The 'Elite' create puppet shows and circuses to confuse, mislead, and distract us. The article linked below is what American's SHOULD be screaming about. But instead, like small children boo'ing the bad puppets, we argue with each other for or against Kavanaugh. Meanwhile the puppet master laughs hysterically at our simple mindedness while a legion of co-conspirators mingle among us, picking our pockets clean. We may be individually smart but we are collectively stupid. The elite know this. They count on it. They thrive off it.

Read about Executive Order 6102 ... and how Congress can now borrow limitless amounts of money to satisfy any and all political whims, ... then erase its own dept by robbing its citizens.


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-29/how-executive-order-6102-doomed-america


{re-posted by request}

The elite create puppet shows and circuses to confuse, mislead, and distract us.  The article below is what American's SHOULD be screaming about.  But instead, like small children boo'ing the bad puppets, we argue with each other for or against Kavanaugh.  Meanwhile the puppet master laughs hysterically at our simple mindedness while his co-conspirators mingle among us, picking our pockets clean.  We may be individually smart but we are collectively stupid.  The elite know this.  They count on it.  They thrive off it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Losing Time

If you work by the hour, the guy with money can buy your time. That’s what it really means to say someone is “rich” – he has more time because he can control not only his own, but yours, too.

The guy who had $1,000 worth of stocks in 1971 could buy approximately 250 of the average working man’s hours. Today, that $1,000 worth of stocks is worth about $28,000… which, at today’s $26-per-hour average, will buy 1,077 hours of the typical working man’s time – four times as much as in 1971.

In other words, compared to the wage earner, the capitalist is four times as rich.

Invert it, and you see about the same thing. A working man would have had to labor for 212 hours to buy the 30 Dow stocks in 1971. Today, his time is much less valuable; he has to sweat for over 1,100 hours to buy the Dow.

That’s why the liberals whine about “ine******y”… and probably why Donald J. Trump was elected. Few people may have done the math, but a lot of people suspected a rat.

And they were right.

Many – including the president – pointed their fingers… but at the wrong rat!

They thought it was the foreigners who had done them dirty: the Chinese with their “unfair trade practices” and the Mexicans “pouring across the border, stealing our jobs,” was the jingo.

For their part, investors, the rich, and the cronies and insiders thought they were smart. They earned their wealth fair and square, they believed, by funding America’s enterprises… and by carefully allocating precious capital to worthy businesses run by able corporate champions.

But the fix was in.

Executive Order 6102: How exactly was the fix put in place?

In 1933, the matter first came before the Supreme Court. Franklin Roosevelt’s Executive Order 6102 made it illegal for citizens to own gold, except in the smallest of quantities.

It came to the Supremes in a series of disputes called the “gold clause” cases. “Where in the Constitution did the president get that power?” people wondered.

Back then, some investors recalled that the feds can play fast and loose with the dollar, as Lincoln had during the War Between the States.

Gold clauses in contracts protected them by insisting on gold as a means of settling up. Eliminating the gold clause meant taking away the ability to protect against inflation... and substantially altering the terms of the deal.

But the Supremes went along with it. Colleague Dan Denning tells the tale:

…First, let me quote a few brief passages from [Justice James] McReynolds’ dissent. They capture the spirit of his objection and the relationship between sound money and political liberty. McReynolds writes that:

“Just men regard repudiation and spoliation of citizens by their sovereign with abhorrence; but we are asked to affirm that the Constitution has granted power to accomplish both. No definite delegation of such power exists; and we cannot believe the farseeing framers, who labored with hope of establishing justice and securing the blessings of liberty, intended that the expected government should have authority to annihilate its own obligations and destroy the very rights which they were endeavoring to protect. Not only is there no permission for such actions; they are inhibited. And no plenitude of words can conform them to our charter.”

McReynolds went on to make the point that when you buy a bond or make a loan, “the creditor agrees to accept and the debtor undertakes to return the thing loaned or its equivalent.” Because Roosevelt’s Executive Order meant companies could be paid back in depreciated dollars instead of gold coin or gold equal to the value of the original loan, McReynolds recognized that this was a de facto default.

The gold clause guaranteeing creditors be paid back in gold or something of equal value, “prevents the borrower from availing itself of a possibility of discharge of the debt in depreciated currency.”

Congress went along with it, too. And then, still in the minority, McReynolds saw the handwriting on the wall. The feds themselves might be the main beneficiaries. Congress would be able to borrow… and then wipe out its own debt by inflation:

“We are dealing here with a debased standard, adopted with the definite purpose to destroy obligations. Such arbitrary and oppressive action is not within any congressional power heretofore recognized. The authority of Congress to create legal tender obligations in times of peace is derived from the power to borrow money; this cannot be extended to embrace the destruction of all credits. […]

For the government to say we have violated our contract, but have escaped the consequences through our own statute, would be monstrous. In matters of contractual obligation, the government cannot legislate so as to excuse itself. […]

Wh**ever may be the situation now confronting us, it is the outcome of attempts to destroy lawful undertakings by legislative action; and this we think the Court should disapprove of in no uncertain terms. […]

Loss of reputation for honorable dealing will bring us unending humiliation, the impending legal and moral chaos is appalling.”

Humiliation Afoot
With the gold clause out of the way, the coast was clear. The feds floated out one program after another, meddling in every aspect of human life.

By the 1950's, the f**e wars had begun, too – major wars – with no declaration or funding from Congress.

By the 1960's, the Johnson team had a full-scale war in Vietnam (a country with no capacity or intention to harm the U.S.).

In addition, it launched a War on Poverty, too… intended to create a Great Society, where the lambs would lie down with the wolves and fruit would hang from every ghetto palm.

But humiliation was afoot. It was soon clear that the feds were going to run out of money.

And this time, it was the Nixon team that shirked its duty. Rather than admit that it had overspent, Nixon repudiated the last link with real money and the ability of foreign governments to exchange their dollars for gold at the promised rate.

Now, the feds had gone Full Paper. Their money was nothing but pieces of paper backed by what was soon to be the world’s biggest debtor.

And now, there was nothing stopping them… There was nothing to stop the chaos McReynolds foresaw...


full article: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-29/how-executive-order-6102-doomed-america

Is all this true or an exaggeration to prove a point. Hard to believe this could all really happen. But if it did .... IF IT DID .... then it's hard to believe this shooting wasn't orchestrated by someone other than "the lone shooter."

Well it didn't take the C*******t Left long to put a nationwide march together supporting gun control. "March For Our Lives" (March 24th) is being supported financially by the same cast of characters who've been duped into believing they actually make a difference. The only people that truly believe gun control will stop gun violence are the goyim ... the useful i***ts ... the bottom feeders who will let the celebrity-of-the-day tell them how to feel.

The people behind the scenes organizing these marches know exactly what their intentions are ... and they're not trying to end school gun violence. Their intent is the systematic erosion of our liberties, the decline of our Christian morality, and the complete t***sformation of America into a totalitarian state. That's the end game. And that doesn't happen until they can eliminate private gun ownership. Period -- end of story.

So do yourselves a favor and stop having the illegitimate and useless gun control argument with the goyim. You are just arguing with sleepwalkers.

Deleting my response. Decided to create new topic instead.

This is how they continue to perpetuate the fraud. They want b****s to believe they are perpetual victims in 'whitey's America.' Just keep beating the same old drum until people finally accept your falsehood as undisputed t***h.

There is already an equal number of w****s being shot in America. More actually. But those shootings don't get sensationalized because they don't sell newspapers or advance the Left's agenda.

FACT: ... If black lives REALLY mattered to the people perpetrating this fraud, they would be screaming about black on black violence which is k*****g INFINITELY more b****s than cops are. Or they'd be picketing Planned Parenthood which has quite literally legalized black genocide. And that's not hyperbole. Look it up. Research the numbers. B****s are being systematically erased from American society and it's not by police shootings.

Black people need to seriously Wake the FcuK Up!!

Do you know how net worth is calculated? It's total assets minus total liabilities. The property's value is the asset while the mortgage owed is the liability. Trump's net worth already factors in for mortgage owed.

He applied for a H1-B after graduating from university. Once approved, Elon Musk took the oath of American citizenship with thirty-five hundred other immigrants at the Pomona Fairplex, in a ceremony he calls "actually very moving."

This is called the legal immigration process. This is what we are all in support of.

Moldyoldy just refers to him as an immigrant in his post, in an attempt (I believe) to show Elon Musk is morally equivalent to i*****l i*******ts. Otherwise, why highlight the fact at all that Elan Musk was South African with Canadian residency 10 years ago? He's been an American for a decade.

2 sides of the same lie ...

Republicans: over promise then under deliver. Say you'll cut spending, shrink government, root out corruption, but then never do it. Instead, grow government, increase the debt, and become corrupted yourself.

Democrats: lie about your opponent, calling them every name in the book however disingenuous until something sticks. Then, count on the ignorant laziness of your constituency to just accept it all as t***h.

NOT RELIABLE!

... {tapping the microphone} Is this thing on?

H**ers just gotta h**e!

Thank you for making my point. While Trump boasted a net worth of $200M by age 30, the actual figure appears to have been much less. No one disputes his $2.9 Billion net worth today.

Everyone with an IRA, 401K, or pension "participates" in the market. But there are very few actual 'market players' from the general public. It's really just wall street elites and central bankers. Swiss central bank, for instance, owns $88 Billion in US stock as of Nov 2017. That's money that's just printed out of thin air ... and that's just one central bank.

Central banks are what's holding up the stock market. And no president past or present can take credit for it. Nor should they be blamed when it collapses. They no longer affect the r****d markets in either direction.


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-03/swiss-national-bank-now-owns-record-88-billion-us-stocks

Haa!! Haaaa!! What a jackass! Now the complaint is Trump only grew his fortune by a factor of 10.

So if permafrost had a daddy who left him $100K and permafrost turned it into $1 Million, he should be the laughing stock of all his family & friends.

What an asshat!! It is laughable how much h**e is being spewed from the party of N0H8!

"Hear hear!"