October 3, 2018
New Rules for Men
By Matt Patterson

And so we have arrived, in the Brett Kavanaugh affair, the inevitable and ultimate apotheosis of #MeToo – the vilification of men qua men.

Now, one accusation alone – no matter how unsubstantiated and uncorroborated – is enough to ruin a man’s reputation, nullify his accomplishments and erase his opportunities...for life.

This is apparently the standard set, and accepted, by roughly half of the country as represented by the Democrat party.

We have thus entered something new and dangerous. And in light of this new reality, new rules for men vis a vis the opposite sex are required. Here are some baseline suggestions:



Don’t hire women. Where accusations against men are concerned, proof is no longer required, nor presumption of innocence granted. Under these circumstances, why on earth would a man hire any woman or interact with any woman in a professional setting?

If a man must interact with a woman in a professional setting, he should do so as little as possible and always with a third and fourth party present (one of whom should be a man). Never under any circumstances should a man be alone with a female co-worker. No written communication with a woman co-worker should take place without a boss or supervisor and at least one male co-worker copied on the correspondence. Ditto with text and telephone communications.

Do not mentor women or girls, large numbers of whom are clearly unstable, fragile creatures and God knows what they may mis-remember or mis-construe. Under these circumstances, it is not even remotely worth the risk to help a woman advance her career. Brett Kavanaugh has spent his life helping women professionally. What good will did it buy him?

Dating and romance are now minefields to be traversed with extreme caution, if at all (see above re: mentoring). Forget making a move, going in for the kiss – unless you get express written consent before every move, you run the risk of being labeled a sexual predator for life.

Even if you do get consent at every stage of the encounter, that still may not be enough. As Cathy Young wrote for the Washington Post, the definition of “consent” is itself disputed and subject to change given the whims of the mob:

“Consent advocates already fret that even an explicit ‘yes’ may not be given freely enough. A series of educational campus posters includes the warning that ‘if they don’t feel free to say ‘No,’ it’s not consent’; a Canadian college campaign cautions that consent is invalid if it’s ‘muted’ or ‘uncertain’ rather than ‘loud and clear.’

This advocacy creates a world where virtually any regretted sexual encounter can be reconstructed as assault...”

In other words, we live in a world where a woman can consent to intimacy, then retroactively withdraw that consent (the exact nightmare that comedian Aziz Ansari recently found himself in).

This is a world in which men and women are not free to find each other, a world in which genuine romance is not possible.

Romance, after all, requires maturity and acceptance of a certain ambiguity from both parties. It requires that both men and women accept responsibility for their feelings and actions, responsibility that modern women often seem incapable of exhibiting and, frighteningly, are not expected to exhibit.

Nevertheless, men are burdened with strong sexually appetites, appetites honed by millions of years of evolution. So what of your natural instincts to pursue, court, woo women? To find one with whom to wed and mate in order to procreate and advance the species?

All I can say is, good luck my friend. Proceed at your own risk.

Take heart, though. The sex robots are already here, and are daily growing cheaper, better and more widely available.

It won’t be long before men won’t need women at all.

Because this ultimately is what men are realizing in our current anti-male hysteria: That interactions with women are often more trouble than they are worth.

Congratulations, #MeToo.

C*****l P****e Swarm After Confrontation at GOP Rep.’s Office
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/author/bryan-chai/?ff_source=push&ff_medium=conservativetribune&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2018-10-02

“When they go low, we go high,” first lady Michelle Obama once said of the Democratic Party.

Apparently, the high road now involves trying to force their way into a GOP congressman’s office.

Maryland Republican Rep. Andy Harris found himself in a scary situation as he tried to keep a group of protesters out of his office, according to Huffington Post reporter Jennifer Bendery.

“Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) just had his office door pushed through and was assaulted by demonstrators, a (C*****l P****e) officer tells me,” Bendery posted on Twitter.

A video of the incident was also posted.

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1047154875317067776/vpOuarDR?format=jpg&name=800x419

“Another little detail, per Cap Police officer: Harris was trying to hold his office door closed but was not successful. Also, the demonstrators were smoking weed. (?!),” she added.

It’s alarming when a group of people, even some drugged-up protesters, try to force their way into someone’s office. And yet that’s what the left seems to have devolved into during the Trump era.

The protesters were justifiably skewered by the public over this incident.

Look, at the end of the day, regardless of political affiliation, it’s never OK to forcibly trespass or try to assault someone. That literally accomplishes nothing other than giving police officers more paperwork to fill out.

This entire ordeal illustrates just how little the left has in its quest to derail Republicans and President Donald Trump. Slanderous accusations have gone nowhere. Attacks on Trump’s policies have yielded nothing. Impeachment calls have fallen on utterly deaf ears.

Nope, apparently all they have left is to delay, obstruct and attack. I was always told as a child, “Show me a man who has to resort to violence, and I’ll show you a man who’s out of ideas.” That couldn’t be more fitting for those on the far left.

Fortunately, Bendery reported there were no injuries.

Still, this illustrates just how dangerously close Democrats are coming to actively embracing violence to oppose Trump.

“When they go low, we go high”? Perhaps Michelle Obama was using “high” in a colloquial sense. If so, these protesters trying to barge into Harris’ office were living up to Obama’s mandate.

This is what Patriots do, they take it to the streets against any and all i******s...

Throttle Hard my friends, Ramp it up
Get Aggressive
Confront
Engage
Attack !


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>



MAN CONFRONTS I******S OVER LOSS OF HIS DAUGHTER

Epic debate at Tennessee Trump rally
Millie Weaver | Infowars.com -
OCTOBER 2, 2018

While interviewing protesters at a recent Trump rally in Johnson City, Tennessee a man confronts a woman advocating i*****l i*********n over the wrongful death of his daughter by a repeat offending i*****l a***n.

This heated exchange captures the heart of the issue.

Patriot White Man Waking Up to the Invaders here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N3PXUuOysk

The Democratic party and all the women of the world who have ever been mistreated by a man want this innocent man, Brett Kavanaugh to pay for all of the sins of every man who has ever harmed a woman. This became very clear to me when the female activists confronted Senator Flake at the elevator and yelled at him that he did not understand their pain from a prior rape.
That encounter made Senator Flake postpone his v**e of YES & call for the FBI investigation of Kavanaugh. Brett Kavanaugh did NOT rape these women, but he is a man, an innocent man as regards these women. But their cry for justice against the sins of OTHER men was enough to cry for more Kavanaugh blood!!
I am disgusted that the Senate has lowered itself to mob rule as when Christ was crucified. This is now more than a witch hunt it has become a Crucifixion.

I still dont understand,if what she says is true then why for god's sake that was not brought up earlier??/Why she didnt go to the police???...Why FBI didnt do anything about it after 6 investigations???...Why she didnt come out earlier after she found out ,he was nominated for Supreme Court Justice????...To many questions,not many answers.....

There will be a hearing tomorrow about Christine Blasey Ford's accusations of sexual impropriety by Kavanaugh. Republicans have set it up to be a useless he/said-she/said hearing. No one is allowed to speak for Ford, like her therapist. The other accuser is not allowed. Mark Judge, Kavanaugh's close friend, who has stated he was "wild when drunk," banned. Republicans had to go outside the committee for a woman to question Ford (and they chose a prosecutor) because the committee has never had a woman. Bad photo-op to have an all male panel.

But about Cosby. Big hero of mine. Loved the guy. Heart-broken and very angry at the same time. I met him in '71 or '72 at the Copacabana in NYC. Sat at his table with him and two of my friends, one a Marine just back from Vietnam. Cosby was very respectful of his service, bought him, and us, a drink. Had him stand up for the audience to applaud. (This was NYC, applause was light.) The Cosby Show often had me close to tears over breaking race barriers. This was a man I strongly felt could reverse many from r****m. I am somewhat devastated by his conviction.

Old allegations are not automatically suspect. It is extremely common for women never to report or to do so decades later. The psychological dynamic of sexual abuse and rape for women is complex. Most decide to just live with it until something suddenly makes them snap and look to confront their abuser. Usually when the perpetrator is about to get some honor, favor, or new marriage with young children. The timing is not planned. Simply a breaking point. Enough is enough.