you have, Grandma!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Armagh wrote:

I might have meant mind, but on thinking it over I realize he doesn't have one.

Not one he can call his own.

Armagh

nwtk2007 wrote:

Not one he can call his own.

Wonder whose mind he's using now?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Armagh wrote:

When I said "government interferes with evolution", I meant human intellectual, emotional and moral development. Leftist/Liberal/Progressive (the Democrats, in other words) government wants the electorate to remain childlike. The better to oppress you! (Remember Little Red Riding Hood? Another child's fable that impressed me.)

What big teeth you have, Grandma!

Agreed. The weak lack intellectual, emotional and moral development. Thus, we have liberal idiocy.

I enjoyed the loony tunes version.

Armagh

nwtk2007 wrote:

Agreed. The weak lack intellectual, emotional and moral development. Thus, we have liberal idiocy.

I enjoyed the loony tunes version.

Do they lack those attributes because they are weak, or are they weak because they lack them?

Armagh

Doesn't seem like too many Libs are posting comments on this topic. Since all they can do is post childish, obscene cartoons, they may have realized this thread is waaaaay above their heads!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Armagh wrote:

Do they lack those attributes because they are weak, or are they weak because they lack them?

Does the beta male become the beta male because he lacks the qualities of the alpha, or because not an alpha, and lacks those qualities?

How is fitness defined? Arnold, while body building, neglects his wife and the Weiner next door knocks her up because she's lonely? Strength is different than fit.

In capitalism, what is fit, what survives? Where is honor's place? Emotional maturity? Moral strength?

Armagh

nwtk2007 wrote:

Does the beta male become the beta male because he lacks the qualities of the alpha, or because not an alpha, and lacks those qualities?

How is fitness defined? Arnold, while body building, neglects his wife and the Weiner next door knocks her up because she's lonely? Strength is different than fit.

In capitalism, what is fit, what survives? Where is honor's place? Emotional maturity? Moral strength?

You're hurting my head!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Armagh wrote:

You're hurting my head!

You started it! Are they weak because they lack those abilities or do they lack those abilities because they are weak??

It's a VERY good question!

Armagh

nwtk2007 wrote:

You started it! Are they weak because they lack those abilities or do they lack those abilities because they are weak??

It's a VERY good question!

You didn't have to take it to an extreme!

You're up early, nwtk.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Armagh wrote:

You didn't have to take it to an extreme!

You're up early, nwtk.

In the ghetto this morning. One needs to stay alert!

Is it really an extreme?? Are we who we are because of the qualities we possess or do we possess those qualities because we are who we are??

Where does that question lead us??

Armagh

nwtk2007 wrote:

In the ghetto this morning. One needs to stay alert!

Is it really an extreme?? Are we who we are because of the qualities we possess or do we possess those qualities because we are who we are??

Where does that question lead us??

It's leading me to an insane asylum!!

Morgan

Armagh wrote:

Government interferes with evolution. But that's what the Leftist/Liberals want. Remember Ovomit saying conservative principles were "thinly veiled Social Darwinism"? About the same time he shouted to the small business creators: "You didn't build that by yourselves!"

The right still bringing up this statement: you didn't build that yourselves" this only shows an extreme lack of comprehension of his speech, or never hearing his speech and is sheepishly following someone else with a misguided interpretation, which may have been intentional in order to steer the sheep away from following him. So good job.

Morgan

nwtk2007 wrote:

In the ghetto this morning. One needs to stay alert!

Is it really an extreme?? Are we who we are because of the qualities we possess or do we possess those qualities because we are who we are??

Where does that question lead us??

We are the creators of ourselves, which can be recreated at an given time, how's that?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Morgan wrote:

The right still bringing up this statement: you didn't build that yourselves" this only shows an extreme lack of comprehension of his speech, or never hearing his speech and is sheepishly following someone else with a misguided interpretation, which may have been intentional in order to steer the sheep away from following him. So good job.

armagh only referred to when he said it, not actually what was meant. A little defensive aren't you?? Look at what the left did with Sessions remark about an island in the pacific. I've enjoyed ringing a few liberal minds out with that one!