You people were the ones who claimed the Obama was historic. He was only historic because he was Black. That seems to be his only qualification. You guys bragged about how smart he was. Chris Mathews got a thrill up his leg.

We on the other hand realize that Trump is only a man. He is doing exactly what we hired him for, and that was to undo everything that Obama did. We know that as long as you guys slam him, that he is doing a good job, because you h**e him for the very same reason we like him and that again is undoing Obama's damage to America.

you know those anti Trumpers can do wonders . you are the ones " dem. followers " that for nearly three years have been fed lies . you want to believe your bimbocratic leaders . yet all this time they keep spitting out lie after lie concerning President Trump . the puppet masters must of really done a number on all of you " dem. followers " going through the education process . or should I say the indoctrination process . while they pretended to educate you . I did not read much of your h**e sense that's all it is . but I do know that President Trump has done more for this country than ANY president I quite some time . what about all the lies from obumer , or hitlary . you think he was so good . that she was some thing special . what about all of their LIES .

Great questions. I will attempt my best left-leaning mind to answer. Oops, did I say left-leaning mind? I meant to say my best critical and unbiased thoughts. Yes, that is what I meant. Swear to God. Scout's honor. On my mother's grave, so help me Sata...er, God.

"How did Hillary Clinton manage to escape prosecution despite compelling evidence she violated the law?
-Interesting anecdote about the Hillary emails is the devastating force Comey's announcement about new investigations into that issue less than a week before the e******n probably sabotaged her p**********l bid: and the Right wants to label him a deep-state operative for the Left? What twisted logic arrives at that conclusion? Deep-state for the Right seems far more apt.

"Did Peter Strzok, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch, and others obstruct justice by protecting Clinton?"
-Zero evidence for this. Strzok, Lynch, and McCabe had nothing to with investigation, and Comey threw a monkey wrench into Hillary's run.

"Why was there never a legitimate criminal investigation of Clinton in the Uranium One case?"
-There was a two year investigation by Republican-held Congress that could not any clear wrong-doing. Hillary was just one of eight that had to sign off on the deal. It was totally legit. Low grade uranium, not nuclear compatible. This issue has been dead, dead, dead for years. Just Conspiracy theorists, with their tin-foil triangular hats, still wonder.

"Was there ever any real evidence of "collusion" between Trump and the Russians?"
-Yes and no, but the Mueller Probe never focused on collusion because it was too vague; they investigated possible obstruction of justice. Was Trump cleared of collusion? No, because no attempt was made to make a case for it. But the Obstruction of Justice inquires produced ten possible incidences Of Trump's interefence. Mueller did not make any indictments for those because it was unclear if a sitting president could be indicted: he specifically left it up to Congress, and not Bill Barr, to decide.

"Did Trump obstruct justice in the firing of Comey or was he legally exercising his constitutional authority?"
-That is a question way beyond me. Executive authority carries a lot of weight, and justly so. But we have the situation when Nixon fired Cox. Do you feel that should be a crime?

"Did the FBI and DOJ improperly use a discredited "dossier" about Trump to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Trump associates?"
-First and foremost and glaring is that the Steele dossier is not--not!--discredited. Not all of it has been proven or disproved. Certain timelines of meetings with Russinas by Americans in the dossier have been shown to be accurate. Maybe the rest is wild fantasy.

"Should Mueller have disqualified himself under the special counsel law based on glaring conflicts of interest?"
-There are no "glaring conflicts of interest." This is just absurd and desperate.

"Was fired National Security Adviser Michael Flynn unfairly charged with making a false statement?"
- Simple: No! And he said as such.

For those of you who have never traveled to the west or southwest, cattle guards are horizontal steel rails placed at fence openings, in dug-out places in the roads adjacent to highways (and sometimes across highways), to prevent cattle from crossing over that area. For some reason the cattle will not step on the "guards," probably because they fear getting their feet caught between the rails.



Subsequent to BarackObama becoming president, he proposed changes to federal grazing policies which, Colorado ranchers quickly protested. Obama subsequently received an interior department report that informed him that there were over 100,000 cattle guards in Colorado. He argued that providing cattle guards to the Colorado farm and ranch industry was a ridiculous use of human resources so he ordered the Secretary of the Interior to fire half of the "cattle guards” immediately!


Before the Secretary of the Interior could respond and presumably try to better inform President Obama about what a “cattle guard” is, Vice-President Joe Biden, intervened with a request that, before any "cattle guards” were to be fired, they should be given six months of retraining.

'Times are hard,' said Joe Biden, “it's only fair to the cattle guards that they be given six months of retraining to reduce their impact of their termination on their families!”


While those two guys were running our country, everything they touched became a mess.

NOW JOE WANTS TO BE YOUR PRESIDENT!



Passed on to you without further comment...





...