Posts for: jasfourth401
Oct 18, 2016 11:05:30 #
archie bunker wrote:
Having just heard my wife speaking on the phone, I had this idea.
We are from all parts of the country, and all speak differently than each other. There are words we all use every day that really aren't words at all. Us Texans are bad about that!
Post your non-words here, and their meaning. No politics allowed!!
I just heard my wife say "I'munna" to her brother.
Meaning: I'm going to.
GO!
We are from all parts of the country, and all speak differently than each other. There are words we all use every day that really aren't words at all. Us Texans are bad about that!
Post your non-words here, and their meaning. No politics allowed!!
I just heard my wife say "I'munna" to her brother.
Meaning: I'm going to.
GO!
"Nerk" The airport west of New York City in New Jersey.
Oct 18, 2016 10:45:05 #
(Main)
JMHO wrote:
An Ohio(?) man who describes himself as a postal worker bragged online this weekend about destroying Donald Trump absentee b****ts.
This was posted by Twitter user Randygbub on Sunday– http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/postal-worker-brags-online-destroying-trump-b****ts/
This was posted by Twitter user Randygbub on Sunday– http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/postal-worker-brags-online-destroying-trump-b****ts/
I'm sorry but this is false. http://www.snopes.com/postal-worker-caught-destroying-absentee-trump-b****ts-in-major-swing-state/
Oct 11, 2016 17:02:19 #
(Main)
S. Maturin wrote:
Checking over "republicans" like John Mc... (show quote)
Sorry. My previous response was embedded within your post. I inserted it before your emoticon...
I've been stating for a long time now that people are not v****g for Mr. Trump. They are v****g to blow up the entire system. It's broken.
I will disagree with your other comment about republicans covering for Mrs. Clinton. I look at everything bluntly and at face value. These scandals that people are shrieking about have very little underpinning. I see it in the various comments tossed around, including many on this board. You can speculate all you want. You can rant about "that criminal". You can call Bill Clinton a rapist. You can point out the play for pay scenario from their foundation. But it's all words without proof, litigated proof. Deleted emails? Really? So she deleted 33,000 emails. That's the best these morons can point to? It's lame. Worse, it's laughably naive. She's nasty, takes no prisoners and plays for keeps. They'll have to up their game big time to get her.
Oct 11, 2016 16:59:37 #
(Main)
S. Maturin wrote:
Checking over "republicans" like John Mc... (show quote)
Oct 11, 2016 15:13:16 #
(Main)
Loki wrote:
People like you who don't understand the differenc... (show quote)
I think it would be instructive to rewind the tape on this. This is what I said:
"That's easy to answer. Impeachment is the process of removing someone from the "office" they currently hold. Mr. Trump's current position is as Republican nominee. He should be removed from that position effective immediately by a v**e of party leaders."
I never said he could be impeached. I specifically stated he should be removed from the position by party leaders by their v**e.
Several posts later I stated:
"I fully understand Mr. Trump cannot be impeached. However, he is an elected politician, v**ed in by tens of millions of v**ers, and should be held to the same standard as anyone who has served, or run for the office."
Thank you for your attention.
Oct 11, 2016 13:06:29 #
(Main)
Loki wrote:
Then why don't you call for Hillary's impeachment ... (show quote)
People have been calling for that for 30 years. And to date, nothing has stuck. The latest scandals (B******i and email gate) offer little red meat. Each argues on technicalities. That won't put her in jail. You need a lot more than that.
Oct 10, 2016 12:54:14 #
(Main)
Loki wrote:
What office does he hold, and what office did he hold when he committed his "crimes?" If he was not an office holder at the time he committed wh**ever offense you think is impeachable, then he cannot be impeached.
He is the popularly elected candidate for President of the United States from the republican party, an office that pays a salary courtesy of the US taxpayer. If you say he doesn't hold that office, then you cannot v**e for him as he was not elected to the post. However, over 13 million people that already v**ed for him to fill that job would respectfully disagree with you.
Oct 10, 2016 07:32:35 #
(Main)
Loki wrote:
Close, but no cigar. An elected official is an employee of the US government. As of now we are not paying his salary, ergo, he is not our employee yet, and cannot be impeached. Even if he was, he could not be impeached for an alleged offense committed as a private citizen, before he even became a candidate. That is a standard law enforcement matter.
I'm sorry but that is not correct. The government matches funds contributed to the campaign up to $250 per donation. It comes out of the $300 million set aside for candidates to run. So no, was are paying his salary. He is allowed to do so by law. It is public record. He also has a complete secret service detail that we, as taxpayers, pay for.
Oct 9, 2016 16:50:21 #
(Main)
zillaorange wrote:
when was trumpt elected ?
He was elected on Thursday, July 21, 2016 after he accepted the v**e tally of convention delegates to be the Republican nominee for President of the United States of America. He got there by getting 13.3 million cast v**es in the primary e******n.
Oct 9, 2016 14:52:46 #
(Main)
Loki wrote:
How many overpaid prima donnas refused to stand fo... (show quote)
Sadly, I am unable to answer your first question as the patriotic network of CBS was running ads while the national anthem was played.
I fully understand Mr. Trump cannot be impeached. However, he is an elected politician, v**ed in by tens of millions of v**ers, and should be held to the same standard as anyone who has served, or run for the office.
Please note I am in no way an apologist for the Clintons. But it is very important to understand they are using the media as Trump has... or in his words, to "suck all the air out of the room." They are going to shove this story line down his throat, all day, every day until the e******n. The leaks of new stories will be constant, titillating and go a long way to further undermine any remaining credibility with the suburban female v**e. And that is all they want. They don't care what you think, or I think. It's down to table scraps now for remaining v**ers.
And the public will be rapt with attention. Hot chicks, sleazy old men, money, power. And all the real issues will wither away.
Back to the game.
Oct 9, 2016 10:40:43 #
(Main)
Loki wrote:
Perhaps you can tell us how it is possible to impeach someone who holds no office.
That's easy to answer. Impeachment is the process of removing someone from the "office" they currently hold. Mr. Trump's current position is as Republican nominee. He should be removed from that position effective immediately by a v**e of party leaders.
Enjoy your Sunday. Good football on. Much more interesting than this train wreck.
Oct 9, 2016 10:13:27 #
(Main)
Loki wrote:
Unless the fact is brought up that while Trump sai... (show quote)
You are absolutely correct Loki. And Bill Clinton was impeached for it. It was d********g.
If the GOP doesn't do the same to Trump they'll be exposed as true hypocrites, or more aptly, lame pussies.
Oct 9, 2016 09:52:17 #
(Main)
Pennylynn wrote:
I ask this question because the timing of this is ... (show quote)
This stuff has been out there for decades. Just wait until the 17 years of Howard Stern gets reviewed and broadcast. This Access Hollywood tape is just the start. They will continue to release embarrassing audio and video until e******n day and the public will eat it up. It is, in a sense, taking a page out of Trump's playbook. Overwhelm the media cycle with a constant barrage of stuff. Nobody will be able to keep track, but everyone will remember he wants to grab any hot broad's pussy. This e******n is over.
Oct 3, 2016 07:31:45 #
(Main)
MICHAEL SALADEN wrote:
At first glance it would appear that this tax repo... (show quote)
A "genius businessman" doesn't lose a billion dollars. A genius businessman makes a billion dollars. Sorry. That's how capitalism works.
Aug 17, 2016 11:39:08 #
(Main)
JFlorio wrote:
Aetna, largest provider cutting from participating in Obamacare in fifteen states to four. This is not political folks, it's math. Many predicted that this monstrosity would fail. It's either dismantle this travesty or go to a VA like system for everyone. If you consider health care a civil right fine, but someone still has to pay for it.
You are correct. It is not political. It is simply math.
Two years ago this country went majority single payer. Today, over 158 million Americans are covered under medicare, medicaid, VA, Indian (IHS), plus the federal/state/local/municipal plans (plus their families). These numbers will grow quickly as the population ages and gets poorer. By 2025, easily 200 million of us will be covered under single payer.
By contrast, Obamacare, a private market insurance option with income threshold subsidies, will have to be modified in order to survive. I am guessing that a medicare for anyone 55+ will be added, plus a guarantee of coverage for anyone up to age 26. They'll take those folks off Obamacare and dump them on the larger "medi-systems". And then it's game over. The only remaining issue will be when the rest of us get converted over to the public option.