V***r F***d: In every e******n the Democrats always c***t, the last e******n is a great example. You had 26 state that had more v**ers than register v**es, wants all v**es were counted...

saveamerica Loc: Texas

In every e******n the Democrats always c***t, the last e******n is a great example. You had 26 state that had more v**ers than register v**es, wants all v**es were counted you had 102.8% total v**es. There is no way you can have more than a 100%. So, why was the last e******n certified? There should have been a whole new e******n within a week or two.
Check the link below to see the what other have to say.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/02/how_to_handle_v**er_fraud.html

bahmer

saveamerica wrote:

In every e******n the Democrats always c***t, the last e******n is a great example. You had 26 state that had more v**ers than register v**es, wants all v**es were counted you had 102.8% total v**es. There is no way you can have more than a 100%. So, why was the last e******n certified? There should have been a whole new e******n within a week or two.
Check the link below to see the what other have to say.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/02/how_to_handle_v**er_fraud.html

A great article and oh so true. I bet the liberals will be out in a large number calling you all kinds of names.

MrEd Loc: Georgia

saveamerica wrote:

In every e******n the Democrats always c***t, the last e******n is a great example. You had 26 state that had more v**ers than register v**es, wants all v**es were counted you had 102.8% total v**es. There is no way you can have more than a 100%. So, why was the last e******n certified? There should have been a whole new e******n within a week or two.
Check the link below to see the what other have to say.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/02/how_to_handle_v**er_fraud.html

Because the Republicans are really stupid. Now they can't fight an e******n using v***r f***d since they will get hauled into court again and the judge that heard the case will not turn it over to another judge, even though he is retired himself. They are trying to fight it now, but it is a loosing battle since the courts are stacked against them.........

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-v**e-fraud/

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

saveamerica wrote:

In every e******n the Democrats always c***t, the last e******n is a great example. You had 26 state that had more v**ers than register v**es, wants all v**es were counted you had 102.8% total v**es. There is no way you can have more than a 100%. So, why was the last e******n certified? There should have been a whole new e******n within a week or two.
Check the link below to see the what other have to say.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/02/how_to_handle_v**er_fraud.html

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

NanaSue57 Loc: Georgia

MrEd wrote:

Because the Republicans are really stupid. Now they can't fight an e******n using v***r f***d since they will get hauled into court again and the judge that heard the case will not turn it over to another judge, even though he is retired himself. They are trying to fight it now, but it is a loosing battle since the courts are stacked against them.........

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-v**e-fraud/

So the lies will just keep on going like the Energizer Bunny. Lies, lies and more lies. C***ting, c***ting and more c***ting.

skott Loc: Bama

saveamerica wrote:

In every e******n the Democrats always c***t, the last e******n is a great example. You had 26 state that had more v**ers than register v**es, wants all v**es were counted you had 102.8% total v**es. There is no way you can have more than a 100%. So, why was the last e******n certified? There should have been a whole new e******n within a week or two.
Check the link below to see the what other have to say.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/02/how_to_handle_v**er_fraud.html

Actually, according to the Ohio Secretary of State data, 63,948 v**es were cast for president in Wood County in 2012, with 32,802 v**es for Obama, 29,704 for Romney, and 1,442 for other candidates. Once again, the figures in the email are completely off base.
Try to use real numbers from a real source. We call those facts. In no county in the United states was there a turnout of more than 100% during the 2012 e******n cycle.

rhomin57 Loc: Far Northern CA.

The Democrats can't help it. Pelose and Hilary came up with 300 v**es more to get Obama on the P**********l Candidates list in '08, than pinned the fraud on some poor old black lady who v**ed several times in a row.

saveamerica wrote:

In every e******n the Democrats always c***t, the last e******n is a great example. You had 26 state that had more v**ers than register v**es, wants all v**es were counted you had 102.8% total v**es. There is no way you can have more than a 100%. So, why was the last e******n certified? There should have been a whole new e******n within a week or two.
Check the link below to see the what other have to say.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/02/how_to_handle_v**er_fraud.html

skott Loc: Bama

rhomin57 wrote:

The Democrats can't help it. Pelose and Hilary came up with 300 v**es more to get Obama on the P**********l Candidates list in '08, than pinned the fraud on some poor old black lady who v**ed several times in a row.

Not true.

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

skott wrote:

Actually, according to the Ohio Secretary of State data, 63,948 v**es were cast for president in Wood County in 2012, with 32,802 v**es for Obama, 29,704 for Romney, and 1,442 for other candidates. Once again, the figures in the email are completely off base.
Try to use real numbers from a real source. We call those facts. In no county in the United states was there a turnout of more than 100% during the 2012 e******n cycle.

There were a number of them, and not only that, a few of them were 100% for Obama, with not even one for Romney.

Al Barrs Loc: Northwest Florida U.S.A.

No one has been able to answer the question of why Obama won his second term or explain the numbers... The day before the v**e Obama's rating was around 47%, the day after the e******n Obama's ratings was around 47%...yet Obama received 53% of the popular v**e...WHERE DID THE 6% increase on e******n day come from???

You know and I know, but no one will take any action against this Democrat e******n f***d and v**e stealing scheme...

When our intended f**r e******n process is assaulted and c*********d the only recourse left to patriotic and Constitution loving people is to enact their rights outlined in our American Declaration of independents and cash in our liberty and freedom survival insurance, our 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

leevette Loc: Florida

To eliminate v**er (and other fraudulent "acts", a 'NATIONAL" and/or 'V**ER" Identification Card could and/or would be the "natural" or "common" logical answer.

With all the of "i******s" now in residence, and still entering our Nation, who do and/or attempt to v**e, along with being on welfare and other similar sources at the tax payers' expense, there should be no wonder that, without some National form of "control", e******nss' final results could or would not be accurate and not a "fsir" decision of the "legal" v**ers and the Nation!

Al Barrs Loc: Northwest Florida U.S.A.

V****G

V****g in U.S. Colonial Times
Depend upon it, Sir, it is dangerous to open so fruitful a source of controversy and altercation as would be opened by attempting to alter the qualifications of v**ers; there will be no end of itit tends to confound and destroy all distinctions, and prostrate all ranks to one common level. --John Adams, 1776.
Every man having evidence of attachment to, and permanent common interest with, the society, ought to share in its rights and privileges. --George Mason, 1787.
The ultimate end of all freedom is the enjoyment of a right of free suffrage. --Maryland Gazette, 1776.
Property: Seven (of 13) states explicitly set a value or acreage requirement of real estate. The remainder required a minimum personal property requirement (in SC, the payment of taxes was sufficient).
Property provides:
Stake in society
Independence from others
A signal of competence
Residency: Many colonies (states) instituted residency requirements. Some made citizenship of the colony or England a requirement.
Cities and Towns differed from Colony (or State) qualifications:
citizenship of a town was determined by having commercial affairs in the town (not a residence)
Usually did not have a real estate property requirement
In Virginia, this meant people with property in more than one town could legally v**e twice

Pro-Property Requirement:
John Adams believed granting those without property the right to v**e would lead to revolution open class warfare.
Thomas Jefferson agreed that those without property were not independent, but saw the cure as giving property to everyone.

Madison envisioned a future country where property-less would outnumber those with property. - Either they would v**e to take property, or would be corrupted by those with property.

FREEDOM IS NEVER FREE...

bahmer

Al Barrs wrote:

V****G br br V****g in U.S. Colonial Times br D... (show quote)

And we see that today we have a very large part of the population that is v****g that owns no property and even in a lot of instances refuses to work for a living. How then is this person to v**e fairly and knowledgeably when he or she has no stake in the game but is only interested in the freebies that a particular political system promises them. I would say that we go back to property ownership or at least those that lease property and understand how our system works.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

saveamerica wrote:

In every e******n the Democrats always c***t, the last e******n is a great example. You had 26 state that had more v**ers than register v**es, wants all v**es were counted you had 102.8% total v**es. There is no way you can have more than a 100%. So, why was the last e******n certified? There should have been a whole new e******n within a week or two.
Check the link below to see the what other have to say.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/02/how_to_handle_v**er_fraud.html

You guys claim to want smaller Govt, Yet one of your proposed solutions is to add to Govt. not only a new office, but an office basing the allocations and staffing on the amount of paper generated by that office. Which is guaranteed to insure growth of the office...Also, v****g fraud only exists in the minds of the right wing...

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

permafrost wrote:

You guys claim to want smaller Govt, Yet one of your proposed solutions is to add to Govt. not only a new office, but an office basing the allocations and staffing on the amount of paper generated by that office. Which is guaranteed to insure growth of the office...Also, v****g fraud only exists in the minds of the right wing...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: