One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: adkguy
Page: 1 2 next>>
Jan 16, 2015 07:03:27   #
KHH1 wrote:
Legislatively, liberals do way more for people that are less fortunate than conservatives...go all the way back to Social Security moving forward...all liberal policies...liberals are willing to do more than just hand people a little chump change. We try to provide things that are life changing...and despite the right's exaggeration of welfare abuse...welfare has helped many from homelessness and to get a leg up for progress to be made in their lives.


And in the real world conservatives do way more for people that are less fortunate than liberals. We just do it with our own money, not the taxpayers.
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 07:03:35   #
[quote=KHH1]I didn't write this..but that is the mark of weak people..can't face the music so change the game..I guess I am that much more smarter and emotionally composed....that you all would have to forge posts on my behalf..... you are the offspring of the daughter humpers that stole this country from the Native Americans. That is why I have no respect for you pieces of fecal matter. I guess black men are the much stronger.[..life is like heavyweight boxing.. you people are non-competitive and have to lie and c***t for survival.
You one r****t mofo. Shove Jesse Jackson and his Rainbow coalition. You the ones need the government to back your plays.
.
.
KHH1 wrote:
** I think the Obama/Muslim thing was/is way less suspect.[/quote]
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 04:05:28   #
keithhowell58 wrote:
Don't take away from the kids i'm pretty sure we all agree with that, we also agree about people (adults) taking advantage of the system should be stopped and if possible put in jail, but lets face it no matter what you do your going to have people taking advantage! I personally know people write now that brag about taking advantage of the system as far as disability, and i also know the longer you give free stuff to people they are going to take advantage! But I feel drug testing isn't the right answer! Maybe if there were better insensitives to get off welfare there might be a change! (Higher minimum wage)it might not make a difference to some critics but if you can send money overseas to build schools and roads and arm foreign armies you can say let's fix our problems first! I know that sounds selfish and mean but that is how i feel!
Don't take away from the kids i'm pretty sure we a... (show quote)

We are not "taking away from the kids", their drug taking, rule breaking parents would be. Put the blame in the appropriate place. Nobody liberal gives a fat rat's ass if someone trying to work is denied because he/she
does drugs, just the scum that continually sucks off the public teat.
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 03:47:59   #
And of those 5 million jobs, how many of them would you work? Are they table waiting jobs paying minimum wage? Can you feed a family on the pay you'll make? Labor department reported Friday that unemployment dropped to 5.6% in Dec vs 5.8 n November. Seemingly good news, but that was caused by 273,000 people leaving the work force. Don't try using the government's numbers to support your arguments because the constantly revise their methods of computation. Not even apples to oranges now, it's more pineapples to hydrangeas.
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 03:22:20   #
KHH1 wrote:
**Yep..they have been revised upward before also**


Not in the last 7 years...
Go to
Jan 13, 2015 16:38:08   #
KHH1 wrote:
By Joseph Lawler | January 13, 2015 | 10:45 am

There were just under 5 million job postings advertised in November, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Tuesday.

The job openings number beat Wall Street's expectations, as businesses continued to add positions at a fast pace toward the end of 2014.

Hiring was flat in the month, while job separations were down, according to the BLS' Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey.

The data on job openings and hiring released by the Labor Department on Tuesday lags the more widely-followed jobs report by a month. Officials at the Federal Reserve and investors still watch the report closely, however, because it contains more detailed information about the state of labor markets in the U.S. relating to the pace of labor market churn.

With 4.97 million job openings advertised on the last day of November, total job openings were up 20 percent year over year. The highest job creation mark on record is 5.27 million, set in 2001.


Actual hiring, however, was not as fast to improve over the course of 2014.

There were 4.99 million hires in November, below the 5 million-plus levels for September and October. Hiring is up by slightly less than 10 percent annually and below the healthy levels that held before the recession began.

Nevertheless, Tuesday’s report on gross hiring and layoffs adds evidence that U.S. labor markets are tightening.

The number of unemployed workers for each posted job opening was 1.8 in November, the lowest ratio of the recovery and the same ratio that applied when the recession officially began in December of 2007. Then, the unemployment rate was 5 percent, rather than the 5.8 percent it was in November.

Other details from Tuesday’s report hinted at underlying strength in job creation. Total separations, including layoffs, retirements, deaths and firings, fell from 4.86 million to 4.62 million.

Within separations, quits were essentially flat, as the quit rate remained steady at 1.9 percent of all workers. Top officials, such as the Federal Reserve’s Chairwoman Janet Yellen, have identified rising quits as a sign of underlying strength in job creation, as workers feel confident enough in their employment prospects to leave their jobs.

Job creation and hiring were up in both the private sector and government month-to-month and over the course of the year, reflecting both an increase in commercial activity and ongoing improvements in state and local budgets strained by the fallout from the financial crisis.

Over the course of 2014, increased labor market churn and rising numbers of advertised jobs t***slated into accelerating net job creation. The economy averaged 289,000 new jobs a month over the last three months of 2014, and 246,000 jobs for the entire year. That rate was well above the 194,000 monthly average for 2013.
By Joseph Lawler | January 13, 2015 | 10:45 am br... (show quote)


These numbers will be revised by the end of the quarter, happens every time.
Go to
Jan 13, 2015 10:32:32   #
JFlorio wrote:
Go away i***t. Haven't seen Christians telling the world you must convert or we will k**l you. Don't see Christians honor k*****g their family members. Assholes like you say these things because your not a believer. That is fine but that doesn't mean you have to be a liar.


Seem to remember something called the Crusades, then there was the Spanish Inquisition. Just saying.
Go to
Jan 13, 2015 06:23:04   #
grace scott wrote:
I'm confused. Are you defending Muslims?


Just trying to understand why the majority of a supposedly peaceful religion would not bring their erroneous brethren into check. Half the world telling me Muslims deserve a break, half the world saying we should k**l them all. I'm not the smartest guy in the room, but who in their right mind starts a war with 1.6 billion enemy combatants?
Go to
Jan 13, 2015 02:58:38   #
Socialist Batman wrote:
The same way Christians react to the KKK? oh wait....


The KKK might have met with disapproval, but there was never a chance Christians were going to be slaughtered for the sins of the Klan. Muslims are really are in danger here. Surprised a Socialist would bring up the past sins of Democrats too.
Go to
Jan 12, 2015 16:37:35   #
Socialist Batman wrote:
https://twitter.com/hashtag/notinmyname


Tantamount to a German saying in 1945 that the N**is were responsible. When I say police their aberrant members, I mean kick ass and take names.
Go to
Jan 11, 2015 14:56:44   #
If there is 1.6 billion members of a peaceful Islam, why aren't they showing their radical brethren the error of their ways? If your religion says violence is a no no, shouldn't you seek to reform those bastardizing it?
Go to
Jan 11, 2015 07:22:31   #
If you restricted ownership of guns to old white guys all the problems would go away. No more mental defects taking liberal mommy's guns and shooting up schools. No more black on black or black on white crime. Hell, old white guys ran the country for 200 years and the country was fine. Now all the freaks and geeks get their panties in a bunch and whine poor me over stupid s**t. It's about America, not your freak agendas.
Go to
Jan 8, 2015 15:36:58   #
Read this post and boiled it down to 2 types of people, those for America and those for themselves. Those for America desire the right things for her, regardless of the consequences to themselves. Those for themselves want all the goodies America has to offer, regardless of the consequences to the nation. My grandchildren are already $75k in the hole with their share of the national debt. You want it, work for it. #stopgivingthestoreaway
Go to
Jan 8, 2015 13:51:54   #
You mean we aren't the laughing stock of the world now??! Stop drinking the Kool-Aid mate.

straightUp wrote:
When people say "it's simple" - it's usually because they aren't looking at the whole picture.

I have a different perspective on this Tasine (I'm sure you aren't surprised).

Actually, McCain was a more popular politician... Palin was a more popular celebrity, so it depends on what kind of v**ers are involved as to which stands a better chance at winning an e******n.

McCain had the respect of old-school Republicans and many moderate progressives based on his long standing record, from his military service to his role as the governor of Arizona. He stood a far better chance of bridging the partisan divide too, which at the time may still have been doable. Palin, basically had no political respect from anyone. Her only advantage was her popularity as a celebrity. Of course I know she was a politician but what I'm saying is that her support was earned not by her very short record as a politician but from the spectacle of being a governor with a pretty face. The spectacle of being a conservative woman, with a pretty face, in politics was basically all she had and as small as that was, it's what the McCain campaign was missing... an appeal to youth and the female, two v**er blocs that they obviously underestimated.

By the time Katie Couric interviewed Palin and exposed her for the twit she is, it was all over. Women who aren't preoccupied with lipstick and pop-songs were insulted that McCain would expect them to fall all over Palin simply because she's a woman.

Good thing too because if they did win, the nation that elected them would have been the laughing stock of the world.
When people say "it's simple" - it's usu... (show quote)
Go to
Jan 2, 2015 05:33:15   #
KHH1 wrote:
"coming".......... :roll: :roll: :lol: :lol:


Ah, not only an authority on all things political, but also an upstanding member of the language police. LIBTURD extraordinaire.
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.