One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: SeaLass
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 97 next>>
May 1, 2024 17:41:02   #
Oldsalt wrote:
Congress has to repay the trust fund all that it has taken. No foreign aide until it is payed back. Then the system must be over hauled. Those of us on the system MUST be the last on the system. It is obviously a Ponzi scheme. And you can't keep raising the age of retirement. No the money that you pay in MUST be put in your account with a real interest rate that will be paid back to you! If you die before collecting it all the remainder will go into a pot for those that have not earned it. The fraud has to be taken out, more oversight at the local offices. It cannot be operated at the DC level. Hell, they have sent multiple checks to the same address and not questioned it. SSI and the IRS both need to be overhauled. Congress is the responsible party it is on them. Unfortunately they don't care, they are only concerned with lining their own pockets.
Congress has to repay the trust fund all that it h... (show quote)


Congress (or maybe I should say the treasury) is paying back all of the money it took from SS. Current estimates are that it will be fully paid back sometime around 2033 or 2034, then what? As for multiple payments, I can see the problem when you have to write out what, 2,000,000 checks a day, not hard for things to slip through. No need to keep raising the retirement age, as soon as it gets within a year or two of the average life expectancy things will quickly improve for the SSA, SS recipents, not so much .
Go to
May 1, 2024 13:43:51   #
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I agree with you 100% . Alcohol which is legal k**ls people . Weed just causes people to lay back and listen to music while eating ketchup sandwiches


They are not so harmless if they are trying to drive while impaired.
Go to
May 1, 2024 13:29:50   #
Justice101 wrote:
The Office of Management and Budget allows around a trillion dollars in ridiculous government grants.
The Biden-Harris regime have opened up easier access and more opportunities to receive them.
Do we really need studies about shrimp on a treadmill, how cocaine affects the sex life of quails or injecting steroids in hamsters to watch them fight?

Grants Plus
Federal grants are now more accessible than ever. Revised guidance reduces burdens on grant seekers and increases t***sparency with respect to more than $1.2 trillion in federal funding.
https://grantsplus.com/insights/blog/federal-grant-writing/key-takeaways-from-the-ombs-uniform-guidance-
revisions/

https://www.rd.com/list/wasteful-government-spending-examples/
The Office of Management and Budget allows around ... (show quote)


Although I do agree with your points in principle, the amount of money spent on most of these types of projects ($ millions to $ 100's of millions, often over 10 years) is all but insignificant compared to the $ trillions the government overshoots it's revenues by on a annual basis. Even your source, Grants Plus, states that they only secured $150 million for their clients. Taking the $1.2 trillion at face value, does that include "big science" projects like the James Webb telescope, the human genome protect, NOAA c*****e c****e studies, etc.?
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 21:38:58   #
JFlorio wrote:
That’s what I meant. The DOD is just an example.



No problem, just that I get the impression that a lot of individuals firmly believe that 100% of all government fraud, waste and incompetence is exclusive to the DoD.
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 19:12:01   #
JFlorio wrote:
It's simple but costly to politicians whose main interest is themselves. Reduce the size and scope of government across the board. More accountability for every department. The DOD could have billions cut without affecting readiness. There are more clerks, staff, and "gophers" in the Military than fighting soldiers. Way to many contract overruns with no consequences. No Inspector Generals watching over the departments.
Almost forgot. Cut congressional staffs by 2/3's.


Why limit it to just the DoD? I'd suspect that EVERY department in the federal stable has an overabundance of useless personnel, and for some departments it's 100%.
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 18:47:25   #
Proud American Patriot wrote:
Good answer!


Go to
Apr 29, 2024 15:03:19   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
It is said,
"The statement that science is the only path to the t***h contradicts itself
because the statement has no basis in science."


But since you are going with an atheist astrophysicist, here's some God seeking science for ya.

Read this:
Return to the God Hypothesis: Three Scientific Discoveries That Reveal the Mind Behind the Universe.
by Dr. Stephen Meyer.

The New York Times bestselling author of Darwin’s Doubt, Stephen Meyer,presents groundbreaking scientific evidence of the existence of God, based on breakthroughs in physics, cosmology, and biology.

Beginning in the late 19th century, many intellectuals began to insist that scientific knowledge conflicts with traditional theistic belief—that science and belief in God are “at war.” Philosopher of science Stephen Meyer challenges this view by examining three scientific discoveries with decidedly theistic implications. Building on the case for the intelligent design of life that he developed in Signature in the Cell and Darwin’s Doubt, Meyer demonstrates how discoveries in cosmology and physics coupled with those in biology help to establish the identity of the designing intelligence behind life and the universe.

Meyer argues that theism—with its affirmation of a transcendent, intelligent and active creator—best explains the evidence we have concerning biological and cosmological origins. Previously Meyer refrained from attempting to answer questions about “who” might have designed life. Now he provides an evidence-based answer to perhaps the ultimate mystery of the universe. In so doing, he reveals a stunning conclusion: the data support not just the existence of an intelligent designer of some kind—but the existence of a personal God.


I'd very much like to see Neil DeGrasse Tyson (The Human who Destroys God) debate Dr. Meyer,
Meyer discusses Tyson and masterfully concludes his book with a chapter on the fallacy of the "God of the gaps".

This is how Meyer begins his Conclusion:

"At 2:00am on a wintery English night in December 1986, I sat outside Isaac Newton's old rooms at the front of Trinity College. As a deep fog moved among the medieval colleges in the center of Cambridge, I reflected on how thinking about science and God had changed since the publication of Newton's great Principia in 1687, almost exactly three centuries earlier. In the epilogue to a later edition of that book called "The General Scholium" and in other scientific works, notably the Optiks, Newton articulated a profoundly theological perspective. Not only did he extol the order and uniformity of nature as a reflection of God's character and superintending care of creation, he argued for the existence of God based on design evident in nature -- in short for a God hypothesis.

Meyer's book is a mind-blower, but you'd best have a pretty solid background in the physical sciences and math to negotiate some of the deep science involved. In fact, in introducing his book, Meyer said he tried to write the narratives to accommodate the widest readership, but that when diving into the science, casual readers may encounter problems. Even with my own science background, primarily in physics and the astro-sciences, I struggled through some sections totally baffled. But I got the message.
It is said, br i "The statement that science... (show quote)



This book is a very elegant and thoughtful development and explanation of some fairly technical scientific concepts, but in the end falls back on the basic "God of the Gap" argument.
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 20:33:51   #
ACP45 wrote:
Smart people know to avoid fallacies.

One of them is known as the fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc.

It’s Latin for “after this, therefore because of this.”

The classic example concerns the rooster and the sunrise.

Every morning before the sun comes up, the rooster does his crazy crowing routine, waking up everyone around. Shortly after, the light begins to appear on the horizon.

If you knew nothing else, and you watched this happen over and over, you might conclude that the rooster is causing the sun to rise.

Of course, this is testable. You could k**l the rooster and see what happens. The sun still comes up. But wait just a moment. Just the fact that this one rooster is dead doesn’t mean that all roosters are gone. Some rooster somewhere is crowing and causing the sun to rise. So your little experiment doesn’t disprove the theory.

What a conundrum, right?

If someone is convinced that a bird is controlling the sun, there is probably no way to convince him otherwise.

We can laugh at this example. How can someone be so dumb? Actually, this basic fallacy affects all science in all times, all places, and all subjects.

MY COMMENT: Examples: 1) Look, California’s cases are down and California bans gatherings, therefore coercive measures are controlling v***s spread! 2) Countless famous people took to social media to announce they had C****-** but it was a mild case thanks to the v*****e, or 3) I took the v*****e and got weak, tired, and a bad headache, so I know the v*****e was working!

https://www.theepochtimes.com/opinion/the-fallacy-that-rules-the-world-5635419?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge
Smart people know to avoid fallacies. br br One o... (show quote)


Easy enough to test your rooster hypothesis. Find a spot in either the Atlantic or the Pacific were the ocean goes from pole to pole. Since there is no land along the band (terminator?) where the sun should rise, plus or minus a 100 miles or so, if the sun does rise then roosters had nothing to do with it since none were present in any location on earth that was within a few minutes of sunrise. Now if the sun doesn't rise,
Go to
Apr 27, 2024 20:12:00   #
Knightlady wrote:
Well, the ball is in Bidens court.

Even with the "gag" order, he'll destroy Biden. I wonder what rules they would try to impose


Simple, Slo' Joe will get 20 minutes to answer each question and be allowed to use a teleprompter. Answers will be delayed for 60 seconds so they can be edited prior to being broadcasted. Trump will get 10 seconds to answer each open ended question and will not be allowed to use a microphone and will have his hands tied behind his back!
Go to
Apr 26, 2024 18:29:44   #
American Scene wrote:
All of the issues they whine and cry and b***h about are quickly forgotten when they want or need to use

them.

Especially when maga women want an a******n, or when they want government program to help them, or

when the truly stupid whine and cry about student loan forgiveness, and how they don't want to pay for

'useless degrees, but have no problem when businesses get PPP loan forgiveness at the taxpayers expense.



Come come now, the lefties are just as bad!

"My body, my choice" only applies to a******ns, not inoculations, diet or health insurance.

They are against the 2nd amendment unless they want armed security for themselves.

They love diversity as long as everybody agrees with their political agenda.

The first amendment only applies to progressive speakers, conservative speakers are to be shut down.

They welcome i*****l i*******ts with open arms, unless the immigrants want to live near them, then the immigrants must be "relocated" as quickly as possible.

"Nobody is above the law." unless their name is Clinton, Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, Mayorkas et. al.
Go to
Apr 26, 2024 16:40:04   #
F.D.R. wrote:
Satire.


I would agree.
Go to
Apr 26, 2024 16:36:44   #
BigJim wrote:
If Israel wanted there could easily be 300,000 civilian deaths, not the Hamas claimed 30,000. They are in no way "indiscriminate"


Of course there is no question that Hamas has done and doubled checked an exact body count to come up with it's 30,000 number. They want to make sure that they don't over estimate the number of strictly civilian deaths, so no Hamas military deaths are counted.

If Hamas really cared about it's civilian population why did it attack Israel? Slo' Joe is not the PM of that country! Japan 'only' k**led ~2,000 people and sunk a handful of ships at Pearl Harbor, I guess we were suppose to have ignored that instead of getting into the most savage war in history.
Go to
Apr 25, 2024 17:55:21   #
Big Kahuna wrote:
The country of Palestine has never existed.


Exactly why I have no idea.
Go to
Apr 24, 2024 17:44:18   #
That also!
Go to
Apr 24, 2024 16:05:58   #
Ri-chard wrote:
Just another lie. you guys believe anything the elites tell you.

You believe the Old Testament is true and accurate even though the PROOF is in total opposition that it is false..

You believe the American Patriots won the Revolutionary War/War of Independance and without proof they were the documented victors with either a Doctrine of Conquest or an American Treaty.

You guys believe the oceans and lakes curve around a spinning ball earth when it is known they are Level to the eyes and measurements. All you have to do is look at NASA's curvature rate of the earth per mile.
Just another lie. you guys believe anything the el... (show quote)



#1 Show me why you think this, other than just assuming it is the case.

# 2 I believe that Cornwallis signed articles of surrender at Yorktown, and latter the British pulled all of their troops and government officials out of the colonies. Also a few years latter we had PRESIDENT George and a CONGRESS running the the country, not KING George and a PARLIMENT.

# 3 Come back when you have a bit better understanding of physics, particularly relativity and the Theory of Universal Gravitation.

Since I believe I have made my points on this topic clear to other readers on OPP, I'll consider this case closed. If you want to consider that as a victory, be my guest.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 97 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.