One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jackexton
Page: 1 2 next>>
Feb 11, 2014 14:24:47   #
The only fraud that was committed whiner, was back when Baby Bush s***e the e******n from Gore. His brother made sure those poor b****s in Broward County, would never have their v**es counted(h*****g chads). Hilary will be the next president, because the Neo-con Pubs, will not unite under Bobby Jindal or under any other electable candidate.
Go to
Feb 11, 2014 14:17:08   #
Do not quote people. You should have enough confidence in yourself, to speak your own mind; besides that, you really didn't say anything.
Go to
Feb 11, 2014 14:12:13   #
Neo-con pubs are not fools, just faithless preppers, wishing they were living in the 50's, again and attacking everything the perceive to be liberal.
Go to
Feb 11, 2014 14:02:37   #
Who the hell cares, get a life.
Go to
Feb 11, 2014 14:00:37   #
Who cares about the Bilderberg group? You can't do anything about them, Chicken Little.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 22:50:20   #
Armageddun wrote:
You make a good point about the Bible being supernatural. :thumbup: :thumbup:


I did not say the bible is supernatural, but demons.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 22:48:15   #
mwdegutis wrote:
None of it will make much sense until you turn your life over to Jesus and ask the Holy Spirit to come into your heart to grant you guidance and wisdom when reading the Bible.


A person should read the old testament, before starting the new testament. It is a foundation on which to build upon. I have read 4 versions of the bible.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 22:37:48   #
Demons do exist. They are as real as God and Satan. You may not have seen them with your eyes, but you cannot see gases such as oxygen, hydrogen or helium. The spirit world is invisible to the human eye. A demon could be defined as a fallen angel. The bible is a good source, for understanding the demonic world. Keep in mind, that they are of the supernatural. Their existance is different than a human's.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 22:25:37   #
jackexton wrote:
I can't believe you are trying to sound intelligent and actually mentioned Fox news network.


I forgot to mention that you also used the Heritage Foundation, wow, you couldn't be more in the dark ages.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 22:20:52   #
jackexton wrote:
I can't believe you are trying to sound intelligent and actually mentioned Fox news network.


Do not mention executive orders without mentioning the all time champ, George W. Bush, a moron of a president.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 22:17:57   #
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Posted By Karen Jeffers
During an interview on Fox News’ “Special Report,” columnist Charles Krauthammer called President Obama’s executive actions “unbelievably unconstitutional [1]” and lawless.

Krauthammer pointed to a double standard in Washington and asserted that if the President were a Republican, “the people would be up in arms and would be impeaching.”

According to Krauthammer, the President has circumvented Congress “at least 15 times” on issues such as immigration, c*****e c****e, and most recently Obamacare. He specifically referred to the Dream Act, in which Obama implemented certain parts of the pending legislation in 2012.

The executive order debate resurfaced when Obama announced at his State of the Union address, “I will issue an Executive Order requiring federal contractors to pay their federally funded employees a fair wage of at least $10.10 an hour.”

Heritage Foundation Legal Fellow Andrew Kloster, who has argued that Obama’s unilaterally raising the minimum wage is likely unlawful [3], told The Foundry that Krauthammer is absolutely correct that the President Obama has taken an unlawful “go it alone” approach.

“Whether it is making unlawful payments to congressional health care plans [4], making recess appointments in violation of the Constitution [5], or urging federal contractors to violate the WARN Act [6],” Kloster said, “this administration has taken numerous actions that are abusive or plainly unlawful.”

Kloster noted that Obama’s actions are often justified on the grounds that “if Congress won’t act, I will.” He said that is not consistent with the Constitution:

Frankly, circumventing the constitutional role that Congress plays in our Republic cannot be justified, no matter what the policy goals. Every President takes an oath to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution” and has a constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” President Obama should always put that oath and his constitutional duty first. His politics, his legacy, his party — all these should come a distant second.
Posted By Karen Jeffers br During an interview on... (show quote)

I can't believe you are trying to sound intelligent and actually mentioned Fox news network.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 22:12:49   #
Harry Cat wrote:
I am trying to understand the self-destructive and irrational behavior of liberals so that I can assist them in self-destruction.


I never met a neo-con, I couldn't beat.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 22:10:48   #
You know so little of war, it requires you to quote others of a greater mind.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 22:08:27   #
Progressive dems are in charge, and it's going to stay that way for a long time. Goodbye neo-con pub.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 22:01:33   #
Why are you pubs obsessed with the President?
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.