The top tier Republicans who flew into a private gathering in their private jets to discuss how to stop Trump have nothing at all to worry about. Trump has absolutely no intention of actually trying to do the stuff he has promised to do. He is saying all those things, Making claims and promises in order to reel in the poorly educated and slow thinking v**ers and there are far fewer of them than the Republican plutocrats and Trump think there are.
Not to worry, Hillary will win in a landslide against Trump and she will probably be an above average president.

I have a question for conservative, libertarian and anti establishment v**ers. In the now very likely event of a GOP meltdown and split handing the e******n to the Democrats who do you prefer as your next president? Bernie Sanders who is to the left of Clinton but is truly an indapendant, outside the influence of multinational corporate money, or Hillary Clinton who is a centerest at the right of the party but influenced by Wall Street. Do you prefer a l*****t above cronyism or a mainstream centerest?

Is there any T***h to this ?


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>



Trump sides with The Council on Foreign Relations Against the U.S. Taxpayer.
...Fine, Mr Trump. But when it comes to trade with Cuba its America’s middle class laughing at the (repeatedly snookered and rooked by Castro) rest of the world. Why on earth should we change that? Why on earth should we revoke one of our few victories?

And if it’s “greedy elites” that cleverly craft and slyly enact foreign policy harmful to middle Americans —if so, you’ll notice that the outfits mentioned-above who’ve been clamoring to end the Cuba “embargo” (from The Trilateral Commission to the Davos Group to The Council on Foreign Relations) aren’t exactly comprised of typical NASCAR or Bassmaster Classic fans.

Why Donald Trump Is Dangerous
02/07/2016 10:35 am ET | Updated Feb 07, 2016
• Jerry Lanson Journalism professor, Emerson College

Some of my liberal friends are secretly rooting for Donald Trump to win the Republican nomination.
If he wins, they argue, Republicans will be crushed in the general e******n. Trump, they insist, has a ceiling on his support. They say Latinos, African-Americans, Muslims and more will turn out to oppose him in record numbers. That women will reject him as a sexist pig. And so forth.
Perhaps. But ultimately, I find this foolish and dangerous reasoning. It conveniently forgets that past dictators initially came to power by being elected. It can happen here, too.
No, I'm not suggesting Donald Trump is Hitler. But he is a demagogue, who in Saturday night's debate said he would bring back "a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding," the simulated drowning technique condemned as torture and banned after it was used as an "enhanced" interrogation tool by the George W. Bush administration.
Trump is a bully. He's a r****t. And he's a loose cannon, a man so enamored of his own greatness that he likely could be manipulated to do almost anything by those who flatter him. Set up internment camps for American Muslims, for example. Start his own version of the brown shirts. Cozy up to Vladimir Putin. Perhaps even trigger World War III.
So if he's nominated, could Donald Trump win this November's p**********l e******n? Absolutely. It might take no more than a recession. Or a timely October terrorist attack or two. Fear and panic are strong motivators for really bad political choices. Look at the rise of far right parties today in Europe.
I wish I lived in New Hampshire. If I did, and I were a registered Independent, I would v**e Republican Tuesday. I would cast my b****t for the mainstream conservative who looks most likely to stop Trump. The problem, of course, is this: After Saturday night's free-for-all GOP debate, just who is that?
Let's hope New Hampshire v**ers can agree on an answer, can rally around someone who at least cuts significantly into Trump's huge lead in the polls.