DOJ Lifts Gag Order On "Clinton/Uranium One" Informant: What’s Next???

November 8, 2017

There’s a (living) eyewitness to one of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s biggest crimes who is ready to testify and share his story publicly, but until last night he was reluctant to do so because of a powerful disincentive to go public h*****g over his head.

No, it was not fear of becoming another victim of Arkancide, nor was it money.

It was a nondisclosure agreement with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, now allegedly run by Director Christopher Wray, who was nominated by Republican President Donald Trump and confirmed by a Republican Senate, and who is supervised by Republican Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Earlier this week Washington super-lawyer Victoria Toensing, an attorney for the former FBI informant, told Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” that her client has “specific information about contributions and bribes to various entities and people in the United States" related to the Clinton’s Uranium One deal.

She said she could not go further because her client had not been released from a nondisclosure agreement, but suggested the gag order could be lifted soon. Toensing also claimed that her client was “threatened by the Loretta Lynch Justice Department” when he pursued a civil action in which he reportedly sought to disclose some information about the case.

As our friend Michael W. Chapman at CNS News reported in his excellent coverage of the Uranium One scandal:

As the case wound down, the FBI directed the informant to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA), which prohibited him from speaking about the case to members of Congress. Special Counsel Robert Mueller was the FBI director during the bulk of the investigation; James Comey became director in September 2013.

According to Toensing, the Department of Justice, under the Obama administration, told the informant that if he violated the NDA, "he would lose his liberty." Toensing told CNSNews.com that she had never heard of an NDA "that had a criminal penalty for violation," and that the penalty is "usually monetary."

As of last night, the gag order – or more correctly nondisclosure agreement – has been lifted.

"As of tonight, the Department of Justice has authorized the informant to disclose to the chairmen and ranking members of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, as well as one member of each of their staffs, any information or documents he has concerning alleged corruption or bribery involving t***sactions in the uranium market," Justice spokesman Ian Prior said.

According to Fox News, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is also focusing on the informant amid scrutiny of the 2010 approval of the controversial uranium deal that netted the Clinton Foundation over $140 million in donations from Russian interests and Bill Clinton a half-million dollar speaking fee.

Grassley is raising questions about potential “conflicts of interest” for Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration, and especially wants to know whether the committee that approved the deal was aware of the FBI probe involving a subsidiary of the same Russian firm.

And Chairman Grassley is getting right to the heart of the real issue here – why was the nondisclosure agreement put in place?

The Washington Examiner’s Todd Shepperd reports that "The Executive Branch does not have the authority to use non-disclosure agreements to avoid Congressional scrutiny," Grassley wrote in a letter to his former Senate colleague Jeff Sessions. "If the FBI is allowed to contract itself out of Congressional oversight, it would seriously undermine our Constitutional system of checks and balances. The Justice Department needs to work with the Committee to ensure that witnesses are free to speak without fear, intimidation or retaliation from law enforcement."

Grassley's letter to the Justice Department also asks for a copy of the non-disclosure agreement the informant signed with the FBI.
In a recent hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Grassley said, "This committee has an obligation to get to the bottom of this issue" and from experience, when Chairman Grassley wants to get to the bottom of something he usually succeeds.

Could it be because senior Justice Department and FBI officials were neck deep in covering up the Clinton’s pay-for-play scheme?

As Fox News reporter Doug Jarrett observed:

It seems it was all covered up for years by the same three people who are now involved in the investigation of President Donald Trump over so-called Russian “collusion.”

But why has there been no prosecution of Clinton? Why did the FBI and the Department of Justice during the Obama administration keep the evidence secret? Was it concealed to prevent a scandal that would poison Barack Obama’s presidency? Was Hillary Clinton being protected in her quest to succeed him?

The answer may lie with the people who were in charge of the investigation and who knew of its explosive impact. Who are they?
Eric Holder was the Attorney General when the FBI began uncovering the Russian corruption scheme in 2009. Since the FBI reports to him, he surely knew what the bureau had uncovered.

What’s more, Holder was a member of the “Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States” which approved the uranium sale to the Russians in 2010. Since the v**e was unanimous, it appears Holder knowingly and deliberately countenanced a deal that was based on illegal activities and which gave Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium assets.

It gets worse. Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney, was supervising the case. There is no indication that any of these men ever told Congress of all the incriminating evidence they had discovered and the connection to Clinton. The entire matter was kept secret from the American public.

It may be no coincidence that Mueller (now special counsel) and Rosenstein (now Deputy Attorney General) are the two top people currently investigating whether the Trump campaign conspired with the Russians to influence the 2016 p**********l e******n. Mueller reports to Rosenstein, while Comey is a key witness in the case. It is not unreasonable to conclude that Mueller, Rosenstein and Comey may have covered up potential crimes involving Clinton and Russia, but are now determined to find some evidence that Trump “colluded” with Russia.

Our Twitter friend, freelance writer Daniel John Sobieski, was pretty tough on Attorney General Sessions when he (correctly we think) he demanded Sessions lift the gag order on the informant:

“The question is now whether Jeff Sessions wants to help President Trump to drain the swamp be vacating the gag order and letting evidence come forth proving the Clintons orchestrated the greatest criminal conspiracy in U.S. history at the expense of American national security or whether he is just another swamp thing committed to clogging up the drainage pipes. Justice may be blind, but it should never be gagged.”

Now that the gag order has been lifted it is time for Attorney General Sessions to choose a side in the much larger question: Why was the nondisclosure agreement put in place to begin with, who demanded the informant sign it, and what was their relationship with Bill and Hillary Clinton?

Sources - conservative hq, Michael Chapman, CNS News, NDA, Ian Prior, Washington Examiner, Todd Shepperd, FOX News, Doug Jarrett,.

Judiciary Member Calls for Mueller’s Resignation!!!

November 4, 2017

Below is the full text of the Gaetz’ resolution:

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Robert Mueller should resign from his special counsel position.

Whereas from 2001–2013, Robert Mueller served as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

Whereas as early as 2009, the FBI discovered that Russian officials were engaging in bribery and extortion, tainting the American uranium industry in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to strengthen their own nuclear program;

Whereas investigations into Russia’s corruption of American uranium-related businesses were supervised by then-United States Attorney Rod Rosenstein, currently serving as Deputy Attorney General, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, currently serving as Deputy Director of the FBI;

Whereas despite knowledge of this corruption, backed by documents and an eyewitness account, neither the Department of Justice nor the Federal Bureau of Investigation under the leadership of Mr. Mueller brought charges;

Whereas the Department of Justice actively threatened the liberty of a confidential informant embedded within Russia’s nuclear program who wished to inform Congress about Russian corruption of American uranium-related companies, and the FBI required this informant to sign a non-disclosure agreement, intentionally depriving Congress of information vital to national security and Congressional oversight authority;

Whereas Members of Congress have raised objections to, and concerns with, the sale of American uranium assets to Russian companies, and raised these concerns in official correspondence to then-President Obama as early as 2010;

Whereas in 2010, when the Russian Federation needed American approval of uranium sales, former President William Jefferson Clinton received hundreds of thousands of dollars in speaking fees from Kremlin-linked institutions, and requested approval from the State Department to meet with central figures in Russia’s nuclear industry, and eventually met with Russian leader Vladimir V. Putin at Mr. Putin’s private residence;

Whereas the Clinton Foundation has either directly or indirectly received undisclosed donations totaling millions of dollars from Russian-linked sources, including from officials in Russia’s nuclear program;

Whereas in 2010, Hillary Clinton, founder of the Clinton Foundation, wife of former President Clinton, and then Secretary of State, approved the sale of Uranium One to a Russian state-owned nuclear technology corporation;

Whereas any thorough and honest investigation into the corruption of American-uranium related business must include investigating the willful blindness of the FBI and its leaders;

Whereas under 28 CFR 45.2, no individual can participate in a criminal investigation if he has a personal or political relationship with any organization substantially involved in the conduct that is subject of the investigation;

Whereas under 28 CFR 45.2, no individual may participate in a criminal investigation if the individual’s participation would create an appearance of conflict of interest likely to affect public perception of the integrity of the investigation;

Whereas the Code of Federal Regulations, applied to Mr. Mueller, demonstrates that he cannot be allowed to investigate his former colleagues, supervisors, and subordinates;
and

Whereas these obvious conflicts of interest are unacceptable to the United States justice system and the American people:
Now, therefore, be it Resolved,


That House of Representatives expresses its sense that Robert Mueller is c*********d and should resign from his special counsel position immediately.

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion/2017/11/hopelessly-c*********d-judiciary-member-calls-for-muellers-resignation-over-uranium-one-scandal-2459747.html (MUST READ - CLICK ON THIS)

You are the pit of propaganda, I now recognize it, as you can't prove a single one of those lies that you want stupid people to believe because they are too lazy to look up the facts and t***h, that you are completely lacking in any semblance of t***h. Put up some proof of any of this BS you just stated, for I know you can't, but now I'm going to start putting up proof that you keep denying.

Your an even bigger hypocrite than I thought, you fail to acknowledge that for the first two years of Obama's Presidency, he had a 40 plus seat majority in the US House, and a filibuster proof majority in the US Senate, and the Republicans could not stop Obama and the Democrats from passing anything that they agreed on, and that's how Obamacare got passed without a single Republican v**e, because they were not even allowed to read it before Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats made everyone v**e on it without reading it until after it was passed. But when the Democrats were working on Obamacare, behind "LOCKED" doors, the Republicans went to Obama and complained that the Democrats were not allowing them to participate in writing the law and adding their ideas for healthcare, but Obama told them, "Too bad, e******ns have consequences." That is what formed Obama's relationship with the Republicans.

Obama's rank that you give him is only by far left radical liberals, progressives, and Democrats, as most all Republicans and Independents and many moderate Democrats consider him the worst President in US history, replacing Jimmy Carter for that dishonor, and Obama's terrible economic statistics in an economic recovery that started 20 days before he was inaugurated, and his foreign relations record, proves that without a shadow of a doubt.

I know nothing of a bill passed through Congress that President Trump has not signed yet, but if he doesn't sign it, and doesn't veto it, it automatically becomes law. So I'll wait and see what happens before I accuse anyone of anything. If he vetoes it, then your accusation could possibly be true, unless he has a really good reason for vetoing it.

But you keep exposing your hatred for the man, as you keep making up fantasy conspiracies that you can't prove, just like Obama never could prove his US citizenship, despite using two different forgeries in his two attempts to prove his citizenship, for you haven't an ounce of proof of any claim of Russian collusion, but we do have proof of the Clinton's Russian collusion, as that will be hitting the investigative Congressional committees in 2018.

Those investigations will include Robert Mueller as a suspect, as US Senators are already demanding that he recuse himself as Special Prosecutor because of his part in quashing an FBI investigation that would have stopped the Clinton sale of Uranium One to the Russians, as it also seems that Obama had a part in it through the DOJ, as Rosenstein was heading that Russian investigation of their criminal acts to get them into the US uranium markets, for the DOJ, and also helped quash the investigation, that he and Mueller kept hidden from the US Congress.

The US Congress now knows about all this, and even the Democrats are mad about it, as one of the investiagtors who wanted to make all this information known to the US Congress, other federal law enforcement agencies, and the public, was made to sign an NDA to keep Congress from learning what the Russians were doing, so the Clinton sale of Uranium One to the Russians would go through. President Trump's DOJ just released him from that NDA, and now about six different Congressional investigative committees have scheduled him to testify and show all the documented evidence of who paid who what, in order for the Russians to bribe and threaten their way into that sale of Uranium One, which took both Rosenstein and Mueller to quash and keep hidden that FBI Russian investigation into the Russian crimes that set up that sale, from the US Congress, so that sale could go through.

But still no proof of any Trump/Russian collusion. And nothing in my posted comment that you say you refuse to read "because it is just plain 'f**e news' and already debunked" (how do you kow if you refuse to read it) is a lie because none of it is f**ed news and nothing has been debunked, unless you want to try to do it yourself, instead of ignoring the t***h, and use lies to keep from having to acknowledge it. You're just one big hypocrite and liar.

Cold iron, the Dow was a in the 18,000s when Donald T***p w*n the e******n, and despite Obama and Hillary Clinton saying that if he won, that the stock market would crash, but instead 8 hours after Donald Trump became our President-elect, it started on it's historic rise and hasn't stopped since, and today it is in the 23,500s, and when he was inaugurated, I believe it had reached the 20,000s. The stock market has broken just about all it's records since President T***p w*n the P**********l e******n, just the opposite of the scare that Obama and Hillary Clinton tried to use on the American people in their attempt to get Hillary Clinton elected President.

What a bunch of BS and lies! If your fantasy of another made up conspiracy is true, then why did the stock market start it's historic rise just 8 hours after President T***p w*n the e******n, which Obama and Hillary Clinton both kept trying to scare the American people by saying that if President T***p w*n, the stock market would immediately crash, yet that historic rise has not stopped at any time during that last year, and is now in the 23,000s, from the 18,000s during the e******n? By the time President Trump was inaugurated it had already gone up to the 20,000s, and since President Trump has been in office, tell us about the stock market rules and regulations that your conspiracy theory claims that he has rescinded, that affects anything in the stock market.

We know that President Trump in Jan & Feb had repealed, rescinded, and reversed all of Obama's economy k*****g EOs, policies, and agendas, but nothing that had anything to do with the stock market rules and regulations. But you radical liberals have been claiming that the success of President Trump's economy is due to what Obama did, but now you're saying that the stock market is doing so good because President Trump "is rescinding all rules that require big banks and corporations to be honest and t***sparent", when the stock market started it's historic rise because President T***p w*n the e******n, nearly 3 months before he actually became President and had the power to rescind what you claim he did to cause it's histroic rise.

You liberals need to get your stories straight, but that's hard to do for hypocrites. It takes someone with only a 5th grade education and intelligence, to claim a conservative to be a N**I, since that acronymn is German for "National Socialists", which are f*****ts, and all f*****ts have always historically been far lesft socialists, c*******ts, and Marxists, and if you doubt this and want to see the proof for it, I'll be happy to post it to disprove more of your hypocritical lies.

The Christian conservative that President Trump appointed to the SCOTUS is anything but a N**I, as that promised posting of what a N**I really is will prove, and the Republicans only did what US Senator Obama and the Democrats threatened that they would do with Bush if he tried to appoint SCOTUS with less than a year left in his Presidency, it seems what goes around, really does come around, but you hypocrites didn't complain about it when Senator Obama and the Democrats threatened the same thing, which much wasn't said about it when Hillary Clinton was projected by the liberal biased mainstream media would to win by a landslide, and that Donald Trump had absolutely no possible path to an 'E*****rial College' win, but when reality showed up, then the proverbial feces hit the rotating air mover, since Hillary Clinton would not be the one making that SCOTUS appointment.

As far as what President Trump will end up accomplishing with the North Korea problem, that Obama just completely ignored, at least he is addressing the problem and has lined up most of the UN to increase sacnctions on North Korea, which does include China and Russia, and has threatened to take military action if North Koprea doesn't live up to it's former agreements concerning nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them on the USA, which when those agreements were broken, Obama just ignored it. Never heard you complain about anything that Obama just allowed North Korea to do without any pushback.

But that is just more proof of your hypocrisy, just another conspiracy theory of yours, while you ignore everyone else's. But Obama is no longer President, so his sins , that you never complained about, don't count, but because of your hatred for President Trump, you are making up a lot of sins to blame on President Trump.

Wasn't the stock market in the 18,000s before the 2016 P**********l e******n, when Obama and Hillary Clinton was warning the American people that if Donald T***p w*n the P**********l e******n, that the stock market would crash, a scare tactic to get the American people to not v**e for Donald Trump, and instead v**e for Hillary Clinton, when in reality 8 hours after President-elect Donald T***p w*n the e******n, then the stock market started on it's historic record setting rise, up to todays amount of well into the 23,000s, which is actually a 5,000 plus rise in just a year?

Your opinion only, as President Trump's accomplishments have been proving exactly the opposite.

But what talking about what recent Presidents have done, exposes the hypocrites when they demeanor President Trump for what he has done, after they said nothing about the flaws, failures, and terrible policies and agendas of the previous President and the harm and suffering he caused the American people. Also talking about the P**********l candidate opponent of President Trump, who promised the American people that she would continue all the failed policies and agendas of that previous President, that caused millions upon millions of Democrats in the '"Great Blue Wall" of states in the rust belt, as well as all the battleground states, to v**e for President Trump instead.

But those facts go against your opinion and agenda, so you just ignore it, as you did my last comment to you, complaining that you had a job and not the time to read the comment, but in reality not the time to make up another of your conspriacy theories against President Trump, since you can't face the t***h of what happened in the e******n, and why so many millions of Democrats v**ed for President Trump instead of Hillary Clinton.

I have no stress, because I love answering you fool's BS, brought on by your "HATRED" for President Trump because he beat your very flawed and criminal Presidentia candidate. The reason I have no stress is because over the last 8 years, thanks to Obama and Hillary Clinton, the Democrats have lost over 1,300 seats to the Republicans all across the USA in local, state, US House, US Senate, and White House e******ns, and what you're seeing from me is really elation and ectasy, not stress, but we know you hypocrites are under great stress over how reality is just the opposite of the fantasy that you keep wanting others to believe, when reality is actually just the opposite.

I'm glad that someone is keeping score, just to show how useless liberal lies are in solving a problem that should not entail repealing the American people's rights.

In your dreams, two Democrats won governorships in two deep blue states, big deal, going to be intersting to find out how those 9 Democratic Senators will do during midterm e******ns in their re-e******n bids in the states that President T***p w*n? If they win, then you'll have something to brag about, even though incumbants win more that 80% of the time.

Ha, ha, ha, you're secret is safe with me.

He spent 10 "TRILLION" in deficits, and three times that much that was covered by taxes, and you're correct, he acomplished nothing but doubling the national debt in only 8 years that took 232 years to acquire and saddling the American people with a healthcare law that makes healthcare unaffordable to all but the rich, but he took and awful lot of very extravagant and expensive vacations and golf outings while many Americans couldn't find jobs and were losing their homes.

Are you implying that President Trump is bringing down the Republican Party, like Obama and Hillary Clinton brought down the Democratic Party over the last eight years, losing over 1,300 Democratic political seats in local, state, US House, US Senate, and White House e******ns to the Republican candidates?

We don't want President Trump to stop his tweeting, because that is the only way that we can learn the t***h, instead of watching and listening to the "F**e News" from the liberal biased mainstream media like NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, NYT, WAPO, and etc.

President Trump has his tax cuts coming very soon, unless the Democrats can once again obstruct President Trump from giving the American people what we elected him to give us, and if they do, 2018 will end up a very sad year for them, so the Democrats better be aware the American people are watching what they're doing more than what President Trump is doing to fulfill his promises, which if he doesn't. we'll know to blame the obstructionist in the US Congress.

All President Trump has to do to lower healthcare costs is to get rid of Obamacare and allow our free markets to work, then people's healthcare costs would probably be cut in half, unless the federal government again tries to controll all healthcare like they did with Obamacare, and pass another federal disaster of a healthcare bill, again trying to control the American people's healthcare, that should be left just between the American people and their doctors, without the federal government poking it's nose into it and causing costs to skyrocket again.

We don't care about his popularity, as long as he fulfills his promises and gets done what the American people want and need, just the opposite of what the American people have suffered through for the last 8 years under the worse President in US history, who was popular only with all the radical left liberals, progressives, and Democrats.

Just reading your humor makes it worth coming to these sites, as that comical relief proves to be nothing but the real and actual t***h that these liberals, progressives, and Democrats h**e to read.