One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Cuda2020
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 789 next>>
Dec 6, 2022 09:05:44   #
Bad Bob wrote:


Yeah, that really happened. LOL
Go to
Dec 6, 2022 08:59:55   #
RandyBrian wrote:
You are much more lucid that Milosia, but every bit as full of nonsense. When has Christians ever tried to "force their religion onto others by trying to make an official religion" ????? Please give me a few specific examples. Or is it the same as your lies about Trump, and it is all based on assumptions and mind reading about 'intent"? But I'll give you the benefit of a doubt, for the moment, and wait to see your specific examples.


Maybe you should look into the Crusades. Please it is my pleasure to educate you. The Crusades were a series of Christian religious wars initiated, supported, and sometimes directed by the Latin Church in the medieval period, other times directed by fanatical Kings hell bent on Christianity for everyone, you know, like the fanatics now. The best known of these Crusades are those to the Holy Land in the period between 1095 and 1291 that were intended to recover Jerusalem and its surrounding area from Islamic rule, but it carried on into the thirteenth century, all over the world.

Show me where I lied about Trump, there is no reason to lie about Trump, it's all right out there in the courts and impeachments.
Go to
Dec 6, 2022 08:47:41   #
manning5 wrote:
==================

I did not actually quote Jefferson. Read it again. No quotes are necessary. Nitpicker!


You did, even though indirectly, and you are trying to influence people by using it, and not accurately, thereby misleading people, it's not nick picking at all, although it is calling you out on your manipulations.
Go to
Dec 4, 2022 18:00:33   #
manning5 wrote:
2.2k
Bill Gindlesperger
Wed, November 30, 2022 at 5:05 AM·5 min read
In this article:

Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson
President of the United States from 1801 to 1809
The best way to understand where we are today, and where we might be headed tomorrow, is to look at where we came from yesterday. That is particularly helpful for all parties in the ever-growing argument as to whether America is, was, or will be a Christian nation.

Of course, as we all have experienced, religion, and especially Christianity, has been used as an excuse for putting others in their place, as a call to arms, and as a justification for getting what we want from those less strong and not part of a particular brand of Christianity. Catholics, Protestants and Evangelicals all have ideas on how the world should center on their own beliefs and interpretations.

Christianity in America has served numerous political causes since July 4, 1776. These have included both legalizing persecution by some and aiding runaway s***es by others. We fought N**is, C*******ts and their ilk, because it was the Christian thing to do.

Going back to America’s formative years during colonization, every type of religious group came to America so that each could practice its own religious beliefs without the threats of kings, popes and other strong-arm European and Asian leaders. Then, of course, rivalries among these same groups sprung up across the new land.

When the Constitution was written, it was based on Christian principles, but not the practice of Christianity or any other religion. In fact, the First Amendment to the Constitution states that everyone in the United States has the right to practice his or her own religion, or no religion at all.

Our country's founders were of varying religious backgrounds and felt that the better way to protect religious freedom was to keep the government out of religion. That’s the reason for the First Amendment to the Constitution and its guarantee of separation between church and state.

This separation has served us well. Other countries have had to deal with armed conflicts between various religious factions, but we have avoided much of that in the U.S.

More:Franklin County nursing home among 2 ordered to pay more than $513K in back wages, damages

The First Amendment has two major clauses.

The first is the Establishment Clause that prohibits the government from encouraging, promoting or establishing religion in any way. That's why Christianity is not the official religion of the United States, and why our government may not give financial support to any religious organization, including school voucher programs that favor schools that promote religion.
=======================
The second is the Free Exercise Clause that gives us the right to worship or not as each of us chooses. The government can't penalize us because of our religious beliefs.

Our American freedom of religion has been challenged repeatedly throughout our history. In 1801, a group of Baptists felt compelled to lobby president-elect Thomas Jefferson complaining about having to pay fees to support the Congregationalist majority. These Baptists felt compelled to lobby for religious freedom in spite of the Constitution’s guarantees. They argued to make all religious expression in America a fundamental human right and not a matter of capricious government approval at will.

"This resulted in Jefferson writing that the First Amendment's original intent established a "wall of separation between church and state." This phrase has for 200 years become a major constitutional bulwark"

If you hang your hat on the writings of Jefferson that are not in any way included in our Constitution to buttress your contention that we have in the Constitution provision for separation of church from state, you are simply wrong. This is a convention not a law, and as such, is suspiciously beneficial to those who are against Christianity.
2.2k br Bill Gindlesperger br Wed, November 30, 20... (show quote)


If you're going to quote someone, please include the quotation marks on where their quote begins and ends. This being in reference to Thomas Jefferson. Bill Gindlesperger has done him an injustice by not doing so in his piece. As a free country what we are truly founded by our founding fathers is our freedom of choice.
Go to
Dec 4, 2022 17:56:29   #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Separation of church and state is not in the Constitution.


Ok, just to make sure, you do know that the Bill of rights is part of our Constitution, right???
The first clause in the Bill of Rights states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” Establishment clause of First Amendment.

Clearly people here are uneducated to why we did leave England, and let me say, they were happy we left.

My question is why do Christians try to force their religion onto to others by trying to make an official religion, don't you guys ever get tired of walking backwards, just wondering?
Go to
Dec 4, 2022 17:43:03   #
Mogon wrote:
Funny!
You’re the same moron!!


I'm not the one ranting the same insane crappola, spare us. It's amazing, I've been gone for I don't know for how long, only to find the same nonsense here, jeez move on.
Go to
Dec 4, 2022 17:35:42   #
Mogon wrote:
The Democrats have an end game.
Total domination of the American people and total control.
Eliminate the middle class.
The Democrats are are creating total chaos by allowing criminals to go free, letting p*******es go free, c***ting in e******ns and rubbing in in the faces of the American people.
If the American people don’t do anything, they win ( that’s what is currently happening), if the American people react in the form of a revolution or a civil war they will declare martial law and lock down the country. If that doesn’t work the UN soldiers will come. ( if I was a devious Democrat, I would be having them come in as plain clothes tourists now and have them available when needed. They wouldn’t have to be brought in afterwards. )
Be careful America the “end game” is almost complete!
The Rino’s in Washington have already sold us out.
The Democrats have an end game. br Total dominati... (show quote)


Yaaaawn...yadda yadda yadda, nothing new to add? same stuff just different day.
Go to
Dec 2, 2022 09:40:27   #
youngwilliam wrote:
How is it propaganda, the biden regime just came out and said the obvious, " I want to ban semi-autos". Goes all the way back to the fineswine saying, "I want to take all your guns" that was in the 80's. Take your blinders off.


Exactly, in the 80's!!! It never happened did it. Taking semi auto's away is not taking your guns away, get over it.
Go to
Nov 26, 2022 10:35:31   #
microphor wrote:
Ahhahahaha, Joe has scramble his messages so much, you're left wondering WTF he was trying to say.


You must have a hearing problem, the rest of us can understand everything he says just fine, which is decent and uplifting, not all derogatory bull like the last usurper.
Go to
Nov 26, 2022 10:30:20   #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Liberal Jimmy Kimmel Attacks Herschel Walker As Dumb and ‘Unintelligible’

Late-night television host Jimmy Kimmel mocked Herschel Walker as too dumb to understand basic math and labeled him “unintelligible” in a recent monologue.

The ABC host initially suggested a staffer would have to explain to Walker what a runoff was because he was too slow to understand how the percentages in Georgia e******n law work.

“Imagine being the staffer who had to explain that one to Herschel Walker,” he joked.

Imitating said staffer he said, “‘You got 48% which is less than 50%.'”

“‘Who?'” he replied, emulating Walker as confused.

Jimmy Kimmel Says Herschel Walker ‘Unintelligible’
As if that weren’t enough, Jimmy Kimmel’s bit then flat-out referenced Herschel Walker as “unintelligible.”

“Despite the fact that he didn’t get more v**es than his opponent,” Kimmel told the mostly white audience, “Herschel remained unfazed and unintelligible.”

He then took joy in the fact that a runoff means another month of Walker on the campaign trail, something he referred to as “a gift from the comedy Gods.”

It was a line of attack from a marginal comedian who once used blackface to mock black athletes. A line of attack which would have ruined most conservative personalities if they tried doing the same to a black Democrat.

Is Kimmel’s Attack R****t?
This isn’t the first time Jimmy Kimmel has described Herschel Walker as “dumb” and “so stupid.”

And the faux comedian has a history of taking r****t jabs at black athletes. Just ask Hall of Fame basketball player Karl Malone.

Kimmel did multiple skits in which he mocked NBA legend and member of the famed Dream Team by donning blackface and proceeding to butcher the English language in an attempt to portray ‘The Mailman’ as ignorant.

In one skit Kimmel as Malone talks “about white people getting deducted by alien.” He sports blackface, a black bald cap, and apparently spray for his arms and legs.

In another episode, Kimmel speaks as Malone promoting Mardi Gras.

“Ya’ll love them naked boobies, so Karl Malone tell you about Mardi Gras in New Orleans,” he says.

Kimmel has since apologized for the skits and said they were ‘impersonations’ that he finds “embarrassing” because he has “evolved and matured.”

But his consistent attacks against Herschel Walker are only missing the makeup at this point. They are r****t not just by the ‘if a Republican ever did this’ aspect, but by the fact that he has a pattern of looking down on black athletes playing to his white audience.

Walker, however, continues to handle himself with class despite the attacks.

MSNBC contributor Elie Mystal this past summer called him “clearly unintelligent” and “what Republicans want from their negroes.”

Walker replied by suggesting his critics “need Jesus” in their lives.

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/liberal-jimmy-kimmel-attacks-herschel-walker-as-dumb-and-unintelligible/?utm_campaign=TPI11222022BR1&utm_source=criticalimpact&utm_medium=email&source=TPICI

Kimmel is an example of why I don't believe there is any late night comedy on TV since Jay Leno was forced out.
Liberal Jimmy Kimmel Attacks Herschel Walker As Du... (show quote)


Damn, wish I had seen that episode, I'd be LMAO
Go to
Nov 26, 2022 10:24:47   #
Rinaldi wrote:
Supply and demand creates more demand, which creates more supply and so it goes


Yes, maybe just maybe...the gun propaganda of... they're coming to get your guns, works so well for the people selling guns. All built from fear the paranoid gun owners carry around with them. Puppets.
Go to
Nov 13, 2022 15:37:27   #
nonalien1 wrote:
Yup. The good ones have retired or moved on. Media owners require a certain slant on what they print . Freelancers find it difficult to sell honest copy. War correspondence can't find takers of eye witness events if it don't fit the narrative.


I don't understand why it's so damn hard to just state the facts of something without someone's damn opinion.
Go to
Oct 23, 2022 09:18:33   #
LogicallyRight wrote:
***We will have more reserves than we had in 1990.
>>>Do you even know how to look at a Chart. That is when we were still building up this new concept, to make us ready for war or national emergencies. He is tearing that down to push his political objectives. It he keeps that up, and an enemy attacked, we wouldn't have the oil for our military to fight back. Just how many stupid pills did you take today.

Our cost to disasters.
In 2021, there were 20 separate billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. The total cost for these events was $145 billion, making this the third most costly year on record, behind 2017 and 2005. 2021 was the seventh consecutive year in which 10 or more billion-dollar disaster events occurred in the U.S.
Go to
Oct 23, 2022 09:09:04   #
Have you been unaware of the recent disasters?
Go to
Oct 10, 2022 11:31:50   #
straightUp wrote:
A delivery of 72 virgins would be more appealing. ;)


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 789 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.