The Alleged 'Defenders Of Christianity' and Patriotic Lovers Of America' are in reality just the opposite! I may have missed it, but I did not find this line in the article. Time and again we have watched these champions of “family values” exposed as hypocrites and frauds, with addictions to porn, even to child porn, to prostitutes, same and opposite sex, to mistresses on the side (sometimes in other countries), not to mention corruption – from Michele Bachmann to Rick Perry to Chris Christie to Jeb Bush – all p**********l hopefuls who have more claim to a cell than to the Oval Office. The author Haraldsson, fails to mention the offenses four of them committed and were found guilty of. The varied and repeated displays of immorality by Republican candidates, however egregious, hardly compares to their view of women as nothing more than fertile chattel, who, amusingly, think they’re actual people.
Not only do Republicans ignore biblical injunctions against their own behavior, but civil injunctions as well, even those set firmly in the United State Constitution. Somehow, everybody is guilty but them. If they are caught, they are not guilty, but persecuted. Victims of witch hunts, like those poor Duggars.

Nearly twenty centuries of destroying every alternative to itself under its belt, and even while they try to strip rights from women, gays, lesbians, and t*********rs, to listen to these self-appointed representatives of the world’s largest religion, they are the ones being persecuted. Shameful! Speaking of moral authority, you are yourself guilty of plagiarism by not crediting the author of the underlined statements. http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/06/reject-absolute-moral-corruption-republican-cult.html :twisted:

I find the article your link goes to, to be in many cases a fine example of not just moral corruption, but corruption of about anything one could think of. The author however lives in a left leaning glass house and there are many stone throwers looking to break another hypocrite's glass house. Most all people, no matter how moral or upstanding cannot live up to and do not live up to the Ten Commandments. You are using a moral authority that even you cannot live up to to condemn others. It's kind of like you are using the Cloward/Piven strategy against Republicans, but inadvertently you d**g your own l*****t Marxist/democrats down right along with the Republicans and yourself. It's hard to hold the high ground when you are just as immoral as the worst among us.

Some one else mentioned this as yellow journalism, I say it's yellow journalism at its finest! My hat's off to the previous poster who made mention of the term.

First, we are NOT a "democracy" and if you want to argue, I invite you to recite the pledge of alleigance. We - America - are supposed to be a "REPUBLIC".. To define a republic for you, its where "free thinking prosperous individuals are able to pursue their own aspirations unimpeded".

Second, in case none have noticed, a "DEMOCRACY" doesn't work. It breeds lifeling criminal politicians, who DEFINITELY don't have the best interests of the people at heart. Yea, 50%+1 creates a tyranny which the other half have to live under. If a democracy worked,Or at this point if democratic republic worked, literally ALL (Marxist) Democrats would realize (They have) that the only way the Welfare State can exist is by ROBBING HARDWORKING PEOPLE of their property (wages, property)... And, personally, I am sick and tired of being robbed every damn paycheck. What they rob from your pay checks keeps the "bread and circuses" going, there by pacifying the unwashed welfare masses.

Now, since the UNITED STATES INCORPORATED is worth over $110 Trillion, where is my shareholder bonus..?? Where is my shareholder dividend. This concept in a nutshell is part of what is k*****g our nation. Kind of interesting, where did you come up with that $110 trillion number?

The second concept is what another blogger said - basically - most in the nation now, as well as the world, live without a conscience. Its the "ME" generation. Part of what made America great was the concept of "RESPECT for the other guy, his family and property".. And that one concept right there - is the real basic problem with Ferguson, MO and Baltimore, MD..

Just sayin.........W

69 Quit pissing in the wind, you're getting wet and it ain't rain.
Sorry, I don't agree with this because when healthcare is driven by profit, taking care of sick people becomes secondary to the profit....the insurance companies without regulation would deny deny deny.....deal with it later....I would love to see the profit taken out.....I'm all for capitalism, but not when it comes to things like cancer...that's immoral in my opinion

We need to return to the insurance system we had before Obama care was shoved up our collective asses. That system worked, Obama care doesn't.

You are aware that in insurance policy is a signed contract between the policy owner and the and the insurance company, aren't you? As such they are legally obligated to pay claims per the coverage purchased and the policy holder should know what they are getting before they sign. Usually what the policy covers is mostly in the policy's fine print and they are only legally obligated to pay claims per the coverage purchased. They cannot deny, deny, deny coverage that is part of the contract between the insurer and the policy holder. I have taken my policies to an attorney before signing just to cover my ass. It's worth the cost and the effort. Believe me insurance companies only cover what is in the contract. You may find there is an alternative, though it may not be your first choice, but it may be all you can afford.

I always bought the most coverage that I could afford, sometimes I couldn't afford what I wanted and had to settle for less coverage. Sometimes I couldn't afford any coverage and went without. I realize many are paying much more for their coverage due to Obama care and can no longer afford health care without government tax subsidies. Once, the insurance companies offered many types of policies for many types of situations and budgets. However now, Obama care sets a minimum amount of coverage required and that is at times those policies cost more than many can afford. That’s why Obama care has government tax subsidies to help lower income policy holders afford these policies.

Not too many years ago I couldn't afford to purchase health insurance and became seriously ill with a life threatening tumor. I needed a high dollar surgery and did not have the assets to get it done. I have lived comfortably but my highest income in the upper 5 figure range. I negotiated with the doctor and the hospital and got terms that allowed me to have the needed surgery. It took me almost 7 years to pay off everyone, but I got it done. There were local charities that offered to help, but I declined because I knew others worse off than me needed that help. So yes, one can get health care without insurance.

You were complaining about huge margins and profits that the insurance make, their margins are at the low end and their profits are made through volume. The board of directors and the CEO’s have a fiduciary responsibility to make and keep their companies viable. I mentioned either on this topic elsewhere that I had read somewhere that most health care insurers have profit margins of 5-8% about the same as the oil companies. I believe those numbers to be fairly accurate. They need many, many paying customers to have the cash to fund both medical services and profits for investors.

Many of the same people who complain that they can’t afford healthcare insurance have no problem buying a new high margin, high profit TV, a high end cell phone, and other extremely high profit items. I have no problem with such purchases, but only after the real necessities, water, food, and shelter are taken care of first.