Retired living with my wife on our retirement farm in Florida age 81 today...

Did I say anything about America being a Muslim country? Or, were you just not capable of interpreting what others write correctly? Try again...

Just remember folks that there are two kinds of "contributions" people and nations make: Good and Bad

So too, Muslims or Islamists. They are either good or bad... With Marxists' take over of our U.S. education systems we no longer have children who are taught the true history of America. They are taught socialism! How many Americans know how many millions of Americans Muslims in north Africa kidnapped and sold into s***ery? How many B***k A******n citizens know that most of the African nationals sold into s***ery that the Northeaster American S***e Traders t***sported to America were sold by Muslims who were Islamists?

Two points you either missed or don't understand in the context of today's style of writing;
1) Research the writing styles of long ago, including our Founding Documents and the Bible and you will see that their style of writing differs from our 'simple sentence' style of today. Where we use lots of periods they used lots of commas to separate thoughts and clauses, so too the 2nd Amendment and other amendments and Articles of the U.S. Constitution.
2) A "m*****a" in 1787 was made up of the town's people not conscripts, but volunteer towns people, nor was it funded by any government, state or colonial and certainly not funded by Great Britain king or Parliament. The town volunteers bought and furnished their own weapons and ammunition, clothing, etc. Usually a leading citizen in the community would organize a local m*****a who might join up with another communities m*****a. Often the chosen town citizen leader of a m*****a bought uniforms and other equipment the people's m*****a needed to defend their towns, families and properties. The central nor colonial or state government, nor certainly the British Government had nothing to do with the 1787 style American m*****a.

Postscript: The American Revolutionary War, or War of Independence broke out precisely because the king of Great Britain ordered his military, British Redcoats, station in the American Colonies to march on town, arrest colonial town leaders, who would have been expected to be the leaders of m*****as, and confiscate the townsmen's weapons and ammunition. The towns' people got wind of the British move to disarm the people of the Colonies and began to organize individually, then these citizen, not colonial governments, met the Redcoats at Lexington and Concord ready to use their weapons and ammunition to defend their towns, families, property and what they had come to believe their right to run their own affairs "without interference" from the king and his government in Great Britain. The second clause of the 2nd Amendment reads, "..., the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The right of the PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR ARMS simply means, even today, we the people of the Nation retain our right to own and carry our own weapons, uninfringed by any government, WITHOUT restrictions of any kind as to which type of weapons we, the people, have the inherent or God's right to keep and bear. That citizen's right to keep and bear arms is our Founders insurance policy that protects the rest of our Bill of Rights of individuals, which are by the way not rights or powers of the Government, they are we, the people's, rights; and the 2nd Amendment is the Founders insurance policy to we citizens that protects all of the other rights and powers of the People, whether they are enshrined in the Constitution or Bill of Rights, as expressed simply but plainly in the 9th and 10th Amendments of OUR, we individual citizen's, Bill of Right and Constitution, which are one and the same. Our Constitution's limited powers of the people created central or Federal government and its Bill of Rights of individuals is the foundation of all of our laws and is to be respected and followed as our Founders intended...

May God continue to bless the People of the United States of America!

Hillary Clinton destroyed her candidacy in 2016 because she failed to get out and campaign, but the big failure was that she was so obsessed that Donald Trump would challenger her self-perceived right to be President that she spent all of her and her teams time and money attacking Donald Trump instead of laying out a viable agenda the people wanted and would accept... Hillary was strictly catering to her own flawed decisions and conclusions. The Donald won that round. So what's happening now as the Democrats and their "Elite" and "Establishment" crowd of Republican t*****rs is the Democrats and their "Elite" and "Establishment" crowd are exclusively attacking President Trump. Obviously, even to the not-so-smart "deplorable" v**ers is they are doing the same loosing Hillary behavior and expecting a different outcome... It won't happen--President Trump will continue to gain support going into the mid-term 2018 e******n and the 2010 general e******n... What will happen is Trump supporters will run new Republican candidates against the brain-dead self-proclaimed "Elite" and "Establishment" Republicans and give President Trump a clear majority to complete his and the American citizen's agenda... We, the People, WILL TAKE OUR GOVERNMENT AND NATION BACK!!!

What Obama was referring to without giving away the "Elite" and "Establishment's" long running strategy in both US political parties is the "One World Government" to be instituted and administered by the United Nations! This began in the 1940s and was championed by none other than former President George H. W. Bush. That is why the entire Bush family abandoned the Republican Party membership and v**ed for Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton in the 2016 p**********l e******n. I have much to say about this desperate attempt by enemies of democracy if anyone is interested...just e-mail me at 'albarrs@wfeca (dot) net'

Al Barrs
Author of TRUE AMERICAN HISTORY

I suggest you check further back than ISIS for a better behavior pattern match for A****a. Go back to 1920 when Adolf Hitler set up his N**i brownshirts to do his thuggery work; just as Barack Obama and George Soros has done with A****a and with various mobs beginning with the 2016 campaign season and even while Obama was still President.

We know Obama use Adolf Hitler as one of his mentors and occasionally even paraphrased from Hitler's speeches and Mein Kampf, Hitlers hefty book (which means "My Struggle"). The thuggery behavior of Hitler's brownshirts and Obama's b****shirts is identical and tells a complete true story about lifelong c*******t Barrack Hussein Obama and despotic George Soros, the anti-American bag man for Obama and his revolutionary co-conspirators attempt to "t***sform" the USA into a c*******t style nation with him at the helm as was Hitler's "dream"... We must not allow Obama, Soros and their paid thug army to succeed at any cost! Al Barrs author of TRUE AMERICAN HISTORY

Never, ever apologize for the t***h!

I just received this related e-message about anti-gun diehards, except when it comes to their self-defense...

ANTI-GUN SENATOR (D-NC) SHOOTS INTRUDER

...YA GOTTA LOVE IT!

Long time Anti-Gun Advocate State Senator R.C. Soles, 74, DEMOCRAT, shot one of two intruders at his home just outside Tabor City , N.C. about 5 p.m. Sunday, the prosecutor for the politician's home county said.

The intruder, Kyle Blackburn, was taken to a South Carolina hospital, but the injuries were not reported to be life- threatening, according to Rex Gore, district attorney for Columbus, Bladen and Brunswick counties..

The State Bureau of Investigation and Columbus County Sheriff's Department are investigating the shooting, Gore said. Soles, who was not arrested, declined to discuss the incident Sunday evening.

"I am not in a position to talk to you," Soles said by telephone. "I'm right in the middle of an investigation."

The Senator, who has made a career of being against gun ownership for the general public, didn't hesitate to defend himself with his own gun when he believed he was in immediate danger and he was the victim.

In typical hypocritical liberal fashion, the "Do as I say and not as I do" Anti-Gun Activist Lawmaker picked up his gun and took action in what apparently was a self-defense shooting. Why hypocritical you may ask? It is because his long legislative record shows that the actions that he took to protect his family, his own response to a dangerous life threatening situation, are actions that he feels ordinary citizens should not have if they were faced with an identical situation.

It has prompted some to ask if the Senator believes his life and personal safety is more valuable than yours or mine.

But, this is to be expected from those who believe they can run our lives, raise our kids, protect our families better than we can, disarm us and o*******w our Nation...

Just remember that the 2nd Amendment regarding American citizen's right to keep and bear arms uninfringed from government meddling or direct intervention was not to protect our right to hunt, target shoot or even self-defense, which were understood God-given rights in the times of our Founders, but to protect we, the people, from another tyrannical government like Great Britain and King George III... See Declaration of Independence...

Yes I agree and I have been suggesting changes to who can legally v**e in the U.S.A. and how to verify who can v**e for many years. People just don't realize that our "fair" e******n process is the only thing that prevents, or stands in the way of, open and armed revolution when a government goes bad...from the f**r e******n process of the Constitution to the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. A life prison term or death penalty might in the long run save thousands if not millions of American lives if real deadly civil war breaks out in the U.S.A. The fairness of our U.S. e******n process is key to preventing open warfare of we, the people, against an oppressive, tyrannical and over taxing government...

Conservatives need to learn that wh**ever a liberal-progressive-socialists says about anything or anybody is the exact opposite of the t***h and they always attack others claiming they are doing what the L-P-S are doing or have done. It's the old liberal flip strategy of the ingrates... They will blame you for doing what they are actually doing to deflect attention on themselves.

I've been preaching that for years...

The Constitution of The United States of America never proposed to give anyone any "prerogative" PERIOD! The Constitution of The United States of America clearly and in plain English says NOTHING about a "prerogative of the president"!

The President has no prerogative...he or she has ONLY constitutionally delegated powers and prohibitions given by the People and clearly outlined in the U.S. Constitution.

Making up prerogatives will eventual lead to a despotism form or government replacing our constitutionally guaranteed republican form of government... Making up prerogatives are the same unconstitutional action as "legislating from the bench" or "judicial activism", which is today rampant in federal courts and the U.S. Supreme Court...

V****G

V****g in U.S. Colonial Times
• Depend upon it, Sir, it is dangerous to open so fruitful a source of controversy and altercation as would be opened by attempting to alter the qualifications of v**ers; there will be no end of it…it tends to confound and destroy all distinctions, and prostrate all ranks to one common level. --John Adams, 1776.
• Every man having evidence of attachment to, and permanent common interest with, the society, ought to share in its rights and privileges. --George Mason, 1787.
• The ultimate end of all freedom is the enjoyment of a right of free suffrage. --Maryland Gazette, 1776.
• Property: Seven (of 13) states explicitly set a value or acreage requirement of real estate. The remainder required a minimum personal property requirement (in SC, the payment of taxes was sufficient).
• Property provides:
– Stake in society
– Independence from others
– A signal of competence
• Residency: Many colonies (states) instituted residency requirements. Some made citizenship of the colony or England a requirement.
• Cities and Towns differed from Colony (or State) qualifications:
– “citizenship” of a town was determined by having commercial affairs in the town (not a residence)
– Usually did not have a real estate property requirement
– In Virginia, this meant people with property in more than one town could legally v**e twice

Pro-Property Requirement:
John Adams believed granting those without property the right to v**e would lead to revolution – open class warfare.
Thomas Jefferson agreed that those without property were not independent, but saw the cure as giving property to everyone.

Madison envisioned a future country where property-less would outnumber those with property. - Either they would v**e to take property, or would be corrupted by those with property.

FREEDOM IS NEVER FREE...