One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Democrats don't care...
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 26, 2020 14:45:56   #
Grugore
 
Democrats don't care about honest e******ns. They only care about winning. Why else would they object to an investigation of v***r f***d?
Every American should be concerned about v***r f***d. Democrats do not care, as long as they win. Nothing else matters to them.

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 14:51:49   #
Kevyn
 
Grugore wrote:
Democrats don't care about honest e******ns. They only care about winning. Why else would they object to an investigation of v***r f***d?
Every American should be concerned about v***r f***d. Democrats do not care, as long as they win. Nothing else matters to them.

Of course we care about honest e******ns, we want it to be as easy as possible for every eligible v**er to cast a v**e and have it counted. Our e******n was closely watched audited and in many instances recounted. Very few irregularities were found in the audits and recounts, where they were found they were explained and corrected. And most importantly absolutely no evidence of coordinated fraud has been presented to any court in the land.

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 14:53:35   #
Liberty Tree
 
Grugore wrote:
Democrats don't care about honest e******ns. They only care about winning. Why else would they object to an investigation of v***r f***d?
Every American should be concerned about v***r f***d. Democrats do not care, as long as they win. Nothing else matters to them.


You are so right!!

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 14:54:12   #
Grugore
 
Kevyn wrote:
Of course we care about honest e******ns, we want it to be as easy as possible for every eligible v**er to cast a v**e and have it counted. Our e******n was closely watched audited and in many instances recounted. Very few irregularities were found in the audits and recounts, where they were found they were explained and corrected. And most importantly absolutely no evidence of coordinated fraud has been presented to any court in the land.


Either you are trolling, or you are incredibly ignorant.

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 14:56:29   #
roy
 
Grugore wrote:
Democrats don't care about honest e******ns. They only care about winning. Why else would they object to an investigation of v***r f***d?
Every American should be concerned about v***r f***d. Democrats do not care, as long as they win. Nothing else matters to them.


How many investigations do you want just how many lawsuits has been filed,30 or more I think. And what has been found ,I mean trump has the best of the best ,the greatest of the greatest lawyers and what have they found?

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 14:59:14   #
roy
 
Grugore wrote:
Either you are trolling, or you are incredibly ignorant.


I think you are the ignorant one because you can't get by the propaganda and conspircy theories you are being fed.

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 15:11:54   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Grugore wrote:
Either you are trolling, or you are incredibly ignorant.

Both...proven time and again.

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 15:17:05   #
Kevyn
 
Grugore wrote:
Either you are trolling, or you are incredibly ignorant.


Please provide the credible evidence, that has been admitted in any court to prove otherwise.

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 15:19:01   #
Grugore
 
Kevyn wrote:
Please provide the credible evidence, that has been admitted in any court to prove otherwise.


Why bother? You would simply ignore it, like you always do. T***p w*n this e******n. It doesn't matter how much the left lies and suppresses the facts. T***p w*n!

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 15:28:27   #
roy
 
Grugore wrote:
Why bother? You would simply ignore it, like you always do. T***p w*n this e******n. It doesn't matter how much the left lies and suppresses the facts. T***p w*n!


In your dreams,In your thinking maybe trump really lost in 2016 because there must have been v***r f***d ,do you agree?

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 16:07:12   #
PeterS
 
Grugore wrote:
Democrats don't care about honest e******ns. They only care about winning. Why else would they object to an investigation of v***r f***d?
Every American should be concerned about v***r f***d. Democrats do not care, as long as they win. Nothing else matters to them.

Republicans have alleged c***ting by Democrats EVEN in e******ns that they win. The onus falls on the accuser to prove it. If you can't don't blame us because you fail...

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 16:07:55   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
PeterS wrote:
Republicans have alleged c***ting by Democrats EVEN in e******ns that they win. The onus falls on the accuser to prove it. If you can't don't blame us because you fail...

Have patience Pete.

Reply
Nov 26, 2020 16:30:31   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Grugore wrote:
Democrats don't care about honest e******ns. They only care about winning. Why else would they object to an investigation of v***r f***d?
Every American should be concerned about v***r f***d. Democrats do not care, as long as they win. Nothing else matters to them.


Seriously? Who is doing all the gerrymandering? Who filed the most law suits trying to limit the number of people who could v**e before the first v**e was cast? Who has file the most lawsuits trying to change the outcome after the v**es were cast? Yep, the good ole GOP.

Tell me, how much of that crap did dems pull in 2016?

Reply
Nov 27, 2020 03:54:53   #
Kevyn
 
Parky60 wrote:
Have patience Pete.


Patience for what, you either have evidence to back your outrageous claim or you are a liar. Put up or shut up.

Reply
Nov 27, 2020 08:26:57   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Kevyn wrote:
Patience for what, you either have evidence to back your outrageous claim or you are a liar. Put up or shut up.

Like I said Kevie...be patient.

Braynard said he has signed declarations to go with his work, which is being used in court filings in five states.

Using Braynard’s findings, a legal group on Nov. 25 filed a lawsuit in Georgia alleging that more than 150,000 illegal v**es were counted. The suit also alleges that 43,688 legal v**es weren’t counted.


E******n Findings Could ‘Easily’ Overturn 3 States, Data Analyst Concludes
Charlotte Cuthbertson ~ November 26, 2020
WASHINGTON—The former data and strategy director for President Donald Trump’s 2016 e******n campaign says he has found enough evidence to suggest the e******n results could be “easily” turned to favor the current president.

“I have no confidence that Joe Biden is the deserved winner of this e******n, based on our findings,” Matt Braynard said in a Nov. 25 video. “He may have won, he may not have won. Trump may have lost, Trump may have been reelected.

“We just can’t know because of how bad this e******n system has operated.”

Braynard assembled a team just days after the e******n to look for inconsistencies in six contested states: Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada.

The group initially identified 1.25 million v**er issues and followed up on them through phone calls and by cross-checking data against other databases.

The team ran several major analyses including of v**ers who had moved out of state but still v**ed in the state they had left; v**ers who registered to v**e using a post office box number rather than a residential address as required; v**ers who requested a mail-in b****t and sent it in, only for it not to be counted; v**ers who didn’t request a mail-in b****t and didn’t receive one, but discovered a v**e had been cast in their name; as well as research on people who v**ed more than once and on those who are listed in the death index.

Change of Address
One of Braynard’s biggest findings involved v**ers who had submitted a National Change of Address form to the post office, indicating they had moved out of state, yet appeared to have v**ed in 2020 in the state they moved from.

In Georgia, the team found 138,221 such people, which represents a much larger number than the state’s current v**e differential (12,670) in the p**********l race.

In Michigan, there were 51,302 such people; Wisconsin had 26,673, Nevada had 27,271, Arizona had 19,997, and Pennsylvania had 13,671.

Braynard said the numbers are high enough that they could “easily” overturn current e******n projections.

“The number of questionable b****ts surpasses the v**e margin in at least three states right now—Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin,” Braynard said on Nov. 25. Those three states have a combined total of 37 e*******l v**es.

“This isn’t speculative. This is just what the data shows.”


A screenshot of a summary of findings regarding the 2020 e******n and low activity v**ers, as well as those who moved out of state, but are tagged as v****g in the original state, according to data from Matt Braynard and team.

The current v**e count difference between the two main p**********l candidates and the e*******l v**es involved are as follows:

Arizona: 10,457 v**es (11 e*******l v**es)
Georgia: 12,670 v**es (16 e*******l v**es)
Nevada: 33,596 v**es (6 e*******l v**es)
Michigan: 154,188 v**es (16 e*******l v**es)
Pennsylvania: 80,555 v**es (20 e*******l v**es)
Wisconsin: 20,608 v**es (10 e*******l v**es)

Braynard said the team also found people who had v**ed more than once. However, he suggested the numbers his team found are likely much lower than the actual numbers, as he was unable to run the data against the numbers of in-person, E******n Day v**ers.

The number of early and absentee double v**ers in Nevada and Pennsylvania was roughly 750 people, while in the other four contested states, it ranged from 150 to 400 people.

Braynard said the analyses his team conducted don’t require any leap of faith or trust in some “magical mathematical formula.”

“I can give you the list of the people who v**ed in this e******n, who filed National Change of Address cards in Georgia, moving themselves to another state,” Braynard said.

“And I can also show you the subsequent state v***r r**********ns of these individuals in other states, who then cast early or absentee b****ts back in Georgia. I can show you the names of the people and the records of them having v**ed in multiple states and the raw data that the states make available.”

Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar’s office previously said it has found no evidence of v***r f***d or mass irregularities in Pennsylvania, while secretaries of state in Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan have said the same.

Early last week, the Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity division said the Nov. 3 e******n was the “most secure” in U.S. history, saying there is “no evidence that any v****g system deleted or lost v**es, changed v**es, or was in any way c*********d.”

Trump’s legal team, however, has said it found enough evidence to potentially overturn the e******n.

Braynard said he has signed declarations to go with his work, which is being used in court filings in five states.

Using Braynard’s findings, a legal group on Nov. 25 filed a lawsuit in Georgia alleging that more than 150,000 illegal v**es were counted. The suit also alleges that 43,688 legal v**es weren’t counted.


A screenshot of a summary of findings regarding the 2020 e******n and the residency status of v**ers, as well as those who are tagged as v****g twice, according to data from Matt Braynard and team.

Post Office Boxes
Again in Georgia, Braynard found a further 1,000 people who registered to v**e by using a post office box number, but attempted to disguise the box number as an apartment or suite number.

When registering to v**e, by law, individuals must use their actual residential address as their residence. A P.O. box number can only be used as a mailing address. Homeless people can list a shelter, a soup kitchen, or even a parking lot as their residence.

“So rather than saying, ‘P.O. Box 123,’ the address is listed as ‘Apartment 123,'” Braynard said, “and that’s a major red f**g.” In Pennsylvania, the group found 1,400 such v**ers.

He said almost all of those people v**ed early or absentee, rather than in person—at a rate far higher than the overall average.

“So that really raises a red f**g because they’re illegally registered,” he said. “It sounds like a good problem for the FBI to solve.”

Braynard said he intends to share his findings with state law enforcement and the FBI.

Mail-In B****t Issues
The 2020 e******n saw an astronomical increase in mail-in b****ting, which has been deemed as the ripest for fraud.

Nine states and the District of Columbia sent b****ts to everyone on their v**er rolls, whether they requested them or not.

Five of the six contested states that Braynard looked at required a v**er to request a mail-in b****t, while Nevada mailed out b****ts to everyone on its v***r r**********n rolls.

In the five states that required a requested b****t, Braynard’s team found a significant number of people whom the state marked as having requested a b****t but not having returned it. Upon contacting those people, Braynard said many of them told his call team that they hadn’t requested a b****t at all. Others said they had requested and returned the b****t, but it hadn’t been marked as received or counted.

In Arizona, 44 percent of the people reached by phone said they hadn’t requested a mail-in b****t, despite the state receiving a completed b****t in their name.

In Michigan, that number was 24 percent; in Pennsylvania, 32 percent; and in Wisconsin and Georgia, 18 percent.

“Those are pretty startling numbers, because the question is, how? How did that b****t get requested? Who did that? Is it possible that people we talked to maybe lied to us or maybe did it and forgot about it? Was there a clerical error that could be this substantial?” said Braynard.

“Once they stripped those b****ts out of those absentee envelopes, it becomes very difficult to come up with a real remedy.”

Within the group of people who did request a mail-in b****t, but the b****t was f**gged as unreturned, between 15 percent and 33 percent of the people reached said they had actually returned their b****t.

In Pennsylvania, more than 160,000 uncounted mail-in b****ts were requested by or in the name of registered Republicans.


A screenshot of a summary of findings regarding the 2020 e******n and the issues with mail-in/absentee b****ts, according to data from Matt Braynard and team.

Braynard said he hopes his findings will help bring greater scrutiny to the e******n process, in particular the verification process of mail-in b****ts (he suggests fingerprints instead of signatures), clean v**er rolls, and the availability of open-source v****g machine data.

“It’s unfortunate, but short of a judge ordering a do-over, another e******n … short of that, I really don’t see how you fix this,” Braynard said.

“This e******n, it appears to me, has been decided by b****ts that are highly questionable. They’re anomalous.

“I cannot say with confidence who won this e******n. I don’t think anybody can.”

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.