publican wrote:
Wrong again. SOME of the "current literature" supports that claim. Meanwhile, there is plenty of the current literature which shows the claim to be without foundation. Until a strong consensus emerges, it is just plain wrong to say that there is any proof.
A genius like you, with a half-dozen degrees, shouldn't need to have that explained. Maybe you made up all that s**t?
A ‘genius’ like you should try thinking on your own instead of relying on whats fed to you
Remember what the tobacco industry did and how they misused science and hid data. That took some time to come out. $$$ is the bottom line. Yes it can happen again.