One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: autocthon
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 24 next>>
Jan 26, 2017 14:51:19   #
Morgan wrote:
I have no control over your lack of comprehension. good luck


Don't think it's my lack of comprehension, I think it's more along the lines trying to make sense of gibberish. Very similar to the old prospector in Blazing Saddles.
Go to
Jan 26, 2017 09:05:01   #
Morgan wrote:
No it's us who have put up with your anti American crap, you only want ONE PARTY with your f*****t party, having us paying for military to the point of breaking the TAX PAYERS BACKS. We don't work for the "government" we work for the military and military contractors! You narrow minded dim witted horses ass.


To quote the toucan in the movie "Rio". "I like you, nothing you say makes any sense."
Go to
Jan 22, 2017 08:38:27   #
I found this a most enjoyable read. This is one part of history I know little about and could not begin to authenticate or disprove it without some amount of research. But it seems very well written and believable. Did you write this or was it was it purloined in part or total from someone else? No matter, it was still impressive.
Go to
Dec 16, 2016 09:22:53   #
Cool Breeze wrote:
No one is willing to pay you for your ignirance! Get a job!


HIS ignorance? Et tu Brute
Go to
Jul 12, 2016 12:15:21   #
S: Just wondering; is it an evil soul eater because of the act of predation on souls or because of the intent to do evil for evil's sake?
Go to
Jul 12, 2016 09:08:14   #
Were you thinking of Savik (Vulcan father of logic) or of Q, the the existentialist anarchist? Anyway, that wasn't quite my thought. I could just never get my justification concept around the idea of a Christian-type God creating us, his most precious invention, granting us free will and the ability to know good from evil and then leaving out simple things like, say, the ability to regenerate important body parts. He, She or It has the where-with-all to engineer some of the most complex biological systems (here I'm leaving out evolution) that we, as mere mortals, can imagine, but grants that ability to lizards, earthworms and others that are apparently only here for us to reign over. So, leaving out my logic flow chart, I can only come to the conclusion that God is damned good at detailed biology and physics, but not so good at the macro view of quality of life. Kind of like putting Deep Blue in a car and forgetting the windshield wipers and the door handles. This can only be intentional or accidental. So, he is either an i***t savant or a sadist.
Go to
Jul 11, 2016 17:20:14   #
As an agnostic I read the back and forths with bated vision (to coin a term or possibly to create a spoonerism) and find differing values in both sides. However, I've found one possibility that I haven't seen explored. If a "God" does exist, could he be an i***t savant?
Go to
Jul 10, 2016 19:30:26   #
Just want to thank the members of this thread. Been watching OPP for quite some time and have engaged in some of the topics but have quit (for the most part) doing that. I completley despise most of the so called discussions that rapidly degenerate into name calling and forays into vindictiveness. Make your point by reason, not by degenerative sophmorisms.
Anyway, I've thoroughly enjoyed reading all the posts, and I do mean reading, not skimming. I must admit, however,to many side forays into wikipedia and the dictionary for both context and meaning.
Go to
Mar 25, 2016 10:46:33   #
JMHO wrote:
The Obama's are hypocrites...and, the i***t v**ers who elected him twice are hypocrites.


If you don't mind a little correction,---- and, the hypocrites who elected him twice are i***ts
Go to
Mar 25, 2016 10:42:21   #
Just so you don't sound too illiterate, that's girding, not "guarding.
Go to
Feb 5, 2016 11:30:00   #
Hey SSgt: Give Dummy boy some slack. You'd whine and cry also if you forgot to take the chicken bones out of your used tinfoil hat. Which probably also explains his avatar's expression.
Go to
Oct 21, 2015 14:11:44   #
Sorry about that, wrong reply button, my sincere apologies to all. I shall go have the biggest piece of Humble Pie I can find.
Go to
Oct 21, 2015 09:34:40   #
Ve'hoe wrote:
I actually think he has a point,,,, as I do with you about the way you "discuss" or "argue",,,,, whether you believe someone is right or not,,,, has no bearing on whether their opinion is valid.

His statements about you are valid,,,, you may think you answer questions,,,, however,, and he is not alone in this opinion, others think you do not..

Sometimes you get close, but then it seems you get insulted that someone,,,"beneath you" should have license to actually "question" you,,,, at least that is how it seems...

Personally,,,, I have a Doctorate,,,,, and you are not better educated than I,,, perhaps in areas of specialization there are standouts, and I get the idea often that you are insulted..... thats when you start the "drunk indian" r****m routine,,,,, and divert into a mudslinging ditch,, instead of addressing some very difficult intellectualy swamps,,, that promise more miring,,, than progress,,, whether you perceive it or not,, it is a predictable pattern in your conversation....
I actually think he has a point,,,, as I do with y... (show quote)



Interesting diatribe. I find it most interesting that someone that has a degree from the "Al Gore School of Rational Thought" could string that many mis-spellings and grammatical errors together into a condemnation of anyone or anything. Please, feel free to ignore me at any time.
Go to
Oct 20, 2015 17:02:11   #
Glaucon wrote:
RESPONSE:

I think you are playing a game and I don’t want to play games. Your game seems to be that I say something and you attempt to refute it. You don’t try to understand it, indeed, you put all your effort into not understanding it or in misunderstanding it. If you need the ego support from deluding yourself into believing you are right ALL of the time, I don’t need the aggravation.

I think there are many people on this site (who are destroying it) who will carry on a mindless game of motivated misunderstandings, insults, and made s**t to attempt to pump up their egos. Do you want to have a discussion, an exchange of opinions and information or do you want to continue your game? If it is game on for you, please don’t bother to respond to this comment.
RESPONSE: br br I think you are playing a game an... (show quote)


I think the one-word response to this is "droll"
You neither refute nor explain, you just attack. This seems to be a common tactic for the left (and sometimes the right, but not as often). The moral high ground you attempt to seize is actually a morass and if I don't agree with you I HAVE to be wrong, by definition. But you're right in one respect, I have no reason to play your game and try to make sense out of your nonsensical rantings.
Go to
Oct 20, 2015 10:40:54   #
58 Rambler wrote:
finally a voice of reason----THANK YOU !


Sorry, 58, but you picked a very poor car as a screen name as well as a strange person as a mentor. Next time don't use an Edith Bunker look-alike.
By the way, was that you I saw in 1960 standing beside a '58 Rambler that had one of the front wheels folded up into the wheel well?
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 24 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.