One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Chamuco
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 next>>
Mar 6, 2020 21:11:39   #
eagleye13 wrote:
The books of Psalms and Proverbs are chock full of wisdom.


No offense but..,
so is Poor Richard's Almanac.
Go to
Mar 6, 2020 19:29:45   #
While your position is well stated..,
it is founded on "givens" which are only assumptions..,
ie, that the Bible represents the actual word of God and..,
that the t***hs that lay within it are infallible and unchangeable.

Forget the fact that there are a wide variety of Faiths which also
PURPORT to be the "word of God"..,
the so-called "word God", which the Bible purports to be, has
PROVEN to be far less than "infallible" [see its' long held interpretation
regarding the inferiority of B****s].

I respect all Faiths but choose Christianity because I believe Christ to
be the the ultimate role model as to how to live one's life.

Few atheists have my respect because they generally are an arrogant,
dismissive and condescending bunch who refuse to accept the REAL
benefits which Faith bestows..., benefits which flow to the individual
regardless of whether God exists or does not.
Go to
Mar 6, 2020 12:16:35   #
My point was that failure to condemn Schumer's remarks based on it being "protected" is beside the point.

Clearly.., censure was in order.

Furthermore.., comparing it to Trump's reference to a Federal Judge as an "Obama Judge" is ridiculous. Judges have been so categorized by who appointed them FOREVER.
Go to
Mar 6, 2020 10:18:22   #
If Schumer used the "N" word.., it would be "protected".

What's the point?
Go to
Mar 2, 2020 14:03:56   #
eagleye13 wrote:
To me;
The bottom line here is religion can be misused.
Same as nationalism.
Both have their good sides.


true.
but not what Canuckus Deploracus and i were comparing
which was religion v. science.., not religion v. nationalism.
Go to
Mar 2, 2020 10:26:01   #
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I tolerate most faiths, respect the rights of my brothers to pursue their own paths, and love God...

I do not whitewash religion (a human construct), nor do I conflate it with faith (a natural construct)....


Similarly.., I do not whitewash science by separating it from the effects of scientific discovery.

Without the "human construct".., NEITHER FAITH NOR SCIENCE EVEN EXISTS.

ADDITIONALLY...

1. while it ABSOLUTELY TRUE that without science.., weapons of mass destruction COULD NOT exit..,

2. it is ABSOLUTELY UNTRUE that without religion the vast majority of wars [including the most destructive of them all -- civil war, ww1, ww2 not to mention korean and vietnamese wars -- WOULD NOT have been waged.

Your tolerance/respect for all religions is laudable but completely beside the point.
Go to
Mar 1, 2020 20:16:09   #
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I already replied...

You can let your breath out....


What you purported to be an answer.., i read as intellectual obfuscation.

Separating science from the product of science is a monstrous non sequitur.

Furthermore.., your characterizing ww2 as a "religious war" just because it involved all faiths
is further evidence of illogic.., specifically.., that the "sides" in ww2 [allied
v. axis] were not religiously connected at all. italy, germany and japan [catholic, christian,
shintu] v. us, russia, england [catholic, christian, atheist].

Bottom line: ascribing the cause of ww2 to religion is just about as IGNORANT as one
can get AND.., reflects a mentality hostile to religion.

I know.., I know.., you LOVE religion.

LOL
Go to
Mar 1, 2020 09:44:52   #
eagleye13 wrote:
You put some good clarity/stats to this subject, Chamuco.


thanks.

i anxiously await Canuckus Deploracus' reply.

i'm not preparing to "hold my breath" on that one.
Go to
Mar 1, 2020 09:02:35   #
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
It is impossible to remove prayer from the school system... Though public didplays can be banned...

I don't know how you figure science has k**led more people than religion... Wars are not fought over science...


Seriously?!?
Scientists have created LITERALLY ALL EXPLOSIVES from gun powder to TNT to Nuclear bombs.
Additionally.., biological and chemical weapons are the product of scientific invention.

Certainly, Religion [like Nationalism and the thirst for land and power] has been an element in justifying war but.., a Bible or the Koran are BOOKS containing IDEAS.
In the end.., it's the "sticks and stones".., not the "words" that accomplish the task of "hurting".

Possibly, like too many, you are unaware of how few wars have been caused as a result of religion. In the recently published book, “Encyclopedia of Wars,” authors Charles Phillips and Alan Axelrod document the history of recorded warfare, and from their list of 1763 wars only 123 have been classified to involve a religious cause, accounting for less than 7 percent of all wars and less than 2 percent of all people k**led in warfare. While, for example, it is estimated that approximately one to three million people were tragically k**led in the Crusades, and perhaps 3,000 in the Inquisition, nearly 35 million soldiers and civilians died in the senseless, and secular, slaughter of World War 1 alone.

I've found that those who jump to blaming religion for warfare or dismissing how scientific advances have contributed FAR MORE to the human carnage are WHOLLY OBTUSE.

Hell..., if c*****e c****e produces 10% the death which some predict.., it will be the product of SCIENTIFIC development [see internal combustion engine, et al].

I suggest you rethink your anti-faith perspective. Like science, faith produces benefits as well as liabilities.

FINALLY.., your assertion that banning "public prayer" is not banning prayer is RIDICULOUS at base.
Go to
Feb 29, 2020 20:10:31   #
PeterS wrote:
This one is for Blade Runner Why are you worried about the sanctity of marriage when you have a president who has been married 3 times, bedded down with porn stars and Playboy bunnies all because a pregnant wife couldn't be tolerated when weighed against his 'manly' needs.

But hey, two men who are dev**ed to each other are an a*********n all while Trump is treated as a savior of this once great country.

Who presents a better example for the children of this nation to follow? Trump, who treats women as if they are exchangeable upon a whim or Pete Buttigieg who is dev**ed to his spouse and family and treats them as if they are first in his life?

It's funny how a single Episcopal Church of God can recognize who is a better representative for the children of this nation while the whole of the Evangelical kindom are blind to what is the glaring t***h!
This one is for Blade Runner Why are you worried a... (show quote)


Meanwhile.., the whole of the "Liberal kingdom" seems to have an aversion to school prayer regardless of its' nondenominational origin.
Science has k**led a hundred thousand times more people than has religion.
How about banning science in public schools.
Close-mindedness comes in all forms.
Go to
Feb 15, 2020 10:52:59   #
D**gonrider wrote:
My first concern is whether this is really a safe place for those of us who do not agree with the general direction of today’s politics. I’m not sure if I suffer from paranoia or just plain old common sense. Also not very savvy technologically so I am hampered by that lack of sk**l. Anyway hi all, here I am for better or worse.


There is no "safe place" on political websites.
Expecting such is counterproductive to potential growth.

I'm interested in what you consider "the general direction of today's politics".

"Common Sense" is wholly subjective to one's particular ideological inclinations
and one person's "common sense" is another's "nonsense".

My only hope is that people try to understand that INSULTS ARE NOT ARGUMENTS
and that disagreement is as American as apple pie.

Anyway.., welcome to the "fray".
Go to
Feb 12, 2020 12:14:47   #
Lonewolf wrote:
Ware did you get the idea they were illeagle.
The eveidenc shows their guilt why would you want them released ?


"ware".., illeagle"..,"eveidenc..,

I haven't laughed so hard in a long time.

No wonder that "wolf" is "Lone".
Go to
Feb 9, 2020 09:38:59   #
Zemirah wrote:
By David Robertson
Sat 8 Feb 2020 10:06 GMT

Scotland is an amazing country. I accept I may have a wee bit of bias but it has so much going for it – stunning countryside, a rich culture, incredible people and a society built on several hundred years of Christian civilization. However Scotland is in danger of throwing at least the last part of that wonderful heritage into the dustbins of history.

The Scotland that anyone over 50 grew up in is now almost unrecognizable – at least in spiritual and societal terms. In the past twenty years, I believe we have secularized faster than any nation in human history (although our Irish cousins are doing what they can to beat us in the race to the bottom!). And that has not been a change for the better.

Of course not everyone sees it that way. They believe that we are moving out of the Christian dark ages into a progressive, secular Nirvana. Tom Nairn over 50 years ago summed up the aim clearly: "Scotland will only be reborn when the last minister is strangled with the last copy of the Sunday Post."

His wish has come true. Scotland's clergy have been effectively neutered – the Established Church has now become little more than the spiritual wing of the secular thought police. Christianity is barred in all but name from much of public life – and the thought police want to ensure that it is limited in terms of private life as well.

This past week has seen two incidents that show just how far things have gone. Franklin Graham was banned from the SEC in Glasgow – at the request of Glasgow City Council (and a Church of Scotland minister) – on the grounds that his expressed [biblical] views on homosexuality and Islam could mean that the meeting was illegal.

Glasgow's motto is "Let Glasgow Flourish". Or at least, that is, the version you will get today. The real motto is "Let Glasgow flourish by the preaching of Your Word and the praising of Your Name". It is this city that now wants to ban the preaching of that Word on the grounds that it might be illegal.

Then this week the Scottish government's Finance Secretary, Derek Mackay, was compelled to resign from his post and suspended from the SNP over accusations that he was g***ming a 16-year-old boy by sending him hundreds of unsolicited messages. This has shaken the Scottish political establishment. They fear that worse is yet to come with the trial in March on charges of serious sex abuse (including attempted rape) of the former First Minister, Alex Salmond. I have written more substantially about this here.

This is not just a case of sex scandals from outliers – there have been too many of these. They are indicative of a wider, more systemic problem. We are reaping what we have sown. The trouble is, that having decided to jettison Scotland's Christian values, no one seems quite sure what to replace them with, other than wh**ever happens to be the 'woke' cause of the moment.

There is a distortion of priorities. In education, millions are spent on social engineering – not least in promoting the latest Q***r Theory philosophies – whilst thousands of pupils are unable to read or write. I visited one classroom for 7- to 8- year-olds where the posters on the wall urged pupils to 'respect others' pronouns'. I would have been impressed if the children could have told me what a pronoun was!

The Scottish government having removed God, Christianity and the Bible from the curriculum are struggling to replace Him with themselves. They seek to control all kinds of private and individual appetites. They regulate eating, drinking, smoking and driving. The only drive they do not want to regulate is sex, which is seen as an appetite to be indulged.

The problem with this philosophy is the fruit of its outworking. Whilst it would be a bit much to call it g***ming, I don't think it goes too far to say that it enables and makes g***ming easier. When you are teaching vulnerable young children about anal sex, pornography, and other things that I don't want to mention in a family-friendly column, what do you expect when they want to experiment with these things?

It is beyond ironic that video material which is used by Scottish schools when posted on YouTube comes with an age warning! When schools are teaching children about sexual positions as documented by this parent, then you know that something is deeply rotten in the system.

Meanwhile the poor suffer as the bourgeois values of the elites are imposed upon all. Schools are under resourced, teachers are demoralized and the devastating effect of family background is seen at its worst in the poorest housing estates. It is beyond irony that having sidelined Christianity (and now actively discriminating against it) we have moved to a situation where the once most literate country in the world, the land of 'the people of The Book', now has one in five of its population functionally illiterate.

In the name of science we have removed Christianity and as a result fewer people are studying science than ever before!

Scotland, rather than being a progressive Nirvana, is becoming a deeply confused, depressed and dumbed down society – one in which we are no longer truly shocked when the latest sexual or corruption scandal is unveiled.

We are a warning to the rest of the Western world of what happens when you jettison your Christian foundations and have nothing tried and tested to replace them with, except the woke theories from academics in Harvard, Edinburgh and Oxford.

It's not all doom and gloom. Sometimes the darkness causes the light to shine all the more brightly. When the Finance Secretary resigned it was the day he was supposed to introduce the new Scottish budget. His deputy, Kate Forbes, stepped into the breach and did a remarkable job – acknowledged as such by even her opponents. In fact, she did so well that the latest odds have her as the favourite to replace Nicola Sturgeon when, as many expect, Sturgeon leaves sooner rather than later.

As the journalist Stephen Daisley commented, "India-raised, Cambridge-educated, Gaelic-speaking, pro-life, Bible-believing Christian. Kate Forbes is not your ordinary Scottish nationalist but, when placed in an extraordinary situation, she showed what she's made of."

Who knows but that may be a straw in the wind of something better to come for my beloved and beleaguered country. We can only pray so. O flower of Scotland...when will we see your like again?!

David Robertson is director of Third Space in Sydney, Australia
and blogs at www.theweeflea.com
By David Robertson br Sat 8 Feb 2020 10:06 GMT br... (show quote)


Conflating "pro-life" with sexual preference issues is INSANITY and wholly counterproductive and damaging to the pro-life movement.
A******n involves CHOICE.., sexual preference DOES NOT.
It is just as impossible for me to be attracted to men as it is for a homosexual to be attracted to women.
There is NO human right greater or more basic than the right to follow one's sexual preference.
There is no more ridiculous notion than to believe a person controls their sexual preference.
Go to
Feb 2, 2020 01:09:01   #
SUZZY wrote:
THEY FEAR TRUMP & T***H!! SOME OF THEM WILL BE EXPOSED AS PART OF THIS PLOT (NUNES, GRAHM. BARR, PENCE ATTORNIES CIPPROSLIME AND SEKELO PLUS MORE. THE T***H WILL COME OUT-- ONLY TOO LATE FOR THE V**E. THE FIX IS IN. GOD HELP US UNDER DICTATOR TRUMP


A fine example of insanity in caps.
Go to
Jan 31, 2020 16:00:54   #
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
The Cover Up would be UNCOVERED with eyewitness testimony.

Yet they squeal about an unfair trial when the opportunity exists to expose the unfairness they think is there.

Must be a creepy feeling defending that freak. They've sold their souls.


No need since that "unfairness" has already been "exposed".., while those few Dems who even believe in "souls" sold them long, long ago.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.