One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Philippe Boeing
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
Apr 25, 2014 13:56:12   #
SouthernTide wrote:
...ummmm, she wolf. He was called a r****t because he publicly said the "negros" would be better off as s***es picking cotton....

He wasn't called a r****t because he disagreed with the government...you DO know that right?


It was not r****t as if Bundy intended it to be but as it was taken out of context after leaving out his describing what he witnessed from the welfare barrio and what subsidies have done to the black population. He said HE WONDERED if they would have been better off during s***ery. A bad interview to be given in the first place because it allows reporters to pick and choose words to make wh**ever sensational case they wish. Negro is the correct term for the black race as is Caucasian for white (or should it be European American?), Hispanic for Latin or Spanish, etc., etc., ad infinitum. Not PC perhaps, but homosexual is still more precise than "gay".
Go to
Apr 24, 2014 21:23:30   #
CDM wrote:
Bundy is the victim of an old trap; arrogant confidence bread in false, short-lived celebrity created by media to motivate stupidity that creates news. Notoriety and righteousness are separated by a wide, subjective gap. Cliven couldn't quite jump the gap. He should shut up and fight his battle in the courts of law.

On a less restrained level; Harry Reid is a s**t-eater who feeds on exactly this kind of s**t. Shame on Cliven for feeding him...


True, true. Bundy knows he fell into a trap. Just like the Esquire reporter did to Phil Robertson. But he will survive, as Reid has actually made r****t remarks about Obama, who is more Arab and white than black.....but still. :))
Go to
Apr 24, 2014 20:01:43   #
jonhatfield wrote:
I lived in East Tennessee among step-relatives from Stone Mountain...real red necks and real nice people who would never have said what Bundy did. Don't excuse r****m. Understand where it comes from and that it can't be entirely condemned, but don't excuse it. You know, I attended a high school in Knoxville of over 1000 students and never ran into r****m when I spoke strongly in favor of integration. Likewise never encountered r****m in my Southern Baptist 2000 member megachurch where I was equally outspoken. There were indeed those who thought segregation or 'separate but equal' was OK (my sister was one of them, in fact, at that time), but they weren't negative about black people. Again, r****m is 'understandable' but don't excuse it. Bundy is understandable, but don't excuse him...for his r****m or for his breaking the law.
I lived in East Tennessee among step-relatives fro... (show quote)


Thanks for the biop. You said "don't excuse it" enough to make the point that either you don't edit or you are just love repeating yourself. In this day and age where every thing can be, and is challenged if politically suitable, as to whether it is PC or not, there really are no set in stone rules. Certainly not for b****s who can use the "N" word anywhere they like or use racial slurs against black Conservatives with no backlash. I say and you hear are points that are taken independent of any guidelines. I assume you will be delighted at the politically motivated trashing Bundy will take over referring to welfare ens***ement to human s***ery. Only one sentence in his whole talk was taken to push the race card.
Go to
Apr 24, 2014 18:17:22   #
jonhatfield wrote:
So why didn't you post the quotes in the first place? hmmmm?? Twisty Tatter Patter..... :?: :roll: :roll:


This is the whole comment from a really old school farmer. A redneck, yes. But a r****t? Only by lefist standards.

http://conservativevideos.com/2014/04/video-cliven-bundy-making-racial-remarks-negro-s***ery/#DT3qgHiWxouJ1oZS.03
Go to
Apr 24, 2014 17:20:29   #
jonhatfield wrote:
Perhaps if what Cliven Bundy actually said was included in the posted subject we could discuss whether what was said was r****t or not rather than discussing (or cussing) ol' Reid? hmmmmm?? Or was cussing ol' Reid the real agenda of the posting of this subject? :XD: :XD: :XD:


According to the Times, Bundy said of black people: “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail because they never learned how to pick cotton. And, I’ve often wondered, are they better off as s***es, picking cotton and having a family and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy.”
Go to
Apr 24, 2014 15:37:47   #
She Wolf wrote:
It was just a matter of time until someone played the race card. Bundy is white so of course he must be a r****t.

Words can not express how tired I am of being called a r****t if I disagree with some policy. The term has been used so many times it has lost its power.

When true r****m arises people will no longer see it for what it is.


"IF" true r****m arises it will be because as long as you are being accused of something you might as well be guilty. This is never more true for the constant misuse of the political punch lines Islamophobia and homophobia.
Go to
Apr 24, 2014 15:06:28   #
Patty wrote:
Yawn.... Man how many of these cards are in the deck?

"“This is not a game.”

Las Vegas, NV – Nevada Senator Harry Reid released the following statement today on r****t comments by Cliven Bundy reported by the New York Times.

“I used to live in North Las Vegas and it is home to some of the hardest-working people I have ever met – men and women who embody the American dream by working hard every day to build a better life for themselves and their families. By contrast, Cliven Bundy has spent decades profiting off government land while refusing to pay the same fair use fees as his fellow ranchers. Today, Bundy revealed himself to be a h**eful r****t. But by denigrating people who work hard and play by the rules while he mooches off public land he also revealed himself to be a hypocrite.

“To advance his extreme, h**eful views, Bundy has endangered the lives of innocent women and children. This is not a game. It is the height of irresponsibility for any individual or entity in a position of power or influence to glorify or romanticize such a dangerous individual, and anyone who has done so should come to their senses and immediately condemn Bundy. For their part, national Republican leaders could help show a united front against this kind of h**eful, dangerous extremism by publicly condemning Bundy.

“The bottom line is that elected officials and those in positions of power or influence have a responsibility to unite behind the basic principle that we are a country of laws, and that wh**ever our differences, it is unacceptable for individuals to use violence or the threat of violence to advance their radical views.”

Does anyone see a bit of hypocrisy here?
Yawn.... Man how many of these cards are in the de... (show quote)


Reid just exemplifies the left formula. They will burn you but if you do the same or call them on it, the smear campaign will begin. Being called a r****t, birther, Teabagger, or other standard smear vocabulary from the socialists is a badge of honor that you have gotten under their skin and they are running out of ammunition.
Go to
Apr 12, 2014 23:50:14   #
son of witless wrote:
Your knowledge of this issue is scary. If you are a gum chewer please refrain from walking or operating heavy machinery.

The fact is that local school districts contribute to state pension plans for public school teachers. The unfunded liabilities facing states and local school districts are scary.

That people like you v**e and help pick our leaders is the scariest thing of all. Along with an ID there should also be an IQ test before citizens and non citizens are allowed to v**e.
Your knowledge of this issue is scary. If you are ... (show quote)


Kali-forn-ya is a classic example of how unions and welfare programs have bankrupted the one time eighth largest economy in the world. The stat is a role model for the way the Progressives are d**gging the the rest of the country.
Go to
Apr 11, 2014 11:10:55   #
permafrost wrote:
Went back and had a look. Interesting and informative. Liked it.

Have to say, do not want to see a bloodbath. If we could somehow git the right-wing nuts to join with us left-wing nuts and work together, maybe we could the the big money out of politics. That is what may destroy our nation. Not the simply right or left wing, policies we toss back and forth. Money get its way and that is only good for money and not the people..

100 mph and 50 mph. Yea, that is about right...


The two party system is designed to keep people fighting while the Potomac two-step goes merrily along to pad its pockets. Go along to get along. That's what they will agree on.
Go to
Apr 11, 2014 10:55:19   #
permafrost wrote:
The right wing is in such need of a boogy man in Govt. Ryan is the perfect person to fill that roll, but they would rather support him. They make no sense whatsoever....


Did you scan the website I sent? How the GOP started out progressive?? Both parties are big government. The difference seems to be that one wants to socialize at 100 mph and the other at 50 mph. Only one way out in my book and it is doubtful the politburo will let that happen without a bloodbath.
Go to
Apr 11, 2014 10:50:29   #
Jack2014 wrote:
Boeing,
The problem is that
People like witless do not make any sense. SS will not go bankrupt for 70 years under current taxes. There is a 2.5-3 $$$ Trillion surplus in the trust fund. Ryan wants it so bad BC it destroys SS if he can destroy the TF like he said he wants to do.
Repuglicans like Ryan will continue to attack successful plans for the poor and middle class because they want to create a surf class. It all fits their big picture. Destroy SS Medicare w vouchers Medicaid, pension funds, personal IRAs, everything they can think of to suppress the 70% of Americans that rely on these programs.thats the stink bomb that witless wants to throw.
Boeing, br The problem is that br People like wit... (show quote)


Or crazy like a fox. Here is a very interesting history of the Republican mentality that might explain what we are seeing.
http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/major-new-push-for-takeover-of-gop/
Go to
Apr 10, 2014 12:06:10   #
son of witless wrote:
All of that sounds good, but it does not work. Liberals will never admit that SS is unsustainable. Ryan does not screw anybody with his plan. In private business the reason the defined benefit retirement plans were replaced with 401ks is that the old plans are too expensive to survive.

In the next 10 years many small school districts will go bankrupt because of their teacher retirement plans. The public sector unions have been successful in blocking reform.

SS is a defined benefit plan. It cannot survive, but do not tell that to i***ts. You know those who v**e Democrat.

Everyone wants a painless way to fund entitlements. Just go after the super rich. Just take the money from the military. There ain't enough super rich to fund the $ Trillions needed to save the welfare state. Demagogues like Barry Obama know this. They also know that the low information v**er can be lied to.

I do not expect to convince those who are brain locked in the past. You can't give vision to those who close their eyes.
All of that sounds good, but it does not work. Lib... (show quote)


Ok. You make good sense. So what is the answer. Support Ryan's cuts or?
Go to
Apr 9, 2014 17:28:20   #
son of witless wrote:
Jack,

There you go again, defending Obama. He can do anything and you just accept it. Do you ever question your unquestioning obedience to Obama? Do you ever do your own research? Do you ever seek out sources of information not controlled by the Obama mafia?


That is not how Trolls work.
Go to
Apr 9, 2014 15:36:26   #
permafrost wrote:
Good beans line. :lol:

A while ago, Oldroy and I went back and forth about ACA. I could not have been more in favor of universal health care.
What we got was such a mess, it could have been put together better by a group of high school kids.

That said, I doubt the is will be repealed. It is in place now. We will see nudges, tweaks and contortions until l it does manage to sorta work.

My disappointment is that like Bush's part D addition to medicare, this was more for the good of insurance cos than for we, the v**ers.

As old as I am probable will not affect me much. Never the less it is a big disappointment and embarrassment to me.
Good beans line. :lol: br br A while ago, Oldro... (show quote)


I agree that the chance of it being repealed are slim and depend on the mid-term e******ns and how many GOP rhinos remain in the House, if the Senate leaves left field. The point of a two party system is to maintain citizens fighting over issues that are portrayed as opposite but in reality are not. Both parties are GOVERNMENT. It has been said that the true difference between the GOP and the DOC is that the GOP wants to socialize the country at 50 mile per hour and the DOC wants to socialize it at 100 miles per hour. This entire administration from top to bottom has not only been a phenomenal failure but pushed the welfare state to the point where it might never be changed. "The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people's money". M. Thatcher.
Go to
Apr 9, 2014 15:19:55   #
Retired669 wrote:
These people don't realize when you have a drivers license, credit card, loan of some type or SS number the government already knows everything about you. I'm pretty sure it's been than way for a long time too. :thumbup:


Your medical records have been private for some time at least they were supposed to be. You political preferences are not on any of the documents you mentioned.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.