Posts: Blade_Runner | One Political Plaza

TJKMO wrote:

Joe Biden Makes America Safer
The gun show loophole has been closed.

fullspinzoo wrote:

Wow! That sure makes up for all the Americans k**led by i******s!

Back on topic.

California became a sanctuary state after Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed Senate Bill 54, the California Values Act,
in October 2017.

With almost 40 million residents, California is the most populous sanctuary state.

At least 16 cities and/or counties in Southern California have expressed opposition to the state law by either filing lawsuits or passing local ordinances.

That was then,

this is now,

The collision between the pillars of gun control legislation and i*****l i*********n is backfiring on the gun grabbers in California.

Since September last, the BP has released 125,000 i******s onto the streets of the San Diego area,
and the folks in southern Cal are rebelling.
Forget the law suits and ordinances, now they are buying GUNS.

Epic Backfire Incoming: Open Border Policies Sparking another Gun Buying Spree.
This time in southern Cal.

Read it an weep, you miserable anti-American glue sniffing l*****t hypocrites.

(Main)

Are trump supporters indoctrinated?

American Scene wrote:

Are trump supporters indoctrinated?

(Main)

McConnell denounces Trump

martsiva wrote:

So Democrats openly supporting the Marxists in B*M is not evidence?? Marxism IS c*******m no matter how hard Democrats on this forum try to twist it!! I gave you actual conditions like censoring free speech, attacks on our Constitutional right to bear arms and the border crisis so quit with your BS!! It`s very relevant what you affirm and deny because you have some ludicrous idea that you know everything, that you are superior and that you are always right!

publican wrote:

Still waiting for a definition. There's no possibility of having a meaningful discussion until we both know what the words mean. I suppose you know what you mean by "Marxist Democrat" but I don't know what you mean by those words. So please enlighten me.

Let's hear it from the horse's mouth, shall we? If you need help understanding how Marx' political philosophy has manifest in the doings of the former democrat party, let me know.

"My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism."
Karl Marx

"Keep people from their history, and they are easily controlled."
Karl Marx

"Accumulation of wealth at one pole is at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil, s***ery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole."
Karl Marx

"The education of all children, from the moment that they can get along without a mother's care, shall be in state institutions."
Karl Marx

"Take away a nation's heritage and they are more easily persuaded."
Karl Marx

"C*******m begins where atheism begins."
Karl Marx

"The theory of C*******m may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property."
Karl Marx

"We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror."
Karl Marx

"The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope."
Karl Marx

"Democracy is the road to socialism."
Karl Marx

"A heavy or progressive or graduated income tax is necessary for the proper development of C*******m."
Karl Marx

"Taxes are the source of life for the bureaucracy, the army and the court, in short, for the whole apparatus of the executive power. Strong government and heavy taxes are identical."
Karl Marx

"There are, besides, eternal t***hs, such as Freedom, , etc., that are common to all states of society. But C*******m abolishes eternal t***hs, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience."
Karl Marx

"There is no greater stupidity than for people to marry and so surrender themselves to the small miseries of domestic and private life."
Karl Marx

"There must be something rotten in the very core of a social system which increases its wealth without diminishing its misery."
Karl Marx

"The democratic concept of man is false, because it is Christian. The democratic concept holds that . . . each man is a sovereign being. This is the illusion, dream, and postulate of Christianity."
Karl Marx

"C*******ts everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things... They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible o*******w of all existing social conditions."
Karl Marx

"Owners of capital will stimulate working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks which will have to be nationalized and State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to c*******m."
Karl Marx

"We know that violent measures against religion are nonsense; but this is an opinion: as socialism grows, religion will disappear. Its disappearance must be done by social development, in which education must play a part."
Karl Marx

"Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people."
Karl Marx

"The social principles of Christianity preach cowardice, self-contempt, abasement, submission, humility, in a word all the qualities of the canaille."
Karl Marx

"It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness."
Karl Marx

"C*******m... is the genuine resolution of the antagonism between man and nature and between man and man; it is the true resolution of the conflict between existence and essence, objectification and self-affirmation, freedom and necessity, individual and species. It is the riddle of history solved and knows itself as the solution."
Karl Marx

"In the eyes of dialectical philosophy, nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred."
Karl Marx

"With disdain I will throw my gauntlet full in the fact of the world and see the collapse of this pygmy giant. Then will I wander god-like and victorious through the ruins of the world. And giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator."
Karl Marx

(Main)

Joe Biden Makes America Safer

fullspinzoo wrote:

Yeah, I've listen to at least 15 legal/political c... (show quote)

TJKMO wrote:

I don’t get WHY you FEEL this way.
Biden has nothing to do with this.

Say what? Biden? Nothing to do with this?
You cannot be serious. Everything the l*****t progressives do is coming from, or I should say, through the White House, and the "k**l Trump" campaign is at the top of the agenda. Joe Biden is right in the middle of this, all the way up to the mush in his skull.

(Main)

People have solutions for pro- hamas agitators blocking traffic..

proud republican wrote:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2024/04/16/people-have-solutions-for-pro-hamas-agitators-blocking-traffic-n2637864

There's more than one solution.
Some solutions are more effective than others.

(Main)

Biden Told Bibi to 'Take the W' and Not Retaliate After Iran Attack, But It Looks Like It's Still Coming

Lily wrote:

There is no leader in any country who cares more deeply for their country than Prime Minister Netanyahu. It is embarrassing our resident of the White House does not care as much for America as Netanyahu does Israel!

Wonttakeitanymore wrote:

Exactly! Gotta love bibi! He’s prorating for Trump to be back

Everyone should read this book:

And, this Israeli soldier has a message for Creepy Joe Biden.

(Main)

Joe Biden Makes America Safer

TJKMO wrote:

If you or anyone will not turn over the weapons they will be FELONS subject to the fullest extent of the Law.

(Main)

Why Christianity Must Be Destroyed - And Why Liberalism Must Do It

crazylibertarian wrote:

Thank you, LogicallyRight. I don't often doe leng... (show quote)

Gary North is full of s**t. At least he was, he died two years ago.

Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, why would he be upset when he read what he had written?

The Stylistic Artistry of the Declaration of Independence

by Stephen E. Lucas
The Declaration of Independence

The Declaration of Independence is perhaps the most masterfully written state paper of Western civilization. As Moses Coit Tyler noted almost a century ago, no assessment of it can be complete without taking into account its extraordinary merits as a work of political prose style. Although many scholars have recognized those merits, there are surprisingly few sustained studies of the stylistic artistry of the Declaration.1 This essay seeks to illuminate that artistry by probing the discourse microscopically--at the level of the sentence, phrase, word, and syllable. By approaching the Declaration in this way, we can shed light both on its literary qualities and on its rhetorical power as a work designed to convince a "candid world" that the American colonies were justified in seeking to establish themselves as an independent nation.2

The text of the Declaration can be divided into five sections--the introduction, the preamble, the indictment of George III, the denunciation of the British people, and the conclusion. Because space does not permit us to explicate each section in full detail, we shall select features from each that illustrate the stylistic artistry of the Declaration as a whole.3

The introduction consists of the first paragraph--a single, lengthy, periodic sentence:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.4

Taken out of context, this sentence is so general it could be used as the introduction to a declaration by any "oppressed" people. Seen within its original context, however, it is a model of subtlety, nuance, and implication that works on several levels of meaning and allusion to orient readers toward a favorable view of America and to prepare them for the rest of the Declaration. From its magisterial opening phrase, which sets the American Revolution within the whole "course of human events," to its assertion that "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" entitle America to a "separate and equal station among the powers of the earth," to its quest for sanction from "the opinions of mankind," the introduction elevates the quarrel with England from a petty political dispute to a major event in the grand sweep of history. It dignifies the Revolution as a contest of principle and implies that the American cause has a special claim to moral legitimacy--all without mentioning England or America by name.

Rather than defining the Declaration's task as one of persuasion, which would doubtless raise the defenses of readers as well as imply that there was more than one publicly credible view of the British-American conflict, the introduction identifies the purpose of the Declaration as simply to "declare"--to announce publicly in explicit terms--the "causes" impelling America to leave the British empire. This gives the Declaration, at the outset, an aura of philosophical (in the eighteenth-century sense of the term) objectivity that it will seek to maintain throughout. Rather than presenting one side in a public controversy on which good and decent people could differ, the Declaration purports to do no more than a natural philosopher would do in reporting the causes of any physical event. The issue, it implies, is not one of interpretation but of observation.

<SNIP>

(Main)

Joe Biden Makes America Safer

TruePatriot49 wrote:

Well, MO, it's obvious that you don't own guns. If you did, you would know that there is no such thing as a "gun show loophole. The only hole is in your head where your brains leaked out. Maybe Larry and Curley can help you understand this, but I doubt it. ALSO, FYI, all gun control laws are unconstitutional. Please sit down with Larry and Curley and maybe the three of you can figure out what the Constitution says.

TJKMO wrote:

I know what the Constitution says about a “well-regulated m*****a”.

OK, what does the Constitution say about a "well-regulated m*****a"?

The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

This is what I call a Well Regulated Militia.

(Main)

Who were the Bad Guys in WWII?

currahee506 wrote:

The "bad guys" were Hitler, Quisling, Mussolini, Stalin, Tojo, and Mao. The weak one who caved to the wishes of Stalin was FDR. The one who caved to the wishes of Hitler was the Pope. The ones who were consistently right about the dangers of both N**iism and C*******m (socialism) were MacArthur, Patton, and Churchill.

LiberalGrammyD wrote:

There is a difference between C*******m and Socialism A Big Difference! Google It...If you can read past 3rdgrade.

There is no difference between c*******m and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: c*******m proposes to ens***e men by force, socialism - by v**e. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.
Ayn Rand

Democracy is indispensable to socialism.
Vladimir Lenin

The goal of socialism is c*******m.
Vladimir Lenin

(Main)

Joe Biden Makes America Safer

Radiance3 wrote:

============ br I It is you whose brain and sku... (show quote)

TJKMO wrote:

I started laughing at
“ I think these are all coming from Barack's Kenyan head. Barack is a Muslim, no matter how he hides it. His action speaks louder than Biden's mouth.”

And I have friends and family laughing along with me.

B. Hussein Obama's mentor was a card carrying C*******t. When Barry O was a teen in Hawaii,
Frank Marshall Davis (C*******t Party USA) took him under his wing.

When Davis was prepping him for college, Barry asked what sort of education he should get.
Davis told him, "You're not going to college to be educated, you're going there to be trained."

In an NYT interview, B. Hussein Obama said, "The Muslim call to prayer is one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”

(Main)

A 'storm' is going to bury trump

American Scene wrote:

And the trump lies will be flowing like raw sewage.

Hope melania attends the trial, and then beats trumps c***ting, lying a$$, and reworks her pre-nup to

get even more of trumps assets

(Main)

If the Indians could have seen the future

American Scene wrote:

Only stupid people cannot understand the cartoon, especially those with child like brains

I understand it very well,
it is a message from an ignorant, h**eful, hypocritical Misanthrope.

(Main)

And so, Roe became law of the land.. thank the GOP

permafrost wrote:

rick, this is not about babies.. It is about cell... (show quote)

Why a Human Being Begins At Conception

Scientists Attest To Life Beginning At Conception

By Randy Alcorn

Some of the world’s most prominent scientists and physicians testified to a U.S. Senate committee that human life begins at conception:

A United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee invited experts to testify on the question of when life begins. All of the quotes from the following experts come directly from the official government record of their testimony.1

Dr. Alfred M. Bongioanni, professor of pediatrics and obstetrics at the University of Pennsylvania, stated:

“I have learned from my earliest medical education that human life begins at the time of conception…. I submit that human life is present throughout this entire sequence from conception to adulthood and that any interruption at any point throughout this time constitutes a termination of human life….

I am no more prepared to say that these early stages [of development in the womb] represent an incomplete human being than I would be to say that the child prior to the dramatic effects of puberty…is not a human being. This is human life at every stage.”

Dr. Jerome LeJeune, professor of genetics at the University of Descartes in Paris, was the discoverer of the c********e pattern of Down syndrome. Dr. LeJeune testified to the Judiciary Subcommittee, “after fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being.” He stated that this “is no longer a matter of taste or opinion,” and “not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence.” He added, “Each individual has a very neat beginning, at conception.”

Professor Hymie Gordon, Mayo Clinic: “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception.”

Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth, Harvard University Medical School: “It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive…. It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception…. Our laws, one function of which is to help preserve the lives of our people, should be based on accurate scientific data.”

Dr. Watson A. Bowes, University of Colorado Medical School: “The beginning of a single human life is from a biological point of view a simple and straightforward matter—the beginning is conception. This straightforward biological fact should not be distorted to serve sociological, political, or economic goals.”

A prominent physician points out that at these Senate hearings, “Pro-a******nists, though invited to do so, failed to produce even a single expert witness who would specifically testify that life begins at any point other than conception or implantation. Only one witness said no one can tell when life begins.”2

Many other prominent scientists and physicians have likewise affirmed with certainty that human life begins at conception:

Ashley Montague, a geneticist and professor at Harvard and Rutgers, is unsympathetic to the prolife cause. Nevertheless, he affirms unequivocally, “The basic fact is simple: life begins not at birth, but conception.”3

Dr. Bernard Nathanson, internationally known obstetrician and gynecologist, was a cofounder of what is now the National A******n Rights Action League (NARAL). He owned and operated what was at the time the largest a******n clinic in the western hemisphere. He was directly involved in over sixty thousand a******ns.

Dr. Nathanson’s study of developments in the science of fetology and his use of ultrasound to observe the unborn child in the womb led him to the conclusion that he had made a horrible mistake. Resigning from his lucrative position, Nathanson wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine that he was deeply troubled by his “increasing certainty that I had in fact presided over 60,000 deaths.”4

In his film, “The Silent Scream,” Nathanson later stated, “Modern technologies have convinced us that beyond question the unborn child is simply another human being, another member of the human community, indistinguishable in every way from any of us.” Dr. Nathanson wrote Aborting America to inform the public of the realities behind the a******n rights movement of which he had been a primary leader.5 At the time Dr. Nathanson was an atheist. His conclusions were not even remotely religious, but squarely based on the biological facts.

Dr. Landrum Shettles was for twenty-seven years attending obstetrician-gynecologist at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in New York. Shettles was a pioneer in sperm biology, fertility, and sterility. He is internationally famous for being the discoverer of male- and female-producing sperm. His intrauterine photographs of preborn children appear in over fifty medical textbooks. Dr. Shettles states, I oppose a******n. I do so, first, because I accept what is biologically manifest—that human life commences at the time of conception—and, second, because I believe it is wrong to take innocent human life under any circumstances. My position is scientific, pragmatic, and humanitarian. 6

The First International Symposium on A******n came to the following conclusion:

The changes occurring between implantation, a six-week embryo, a six-month fetus, a one-week-old child, or a mature adult are merely stages of development and maturation. The majority of our group could find no point in time between the union of sperm and egg, or at least the blastocyst stage, and the birth of the infant at which point we could say that this was not a human life.7

The Official Senate report on Senate Bill 158, the “Human Life Bill,” summarized the issue this way:

Physicians, biologists, and other scientists agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human being—a being that is alive and is a member of the human species. There is overwhelming agreement on this point in countless medical, biological, and scientific writings.8

Footnotes:

1 Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session 1981.

2Landrum Shettles and David Rorvik, Rites of Life: The Scientific Evidence of Life Before Birth (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1983), 113.

3 Ashley Montague, Life Before Birth (New York: Signet Books, 1977), vi.

4Bernard N. Nathanson, “Deeper into A******n,” New England Journal of Medicine 291 (1974): 1189Ð90.

5Bernard Nathanson, Aborting America (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1979).

6Shettles and Rorvik, Rites of Life, 103.

7John C. Willke, A******n Questions and Answers (Cincinnati, OH: Hayes Publishing, 1988), 42.

8Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session 1981, 7.

Human Conception: The Beginning of Life

(Main)

The Death Penalty Must Be Banned in the USA

Blade_Runner wrote:

Since you are failing so miserably to obey Him, apparently Jesus' "most enlightening response" is a far greater challenge than you are able to face.

TJKMO wrote:

No.

I have repeatedly stated my commitment to Love, T***h and Justice as embodied in both the Divine and Human manifestations of Jesus Christ.

You are no more a disciple of Christ than the man in the moon.
With very poor communication sk**ls, you have revealed yourself in such a way that you've confused a lot of folks here about your g****r and sexual orientation.

Some, like me, believe you when you say you are a man, others think you are a woman, some think you are gay, even a t****y.

In this instance, your g****r and sexual proclivities are irrelevant.
Out of all the confusion, one thing is clear, you are just one more l*****t SJW with a humongous chip on your shoulder and a very nasty bone to pick with at least half the American people, and most shamefully, you are using Lord Jesus as a crutch to justify your Crusade.

Your demonization of those Americans who embrace the long overdue concept of making America great again is wickedness on steroids. You do not have the power or authority to pass such judgement.