NO, it is NOT just semantics! It is a well-coordinated push by the MSM to o*******w the e******n and cloud people's minds with UNT***HS!

They c***t by numerous methods in an attempt to secure the e******n for their China Boy Biden, they they rush to call the e******n for Biden while v**es are still being counted. They begin their bogus President-Elect gig in an attempt to CONFUSE the low-information v**er and further attempt to convince them that Biden has won! Now they are doing everything they POSSIBLY can to deny the OBVIOUS FRAUD that has been committed in this e******n!

But there are still many paths for Trump to be PROVEN to be the TRUE WINNER of this E******N!!

I am a very nasty seventy-three year old retired federal law enforcement officer from Pennsylvania how some ever do not mistake age for senility with that standard in mind and my knowledge of the United States Criminal Code do you have any idea of how many democrat politicians would be in real hot water? I don’t want to be mean about this but I feel that someone should inform His Excellency Gavin Christopher Newsom the esteemed Governor of the State of California that whilst Alphonse Gabriel “Al” Capone a used furniture salesman from Chicago, Illinois and Cook County Deputy Sheriff was never convicted for any the alleged homicides in furtherance of his questionable prohibition alcohol business he did spend a great deal of time as a guest of the Federal Bureau of Prisons for income tax evasion. Meyer Lansky (born Meier Suchowlański; July 4, 1902 – January 15, 1983), once observed “the government does not care what you do they just want to be your partner”.

Like I said Kevie...be patient.

Braynard said he has signed declarations to go with his work, which is being used in court filings in five states.

Using Braynard’s findings, a legal group on Nov. 25 filed a lawsuit in Georgia alleging that more than 150,000 illegal v**es were counted. The suit also alleges that 43,688 legal v**es weren’t counted.

E******n Findings Could ‘Easily’ Overturn 3 States, Data Analyst Concludes
Charlotte Cuthbertson ~ November 26, 2020
WASHINGTON—The former data and strategy director for President Donald Trump’s 2016 e******n campaign says he has found enough evidence to suggest the e******n results could be “easily” turned to favor the current president.

“I have no confidence that Joe Biden is the deserved winner of this e******n, based on our findings,” Matt Braynard said in a Nov. 25 video. “He may have won, he may not have won. Trump may have lost, Trump may have been reelected.

“We just can’t know because of how bad this e******n system has operated.”

Braynard assembled a team just days after the e******n to look for inconsistencies in six contested states: Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada.

The group initially identified 1.25 million v**er issues and followed up on them through phone calls and by cross-checking data against other databases.

The team ran several major analyses including of v**ers who had moved out of state but still v**ed in the state they had left; v**ers who registered to v**e using a post office box number rather than a residential address as required; v**ers who requested a mail-in b****t and sent it in, only for it not to be counted; v**ers who didn’t request a mail-in b****t and didn’t receive one, but discovered a v**e had been cast in their name; as well as research on people who v**ed more than once and on those who are listed in the death index.

Change of Address
One of Braynard’s biggest findings involved v**ers who had submitted a National Change of Address form to the post office, indicating they had moved out of state, yet appeared to have v**ed in 2020 in the state they moved from.

In Georgia, the team found 138,221 such people, which represents a much larger number than the state’s current v**e differential (12,670) in the p**********l race.

In Michigan, there were 51,302 such people; Wisconsin had 26,673, Nevada had 27,271, Arizona had 19,997, and Pennsylvania had 13,671.

Braynard said the numbers are high enough that they could “easily” overturn current e******n projections.

“The number of questionable b****ts surpasses the v**e margin in at least three states right now—Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin,” Braynard said on Nov. 25. Those three states have a combined total of 37 e*******l v**es.

“This isn’t speculative. This is just what the data shows.”


A screenshot of a summary of findings regarding the 2020 e******n and low activity v**ers, as well as those who moved out of state, but are tagged as v****g in the original state, according to data from Matt Braynard and team.

The current v**e count difference between the two main p**********l candidates and the e*******l v**es involved are as follows:

Arizona: 10,457 v**es (11 e*******l v**es)
Georgia: 12,670 v**es (16 e*******l v**es)
Nevada: 33,596 v**es (6 e*******l v**es)
Michigan: 154,188 v**es (16 e*******l v**es)
Pennsylvania: 80,555 v**es (20 e*******l v**es)
Wisconsin: 20,608 v**es (10 e*******l v**es)

Braynard said the team also found people who had v**ed more than once. However, he suggested the numbers his team found are likely much lower than the actual numbers, as he was unable to run the data against the numbers of in-person, E******n Day v**ers.

The number of early and absentee double v**ers in Nevada and Pennsylvania was roughly 750 people, while in the other four contested states, it ranged from 150 to 400 people.

Braynard said the analyses his team conducted don’t require any leap of faith or trust in some “magical mathematical formula.”

“I can give you the list of the people who v**ed in this e******n, who filed National Change of Address cards in Georgia, moving themselves to another state,” Braynard said.

“And I can also show you the subsequent state v***r r**********ns of these individuals in other states, who then cast early or absentee b****ts back in Georgia. I can show you the names of the people and the records of them having v**ed in multiple states and the raw data that the states make available.”

Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar’s office previously said it has found no evidence of v***r f***d or mass irregularities in Pennsylvania, while secretaries of state in Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan have said the same.

Early last week, the Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity division said the Nov. 3 e******n was the “most secure” in U.S. history, saying there is “no evidence that any v****g system deleted or lost v**es, changed v**es, or was in any way c*********d.”

Trump’s legal team, however, has said it found enough evidence to potentially overturn the e******n.

Braynard said he has signed declarations to go with his work, which is being used in court filings in five states.

Using Braynard’s findings, a legal group on Nov. 25 filed a lawsuit in Georgia alleging that more than 150,000 illegal v**es were counted. The suit also alleges that 43,688 legal v**es weren’t counted.


A screenshot of a summary of findings regarding the 2020 e******n and the residency status of v**ers, as well as those who are tagged as v****g twice, according to data from Matt Braynard and team.

Post Office Boxes
Again in Georgia, Braynard found a further 1,000 people who registered to v**e by using a post office box number, but attempted to disguise the box number as an apartment or suite number.

When registering to v**e, by law, individuals must use their actual residential address as their residence. A P.O. box number can only be used as a mailing address. Homeless people can list a shelter, a soup kitchen, or even a parking lot as their residence.

“So rather than saying, ‘P.O. Box 123,’ the address is listed as ‘Apartment 123,'” Braynard said, “and that’s a major red f**g.” In Pennsylvania, the group found 1,400 such v**ers.

He said almost all of those people v**ed early or absentee, rather than in person—at a rate far higher than the overall average.

“So that really raises a red f**g because they’re illegally registered,” he said. “It sounds like a good problem for the FBI to solve.”

Braynard said he intends to share his findings with state law enforcement and the FBI.

Mail-In B****t Issues
The 2020 e******n saw an astronomical increase in mail-in b****ting, which has been deemed as the ripest for fraud.

Nine states and the District of Columbia sent b****ts to everyone on their v**er rolls, whether they requested them or not.

Five of the six contested states that Braynard looked at required a v**er to request a mail-in b****t, while Nevada mailed out b****ts to everyone on its v***r r**********n rolls.

In the five states that required a requested b****t, Braynard’s team found a significant number of people whom the state marked as having requested a b****t but not having returned it. Upon contacting those people, Braynard said many of them told his call team that they hadn’t requested a b****t at all. Others said they had requested and returned the b****t, but it hadn’t been marked as received or counted.

In Arizona, 44 percent of the people reached by phone said they hadn’t requested a mail-in b****t, despite the state receiving a completed b****t in their name.

In Michigan, that number was 24 percent; in Pennsylvania, 32 percent; and in Wisconsin and Georgia, 18 percent.

“Those are pretty startling numbers, because the question is, how? How did that b****t get requested? Who did that? Is it possible that people we talked to maybe lied to us or maybe did it and forgot about it? Was there a clerical error that could be this substantial?” said Braynard.

“Once they stripped those b****ts out of those absentee envelopes, it becomes very difficult to come up with a real remedy.”

Within the group of people who did request a mail-in b****t, but the b****t was f**gged as unreturned, between 15 percent and 33 percent of the people reached said they had actually returned their b****t.

In Pennsylvania, more than 160,000 uncounted mail-in b****ts were requested by or in the name of registered Republicans.


A screenshot of a summary of findings regarding the 2020 e******n and the issues with mail-in/absentee b****ts, according to data from Matt Braynard and team.

Braynard said he hopes his findings will help bring greater scrutiny to the e******n process, in particular the verification process of mail-in b****ts (he suggests fingerprints instead of signatures), clean v**er rolls, and the availability of open-source v****g machine data.

“It’s unfortunate, but short of a judge ordering a do-over, another e******n … short of that, I really don’t see how you fix this,” Braynard said.

“This e******n, it appears to me, has been decided by b****ts that are highly questionable. They’re anomalous.

“I cannot say with confidence who won this e******n. I don’t think anybody can.”

"Apart from an apparent complete ignorance of how civil litigation works in the American court system, specifically evidence FOLLOWS discovery, it is astonishing how easily the power brokers and propaganda arm of the Progressive Socialist movement have dumbed down their collective masses into believing they are incapable of committing v***r f***d.

Over 300 sworn affidavits by e******n employees under penalty of perjury have revealed instances of v***r f***d large and small - from a citizen's discovery of a garbage bag in a dumpster filled with v****g machine printouts of b****ts marked for president Trump to the history of the D******n v**er system and Smartmatic software and how the algorithms were manipulated to alter or change v**es. At present, 3 D******n employees involved in the process have sworn affidavits to that effect.

Statisticians are among those who swore affidavits stating the statistical impossibility of president Trump's 700,000+ lead in PA on e******n night falling to 10,000 v**es behind in less than 4 hours.

Two examples of filings out of hundreds:

(NOTE: in these two cases, Chief Judge Kenny failed to follow civil court procedure by disallowing expedited discovery and summarily dismissing the cases.

Judge Kenny denied the motion for preliminary relief stating that the plaintiffs' "interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible", with plaintiffs not fully comprehending the "absentee b****t tabulation process".)

You don't have to have sworn affidavits to file in civil court, and you certainly don't have to have a ton of evidence. The argument is, "On a reasonable basis in fact and law, I have enough information here to make an allegation, and we want the opportunity to pursue our law suit and conduct discovery - written discovery, document demands, depositions, witness lists, and we want this done quickly."
At this point, you can in fact get subpoenas.

Michigan: Constantino et al v. City of Detroit et al

November 9, 2020, Wayne County Michigan.

State of Michigan Third Judicial Circuit Court for the County of Wayne.
Circuit Court Judge Timothy Kenny Chief Judge Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan.

Plaintiff: CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, Jr.,

Plaintiff Attorney: David A. Kallman (P34200) Erin E. Mersino (P70886) Jack C. Jordan (P46551) Stephen P. Kallman (P75622) GREAT LAKES JUSTICE CENTER.

Case No. 20-014780-AW

V***r F***d, V**er Integrity, Plaintiffs alleged e******n f***d, seeking to prevent the e******n results of Detroit and Wayne County from being certified.

Defendant: CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT E******N COMMISSION; JANICE M. WINFREY, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of the DETROIT E******N COMMISSION; CATHY M. GARRETT, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS.

To wit:
1. The e******n was held on November 3, 2020 and approximately 850,000 v**es were
reported as cast in Wayne County, Michigan.

2. Plaintiff brings this action to raise numerous issues of fraud and misconduct that
occurred in order to protect the rights of all v**ers in Michigan, especially Wayne County.

3.In summary, this Complaint raises numerous instances of fraud, including, but not limited to:

* Defendants systematically processed and counted b****ts from v**ers whose name
failed to appear in either the Qualified V**er File (QVF) or in the supplemental
sheets. When v**er’s name could not be found, the e******n worker assigned the
b****t to random name already in the QVF to person who had not v**ed.

* Defendants instructed e******n workers to not verify signatures on absentee b****ts,
to backdate absentee b****ts, and to process such b****ts regardless of their validity.

* After e******n officials announced the last absentee b****ts had been received,
another batch of unsecured and unsealed b****ts, without envelopes, arrived in trays
at the TCF Center. There were tens of thousands of these absentee b****ts, and
apparently every b****t was counted and attributed only to Democratic candidates.

* Defendants instructed e******n workers to process b****ts that appeared after the
e******n deadline and to falsely report that those b****ts had been received prior to
November 3, 2020 deadline - i.e., change the date on the b****t.

* Defendants systematically used false information to process b****ts, such as using
incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the e******n workers inserted new names
into the QVF after the e******n and recorded these new v**ers as having birthdate
0f 1/ 1/ 900.

* On daily basis leading up to the e******n, City of Detroit e******n workers and
employees coached v**ers to v**e for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. These
workers and employees encouraged v**ers to do straight Democrat b****t. These
e******n workers and employees went over to the v****g booths with v**ers in order
to watch them v**e and coach them for whom to v**e.

* Unsecured b****ts arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed b****t
boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes.

* Defendant e******n officials and workers refused to record challenges to their
processes and removed challengers from the site if they politely voiced challenge.

After poll challengers started discovering the fraud taking place at the TCF Center,
Defendant e******n officials and workers locked credentialed challengers out of the
counting room so they could not observe the process, during Which time tens of
thousands of b****ts were processed.

* Defendant e******n officials and workers allowed b****ts to be duplicated by hand
without allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate. In fact,
e******n officials and workers repeatedly obstructed poll challengers from
observing. Defendants permitted thousands of b****ts to be filled out by hand and
duplicated on site without oversight from poll challengers.


Michigan: Stoddard v. City E******n Commission of the City of Detroit

November 4, 2020

State of Michigan Third Judicial Circuit Court for the County of Wayne.
Circuit Court Judge Timothy Kenny Chief Judge Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan.

Plaintiff: Sarah Stoddard and E******n Integrity Fund.

Plaintiff Attorney: Edward D. Greim (pro hac forthcoming) Special Counsel, Thomas More Society
Missouri Bar No. 54034, GRAVES GARRETT, LLC. Ian A. Northon (P65082) RHOADES MCKEE PC

Case No. 20-014604-CZ

V***r F***d, V**er Integrity, Plaintiffs, a Michigan poll observer and a nonprofit organization, allege that absentee v**e count centers in Detroit do not have one inspector from each political party present, in violation of state law. Plaintiffs seek to halt the counting of absentee b****ts until observers from both parties are present.

To wit:

1. This lawsuit challenges the ongoing action of the City E******n Commission of the City of Detroit and the Detroit City Clerk with respect to one-party control of the Absent V**er Counting Board (“AVCB”) operating out of TCF Center (formerly known as Cobo Hall).

Specifically, individual inspectors from a single major political party are “curing” rejected absentee b****ts – those absentee b****ts that cannot be properly read by the electronic counting machine -- including t***sposing the v**er’s perceived choices onto a new b****t, without the required oversight and signatures of two e******n inspectors—one from each major political party. These rejected absentee b****ts are reviewed by only one inspector, in most cases a Democratic inspector, who then unilaterally decides how the v**er intended to v**e and creates a b****t that can be read reflecting the inspector’s unilateral decision.

2. This violates MCL 168.765a (10), which requires one inspector from each party to be present at the AVCB. It also violates the Secretary of State’s rule, as set forth in her controlling E******n Officials’ Manual, requiring that any cured b****t bear the signature of two e******n inspectors who have expressed a preference for different political parties. See 168.765a(13). In application, this arrangement in the TCF Center fails to comply with Michigan law and invites fraud.

3. This action seeks an order: (a) halting further “curing” of absentee b****ts rejected by the counting machines until one inspector from each party is present to observe the cure and sign the cured b****t; and (b) segregating the rejected and cured b****ts; and (c) halting certification until the statutorily-required inspectors can be located and used to ensure e******n integrity." - Blade Runner