Not a single claim in the original post is true. Indeed, there is not the smallest shred of evidence that could lead even a "normal" ultra-right person to believe one of the claims. This site seems to be dev**ed to the craziest bigots in our country.

How long does out take you people to recognize that you are engaged in mutual masturbation? If the ACA were regarded as an unconstitutional tax -- one of the issues before the court -- the court wouldn't have ruled that the individual mandate was constitutional. Robert's holding does have some troublesome implications for the future, that isn't one of them.

Government has NOT grown! Every jobs report shows that decreases in government employment are offsetting much of the job increase in the private sector.
Just saying someone has broken the Constitution and deserves impeachment lacks something: what particular actions has the president taken that are high crimes?

No one has ever suggested that the Court "redefine" marriage. The Supreme Court's purview is to say what state and federal governments may do or not do with respect to relationships between people. The Court can certainly conclude that the governments of California and the United States have no power to give special treatment to one form of relationship over all others unless it can show that doing so is based on a "fundamental interest" of the nation. This the government cannot possibly do.