Contrary to the Trump's right wing position that the Iran deal was "a horrible deal", mainly because anything Obama did was a horrible deal, the horrible deal did accomplish things. The things it accomplished took years to negotiate, and brought a unified agreement between key nations, including China and Russia.

Tens of thousands of centrifuges were taken offline, leaving specific types for medical use
weapons grade reactor cores were filled with concrete
weapons grade materials were removed from Iran
Several nations were watching like a hawk for deviations of agreements
Inspections controls were part of the deal
These deals meant that it set Iran back many years toward being able to proceed as they were, leaving years to intervene
Economically trade deals were good for the world's econy being able to sell goods to 80 million people

If Trump could get a fraction of what this deal provided with North Korea he would be a hero. It will never happen. Kim has a long record of agreeing to anything and then not adhering to it. Kim is set to be the winner, he will effectively have trade sanctions lifted and start exerting an influence if not control over South Korea. Trump is going to get Kim making agreements that he comes back bragging about getting the best deals, other presidents have too and they didn't mean anything. Kim most likely has a whole array of his failed experiments he's ready to give up and destroy in order to make Trump look good. He also has a substantial array of conventional weapons that will not be on the negotiating table. Trump does not have what it takes to put the negotiating team together and put a deal together with Kim that means anything. Meanwhile Kim will have his trade sanctions lifted.

Obama's "horrible" deal, which by the way our military and intelligence advisers were saying and still say have been adhered to by Iran, brought a stability to that part of the middle east. Iran has 80 million people, does any country want a war fought in Iran that makes it as uninhabitable as so many other countries in the middle east have been rendered?

So our i***t in chief who sees attacking a relatively stable country as an option to solve the problem that actually had been solved is willing to blow Iran wide open in the same way Syria has been. The same allies will be involved in that proxy war where Russia is going to be backing the regime we will be fighting. Trump has done the thing to set the table for war, he has used years old information about Iran's nuclear status that is no longer true.

I'm suspecting that Russia (Putin) is about to drive the final wedge that caps this country as the world's leader, which it is no longer. Russia and China signed onto this deal with NATO, what is to keep Russia and China, as well as every other country from honoring their sanctions lifting and maintaining the deal as is? The US cannot attack Iran against the combined solidarity of the rest of the world. China and Russia would like to see the US destabilized to the degree that the world's currency is not the dollar. If you are sitting in Putin's shoes he has gotten from Trump what no other president including Pence would have ever given up. We are no longer the world leaders we once were, other countries are stepping into the void.

Imagine if the head of a federal agency announced a new policy for its scientific research: from now on, the agency would no longer allow its studies to be reviewed and challenged by independent scientists, only democrat scientists, and its researchers would not share the data on which their conclusions were based. The response from scientists and journalists would be outrage. By refusing peer review from outsiders, the agency would be rejecting a fundamental scientific tradition. By not sharing data with other researchers, it would be violating a standard t***sparency requirement at leading scientific journals. If a Republican official did such a thing, you’d expect to hear denunciations of this latest offensive in the “Republican war on science.”

That’s the accusation being hurled at Scott Pruitt, the Republican who heads the Environmental Protection Agency. But Pruitt hasn’t done anything to discourage peer review. In fact, he’s done the opposite: he has called for the use of more independent experts to review the EPA’s research and has just announced that the agency would rely only on studies for which data are available to be shared.

Liberals have accomplished the very successful dumbing down of our citizenry during the past 40 years. This was an absolute long-term plan so that less and less people would have the ability to think and understand complex issues in science and politics. It is the Lemmings affect so that all of their brainwashed followers simply nod their heads and simply believe wh**ever their supposed leaders say without thought or logical review or challenge. G****l W*****g is a prime example of group think without challenge. None of the scientific model predictions have come true and that is why they were force to change their talking point message to C*****e C****e. The earths climate has never been static for any long period of time so their basic premise is farcical. Since our last Ice Age, the earths average temperatures have been bot much higher and much lower than they are now. There are ice core samples that prove my last statement as simple t***h. The reason for G****l W*****g/C*****e C****e has been promoted by supposed leaders is to create another simple method for taxation and to add another layer of control over your everyday life. A docile and conformatly stupid citizenry is much easier to manage and control.

Well, that's the last thing the Al Gore people want, that will show how they are laying about the facts.

https://www.city-journal.org/html/scott-pruitt-warrior-science-15821.html