They want to put this on Obama.....the white right freaked out from day one when he was elected.....r****ts and cops bugged the hell out.....now that there is a pushback....they are like vehoe and ao...only understand effect...but not cause...as they say...some people will break a bird's wings and then complain because it cannot fly..........


By Bobby Eberle November 17, 2015 7:13 am

When Barack Obama was running for president he often spoke of "fundamentally changing" America. Other presidents and candidates have talked about improving America or "making America great again," but Obama was unique with his words. Now, we see what he meant. He HAS changed America, and he has done so by creating a climate of prejudice, hatred, and excuses for unacceptable behavior.

The tensions that first erupted at the University of Missouri have now spilled over into other campuses. Groups aligned with and sympathetic to the Black L***s M****r movement are marching across campus railing about "racial ine******y and injustice." Their demands have already caused the resignations of top administrators, and yet no one in authority is calling these kids out and setting them straight.

An ideal person to do this is Barack Obama. But, of course, instead of saying what needs to be said, Obama fans the flames, and in every single instance, he comes out on the side of perceived r****m and against the "white man" and the police.

When Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates -- a friend of Barack Obama -- was arrested back in 2009, Obama was quick to play the race card. If you recall, neighbors called the police because they thought someone was trying to break into Gates's home. It turned out to be Gates, but when questioned by police, Gates became abusive and uncooperative, so he was arrested.

Here's the opening of a report by CNN as the story was unfolding:


President Obama said that police in Cambridge, Massachusetts, "acted stupidly" in arresting a prominent black Harvard professor last week after a confrontation at the man's home.

"I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played," Obama said Wednesday night while taking questions after a White House news conference.

So... without "seeing all the facts," Obama immediately said that police "acted stupidly" and implied that the whole thing was racially motivated. By saying "what role race played," Obama is putting race out there as an issue when it was not an issue at all. This happened only about six months into Obama's first term as president, and, as we know, there was more to come.

When George Zimmerman was on trial for k*****g Trayvon Martin, Obama was already convicting Zimmerman in the court of public opinion. Obama stated that Martin "looked like him," obviously implying that Martin was only k**led because he was black. As it turned out, the jury sided with Zimmerman saying that he acted in self defense when Martin attacked him.

Then there is Michael Brown -- the poster child of the entire Black L***s M****r movement. Brown who was black was unarmed when he was shot by a white police officer. (I wrote that sentence in that way, because that is the extent that Obama or the media will describe what happened.) Yes, Michael Brown was shot after having been high on drugs, robbing a store, and attacking a police officer (punching him and going for his gun). The grand jury sided with the officer, but the facts don't really matter to people like Obama and others who want to play up the incident just to stir up more racial strife.

Obama has come out in support of the Black L***s M****r movement. B****s are k*****g b****s all across the country and neither Obama nor the movement ever speaks out. Only when it's a perceived crime or injustice by a white against a black does Obama say anything.

And so we have come to this. Students are protesting because of name-calling and other "injustices." It has now spiraled into demands about hiring, free tuition, and student loan absolution. Obama, as you would expect, has voiced support for the protests. Is it any wonder the protests are spreading and becoming more intense?

As reported by MediaITE.com on Monday, "Protesters at Dartmouth University disrupted students studying in the library, reportedly directing profanity towards white students and physically pushing others."


In a critical editorial, the conservative Dartmouth Review listed some of the epithets hurled by the protesters: "F*** you, you filthy white f***s!" "F*** you and your comfort!" "F*** you, you r****t sh*ts!"

In addition, the Review reports that some of protesters became physically violent: "Men and women alike were pushed and shoved by the group. 'If we can't have it, shut it down!' they cried. Another woman was pinned to a wall by protesters who unleashed their insults, shouting 'filthy white b*tch!' in her face."

The flood of demonstrators self-consciously overstepped every boundary, opening the doors of study spaces with students reviewing for exams. Those who tried to close their doors were harassed further. One student abandoned the study room and ran out of the library. The protesters followed her out of the library, shouting obscenities the whole way.

Are there no voices out there willing to speak out against this craziness? Our president should be doing it, but all he does is stoke the fire. Imagine if the sentiments in the video below were actually spoken by Barack Obama or anyone who is notable and truly cares about the black community and race relations. Instead, we get r**ting, l**ting, "knock out games," and now college protests.

Jeb Bush Accuses Obama Of ‘Getting Us Into A Quagmire’ In Middle East

November 16, 2015 3:35 pm / 93 Comments / Politics, Top News

GOP p**********l candidate Jeb Bush offered up his strategy for dealing with ISIS in the wake of Friday’s attacks in Paris — and declared, with no apparent sense of irony, that President Obama is creating a mess in the Middle East.

“What I would do is […] what I proposed at the Reagan Library two months ago — which is to defeat ISIS, and to defeat Assad, to bring stability because it’s in our national security interests to do it,” Bush said Monday morning on Fox & Friends. “That requires a no-fly zone, safe zones. It requires arming directly the Kurdish forces in Iraq. It means reengaging with the Sunni tribal leaders that were successful in fighting with us, side-by-side, with the surge.

“It means a strategy — we don’t have a strategy right now. This president is incrementally getting us into a quagmire, without having a strategy to defeat ISIS. This is a threat to Western civilization, a threat to our own country. We need to be merciless in this effort.”



Co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck also offered this question to Jeb — and like the former Florida governor, she apparently showed no sense of irony about the impact of the Iraq War: “Governor, can you reconcile this equation for me: less troops, no strategy, a dose of denial — and yet still offering to accept 10,000 Syrian refugees into our land right here?”





Bush’s response was that this was indeed a “bad formula” — that instead of taking in refugees here, the goal should be to create “safe zones” in the region itself so that people would not have to leave. He did say, however, that he would have “compassion for people that are not part of this fight,” by taking in Christian refugees.

And while calling for a no-fly zone, Bush also criticized the idea of the Obama administration talking to Russia (who are, of course, currently flying inside Syria). “Look, I think it’s always good to talk to people. But we need to be talking to them from a position of strength, not weakness. And that’s exactly where we are today as it relates to our role in the Middle East — a position of complete weakness.”

Early signs that Democratic turnout may sag in 2016

By Michael Barone (@michaelbarone) • 11/16/15 7:13 PM

In my Wall Street Journal article on polling last Thursday, I made the point that one thing pollsters have trouble projecting is turnout. And the key fact about turnout in this decade is that it has been going down — despite all the talk about how vast surges of non-w****s and Millennials into the e*****rate will produce a "death spiral" for Republicans.

Turnout in 2012 was lower than in 2008, turnout in 2014 was lower than in 2010, and in both cases turnout was down particularly among Democrats. Barack Obama received 3.5 million fewer v**es in 2012 than 2008, but that was enough to win because Mitt Romney received only 1 million more than John McCain.

What will turnout be in 2016? Will Democratic turnout surge this time, unlike 2012? In recent news stories I find clues suggesting that the answer will be no.

The first comes from Politico, headlined "Poll: Republicans more optimistic about their party's ideas." It quotes a Gallup survey finding that 60 percent of Republican identifiers say their p**********l candidates have come up with good ideas for solving their most important problem, while a significantly lower 42 percent of Democratic identifiers say their p**********l candidates have.

To be sure, Republicans and Democrats have different priorities: Republican v**ers tend to focus on allegedly declining values and foreign policy dangers, while Democratic v**ers tend to focus on economic ine******y and c*****e c****e. But these results suggest that the Democrats' economic solutions — higher minimum wages, higher tax rates on high earners, mandatory paid family and sick leave, equal pay for women (which has actually been the law for more than 50 years) — fall short of addressing the economic problems they perceive. Which makes a lot of sense, when you think about it.

The other sign comes from a Wall Street Journal article, pointing out that four-fifths of the people who gave $5,000 maximum contributions to Barack Obama's re-e******n campaign in 2012 haven't contributed to Hillary Clinton. One Obama fundraiser is quoted as saying, "Most Democrats will be behind Hillary if she's the nominee. Once that becomes clear, the rest of that money should be easy to get."

But it's already clear, at least as clear as it has been in any cycle in which a president is not running for re-e******n, that Hillary Clinton is going to be the Democratic nominee. And while it's certainly possible that maximum contributions can be pried out of many of the currenly non-contributing four-fifths, their hesitation to part with their money suggests something in the nature of less-than-full enthusiasm for the candidate.

You can be pretty sure that these people will v**e in November 2016, and that almost all will v**e for Clinton. But if their apparent lack of enthusiasm for her is shared by large numbers of Democrats who, for wh**ever reason, don't max out for Democratic candidates, that's not a good sign for heavy Democratic turnout next year.

Limbaugh: Obama not interested in winning against ISIS

'They're asking us to not believe exactly what we see'

In the wake of the Paris terror attacks last week, radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh says President Obama has no interest in winning against the Islamic terror group ISIS.

At a news conference Monday, Obama was asked if his “reluctance to enter another Middle East war and [his] preference of diplomacy over using the military makes the U.S. weaker and emboldens our enemies.”

Obama responded: “Some of [my critics] seem to think that if I were just more bellicose in expressing what we’re doing, that that would make a difference, because that seems to be the only thing that they’re doing is talking as if they’re tough. Folks want to pop off and have opinions about what they think they would do, present a specific plan. What I’m not interested in doing is posing or pursuing some notion of American leadership or America winning or wh**ever other slogans they come up with that has no relationship to what is actually gonna work to protect the American people and to protect people in the region.”

What do YOU think? Can America survive another year of Obama? Sound off in today’s WND poll

That comment set Limbaugh off, who asked, “Did I just hear what I just heard?”

“If America winning doesn’t have any relationship to what’s gonna work, then what the hell are we working on? What’s the point?”

“He really makes the case here,” Limbaugh continued, “that this is bitter clinger rabble-rousing. It’s just insignificant. This idea of America winning, it’s so backwards. We intellectuals are so far beyond the concept of America winning. That’s not what this is about. We’re not in this to win. That’s not why we’re doing what we’re doing. That’s his point of view here. American leadership, America winning, other slogans we can come up with. I’m not interested in that. That has no relationship to what’s actually gonna work to protect the American people. America winning has no relationship to protecting the American people?

“This is arrogant condescension and the whole idea here about winning and victory, intellectuals, in their world, that is blue-collar stuff, that’s hayseed, hick stuff, talking about winning and this and that. The intellectuals know there is no winning. There’s just containment. There’s appeasement, there’s cooperation, coalition. Winning? Come on, don’t waste my time. We’re so beyond winning. In his vaunted world of superior intelligence and being, winning is such a passe thing. Leadership, it’s so irrelevant to the real world today. But he wasn’t finished. He then lectured everybody on how we have to accept Muslims as well as Christians or we’re all just a bunch of bigots.”

Want to know the secrets of the doctor of democracy? Read the classic “Rush Limbaugh: An Army of One.”

Limbaugh said Americans citizens are truly concerned about attacks within our borders now, especially in the wake of what happened in Paris as well as the ongoing influx of Muslim “refugees” from Syria into the United States. He says government officials, including the president, want Americans to deny reality.

“They’re asking us to not believe exactly what we see,” he explained. “They’re asking us to deny common sense. They’re asking us to deny what’s rational. They want us to believe them. ‘Ah, it’s workplace violence.’ Really? Allahu Akbar. It happens every day.”

Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

Limbaugh also claimed there was only one time the president seemed lively during the news conference.

“The only time he came alive, the only time Obama got passionate was when what? When he started talking about the migrants. When he started talking about the migrants and how we must keep our doors open. He started condemning people who think we need to keep Syrian refugees out of here, we need to keep Muslim refugees out of here, we only should let in Christians, he blew up.”

Obama explained: “As we accept more refugees, including Syrians, we do so only after subjecting them to rigorous screening and security checks. We also have to remember that many of these refugees are the victims of terrorism themselves. That’s what they’re fleeing. Slamming the door in their faces would be a betrayal of our values.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/limbaugh-obama-not-interested-in-winning-against-isis/#e04M6SbrYhbuQE1m.99

President Obama: ‘Folks wanna pop off’ about ISIS without specifics

by Julie Pace, Associated Press | November 16, 2015 at 11:25 AM

ANTALYA, Turkey (AP) — President Barack Obama on Monday conceded that the Paris terror attacks were a “terrible and sickening setback” in the fight against the Islamic State, but forcefully dismissed critics who have called for the U.S. to change or expand its military campaign against the extremists.

“The strategy that we are putting forward is the strategy that is ultimately is going to work,” Obama said during a news conference at the close of two days of talks with world leaders. “It’s going to take time.”

The president grew irritated amid repeated questions about whether he had underestimated the strength of the Islamic State. He said most of his critics are simply “talking as if they’re tough” and offering no real ideas. And he brushed aside those who call for sending U.S. ground troops into the region, saying that “would be a mistake” and wouldn’t work unless the U.S. was committed to being a permanent occupying force in the region.

“This is not an abstraction,” Obama said. “When we send troops in, those troops get injured. They get k**led.”

While Obama did not single out his critics by name, some Republican p**********l candidates, including former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, have called for sending U.S. forces into Syria. Bush has also suggested that any U.S. assistance to refugees fleeing the Middle East should be primarily focused on Christians, another idea that rankled Obama.

“That’s shameful,” Obama declared. “That’s not American. That’s not who we are.”

Rather than casting about for a new strategy, Obama said U.S. would intensify its current campaign of airstrikes and arming and training moderate forces. And he called on other nations to step up their involvement in the fight against the extremists.

The president also announced a new effort to share intelligence with France following the coordinated terror spree across Paris that k**led at least 129 people and injured hundreds. Officials said the U.S. was already using intelligence to help France identify targets in the flurry of airstrikes France launched against the Islamic State’s stronghold in Syria following the attacks.

While officials say the U.S. had been aware of the Islamic State’s desire to strike targets outside the Middle East, Obama said he had not been briefed on any intelligence that indicated an attack in Paris was likely.

“I’m not aware of anything that was specific,” he said.

Obama’s comments followed a two-day meeting with leaders from the Group of 20 rich and developing countries. The meeting in the seaside city of Antalya, just a few hundred miles from the Syrian border, was planned before the Paris attacks, but the carnage there ratcheted up the urgency in the talks.

The discussions about the Islamic State came amid a glimmer of progress in efforts to end the Syrian civil war, which created the chaos that allowed the extremist group to thrive. A foreign ministers’ meeting in Vienna over the weekend resulted in a new diplomatic plan that envisions negotiations between Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government and opposition groups starting by Jan. 1.

Still, sharp differences over Assad’s future and disagreements about what militant groups in Syria should be considered terrorists have dampened hopes for a breakthrough.

Obama voiced optimism about the plan, saying he had “some degree of hope” that the plan would provide a path forward. But he added, “We are very clear eyed about the very, very difficult road ahead.”

___

Published November 16, 2015
By Sheryl Estrada

Student Black L***s M****rThe student protests at the University of Missouri and resignation of former President Timothy Wolfe on Nov. 9 have sparked similar protests at college campuses around the country.

Many students say the Black L***s M****r movement, which grew nationally following the protests of the fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., in 2014, has inspired them.

Dartmouth College Teaches #BlackLivesMatter

On Thursday night, student protesters at Dartmouth College vocalized their support of the movement. Activists began to chant “Black L***s M****r” in the school library, shown on cell phone video.

The geography department and African and African-American studies program at Dartmouth added a spring-term course “10 Weeks, 10 Professors: #BlackLivesMatter,” dedicated to considering race, structural ine******y and violence in both a historical and modern context.

At Dartmouth, an Ivy League university in Hanover, N.H., race-related tension has existed on campus for quite some time. The student body is 47 percent white, 14 percent Asian, 8 percent Latino, 7 percent Black and 2 percent Native American.

Last year, in pursuit of a Freedom Budget, students held an overnight sit-in in the office of the president. The budget addressed concerns over diversity, including among faculty; perceived sexism; and the atmosphere for underrepresented people, including the L**T community.

After meeting with the student activists, President Philip J. Hanlon sent out a campus-wide email rejecting their input:

Their grievance, in short, is that they don’t feel like Dartmouth is fostering a welcoming environment. I met with these students yesterday and again today, and I deeply empathize with them. I made it clear, however, that meaningful change is hard work. Progress cannot be achieved through threats and demands. Disrupting the work of others is counter-productive. Academic communities rest on a foundation of collaboration and open dialogue informed by respectful debate among multiple voices.

Brown University Faces Controversy

At Brown University last week, students joined their peers at other colleges in protesting racial discrimination on their campuses. Students shared personal statements and experiences followed by a walkout and teach in from Africana graduate students.

Brown is located in Providence, R.I. The student body is 43 percent white, 12 percent Asian, 11 percent Latino, 6 percent Black and less than 1 percent Native American. Currently, the university is facing racial bias allegations from a Dartmouth student.

Brown University President Christina Paxson has called for a full investigation and regular meetings on racial issues after a campus police officer handcuffed a Dartmouth student during an encounter that officials called “heated and physical,” according to the Providence Journal.

Geovanni Cuevas, 23, a senior Dartmouth delegate attending the annual Latinx Ivy League Conference, said a public safety officer slammed him against a wall, threw him to the ground and handcuffed him early Saturday morning. He was waiting in line outside a party at the Machado House on Prospect Street when he told the officers they were acting inappropriately toward a drunk Brown student.

At the conference, Latino students from Ivy League schools gather to discuss race, g****r and socio-economic issues.

Paxson apologized in an email Saturday to the campus community.

“I apologized this afternoon to our students and our guests for the fear and pain this incident has caused,” Paxson wrote. “Now I extend this apology to our entire campus community … especially to our students of color.”

Students at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., participated in a sit-demonstration on Friday at the office of President John J. DeGioia to ask for the name of Mulledy Hall, which is currently under renovation, to be changed.
According to The Georgetown Voice, the student-run publication, the residence hall is named after the school’s 17th president, and a s***e owner, Thomas F. Mulledy. He sold 272 Black s***es owned by the Jesuits in charge of the school to pay off $47,654.54 in operations debt in 1838. The student body at Georgetown is 59 percent white, 9 percent Asian, 8 percent Latino, 6 percent Black and less than 1 percent Native American.

Previously, instead of changing the name, President DeGioia established the Working Group on S***ery, Memory and Reconciliation, a 15-member advisory group comprised of three students and faculty. The group’s goal was to assist him in addressing the school’s history with s***ery.

In an email sent on Saturday, DeGioia said that until a permanent change is made, Mulledy Hall will be known as “Freedom Hall” and McSherry Hall will be “Remembrance Hall.” McSherry Hall was named after William McSherry, a Georgetown president, who advised Mulledy on selling of s***es. He sold s***es as well.

Additionally, the Working Group will also have events for dialogue regarding the issue on Nov. 18 and 19 and a teach-in on Dec. 1.

Frustrated 8th-grader writes letter about r****m he experiences at school
by theGrio | November 14, 2015 at 3:54 PM
Za’Khari Waddy is only 13 years old, but already, he has had to face extreme r****m.

“Ever since we’ve moved to this area my son has been faced with r****m,” Za’Khari’s mother, Zettrona Powell, wrote in a letter to the school. “He’s been asked if he was going to rape or rob a young lady, he’s been pushed into lockers and called a n—-r on numerous occasions.”

Za’Khari wrote an open letter describing the abuse he has had to endure at school, in the hopes that he will be able to draw attention to the issue.

“Yesterday on the football bus coming from our football game a kid … started saying r****t things to me. He then started saying he does not like b****s and he told me 200 years ago my ancestors hung from a tree and after he said that I should I hang from a tree,” Za’Khari wrote in his open letter.

Frustrated 8th grader writes letter about r****m he experiences at school news letter“That made me super mad, so in the locker room I told him not to call me n—-r or that I should be hung on a tree,” he continued.

“The coaches took me away from the kid because I was really mad and they think I was going to fight him but I want someone to do something about it because I’m tired of boys messing with me because of my skin. I’m at my boiling point with this. Please do something about this because when I bring it to the office/principle [sic] you do nothing about it and I’m tired of the r****m.”

Despite this, the school has done nothing except to tell Za’Khari’s mother that they would look into the issue.

“This has crushed my son’s spirit,” she said. “When my son got off the bus, he threw his backpack, the coaches came in and told him don’t let it get to him. How can he not allow this to bother him mentally? This has mentally damaged my son.”

A DANCE OF DEATH IN THE WEST
Michael Savage: 'They're N**is in head scarfs. This is a barbaric revolution'
Published: 21 hours ago

There is a dance of death in the West and actual death in the Middle East, courtesy of the Islamof*****ts. Meanwhile, the Caesar in the White House entertains himself with a thousand sycophants, partying on behind closed doors as if the Islamof*****t hand will not touch him. He thinks he’s protected from this new plague, the Black Death of radical Islam.



We’re facing something the West hasn’t had to deal with since the wars of religion in the 16th and 17th centuries. When those religious wars ended in one place, they began in another. They lasted for over one hundred years.

The same thing is happening right now. The radical Muslims are on the warpath and they are against everyone else. They are against Muslims who are not as fanatical. They are against the members of all other religions. They think they are going to take us back to some pristine religious period in human history that never actually occurred.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!

It’s all complete rubbish. These “faith warriors” live lower than the pigs they despise. They kidnap and rape 8-year-old girls and say the Quran authorizes it. They’re not purists. They’re k**lers. They’re N**is in head scarfs. They aren’t leading a religious revival. They’re trying to take us back to a state of barbarism that has been extinct for 1,200 years.

This is a barbaric revolution, and we have a man in the White House who denies its existence. But whether he chooses to acknowledge it or not, it’s going to continue until someone puts a stop to it.

See Michael Savage’s se******n of no-nonsense books in the WND Superstore!

Jonathan Sacks called the fight against radical Islam the “defining conflict of the next generation.” He likened radical Islam to a starfish. When you cut off a spider’s head, it dies. But when you cut off the leg of a starfish, the starfish can regenerate it. Radical political Islam is a starfish. If you defeat ISIS or al-Qaeda, they will merely come back under another name.

Why would any government bring in unvetted Muslim immigrants at a time like this? It would seem that only an insane prince would do this to his country. But Obama is not insane. He’s stoned. He’s stoned on the orthodoxy of the progressive left. Obama and his supporters are drunk on their ideology. They think they’re going to create a progressive utopia by continuing their attack on all Western values.

This is precisely how great civilizations of the past declined and eventually fell. They rejected the values that made them great and degenerated into narcissism and selfishness. They kept on partying until they were too weak to defend themselves. Then, the unthinkable happened. They fell.

From Government Zero, Center Street Books, Copyright 2015
Copyright 2015 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/a-dance-of-death-in-the-west/#VZYrLSu7ItCqYjkU.99

demented is the correct term..if I was a vehoe b***h type of person and chronicled your posts.........I could only imagine what type of profile it would disclose...........but who gives a phuck..it is just a mark who gets gratification through the reactions he THINKS he is getting out of others............ain't happening......

that is read YOUR rap sheet...not YOU rap sheet....

Be sure and post my drivers license also......

Please do......Cool Breeze was right......you are demented....I'm on welfare, a janitor and now a criminal.....and ate in a flooded closed food establishment.....

learn to spell ghetto..........you're an i***t........

"to" someone else? I don't have to wish...I know how to get off my azz and accomplish.....I bet your type really hope I am telling lies...personally I did not realize how much I accomplished until I got on OPP........I could see where a r****t who believes black people are inferior would think it is a lie....if you would have grown up somewhere like Houston of LA...you would have seen black doctors, lawyers, engineers and even large premier black universities....but the sticks have nothing but other angry white people who are fairly marginal......