One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: crazylibertarian
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 644 next>>
Apr 17, 2024 07:49:33   #
Kevyn wrote:
Trump, who has denied wrongdoing in the case and called it a political witch hunt, said last week that it would be a "great honor" to be jailed for breaking the gag order. Trump violated his gag order in the case and should be held in contempt over posts that attacked Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels, potential witnesses. Give him his wish, his hideous spray tan will accent an orange jumpsuit nicely!



This moral judgment from a man who believes its OK to k**l fetuses up till they're born.
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 07:46:34   #
Big Kahuna wrote:
Hitler and Stalin would both have loved our current Demorat C*******t/F*****t Party.



Stalin admired Hitler & according to Nkiolai Tolstoy, Leo's grand nephew, Hitler was the only man Stalin ever trusted.
Soviet officers had been warning Stain for weeks that the Germans were building up on their eastern front and were going to attack. Stalin dismissed it & when they finally did attack, Stalin was so discombobulated that for day he couldn't give orders for a counter-attack.
Go to
Apr 16, 2024 18:54:26   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Gary North is full of s**t. At least he was, he died two years ago.

Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, why would he be upset when he read what he had written?

The Stylistic Artistry of the Declaration of Independence

by Stephen E. Lucas
The Declaration of Independence

The Declaration of Independence is perhaps the most masterfully written state paper of Western civilization. As Moses Coit Tyler noted almost a century ago, no assessment of it can be complete without taking into account its extraordinary merits as a work of political prose style. Although many scholars have recognized those merits, there are surprisingly few sustained studies of the stylistic artistry of the Declaration.1 This essay seeks to illuminate that artistry by probing the discourse microscopically--at the level of the sentence, phrase, word, and syllable. By approaching the Declaration in this way, we can shed light both on its literary qualities and on its rhetorical power as a work designed to convince a "candid world" that the American colonies were justified in seeking to establish themselves as an independent nation.2

The text of the Declaration can be divided into five sections--the introduction, the preamble, the indictment of George III, the denunciation of the British people, and the conclusion. Because space does not permit us to explicate each section in full detail, we shall select features from each that illustrate the stylistic artistry of the Declaration as a whole.3

The introduction consists of the first paragraph--a single, lengthy, periodic sentence:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.4

Taken out of context, this sentence is so general it could be used as the introduction to a declaration by any "oppressed" people. Seen within its original context, however, it is a model of subtlety, nuance, and implication that works on several levels of meaning and allusion to orient readers toward a favorable view of America and to prepare them for the rest of the Declaration. From its magisterial opening phrase, which sets the American Revolution within the whole "course of human events," to its assertion that "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" entitle America to a "separate and equal station among the powers of the earth," to its quest for sanction from "the opinions of mankind," the introduction elevates the quarrel with England from a petty political dispute to a major event in the grand sweep of history. It dignifies the Revolution as a contest of principle and implies that the American cause has a special claim to moral legitimacy--all without mentioning England or America by name.

Rather than defining the Declaration's task as one of persuasion, which would doubtless raise the defenses of readers as well as imply that there was more than one publicly credible view of the British-American conflict, the introduction identifies the purpose of the Declaration as simply to "declare"--to announce publicly in explicit terms--the "causes" impelling America to leave the British empire. This gives the Declaration, at the outset, an aura of philosophical (in the eighteenth-century sense of the term) objectivity that it will seek to maintain throughout. Rather than presenting one side in a public controversy on which good and decent people could differ, the Declaration purports to do no more than a natural philosopher would do in reporting the causes of any physical event. The issue, it implies, is not one of interpretation but of observation.


<SNIP>
Gary North is full of s**t. At least he was, he di... (show quote)




I meant to write that Jefferson was upset with The Constitution when he read it.
Go to
Apr 16, 2024 14:23:16   #
Milosia2 wrote:
Two dummy posts in a row !



No one with more than a room temperature IQ and a sixth grade education would expect anything better from you.
Go to
Apr 16, 2024 14:21:23   #
LogicallyRight wrote:
A very good analysis of a lot of what is happening today. Well done.



Thank you, LogicallyRight. I don't often doe lengthy posts but this has been bouncing around in my head for months.

I just began reading Gary North's Conspiracy in Philadelphia that dovetails somurious ewhat with this. I just finished the Foreword and Preface and have begun the body. It is shaking me to my core.

I will only say that it has forced me to the conclusion that our vaunted and idolized Constitution that replaced The Articles of Confederation was not properly ratified and, legally, we should be operating under The Articles.

It's free and clearly written and requires only rare review to understand. Keep an open mind and let me know your reaction.

I care about basic assumptions not window dressing. Remember, the entirety of mathematics rests upon some basic assumptions, none of which can be proved.

Our assumptions about government are in The Declaration & Thomas Jefferson was reportedly upset when he read it.
Go to
Apr 16, 2024 13:34:17   #
American Scene wrote:
Why are so many trump supporting magas so uninformed, and why do they tell so many lies?

The reasons are too numerous to mention, but ignorance and h**e are near the top of the list.



https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrants-taxes-rent-v*****e-requirements-983035929946



Low information is the backbone of Democratic v**ers. Just look at a map or where they're centered.
Go to
Apr 16, 2024 13:06:35   #
Why Christianity Must Be Destroyed
And Why Liberalism Must Do It

Christians accept that we are all flawed. As part of our flawed status, we realize that at some point we will have to face judgment for our offenses. Those offenses range across the full spectrum of human sins, from taking the Lord’s name in vain to murder.

Progressives labor under no such illusion. They know that they are beyond reproach; their hearts are so good. Since Progressives have no flaws, they face no judgment and have nothing to answer for. They are entitled to reject our forgiving Christian God because they have no sins. They are their own gods & that entitles them to despise Christians.

It also entitles them to their intolerance, judgmentalism and self-righteousness. They have relied on satire and ridicule and their condescension turns to outrage when it is turned around on them. Hence their hatred of Donald J. Trump, Rush Limbaugh & Joseph McCarthy.

Joseph McCarthy investigated the extent of c*******t penetration of the American government. Extreme left-wingers and outright c*******ts had been shepherded into The Franklin D. Roosevelt administration throughout his twelve-year presidency. Joseph Stalin had wanted them in the administration to influence decisions and as sources of information. It wasn’t hysteria. There were c*******ts.

During World War II, it had become clear that there were many N**i sympathizers in the United States. There was concern that the same mistakes not happen again with the new Satan, c*******m. McCarthy became a point man for the new efforts. The American Left, realizing that the c*******ts were fellow ideologues in the movement to replace the worship of God with the worship of government, defended them and started the anti-McCarthy hysteria, just like what is going on today, with Donald J Trump.

In retrospect, it was kind of odd anyway. On the one hand, American progressives would say there’s nothing wrong with being a c*******t then rail at being called one or if one of their own was. William F. Buckley, Jr. once remarked that he never heard McCarthy say anything that matched in viciousness the things that liberals said about him. I have never heard of Trump saying anything that matched in viciousness the things his opponents say about him.

Rush Limbaugh was another example. The Left always thought that satire was its sole province. They relished subjecting religion and conservatives to their satire that was often mean & sacrilegious. Rush turned it around on them & they howled in furious indignation. They accused him of the h**e that they harbored, something the Left has always done. How dare anyone use their methods against them? Rush was never mean nor vicious but the liberals certainly were and as Buckley had said about McCarthy, Limbaugh never said anything that matched in viciousness the things that were said about him.

Bill Raspberry was a great liberal (in every sense of the word) columnist. He’d been saying the same things about Rush as other liberals when someone challenged him as to whether he ever had listened to him. He admitted that he hadn’t, and to his credit, he did. In a subsequent column he said that Rush didn’t satirize women and minorities; that he was an entertainer and that he satirized liberals. Then as now, liberals can give it but they can’t take it.

And now we have the case of Donald J. Trump. Whereas Ronald Reagan also espoused conservatism, he nevertheless believed in making nice with liberals. They did not care. They were constantly hostile to him & did everything they could to block his moves. The take home lesson is that you don’t make nice with liberals. Liberals do not reciprocate. Their agenda to direct society remains and anything is permissible to achieve that goal.

Donald J. Trump must have gotten that message somewhere along the line. He never even tried to get along with them. They are outraged. Hell hath no fury like a liberal scorned and they’ve reacted. They tried to impeach him twice, once meaninglessly and was a complete waste of time.

They have now unleashed a barrage of legal actions against him without precedent & unjustified. What they don’t realize is that it can be turned around and used against their own, such as Joe Biden. These new precedents, if left unchecked, will likely result in permanent damage to the office of the presidency that will resonate to the detriment of the country & possibly lead to its destruction. It is that serious.

Understand, that the thought that we will eventually face judgment is a brake on our worst impulses. We know that we will be called to answer for our sins. By thinking there is no God, liberals get off that hook in their minds. Wh**ever system they foist on the public, they can just walk away and think there are no repercussions.

And that is what leads to their excesses. C*******m, F*****m & German National Socialism are ultimate progressivisms and all were & are atheistic. As Mussolini said, “All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state,” and that included churches. Gulags, K*****g Fields, Auschwitz and the Cultural Revolution all targeted religion and churches. It is no accident that church attendance is much lower among progressives.

They can conceive of no power in the universe that is beyond their comprehension. They have no God but themselves; they are their own judges, juries and executioners and they have executed; 21 million under National Socialists Workers’ Germany, 20-40 million in the USSR, 65-75 million in China, 1.5 million in Cambodia. They were all atheistic, either officially or functionally.

And so it continues. Liberals have been the driving force in moving America to secularism, a very dangerous journey.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was the most prominent Soviet dissident. He’d published several books with the horrors of Soviet Socialism as a background but when he published The Gulag Archipelago in December 1973, he was stripped of his Soviet citizenship and forced into exile. It the emergence and horrors of the Soviet political prison system. He first went to Germany but came to the United States, Vermont, in 1978. Under Josip Stalin, he would likely have been executed but the Soviet government of the 1970s didn’t chance it. They knew it would cause an international uproar.

After the Soviet Union collapsed, Solzhenitsyn returned to Russia in May 1994, and said that he could not recommend American society because we had lost our spirituality. John Paul II said much the same thing. So do I.

Christianity has been our salve. Secular liberalism, whether f*****m, socialism or c*******m, needs the populace to replace Christianity with the worship of government. They need to destroy it. They are succeeding.
Go to
Apr 16, 2024 12:40:08   #
American Scene wrote:
Next will come the conviction that so many magas are so terrified of.

And then the next criminal trial will start.



Hey AS (S?), when what you're cheering on against Trump gets turned around on you, you won't be laughing.
Go to
Apr 15, 2024 17:22:11   #
American Scene wrote:
And the trump lies will be flowing like raw sewage.

Hope melania attends the trial, and then beats trumps c***ting, lying a$$, and reworks her pre-nup to

get even more of trumps assets



Alvin Bragg should be tried for treason against the Constitution and so should OPP's liberals.
Go to
Apr 15, 2024 16:50:06   #
fullspinzoo wrote:
He is the epitome of a scumbag lawyer. Can't believe they're using this scum for their numero uno witness. Bragg pushed this up to a felony, was a misdemeanor that had run out of time. Whether you agree or not, people who go to Trump's rallies walk away with a feeling of p***e.


To describe Cohen as scum is a disservice to scum. Scum is non-volitional. It serves an important function in nature.
Go to
Apr 15, 2024 16:45:56   #
PeterS wrote:
What's so ironic is that Trump never needed to hide his relationship with Stormy Daniels from his fanatical followers. They don't care but Donald should care because his lawyer, Michael Cohen, has already served time. So if this is a Witch Hunt it's only because Donald Trump has made himself into a Witch!

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/e******ns/2024/04/14/trump-hush-money-trial-begins/72943357007/



What type of a man violates the privileged communication status with a client? What type of people applaud it?
Go to
Apr 15, 2024 16:41:11   #
pegw wrote:
About half of what you wrote is right on, but half of it is right wing Republican BS. The only reason our favorite career criminal loves America is because he can make money off it.


Making money used to be admired. It was called success in the free market.
Go to
Apr 14, 2024 19:21:32   #
Conspiracy in Philadelphia

I urge everyone, Democrats, Republicans, conservatives, liberals, c*******ts, to go to garynorth.com/philadelphia.pdf
and read Gary North’s history of our current constitution, Conspiracy in Philadelpia. I have read only The Foreword & The Preface, thirty pages. It is North’s contention that our entire constitution is invalid.
He cites the following facts:
All attendees took a vow of lifetime silence.
They held their meetings on the second floor: no eavesdroppers
The press was barred from attending.
The legislatures’ instructions were deliberately violated.

There were 55 delegates 39 signed it. The majority of them were lawyers. Many were Masons. Two were Catholic.


Further, he concludes that without George Washington’s belated attendance and influence it would not have been ratified.
If these things are not frightening enough, The Preface ends with Article XIII from The Articles of Confederation outlining its requirements for amending them. The ratification process that was pursued by the Convention did an end run around it.
North argues, essentially, that our current constitution was illegally ratified. If it was not legally ratified, then we have some deep problems. Read & draw your own conclusions.

garynorth.com/philadelphia.pdf.
Go to
Apr 14, 2024 14:55:19   #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Alina Habba revealed a dirty secret about Alvin Bragg that Democrats wanted to bury

Photo by Gage Skidmore via Wikimedia, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
Alvin Bragg’s trial against Donald Trump begins on April 15.

This is the first time a former President faced criminal charges.

Now Alina Habba revealed a dirty secret about Alvin Bragg that Democrats wanted to bury.

Habba says Biden Justice Department behind Bragg case
Trump lawyer Alina Habba went on Rob Schmitt’s Newsmax show and blasted Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for coordinating with President Joe Biden’s Justice Department on the politically-motivated case he is set to bring to trial.

“[Garland’s] the puppeteer, effectively, and so is the current President, or resident, as I call him, in the White House. Truly, there is obviously a coordinated effort. There’s no question about that,” Habba declared.

Bragg charged former President Donald Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records by reimbursing Michael Cohen for a $130,000 payment to conceal a nondisclosure agreement in October 2016 and then listing it in company records as for legal services.

This is normally a misdemeanor charge with a two-year statute of limitations that long ago expired.

But Bragg bootstrapped it up to a felony by claiming Trump falsified business records to cover up another crime.

Trump isn’t charged with another crime and Bragg claims he doesn’t even have to say what this second crime is.


Habba says charges are the punishment for Trump running for office
Bragg’s predecessor refused to bring charges in this case because it was legally preposterous.

Former Manhattan District Attorney’s Office prosecutor Mark Pomerantz described it in his book as a “zombie case” that refused to go away because prosecutors had nothing else to change Trump with, but they regarded it as a dead man walking from a legal perspective.

But after Trump announced he was running for President in November 2022, Bragg quickly fast-tracked the case and indicted him before the five-year statute of limitations on the felony charges expired in May.

Habba explained this backstory of him dredging up the case no one wanted to touch as evidence Democrats were just desperate to indict Trump on any charge they could find to derail his campaign.

“Back in the day, this case was looked at, it was investigated, charges were not brought. Indictments were not made because they knew the case was not real,” Habba stated. “Then [Trump] ran for office. They bring the charges. If you look at that timeline alone, I wanna know how they’re gonna wipe this story away because it speaks volumes. You didn’t bring the charges. You said there was no story.”

“And then he runs for office, and they bring an indictment on this case,” Habba continued. “And that case that’s going forward in April is another disgrace and shows the demise of the state of New York, which I used to love.”

She also revealed how former Biden Justice Department official Matt Colangelo went to work for Bragg shortly before he brought this case as further evidence of collusion between the White House and the Manhattan District Attorney.

“It’s d********g. Just look at the White House log,” Habba added. “If anybody wants to tell me something’s not coordinated, explain to me why a state official, who is supposed to be elected by their state and work for their state constituents, is now working with the White House administration.

“It makes no sense,” Habba concluded.
Alina Habba revealed a dirty secret about Alvin Br... (show quote)



He should have to reveal what the crime was. If he can't, he should be disbarred
Go to
Apr 14, 2024 14:49:09   #
JFlorio wrote:
He said cops being k**led moron. None were on J*** 6th.



He lives with the fantasy of the i**********n on J****** 6.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 644 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.