The Fence Test ...

You can't get any more accurate than this!

This is straightforward country thinking..

by Jeff Foxworthy


http://www.jefffoxworthy.com/uploads/galleries/2014/jeff-foxworthy-photo-shoot__large.jpg

Which side of the fence?

If you ever wondered which side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!

If a Republican doesn't like guns, he (isn't considered a Republican by other Republicans) doesn't buy one.
If a Democrat doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a Republican is a vegetarian, he doesn't (have teeth) eat meat.

If a Democrat is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a Republican is homosexual, he quietly leads his life (and wants to beat up put in jail other homosexuals).
If a Democrat is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.

If a Republican is down-and-out, he thinks about (how if the rich get a tax cut, he will then be rich) how to better his situation.
If a Democrat is down-and-out he wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a Republican doesn't like a talk show host, he (saays she asked mean questions because of her period) switches channels.
A Democrat demands that those they don't like be shut down.

If a Republican is a non-believer, (all republicans believe that their interpertation of the Bible must be forced on all others) he doesn't go to church.
A Democrat non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.

If a Republican decides he needs health care, he (gets mad that he has to waste money and now cannot afford that camper or boat that he wants) goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
If a Democrat decides he needs health care, he demands that the rest of us pay for his.

If a Republican reads this, he'll forward it (to a discussion sight because his imaginary friends refuse to read it.) so his friends can have a good laugh.

A Democrat will delete it because he's "offended."

Well, I forwarded it.

Ya! right if you believe these so called scientific organizations that are payed big bucks to say anything that will line there pockets with cold hard cash will tell the public anything they are told to say.An if you don't believe what I'm saying then believe me when I say I've got some really prim swamp land for sale for the right price. This old world has been going through changes since it was a baby so what's the diferance does it make now just because some dam liberal says so as he reachs behind him to pay the scientist off.??????????
NASA needs all the money they can get since there budget has been cut DUHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Great bit of the REAL history, Tasine. And correct history ALWAYS bothers the secular liberal progressive anti-Americans who seem to have been as qualified as their "hero," [Alinsky] at the total deception of America by infesting politics, government, education, media and entertainment while "WE" were too busy working. Hummmmmmmmmm. David Barton is currently going through every bit of secular liberal progressive deception printed in America; that couldn't be any further from the t***h. The "Alinskyite" bunch have now been "exposed," and are trying to infest and infect America with a "DEATH TO AMERICA" ideology that is beginning to "swarm" US, "From Sea to Shining Sea."

It was Pres. Woodrow Wilson (D), who re-segregated America. It seems the likes of Woodrow and Margaret Sanger [PPH], and most Democrat s***e owners in the plantation South thought of "negroes" as "feebleminded," and "weeds," and "needed to be destroyed," and were "sub-human," and Pres. Wilson (D) actually fired ALL the black military and government employees, Congressmen, etc., and like "Slick Willie" Clinton, believed that the "negroes" should be serving the coffee, not running for office. And that's just what Wilson (D) did; kept ONE "negro" on the WH payroll; as Pres. Woodrow's "man servant." Hummmmmmmmmmmm. Interesting when the secular liberal progressive anti-American "Historians" write the "history," how it all changes. I believe conservative "Historian" David Barton, is trying to sort all that out now; especially for the "a******n" of secular liberal progressive school books. Damn shame when the "earthly" forces get hold of a pen or a "Seat." Hummmmmm, again.

A majority does not make right.

ROSSITER’S APPROACH.
His Analytical Procedure.
Rossiter’s book is analytical, as were the first five in this series of synopses
(including Weiss6). That is, he works downward from a basis of established fact, and
applies it to characterize and model the liberal mind. This is a deductive approach,
much like proving a mathematical theorem. Rossiter is possessed of all the historically
proven facts about personality disorders. He simply observes that by its beliefs and
actions, the liberal mind matches that established data.
By mind, he means the thought processes that are used by individual liberals.
He then generalizes to the corporate level of liberalism, from which proceed the liberal
agenda and political actions. His characterization is in psychiatric terms, in general,
and the terms of personality disorders, specifically. He models the liberal mind as a
personality disorder because its beliefs and resulting actions fit exactly the psychiatric
model of a personality disorder. His evidence supporting this model is the statements
and actions of liberal politicians and intellectuals, individually and corporately.

There is also the simple fact that every diagnosis we have, from the shrinks, originated as one persons opinion.

Now, refute that.

Obama Releasing Criminal I******s Into America

House Republicans - April 29, 2016 - Total Conservative


As if President Obama’s efforts to stop deporting non-felon i*****l i*******ts were not misguided enough, new numbers from the Center for Immigration Studies show that his administration won’t even deport the really dangerous ones. A new report shows that in 2015, Obama’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency released 19,723 i*****l i*******ts with a total of 64,197 convictions back into American society. Among these crimes were all manner of violent felonies, including more than 200 murder convictions.

“These are people that were here illegally, got caught committing a crime, were convicted of that crime and instead of deporting them, they were just released back out in the United States of America,” said House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz on Thursday.

Brandishing the statistics at ICE Director Sarah Saldana, Chaffetz accused her agency of acting against the American people.

“There is a whole list of categories there that are a harm to public safety, including those that commit homicide, that you went ahead and released anyway,” he said. “And so that law is crystal clear. You are making these discretionary choices and released these people out in the public and they are committing more crimes.”

Saldana responded in the only way a liberal bureaucrat can respond – by sidestepping the problem. “I can’t tell you how disheartening it is to hear a very important issue being bandied about as a political football,” she said. “I would ask we focus on solutions rather than political banter.”

Well, the “solutions” involve a new president who isn’t actively trying to erase our sovereign borders, and a Republican legislature that isn’t afraid to advance a truly conservative agenda. But since we’re in the here and now, it’s only fair that we point out the lawlessness being promoted by this administration.

Oh, but there’s nothing anyone can do, don’t you know? Just listen to Democrat Carolyn Maloney. She related the case of Jean Jacques, a murderer who was supposed to be deported back to Haiti in 2015. But we couldn’t do it because Haiti refused to take Jacques back.

“This is such an injustice,” Maloney said. “that they will not abide by their treaty. They won’t take their felon back.”

Seriously? This is a United States congresswoman throwing up her hands. What more can we do if the global superpower known as Haiti won’t cooperate?

If we’re in such a position that we are powerless to return i*****l i*******ts to the third world, then Barack Obama has weakened this country even more than his critics believe.

But of course, it’s nonsense. We could put all of our prisoners in Haiti and there’s nothing anyone could do about it. But Obama and the Democrats are going to keep selling us this fantasy where we have no choice but to accept i*****l i*******ts. Hey, it sucks, but whatcha gonna do?

I dunno. But something would be a nice change of pace.


http://totalconservative.com/house-republicans-obama-releasing-criminal-i******s-into-america/#sthash.baRKXj64.dpuf

"I AM A DOCTOR BUT, I self identify as a Christian today!"

Good luck with that homosexual rape you experienced, twelve year old patient boy, but you said you think it might mean you are GAY. Well, I know we have been working on this together for six months, but that was before you admitted YOU might be a q***r! And that offends my sincerely held beliefs.

Good luck with the suicide thoughts and arm cutting, but you disgust me.

Here's a list of others who might treat your sorry ass. Look up the phone numbers yourself. With your disgususting propensities, I cannot be forced to perform any services for you, so there will be no records forwarded to the infidel who agrees to treat you next. Let the heathen do his OWN work!

You understand this is necessary because I am a good loving Christ centered human being right? No hard feelings then?

Why don't you follow the exact teachings of the Bible and stone him to death?
When was the last time you acted like Jesus and did not charge to heal peopple?
Who is the person that you have overwhelming h**e (in the name of Christ) for? You know, the one you loving wrote this blog to.

Bye.

FOREWORD.
Many of us are familiar with the left-wing’s penchant for referring to rightwingers
as “right-wing nuts”. It is harder for liberals to refer to those holding Ph.D.s as
“nuts”, but I have known some of the latter who were a little strange. However, would
a left-winger refer to a psychiatrist (who naturally holds an M.D.) as a nut? Especially
one who has forty years experience as a forensic psychiatrist (who diagnoses nuts).
It’s an interesting question, because what we have in this book, The Liberal
Mind5, by Lyle Rossiter, is a right-wing psychiatrist who shows persuasively that the
thought processes of the average liberal are, in fact, a mental disorder. It’s a disorder
not unlike a personality disorder. And, of course, Rossiter has dealt with personality
disorders for forty years, since criminals usually display them. So, here we have a
psychiatrist saying most liberals are nuts. And, he can prove it. What a turn of the
tables.

http://alphaaquila.org/Library/synopsis_rossiter.pdf